The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ Mandamus questioning the action of respondents particularly the Respondents No.s.3 to 6, without issuing any notice, having no authority, are continuously interfering with the house construction of the petitioner in spite there being a valid Plol tr'i i e Permit No. O1O3lBPt3121t2O23 dt' 221(tAl2O23 in the house Permtsston to an extent of B7B Sq- Yards in surv€y no 3431 10 petitioner's hous;e situated at Ameenpu' Village 86 mandal, Sangareddy drstrit:t and The Hon'ble High Court Orderr n lA/P No- 9554 of 2025 in favour of the petitir ners herein' is highly illegal, acustt of power, arbitrary and against the princillles of natural iustice and also r' o1:rtive of Articles 14, and 300-A of the C onslitution of lndia consequentlydtrer:ttlti:respondentauthoritiestonotinterferewiththepetitioners construction acliv:y r house plot to an extent of 878 Sq Vardl; in survey no' 343/10 situated at A'Irr)enpur Village and mandal' Sangareddy dist'ict' IAN O: 1 OF 2025 Petitionuncle'S;ectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircimsrancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court ma1' be pleased to directtheResprln.je:rltsNos.3to6nottointerferewiththehrluse.constructionof the petitioner i'r sF'ir> there being a valid house permissir'n Vide Permit No' o1o3tBPt3121l2lo']3lt.22lo}l2o23inthepetitioner.shouseplottoanextentof BTBSqYardsnSl]a/eyno.343/10situatedatAmeenpur.,/illa,:leandmandal, Sangareddy distrlr:t. lending disposal of the above Writ Petition CounselfortherF|el:ilioner:SRIRAMAVARAMCHANDRASI.]EKl\RREDDY Counsel for ther Fiiespondents No'1to6 : GP FOR HOME The Court made th'e following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTTCE T. VINOD KUMAR Writ Petition No.1499O of 2025 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.l to 6, and with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at the admission stage.

2. The case of the petitioners, in brief, is that, respondent Nos.3 to 6 are interfering with the construction of house by the petitioners, in spite of there being a valid house permission dt.22.0g.2023 granted by the concerned authority in respect of plot admeasuring B7B square yards in Sy.No.343/10 situated at Ameenpur Village and Mandal, Sangareddy District; and also the orders of this Court in W.p.No.9554 of ZO25 dt.07.04.2025 without issuing any notice and without following due process of law, which action of the respondents it is contended as highly itlegal, arbitrary, against the principres of natural justice and in violation oF Articles 14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of India.

3. Per contra, learned Government pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 6 on instructions would submit that as of date, no complaint has been received from any one or any case is registered against the petitioners and for the said reason, there is no necessity tor the respondents-authorities to interfere with the alleged I { 2 constructic,n being made by the petitioners based on the permission obtained fron [lr(] authorities concerned.

4. Lea.n,::d Jovernment Pleader further submits that ;inc(: as of date, no compla nl or (:ase is registered against the petitioners, the claim of the petitioners of the respondents-authorities lnterfering r,vith the ,:onstruction of house is dr:r i : l.

5. The a'ore said submission made by the learned Governn.rent Pleader appearing crr hel^alf of respondent Nos.1 to 6 is placed on record.

6. Havinr,l rr:qard to the submissions made as above, anr. since, it is stated to thi:; lcurt that as of date, no complaint is receivel or case is registered altainsL the petitioners and that the respondents-au,:horities are not interfering rvth the construction being undertaken b,r thr, petitioners in the plot;:,drreasuring 878 square yards in Sy.No.34:i/10 situated at Ameenpur \ii lage and Mandal, Sangareddy Dist.ict, [)ursuant to permission dl .)','..08.2023, this Court is of the view that t1e r,,)spondents- authorities ,,rrr: to be directed not to interfere wi:h the subject construction, exr:r:pt in accordance with law.

7. Subrer.t tl above direction, the Writ Petition is rJisprrsed of. No order as to c :rs1.s . B. Miscel anoous petitions, if any, pending in this w -it pr:tition shall stand closed __ !f SDA A. SRIhIIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To, //TRUE COPY' /SE(:)TION OFFICER \ 1 2 The Prinr;i1 I :; lcretary Department of Home Dr B R Amlredkar Bhavan Secretarial B I llings State of Telangana' Hyderaba(l The Direi:k;r ! e:neral, Telangana Special Prole-ction Force T:lPF' 4th Floor n, 'iar," f: f, ;l; rt Raniottni Sicrrndciahad 500003

3. The Add. Director General, Telangana Special protection Force TSpF ,4th Floor Buddha Bhavan Ranigunj Secunddrabad 500003

4. The Commissioner of Police, Sangareddy, Telangana Special protection Force TSPF ,Sangareddy District.-

5. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Telangana Special protection Force TSPF,Ameenpur, Sangareddy District.

6. The Station House Officer, Ameenpur PS Ameenpur, Sangareddy District. T One CC to SRI RATMAVARAM CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY. Advocate. loPUCl B. Two CCs to GP FOR HO[/E, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 9. Two CD Copies. BSK GJP w \ / HIGH COL'RT DATED:10/r06/2025 It ORDER WP.No.14990 of 2025 o I 1 ,J -); L-1 ,+ * 25 rU[ r' o{1..^^.-. -. I I DTSPOSING ()F THE WRIT PETITION WTTHOUT rll'OSTS e b+