The High Court · 2025

8. Ch Srinivas Rao, S/o Not Known to the Petitioner Age about 45 years, Occ C.l. of Police, Vanasthalipuram Police Station Rachakonda .

9. G. Girish Kumar, S/o Not Known to the Petitioner, Aged about 30 years, Occ S.l. of Police Vanasthalipuram, Rachakonda Commissionerate, Fl/o Vanasthalipuram Police Station, Rachakonda.

10.Mr. Srinivas, S/o Not Known to the Petitioner, Aged about z[() Years, Occ Circle Inspector of Police, Jeedimetla. I\Iedchal Nilalakajgiri District' Cell 1'lo 7386868600 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, th I Fligh Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly 3ne in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4nd re;pondent who illegally arresting the petitioner on 271212025 in collusion with 7tf respondent harassing in active the petitioner and threatening to settle dispute with Tttr r€)spondent collusion with respondent 8 to 10 for their illegal gains a:, be,ing illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14,21 oI Constitution of lndia. Crnsequently, direct the Respondent No.2 and 3 to enquire the matter against the Respondent Nos. 8 to 10 and submit the action taken Report before the Honouralrle Court. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ,;irc.rmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High (-)ourt may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 to initiate Departrerrtal enquiry into the acts of Respondent No.8 to 10 who are misusing their du res as they are holding the offices of respondent No 4 to 6 who illegally arrestinr the petitioner in Crvil Disputes in F.l.R No 27O125 dated 231212025 of Vanasthalipuram polrce Station against the petitioner for the offence u/s 't08,318 (4) 316(2)61 (1) r/w 3(B) BNS for want of seftle the civil dispute with respondent No. 7, b y submitting the action taken report before the Honourable Court, pending dispose I of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI U.V.SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: ASST. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER IION'BLE SRIJUSTICE IC LAKSHMAN WRIT Pf,TITI ON No.19722 0F 2025 ORALORDER: There is no representation for the petitioner, both pre-lunch and post-lunch.

2. Heard learned Assistant Govemment Pleader lor Home'

3. This writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondent No.4 in illegally arresting the petitioner oo 27 'O2'2O25 in collusion with respondent No.7 and harassing him and threatening to settle the disputes with respondent No 7 in active collusion with respondent Nos.S to l0 as illcgal.

4. In paragraph Nos.7 and [l ol- the rvrit a{fidavit, the petitioner specificatly contended that the name ol the purchaser of the subject plots was not mentioned correcth bl the dcceased and, in fact, the plots were registered in thc namc of petitioncr's f'ather' The said fact was not within the knowlcdge of the deceased' Taking advantage of the alleged suicide lcttcr' respondenl Nos'7 to 10 have cleverly implicated the petitioncr as an accuscd lor their wrongful gains and continuing the case. and it amounts to abuse of process of law. In spite of regular visits to respondent No 4, -I 2 KL, J \v.P No 19122 of2025 respondent No.8 holding the offtce of respondent 1'tro.'1, failed to discharge his duties as Station House Offrceq Vrrnasthalipuram who along with respondent No.9, the Investigating OIficer. were involved in civil disputes illegally whose actions wet e intentionally in act ive collusion of respondent No.7 and ignored Top Boss (wrongty ryped as Brass) of Rachakonda as respondent l.los.4 and 8 are cl,:se associates of Ruling Political Party, as srtch, he has no altemative except to file the present writ petition.

5. 'Ihe said allegations made by the petiticner herein arc contrary to the record and appears to be baseless.

6. Learned Assistant Govemment Pleader tbr Home. on instructions. would submit that the petitioner her;in is accused No. I in Crime No.270 of 2025 pending on tlre file ol Vanasthalipuram Police Station. He was alrested rx 118.02.2025 I le is on bail

7. On the complaint lodged by Mrs. Bentu Sunitha - respondent No.7 herein, the Police, Vanasthalipurarr I'olice Station havc registered Crime No.270 of 2025 against the p,:titioner herein and others ftir the offences under Sections - 108,3l8 (4).316 (2). 6t (I) read *ith 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. :2023. -the I 3 (1, I allegation leveled against the petitioner and others is that the husband of respondent No.7 committed suicide due to harassment of the petitioner and o'ther accused. There are specific allegations against the petitioner in the c.omplaint dated 22.02.2025 of respondent No.7.

8. As discussed above, the petitioner herein supprcsscd the aforesaid facts. There are no specific allegations against respondent No.4 i.e., he has detained the petitioner herein and that the police are interfering with civil disputes. The petitioner cannot file a writ petition with vague allegations. Therefore, the present writ petition is devoid of merits and the same is liablc to be dismissed.

9. This writ petition is accordingly dismisscd. [n the circumstances ofthe case, there shall be no order as to costs As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions. if any pcnding in the writ petition shall stand closed To, //TRUE COPY// SD/. S.MALLIKARJUNA RAO STANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER 1 Jlp lfil:'pql,*".$rry, Home Department, Secretariate Buitdrng, Srare of 2- The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda Commissionerate, Neredmet, I etangana, Hyderabad. Secunderabad, Telangana. 3 !ne. pepyty.Commissioner of Potice, L B Nagar Zone, L. B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy District.

4. The Station House Officer, Vanasthaltpuram police Station, Rachakonda 5. The Sub-lnspector of Police, Vanasthalipuram police Station, Rachakonda 6. The Station House fficer, Hayatnagar police statron. Rachakonda, Hayatnagar, Ranga Reddy Dist.

7. One CC to SRI U.V.SURESH KUMARM, Advocate. [C PUC] 8. Two CC:s to GP FOR HOME, High Court forthe State cf Telangana. [OUT] 9. Two CCt Copies. c BSK KS \ HIGH COURT DATED:1010712025 ( { I , .\i -i 2li :iP ?lEi ORDER WP.No.19722 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS