High Court · 2025

Pptitiqn irrdt; Sectton 151 CPC praying that in the circu'nstances stated in the affidavi! f led '' support af the petition' the High Court ma" be pleased tq dilgct!heresp.]1d(.lltSnottodemolish/interferewithtileri3htsofpetilionerin resoect of hc,ttses s tuated in the house plots vide numberr; 15 (adm' 40 sq' yards), 36,97 10(i 12g' 132,195,253, 2g2'301' 302' 103' 3iO6' 314' 326'327' '328,347,359 36ir, 387' 414' 420,421 and H Nos'0-7811' 1t10718,1155' 1' 1L7t}l344(ear:ha:lnB0sq.yards),1-1071E,t361(adm(3Osqylrds)and1-7411 (aOm eO sq. yarc,') that are forming part of Sy Nos 308/4 sl8/6 and 308/7' r:1 Balaiah Nagar, Gajularamaram, eutbullapur, tvlechal_Malkajgiri District, pending disposal of the above writ petition in the interest of justice Counsq! fos lfq Pelitio4gq: SRl. p. I_AKSHMA REpDy Qggnsql fo;!!9 Rqspondenr Nos. 119+: Gp FOR REVENUE counsqr for !h Rsspon(ent frro.6; sRr " . rs3o|tHtlfiEoo", Counsgl for lhe Respondent go.7: eBt V. NABSTMHA gOUD, SC FpRttl,IDA gglnsel for the Respondent No.!i QBt tr4, HAMSA RAJ, sq FoR ApsFe [f.E Gosrt *44e tle foltsyying: oRpEn THE, HON'B LE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKA \VRIT PETITION No. 15986 of 202,3 R RE,DDY ORDER: T:isl,-IllletitionisfiledSeekingtodeclzretheictlonof the resiottrlt't rs in trying to demolish the petLtiorre rs houses situalerl in -,)tlse plots vidc numbers 15 (tLdrn'''zls;r' ring 40 square 1'ar<l:'l 36, 97, 106, t2g' 132' lg5' 253''292' 301' 3O2' 303, 306, '..: 'i,326,327,328' 347,359,369 387 414' 420' 42larcllllos.1O-78/l,1llO7lBli55'1-1()7/ll'/ll''4(each admea;ltrit'. 8(J square yards, 1-1O7/B/361 aclnre asrrLng 60 square ] :Lr':l:; atlcl l-741 I (admeasuring 80 sc uar: r a rds) that are forrnir:. part of Survey Nos.3O8/4, 3oti/6 .[rl(i 3oal7, Balaiar 'J r1ar, Gajularamaram, QutbullrLpur'' Medchal- Malka-11ir-i )isl,rict, that too rvithout issuin'1 a'r'r ro:ice or .incl without fo11ou'ing due proc':dure' iLs illegal' : r,iolative of principles of naturai j rstir:t ' oppor11lr'l tt' arbitrtt:1' a It ir' Comnt-.llir.i statecl thal the petitioners be ong L.l Vaddera rrnd other weaker sections and t he1' :trc all doing labou:rvcltt.instonequarriesandcrushersrri;lretingfrom variolt; :tt.: : s' It is further Stated that they are i;r 1 rossessron and o,;<'t'rilr ron of Smali extents of plots ra rqing ftom 40-80 squal(: y:rr(ls in Survey Nos 308/4, 3O8/ I ar-rC 30817 at 2 l Gajularamaram Village, eutbullapur Mandal, having acquired the same by way of unregistered gift deed dated 12.11.1991 executed by the original owner of the said land. It is iurther stated that thereafter with a view to maintain the said plots cf land, the petitioners along with other similarly situated persons formed into a registered society on 24.72.2OOg, which in turn executed Notarised Gift Deeds and sale deeCs in their favour by allotting 80 square yards each and thus they are in possession of the said plots, by constructing single room houses thereon. The grievance of the petitioners is that despite the same, the respondent authorities are trying to demolish the structures/houses on the subject plots, without issuing them any notice or opportunity and without following the due procedure as contemplated under law. Learned counsel for lhe petitioners vehemently contends that the petitioners have obtained electricity power connection and also water supply connection which would establish that they are in possession and enjoyment of the subject plots and as such, the respondent authorities are not entitled to evict the petitioners from the subject rand much ress to demorish the houses/ structures constructed thereon, without following due process of law and without following the guidelines issued by :f 1r J,1 '*Eff _) the Hor 'b1e A pt:x Court in Re: Directions in the ndtter of demolition c'.f structuresl and Raiendra Numctrl' ):lariatga And.Anotlre'rts.U'P'Aa@sEvamVikasP.]rishadand others2 . L:arr rl Standing Counsel appearing lor re;pondent No.S/A rdb ri Pradesh State Financial Corp ora1iol1 (APSFC) submi;; th,' t in fact, the subject lands have been z llct ed to the APSFCT 1>'r 1 L.' State Government and they are i:r posse;sion and enjoynt:rt I1 lhe said land; however' the petiti':ne -s ': atming to be th<r p'-rt,lrascrs of the subject house plots urlde: notarised gift dt:,:cls Liric deeds are making efforts to cncroa c1^ ';he land allotte'tl tcr 1.PSFC in Survey No.3o7; except ster.ing that, the petitio':ers 1tave not placed any record to el:tab ir;h that they have ltltrt:l irsed the same under registered :lale (1e( d or they have obtzLilred any permission for constrrrctiorL lf houses there:n. l, 'irrned Standing Counsel further :;ublnits that after the strttul: (/uo order passed by lhis Court vi.le itr; o rder dated

