Masjid-e-Akbari, Hyderabad v. Housewife
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, this criminal petition is dismissed for
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Two CD Copies TTS/PSL ,fi s ) L) * ,F t_ 2 * l I HIGH COURT DATED: 05/08/i1025 ORDER CRLP.No.6064 ot 2021 CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED FOR NON-PRC)SECUTION a. / J
Judgment
2. Smt. Azizunnisa Begum, Wo. Mohd. knam Ali, Aged about 60 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o H.No.8-442O1D, NRR Puram Colony, Site-|, Borabanda, Near Masjid-e-Akbari, Hyderabad.
3. Smt. Mohd. Mehtab Ali, S/o. Mohd. lmam Ali, Aged about 48 years, Occ: Working at Soudi, R/o H.No.8-4-42OlD, NRR Puram Colony, Site-|, Borabanda, Near Masjid-e-Akbari, Hyderabad.
4." Smt. Atiya Sultana, Wo. Abbas Hussain, Aged about 44 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o H.No.8442OlD, NRR Puram Colony, Site-|, Borabanda, Near , .Masjid-e-Akbari, Hyderabad.
5. Smt. Zakiya Sultana, Wo. Jaffer Hussain, Aged about 40 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o H.No.84-4201D, NRR Puram Colony, Site-|, Borabanda, Near Masjid-e-Akbari, Hyderabad.
6. Smt. Zareena Tasleem, Wo. Mohammed Mehtab Ali, Aged about 38 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o H.No.8442OlD, NRR Puram Golony, Site-|, Borabanda, Near Masjid-e-Akbari, Hyderabad.
7. Majda Taranum, Wo. Mohammed Sarwar, Aged about 30 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o H.No.8-4-42OlD, NRR Puram Colony, Site-|, Borabanda, Near Masjid-e-Akbari, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONERS/A1 & A7 AND
The State of Telangana, r€p., by its Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad.
Smt. Hafsa Jabeen, Wo. Mohd. Sarwar, Aged about 32 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o H. No .8-4-3791 189/N, NRR Puram, Borabanda, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS'DEFACTO COMPLAI NANT Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C.No. 5721 of 2020 on the file of the Xlll Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampa{ly, Hyderabad District for the offences under section 498-A, 420, 506 IPC and Sec. 4 and 6 of D.P. Actagainst the petitioners / Al to A7. @. l.A. NO: I OF 20?{ Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying thdt in the circumstances stated in the Me,morandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioners/ Al to A7 in C.C No. 5721 of 2020 on the file of the Xlll Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad District, pending disposal of the above quash petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. K. KRISHNA VENI, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Sri. E. Ganesh Assistant Public Prosecutor on brehalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri. M.A. Wahab, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following ORDER: \ t I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAI, CRIMINAL PETITION No.6O64 of 2O2l ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure L973 by petitioners/accused Nos. 1 to 7, seeking to quash the proceedings against them in C.C.No. 572L of 2O2O on the file of XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad, for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 42O,506 of the Indian Penal code, 1860 (for short, 'the IPC) and Sections 4 and 6 of the Dowr5r Prohibition Act, 1961 (for short, the ActJ.
2. On the earlier dates of hearing i.e., 28.M.2025 and OL.O7 .2025 there was no representation on behdf of the petitioners. Accordingly, the matter was listed for dismissal. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. As the circumstances are evidencing that the petitioners are \ not evincing any interest to prosecute the case, this Court is left with no option but for dismissing the petition for non-prose, cution.
Operative part
Accordingly, this criminal petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications if any, stands closed. SD/. B. REKHA RANI REGISTRAR AS //TRUE COPY/' OFFICER To,
1. The XlllAddl. Chief Metropolitan M agistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad. 2. The Statkln House Officer, Police Station WPS, CCS, DD, Hyderabad City and District.
3. One CC to Sri. K. KRISHNA VENI, Advocate [OPUC].
One CC to Sri. M.A. WAHAB, Advocate [OPUC].
Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderalcad [OUT].
Two CD Copies TTS/PSL ,fi s ) L) * ,F t_ 2 * l I HIGH COURT DATED: 05/08/i1025 ORDER CRLP.No.6064 ot 2021 CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED FOR NON-PRC)SECUTION a. / J
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this criminal petition is dismissed for
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860; Prohibition Act, 1961.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.