1. Palle Babu Rao Goud v. 1. The State of Telangana

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim direction directing the Respondents not to sanction any construction permissions in the alleged layout dated 15.10.1572, i.e., agricultural land to an extent of 4 acres in survey No.714, Chowdariguda Village and Grapanchayath, Ghatkesar Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri district, pending disposal of the above writ petition. IA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section '1 5'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the.High Court may be pleased to be stay all further proceedings including sanction of House construction permissions in Survey No: 714, situated at Chowdaryguda village and Grampanchayat by the Respondents and not to entertain any sort of constructions by demolishing the illegal unauthorized conslructions if any, in the said alleged layout till the disposal of main Writ Petition 16214 of 2023 in the interest of Justice. IA NO: 3 0F 2023 BETWEEN

04. K.Bhagavan Reddy S/o K.Yella Reddy, Aged about 51 years, Occ: Business, R/o D.No.16-140/1, St.No.3, Prasanthinagar, Uppal, Hyderabad. Guda Rama Krishna S/o G.Krishna Murthy, Aged about 42years, Occ: Pvt.Employee, R/o Flat N0.104, Sai Bhavana Nilayam, Madhuranagar, Pragathinagar Colony, Nizampet, Medchal Malkajigiri dist. Guda Lalitha Madhuri Wo Rama Krishna, Aged about 38 years, House wiFe, R/o Flat No.104, Sai Bhavana Nilayam, Madhuranagar, Pragathinagar Colony, Nizampet, Medchal Malkajigiri dist. i. K.Somasekhar S/o Anjaneya Sarma, Aged about 43 years, Occ: Purohit, R/o .No. 18-78/1/1, Maruthinagar, RTC Colony, Peerzajiguda, Medipally Mandal, Medchal Malkajigiri dist.

05. K.Prathysha D/o Somasekhar, aged About 35 years, House Wife, R/o .No. 1B-78/1/1, Maruthinagar, RTC Colony, Peerzajiguda, Medipally Mandal, Medchal Malkajigiri dist. ub. O.Radha Krishna Murthy S/o Subhramanaya Sarma aged about 46 years, Occ: Purohit, R/o H. No. 2-3-7 12 I L42, lalithanagar Colony, Road No.3, Nagole, Uppal mandal, Medchal Malkajiri district. ..Petitioners / Prop. Respondents B-13 \ I / I AND /, 1 . Palle Babu Rao Goud, S/o. Late P.Balaraj Goud, Age 48 years, Occ. Business, Fl/o. H.No.3-51, Korremula Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Medchal- Malkajgiri (District).

2. K.Shanker, S/o. K.Krishna, Age.55 years, Occ. Bussiness, R/o. H.No.5-67/1 , Korremula Village, GhatkesarMandal,Medchal-Malkajgiri (District). ...PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS

3. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principle Secretary Panchayath Raj Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

4. The Commissioner, Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority, Jayanthi Complex, San.jeeva Reddy Nagar Road, Srinivasa Nagar, Ameerpet, Hyderabad-500082

5. The District Collector, GM83 + 64Q, ECIL-Keesara Road, Near ORR Keesara, Godumakunta, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Telangana-501301

6. The Additional District Colleclor, GM83 + 64Q, ECIL-Keesara Road, Near ORR Keesara, Godumakunta, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Telangana-50130'1 7. The District Panchayath Officer, JFJJ + 2JM, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. Telangana-50140'l

8. The Mandal Panchayat Officer, Ghatkesar Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Telangana - 501 2'18

9. The Secretary, Chowdaryguda Grampanchayath, Ghatkesar Mandal, Medchai-Malkajgiri District. Telangana- 5O1218 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 16-4 of Writ Rules praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners herein to implead as Party Respondents B to 13 in main W.P. in the interests of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 BETWEEN / I \ 1 PalleBa b u RaoGoud, S/o. Late. P.llalarajGoud, Age :48 years, Occ:Bussiness,R/o: H.No.3-5 1, Korremula Village, GhatkesarMandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri (District).

2. K.Shanker,S/o: K.Krishna, Age:55 ycars, OcC: Bussin css, R/o: H.No: 5-6711, Korremula',/illage, Ghatkesa rMa ndaliMedcha l-Ma ll<ajg iri (District) . Petitioners/Petitioners /r. i{ t) 1 The State of Telangana Rep. by its Principle Secretary Panchayath Raj Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Commissioner, Hyderabad Metropolitan Devellopment Authority, .layanthi Complex, Sanjeeva lleddy Nagar Road, Srinivasa Nagar, Ameerpet, tlyderabad-500082

3. The District Collector, GM83+64Q,ECIL-Keesara Road, Near ORR Keesara, Godurnal<unta, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, 1-elangana-501301

4. The Additional District Collecl.or, GMB3+64Q, ECIL-Keesara Road, Near ORR Keesara, Godumalrunta, Medcha l - l4alkajgiri District, -l r':lan ga na -50 I 30 1

5. The District Panchayath Offir:er, )F))+Tl\1, Medchal-Malkajqiri Dlstrict. Tela nga na'501401 I I / I i I I I 1l (l., lX .t (; I 1,,. Metrt,l, tl l']ilnchayat ( )lli' ,'l ( ilr, rl ke';; rt Mandal, Mltlr,hal fvl,t lk.r jg iri Distttc:t, I I ' I . t t t r / 1 . r t t . I r,() i .i ltl

7.. The Ser-rcta rY, Chowdaryquda Gra mPa rrchJYatrt, Ghatkes;ir Mandal, Medch.rl-ivlalkJJqlri l)i:;lrrct Telartgana- 501218 U.K.tilragdv(rn Rcddy S/o K. Ytrlla l(etldy, Aged about 5 1 years, Occ: [:]usinct;s, l1/o D. Ncr. t6-140/1, St. No..J, t'r.,isanthiriaqar, Uppal, tlyderabad.

9. Guda Rarrra Krishna S/o G-Kr t:i rttrr Mut [l Iy, Aged about 42 years, Occ: l)vt- [ rnploytr:, tVu Flat No. 104, Sai Bltav.rtt.r Nlil,.tyrrtr, Mtrclhurarra<;ar, Pragatlt inri,ld r ( rrlr,rr)y, Ni..lmpet , Medchal Malkajt,lirr tlt ;t t(1.(,utia Lalittra Madhuri W/t, ll rttrrI''ti',lttt t, At,t'd abottt 3{J years, ()(.( .il('j(r"' rvalr', 11/o Flat No-i04, Sai Bhav.rrt,.t l\1rl'lyirtIr, Mld lrur ar t"tqa r, PragathinaltJarI ( r,lt)lly, Ni,rarmpet, Medchal Malkali'-;it t 'lt';t I 1. K.Som.rst:khar S/o Anjarreyar 1;.1rrllar, Aged about 43 Years, Occ: Pui'l:hit, R/o .No. ll3-7B/ II 1,, Marrttttiri,-"' tr, RTC Color ry, Peerzajig uda, tvltrrl ilrally Ma rrdal, Medchal Malkajigiri dist. 1 2.K.Prathysha D/o Somasekhiit, aqed About 35 Years,Occ: Hou:,t-'Wife, R/o .No. lB-78ll/1, Marutltinuqrr, R1-C ColonY, Peerzajiguda, Medipally Mandal, Medchal Malkaji';iri dist.

13. O.Radha K.rishna Murthy S/o Srrbhrarnanaya Sarma aged about 46 Years, Occ: I)LIrohit, R/o H. No. 2 -3 -7 I7/ 142, L;il itir;trraqar Colony, Road No.3, Nagole, Uppal rn.lrrcial, Mr-'dt:hal Malkaiiri dislrict l((,!;J)ondertL'; / l{e:;J)on clc I I [:, I I f Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to be grant stay all further proceedings and direct the Respondent No.7(gram panchayath) not to sanction any permissions and not to entertain any type of constructions in survey No.714 to an extent of Acers 15.08 guntas in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI VUTHPALA SUNIL KUMAR Counsel forthe Respondent No.1, 3 to 6: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: SRI PUTTA KRISHNA REDDY, SC FOR MCPL Counsel forthe Respondent No.7: SRI P.KISHORE RAO, SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT Counsel for the Respondent No.8: SMT D.MADAVI, SC FOR HMDA Counsel for the Proposed Respondents: SRI K.BHAGAVATH REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER I I I I HON'BLE SRI JT'SUCE K. I.AI{STIMAN - U/RIT PETffiON No.l@L4ofM' ORDR.: Heard Sri V. Sunil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Putta Krishna Reddy, learned standing counsel appearing for respondent No.8 and Smt. D. Madhavi, learned standing counsel appearing for 2nd respondent. Perused the record.

