The High Court · 2025

The Tahsildar, Toopran Mandal, Medak District Kathula Mutyalu, S/o Narsaiah, Age ryl?jor, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o Narsampally Village, Toofiran Mandal, Medak District Zinka Satyanarayana, S/o Naiayya,..ngq Jtlqjgt Occ Agriculture, Rl/o Narsampaliy Villa!e, Toopran Mahdal, Medak District' Bolni Yadagiri, S/o Chandraiah, Age . Ygjpt' Occ Agriculture, Rl/o Naisampally Village, Toopran Mandal, tvledak District' Sakali Kistaiah, S/o Lachaiah, Age. Maior, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o Nacharam Village, Wargal Mandal, Siddipet District. Nathala Prabhakar Reddy, S/o Ram Reddy Agq Major, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o t'liriimpattv vittage, ioopran Mandal, Medak District

10. Nathala Sudarshan Reddy, Slo Ram Reddy, Ag9 {ajor' Occ Agriculture, Rl/o Narsampally Village, Toofian Mandal, Medak District 1'1. Nathala Narasimha Reddy, S/o Ram Reddy, Age- Malor, Occ Agriculture, R/o Narsampally Village, Toofran Mandal Medak District' l2.Agraharam Venkati, S/o Rajaiah, AS9. Y?io1 Occ. Agriculture, R/o Nirsampally Village, Toopran Mandal, Medak District

13. Zinka Mallesham, Sio Venkata Swamy, Age Major, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Narsampally Village, Toopran ltlandal, Medak District'

14. Mangali Ramulu, S/o Rajaiah, Age. Ivlajor, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Nacharam Village, Wargal Mandal, Siddipet District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lnlia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, tht: High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction one in the nature of Mitrrdamus declaring the action of the unofficial respondents in collusion with the off cial respondents trying to interfere with the petitioner possession and also trying k) rlamage the standing crop in Sy.No. '18412 extent of Ac. 2-00 guntas, Sy.No 1U5/2 extent Ac. 2-37 guntas, Sy.No. 225 extent of Ac. 10-35 guntas, Sy.No. ZZ6t2 extent of Ac, 6-06 guntas, Sy.No. 22712 exte^l of Ac. 1-23 guntas of Narsanrpally village, Toopran Mandal, Medak District rs arbitrary and illegal and consequen y ssue a direction to the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner pending direction in Contempt Case No. 1640 of 2019 and to pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci-cumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou 1 may be pleased to grant injunction restraining the respondents from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner land in Sy.No. 184/2 extent of Ac. 2- 00 guntas, Sy. No. '1 85/2 extent Ac. 2-37 guntas, Sy.No. 225 extent of Ac. 10-35 guntas, Sy.No. 22612 exlent of Ac. 6-06 guntas, Sy.No. 22i l1l extent of Ac. 1-23 guntas of Narsampally village, Toopran Mandal, Medak Dis.rict pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI MOHD ASIFUDDIN Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGp APPEARING ON BEHALF OF GP FOR REVENUE SRI K. MURALIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5 to 14 : --- The Court made the following: ORDER 1 THE HON'BLT SRI JUSTICE E'V'VENUGOPAL N No. 15010 of 2o2s o o ER: RD The present writ petition is filed undcr Article 226 of tl:,e Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamr'ts declaring the action of the unofficial respondents, in corlusion with the of{-rcial respondents' in attempting to interfere with the petitioner's peac"ful' possession and to damagc the standing crop in lands bearing Sr'Nos i84/2 (Ac 2 O0 gts), 185/2 (Ac' 2'37 eLs\' 225 (Ac 1035 gtsl' 226 12 (At: 6'06 gts)' and 227 12 (Ac 1 23 gts)' situated at Narsampallv Village' Toopran Mandal, Medak District' as arbitrary' illcga I and high - handed and consequently to direct the respondents not to cau-qe anv intcrfercnce with the Petitionet's Possessron over the said lands Pending 1640 of 2019. and to Pass such in ContemPt Case No or orders as may be deemed flt and proper in thc Intercst proceedings other order of justice' 2 Heard petitioner and Sri Sri Mohd.Asifuddin, lcarned counse[ [or the Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government on behalf of learned Govern-ment Plezrder for Pleader aPPearing Revenue Sri K'Muralidhar ReddY \.. -"*-l -II 2

3. The iearned counsel for the petitioner slrbmits that the petitioner's late lirther, Sri Nathala Ram Reddy, u,as the owner and possessor of agric:ultural lards in Sy. Nos. la4l2 (Ac :2.OO gts), 185/2 (Ac. 2.37 gts), 225 (Ac. 1O.35 gtsl,226/2 (Ac. 6.06 gls,), and 227 /'2 lAc. 1.23 gts) situated at Narsampally Village, Toopran Mandal, Medak District. The petjtioner filed O.S. No.98 of 1988 br p:rrtition and separatc possession, which was decreed on 22.06.19( 5. Subsequentll,. through E.P.No. 1tr of 2OO9, possession of his all,rtted sharc rvas delivered on 28.Oil.2OO9 pursuant to the decree. Thc pretitioncr states that despite the dccree, the Tahsildar failed to effect rnu[;.iLion in his favour, compeliing him to hlc E-P. No. 1 of 2012, :rr-t rvhich the Junior Civil Judge, G:rjwcl, directed the Tahsildar to implcrn(rnt the decree. Hou,ever, the T:rhsildar's report dated 06.06.2012 incorrectly partitioned thc pcritioner's share between him and hi:; wife, whrch thc petitioncr contends is beyond the Tahsildar's authorilr.. (a) [ lc further submits that though he puK:]raLsed additional lands in Sy.Nos.225 and 227, mutation was refus,rcl on technical grounds. Dcspite scveral representations and directirtns issuecl by thr: District Collcctor, Mcdak (Lr.No.Dl/6a /2013 dated (,9.O1.20 13), the respondcnts\_faLled to comply. The petitioner ther( forc hled W.p. No.4777 of 21J14, u'herein this Hon'ble Court directe<l irnpk:men tation of the (lollector's orcier, which remains pending. Subsr.quently, due to interfcrencc by cer Lain private individuals in col]usion rvith revenue 3 oflicials, the petitioner filed W.P. No.1471O of 20 18 and later W.P.No.6533 ol 2019, wherein this Court directed issuance of pattadar passbooks and title deeds within three months. Non compliancc led to Contempt Case No. 164O of 2019, wherein this Court permitted thc petitioner to apply online through the Dharali Portal and directed the authorities to process the same expeditiously. The petitioner contends that despite submitting the online application and furnishing the Court's orders, the unofhcial respondents, in coilusion with the ofhcials, attempted to interfere with his possespion on O5.05.2025, when there was a sta-nding crop on the land. He alleges that such interference is illegaJ, arbitrary and high-harded, particularly when the matter is still pending before the revenue authoritics pursuirnt to t his Court's earlier orders (b) He therefore prays that this Court be pleased to declare the intcrference by the respondents as illegal and arbitrary and direct them not to disturb his peaceful possession and enjoyment ol the subject lands pending final orders in C.C.No. 1640 ol 2019, in order tr> protect his standing crop and property rights. I I

3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the writ petition is not maintainable ald that the ofhcial respondents have not interfered with the property of the petitioner. Thc official respondents will follow the due process of law before they resort to anv I I 4 steps arld the apprehension o[ the petitioner is onlv zrrt assumption without therc beirrg any substantive evidence. Thc petition is an abuse of process and secks to re-agitate matters rrlready pending before competent authorities. Therefore, it deserves to lle dismissed.

4. On a careful consideration of the submi;sions made by both sides and upon peruszrl o[ the record, this Court uithout making any observations on the merits and demerits of the t;: se and also the aspect of possession of tl-re petitioner, deems it appr lprial e to grant Iiberty to thc petitroner to file necessary application ats, rlirected in the vvrit petitions referred to above ald upon hiing of such zrn application, the olficial responctcn ts, concerned, are directed to exrtmint: the same in accorda-nce u'ith law and upon causing notice on a.l the interested parties and pass appropriate orders as expeditiour;ly a. ,o""tbta preferably u,ithin zr penod ol two months thereafter. 5 With abovc directions, the present writ petition is disposed No orcicr zls to the costs. Miscellaneous applrc,ttions, if any pending, shall stand closed Sd/-A.H.S. GOWRI SHANKAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /',J SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Sec-etariat, The State of Telangana, Hvderabad.

2. The District Collector, lvledak District.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Toopran, Medak District. 4. The Tahsildar, Toopran lvlandal, Medak District. 5. One CC to SRI MOHD ASIFUDDIN, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana \ IOUT]

7. Two CD Copies PVL PMK HIGH COURT DATED:1 sl10t2O2S ORDER WP.No.15010 of 2025 t t t\ a.'.. i! -l DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \o 1e 'V