K.Saileela v. 1. The State of Telangana

the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased be pleased to direct the respondents No.7 and 8 not to create any third party alienations in Sy.No.'t4lA, and 14lEE to an extent of Ac.1.36 gts., situated at Chandrakal Village, Peddakothapally Mandal, Nagarkurnool District. I.A.NO:3 OF 2023 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.10 not to accorded any construction permissions in in Sy.No.'14lA, and 14lEE to an extent of Ac.1.36 gtsr, situated at Chandrakal Village, Peddakothapally Mandal, Nagarkurnool District. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI MALOTHU RAVEENDAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1, 2,7 & I : GP FOR REVENUE Gounsel for the Respondent No.3 : G.P FOR PANCHAYATH RAJ Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 6 : G.P FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.9 & 10 : SRI LAXMAIAH KANCHANI Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.11 to 14 : SRI T.SANJAY REDDY The Court made the following ORDER HOI I'BLE SRT JUSTICE K' LAI(SHMAN ON No .160 150 F 2o2!J u[]'l.rT ORAL O_BDIIE: Mr.Lax r raiah Kalchani' learned Standing' Counsel for petittot ter , responcler t I t 's'9 and 1O is present' 2. Mr.lrilal - t.hu Raveendar' learned coun s':1 for the s : eks Permission of this Court to r*'it'rdraw the presenL V/:-i I)etition with a liberty to file comprch':nsive n'rit petition. I r: '-rad arldressed a letter dated 21 t)2 2(]25 to the Registrar l.I -r <licial) to the said effect and the sarrre was placed on recorrI

3. Crrrtrl'g libertY dismisse c r,; withdrawn' there shalL lre no order as to costs' as sought for, this \trrrit Petrtion ts In the circumstanc:s; < f the case' l\s a :;equel thereto' miscellaneous pt t ti('ns' il anY, pendrng r-l ne Writ Petition shall stand closed ENI- K. AMMAJI ASSISTAii REGISTRAR /,TRUE COPYII '- sEctroN oFFlcER I I To ffi#$'-i:,il1i*iil:s: "" iil f['.^{*$'#l*^m'*;i;at(s' LA(L u gl? f ;,' HIGH COUR T DATED:2510212025 ORDER WP.No.160't5 of 2023 l{r- 1t(o 2 i' I .l ', 2ti L tl '+ . ,1, i\'/,,\ \_ DISMISSINIi THE W.P AS WITHT)IIAWN WITHOUT COSTS. uL qo[o(P5