23.o())(.),,irr,henthepetitionersmadeeffort:jto..lrt:roachrrpon their larlr. -he respondent authorities resistr:d the ;aid action ' zo2+ s tlt (lr t inc SC 3291 2Civil ./rDnea rr. i,1604 of2024 dated l'7.122024 / ! I 4 :l and there are no constructions/ structures whatsoever on the subject land Learned Government pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 submits that the land- claimed by the petitioners is forming part of Survey No.3Og, whereas the land glaimed by respondent No.5 is forming part of Survey Nos.3O7 and 308; thus, there are serious disputes with regard to right, title, possession and naturc/classification of the subject land, which are required to be adjudicated by the crv court in a properly instituted in civii suit; and as such the present writ petition as filed by the petitioners is not maintainable. In view of the above and since it is evident that there are serious disputes among the parties with regard to flght, title, possession and nature/classihcation of the land, which are required to be adjudicated by the competent civ court, this Court, without expresstng any opinion on lhe merits of the matter, deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition by directing the respondent authorities to follow the guidelines issued by the Hon'ble Apex court in Re: Directions tn the mdtter of denolition of stntctures (supra) and, Rajendra Kumqr Bdrjdtga *nt Another os. (1.p. Aoczs Eoam Vikrrs \ I dSF*BZ / ,/ - I I To, ) Parishad tnd others (supra) strictly, befo:e inilirLting any action fo: :,'ic1.ion of the petitioners, if they ar-e Iirlrtlrl to be in posse:; ;ir.rrL. \\'irlr -,,c above observations, this Writ Pt. titiorL is disposed of. Ti-r:rr' : i rl1 be no order as to costs. I)enr- r q miscellaneous applications, if anl . sl.al1 stand closec. S|I/-K.BH/WANI swAMY ,/ ASSISTAI\IT REGISTRAR / //TRUE COPY// .SECTION OFFICER I The Prircroal :;'rcretary., Revenue-Department Secretariilt H /derabad' T S' i, i[: Fiifir#, I [ih?'ffi I *i 1i,el+"tUl,'i4{[l3 i?*:' iL *,, ; ii.iE A.ii;; ') adesh, state Financial c^orporatior ", No 2, 2nrl c'rr;s sta dili' i"iljtiiilr Fl't' vllav''*'da lndhra Pradesh- o ?2n303lrr,v (- cmmissioner, Greater Hvderabad Mun cipal rlorporation' circle' Development , ?fl""'l;'":lsllliET.commissioner'!-lvderabad,--Metropclitart floor' Wist V/ing Ameerpet' -+th 3f Authority. l:rrvarna;aylniiii" itii'pi"i' F{vderabad. 6i:,"cdi; siRl P LAKSHT'IA REDDY, AdvocatetotJSL* Y#E Eiil-,"' t;p roC irveuuE 'High Hvderabad Ir.;t]Tl . ii'":=c?iil'Si'i' il,t DHANANJAY REDDY sc-FoR.GHrI(l t )PUCI i gffi Sii ii :i,l Y'' HmxHxl $'Po-'i53s?YNft ,o''"' court ror trt of rerangana ar I o 1 1

3.Two CD 3oP' es B M S HIGH COIJRI' DATED:2710it12025 ORDER WP.No.15986 of 2023 i, .: .u,l I I l I i i i I i I I I I I I I DISPOSING .OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ,// /.1 ,/t ,/l /{ 4