Firt flo.iot, Spandana srirts, f-zs Madhurabagar. Hyderabad v. (West Zone). Serilinqamaplly, Hyderabad'
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 7985 OF 2011 Between: Firt flo.iot, Spandana srirts, f-zs Madhurabagar. Hyderabad -,
Sri. D.V.RAO, S/o. Sri Raghavaiah, aged about 53 years, Occ: Business' R/o' 2. Sri. A.Appa Rbo, S/o. Sri. A Venkata Ramaiah' aged about 51 years' ucc: - gusinesb] R/o. Ftat S S t,tivoOaya Apartmenls Plot No.79, Snehapuri 3 S;i. ijls;-iR;Jy, db S. a.tr, tatta Reddv Ased about 66 vear.s Q9c,,.!9Ja Plot No 62' Ayyappa society Khanamewl' Madnapur' colonv Nacharam, HYderabad-76 -No - Employee, R/o. Hyderabad. AND ...PETITIONERS (West Zone). Serilinqamaplly, Hyderabad'
1. The Commissioner And Spl. Officer, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation z. 5rl. i.s*iu5t, slo i.venxuiu, Aged about 26 y-ears, occ: Business' . . - nio n tro r-t-b RmararaOninrgai Tall"gadda,-suryapet, Nalgonda District. ...RESPONDENTS petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia firaying that in the circumstancesStated.ntheaffidavitfiledtherewith, the HighCourtmaybe pleased to issue a writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamusdeclaringtheproceedingsNoLRS/6152/G/CR-'11^/l\/est Zonet.GHMC]200B dated 21 .5.2OOg on the file of the 1st respondent as illegal, arbitrary, and against the rules made in G.O'Ms No 902 MA'31'12'2007 ' l.A. NO: 1OF 2011 (WPMP. NO: 9916 OF 2011) PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatintheCircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings No.LRS/6152lctcR-11AlVest zonelGHttilc/20O8 dated 21.5.2O0g on the file of the 1st respondent pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI A.BHASKARA CHARY Corn. "t for the Respondent No.1: SRI G.MADHU SUDHAN i EDDY, SC FOR GHMG Counsel for the ResPondent No.2: - The Court made the following: ORDER 0 ( I I HON'BLE SRIIUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT PETITION NO.7985 OF 2011 ORDER: Mr. A.Bhaskara Chari, learned counsel for petitioners and Mr. G.Madhu Sudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC for respondent No.1, submit that the matter has been settled out of Court and the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous
Recording the same, this Writ Petition is dismissetl as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. S HAVANI SWAMY ANT REGIST /,TRUE COPY/' CNON OFFICER To 3ffi 33 I 3Rl Afllt',ss,',ff^Tx S'.JV:3'3 1 2 3 Two CD CoPies U H MC TOPUCI PSK BS $ HIGH COURT DATED:2810812025 ORDER WP.No.7985 ot 2011 ,1,;1t, i. .: ,z; 'i\ '':.. i' : I i, li4 t:; ?fifr \..\.:. I ,i.r DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS d I I I a a
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.