2. Petitioners are claiming that they are absolute owners and possessors of the plot No.25 to al extent of 2OO square yards, plot No.26 to an extent of 22O squzrre yards, plot No.27 to an extent of 22O square yards and plot No.28 and 29 to an extent of 460 square yards on I I the strength of documents bearing Nos.2487 of 2008 dated 07.06.2OO8, 1837 of 1995, 2484 of 2OO8 dated

07.06.2008 and 2486 of 2OO8 dated 07.06.2OO8 I respectively, 1n Sy.No.714 situated at Padma Nagar Housing Colony Township, Korremula Village Now comes under the Chowdar5rguda Village, Ghatkesar Manda-I, the KL,J W.P.No-16214 oa 2023 2 then Ra-nga Reddy District, now Medchal-Malkajgiri District. They are in possession of the said open plots.

3. It is further contended by the petitioners that their father's vendor i.e., Sri K. Shankaraiah executed a registered sale deed in favour of Srinivas Goud who inturn executed registered sa-le deed in favour of Sri Bhagawanth Reddy. He has approached 8th respondent seeking permission for construction. The said sale deeds are forged and fabricated one and therefore, 8th respondent cannot consider the sarne and grart permissions for construction. 1"t petitioner has submitted representation dated 26.O5.2023 to the then Gram Panchayat with a request not to issue any permission in respect of the said property.

4. Whereas, Sri Putta Krishna Reddy, learned standing counsel appearing for 8th respondent and Smt. D Madhavi, learned standing counsel appearing for 2"d respondent would contend that there are serious disputes with regard to the title. It is contended by the I I L KL,J W.P.No.l62l4 of 2023 3 I learned counsel for tJ.e petitioners that Katta 1 Shankaraiah did not have any land in 1972 but, he has sold Ac.7.26 guntas. Therefore, he has submitted a representation dated 26.05.2023 to respondent No.7 with a request to take action. The same was not considered.

5. As discussed supra, there are serious disputes with regard to title of the said property. Fabrication, forgery etc., either 2"d respondent or 8th respondent cannot consider. 8s respondent will consider only the following aspects: (i) Prima-facie title and possession of applicants (ii) Mis-representation/ suppression of facts I (iii) False statements if any made by the applicant (iv) Deviation in construction to the building permit orders.

6. As discussed supra, fabrication, forgery etc., 8ft respondent can't consider. There are serious disputes with regard to the title of tJle property. Therefore, petitioners cannot submit aforesaid representations to 7th II I{L,J W P.No.l62t4 of 2023 4 and 8th respondents and file the present writ petition I I alleging non-consideration of the same. Therefore, these petitioners a-re not entitled for any relief much less any relief sought in the present writ petition. This writ petition is liable to be dismissed and accordingly dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to approach competent civil Court. There shall be no order as to costs.

7. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stald closed. \ To, //TRUE COPY// SD/-L.LAKSHMI BABU UTY REGISTRAR D ECTION OFFICER "l . One CC to SRI VUTHPALA SUNIL KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRI K.BHAGAVATH REDDY, Ad.vocate IOPUCI 3. ONE CC tO SiTI PUTTA KRISHNA REDDY, SC FOR MCPL [OPUC] 4. One CC to SMT D.MADAVI, SC FOR HMDA [OPUC] 5. One CC to SRI P.KISHORE RAO, SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT [OPUC] 6.TwoCCstoGPFoRPANCHAYATRAJRURALDEV,HighCourtforthe State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUTI

7. Two CD CoPies ,r"% I I I HIGH COURT DATED:0310312025 ORDER WP.No.16214 ot 2023 E SIA I H OB APN 2[25

7. a /. * D6SPA. tC DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS ,( , I