✦ High Court of India · 20 Aug 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 20 Aug 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
20 Aug 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,098 words

3 K Janardhan Raju, s/o Subba Raju, aged 36 years, Occ Service, R/o Door 4 i V D-. Rgrya-Ra1u, s/o Atchutarama Raju, aged 41 years, Occ Service, R/o 5. K G.S V.V.S.lvt. Phaneendra Gupta, s/o K. Mangaiah, aged 35 years, Occ 6 A VrS: Patnaik, s/o A. Satya Rao, aged 40 years, Occ Service, R/o Door 7 B Sri Hari, s/o B. Venkata Ramaiah, aged 40 years, Occ Service, Rio Door B P E Lavaq [unpr, s/o Hanumanth Rao, aged 46 years, Occ Service, R/o 9. Smt D. {qmes-wqri, rrv/o S. Srinivasa Rao, aged 29 years, Occ Household, Door No.7-6-81, Flat No.210 No.7-6-8 1, Flat No 209. No 7-6-81, Flat No.205. R/o Door No.7-6-8 1, Flat No.303. '10. K.V. Buchaiah, s/o Chandra Sekharaiah, aged 48 years, Occ Service, R/o Door No.7-6-81, Flat No.304. 1'l Vemuri Nag^a-Diwakar, s/o V. Venugopalam, aged 40 years, Occ Service, R/o Door No.7-6-81, FIat No.305. '12. Smt. V^emavarapu Subbalakshmi, w/o K. Nagamalleswara Rao, aged 60 years, Occ Household, R/o Door No.7-6-81, FlaaNo.309. 13 Anand Kumar Patro, s/o Trinath Patro, aged 34 years, Occ Service, R/o Door No.7-6-81, Rat No.403. 14 B S.R Anjaneyulu, s/o Surya Prakash Rao, aged 41 years, Occ Service, R/o Door No.7-6-81, Flat No.404. '15. L.G. Raju, s/o Rajulu, aged 45 years, Occ Service, R/o Door No.7-6-81, Flat No.410. 16 Smt G Jyothi, w/o Sridhar Babu, aged 30 years, Occ Household, R/o Door No.7-6-81, Flat No.504. ? - " grvv v! Door No.7-6:g1, Flat No.5o5-

17. Smt. G. Naqamani. w/o-Nagabhusanam, aged 35 y : rrs, Occ Service, R/o 18.V- Kiran, s/o Narasimha Rao, aged 35 years, Occ Ser- ice, R/o Door No.7_6- 19.Smt. B. Lakshmi Manoa-.Mo.B. Srinivas Rao, aged 40 ears. Occ Household. or Ramya chandra t' cn' p'iiv' " i c" c"'nt,el'nl n! 5 81, Flat No.509. R/o Door No7-6-81-flat ruosi'o'iir 'r?I'?E;iiu., o I u [Si l,t' ! iJ ; 51'3i,;i .?3 "rt', -iir"e''r'r7Ji' AND ..PETITIONER 1 2 3 4 I3:.'J?ff :|"+:i"',ilx jr,,?J,l',-".:l$i::fi The Deputy Collector & Tahsildar, euthbullapur Mandat Ranga Reddy district. State of Telangana. ?:.?:t:,iMagistrate,Ransa I[:"5]ti:ff:enue lnspector, Quthbulrapur Mandal, F ansa Reddy district The Special Court UnderA i,Lrn! Grabbing. (prohibrt( n)Act, 1982, rep bv 2nd Froor, e n x R- Govi 5rr;"E;'b;;;j"'. t'j,-r el;;nt';d,"' lli5":93:,.r,. ..,RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndi; praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit ffeO tn"r"*itn the ligh Court mav be pleased to issue a writ order or oirection, moiu ""i i,iirr"'r.irfu writ of Mandamus decraring. the proceeding. ,;iin" 2n<r Respondent-Deputy "t collector and rahsirdar oitr,orrrip* rr,lr"o,J R:idy District bearing proceedings No Br1028/2013 dated zs ri.zuq as iregar, arbitrary, u nconstitutiona I and against to the principles tf naf riral lustrr r I.A. NO:1 oF 2014(WPMP. NO:48470 oF 20141 "nrng, "prrti"rruri,, Petition under section 151.cpc praying that in the cirr umstances stated in T-":{ldrrlt fited in support of the p"iition, inliigh Court may be pteased to drrect the Respondents No.'r & 2 ,no *,uii .r6orain"t" offici; rs not to iriiiri" uny coercive steps incrudino removar of any part of mutti-storier residentiar comprex by name 'Miractes *rrii^91,::o:: l:igilil in'!r,.rrn,. of the proceedinss of the 2nd Respondent bearing No.Bt1o2}t2:013, 2i 11.2014 durino the pendency of the Writ petition be-fore this H"";U-f" Ctrn Counsel for the petitioner : SRI B.CHINNAPA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER -dated t THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.387O4 of 2014 ORDER: Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and Smt. S.Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration appearing for the respondents and perused the material on record. 2 Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are questioning the impugned notice issued by the respondent No.2 in Proceedings No.B/ lO28/2013, dated 25.11.2014 3 Learned Counsel for the petitioners further submits that the similar situated persons have hled a writ petition before this Court in W.P.No.39OO3 of 2Ol4 and this Court disposed of the said writ petition on

19.12.2014 by setting aside the impugned notice bearing No.B/1028/2013, dated 25.I7.2OI4 and requested to pass similar order in the instant case also. 2 sr(, .r W.P.\ t.387O4 of 20t4

4. On the other hand, the learn: i Assistant Government pleader for Stamps and Regis: :rtion is not disputing the submission made by the lear necr co,nsel for the petitioners with regard to tht: disposzrl of W.P.No.390O3 of 2014, dated 19. 12.2Ot4.

5. In view of the above made submissirns by both sides and for thc reasons alike in tlr: order in W.P.No.390O3 of 2014, dated 1g.12.2O1., this writ petition is disposed of by setting aside tlr: impugned notice bearing No.B/ l}2g/2013, dated 25 1l.2OI4 issued by the respondent No.2, however, nih liberty to respondent No.2 to issue a show causc no ice inviting objections from the petitioners, hold an on(pl ry, wherein he sha-ll give an opportunity of personal hr.r ring to the petitioners, 'a,d pass a finar order. Ther<-- ihair be no order as to costs.

6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, penc ing in this writ petition sha_ll stand closed. E sr, J W.P.No.38704 of 2014

7. Registry is directed to annex copy of the order in W.P.No.390O3 of 2014, dated 19. 12.2OL4. SD/-MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUW REGIST //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Cotlector and District fMagistrate, Ranga Reddy district, Telangana State,state of Telangana, Lakdikapul, Hyderabad.

2. The Deputy Collector & Tahsildar, Quthbullapur Mandal' Ranga Reddy district- State of Telangana,

3. The Mandal Revenue lnspector, Quthbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy district State of Telangana.

4. The Reqistrar, Special Court Under A.P. Land Grabbing, (Prohibition) Act, 1982,2i'd Floor, B.R.K R. Govt. Offices Complex, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad.

5. One CC to SRI B.CHINNAPA REDDY, Advocate. [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

7. Two CD Copies. BSK BS HIGH COURT DATED:2010812025 ORDER WP.No.38704 o12014 :_\ 2 I 1! [!c [H -iir , '{ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ? l} lP t., l+ 10 i I +

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments