✦ High Court of India · 06 Jan 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 06 Jan 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
06 Jan 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,080 words

'1 . Panduranga Reddy, S/o Late Janga Reddy Age 60 years, Occ. Agriculture, r/o D.No. 2^84, Talakondapally village and Mandal, Rangareddy District. 2. Sridevi, w/o Panduranga Reddy Age. 54 years, Occ. Household and Agriculture, r/o D.No. 2-84, Talakondapally village and Mandal, Rangareddy District. ...PET',.NERS AND

1. The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Roads and Buildings, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Rangareddy District. 3. Executive Engineer, R and B., Shad Nagar, Rangareddy District. 4. The Divisional Engineer, R and B, Shad Nagar, Rangareddy District. 5. Asst.Engineer, R and 8., Shad Nagar, Rangareddy District. 6. Junior Engineer, R and B., Shad Nagar, Rangareddy District. 7. The Gram Panchayat, Talakondapally village, represented by its Executive

8. The Mandal Parishad Officer, Talakondapally Mandal, Talakondapally, Officer, Talakondapally village, Rangareddy District. Rangareddy District' ..RES'.NDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS Respondent Authorities in undertaking the work of widening of the road from Amgangal to Shad Nagar et, Kadthai to Kaiwakurthy through the private pa to lands of tile. of the petitioners i.e., Land bearing Sy.No.324l e l1l1h11 extent c..2-14 gts, Sy.No.325l @ 1111 extent Ac.7-14gts belonging to the 1"t petitioner and Sy.No.325/ eo /1 extent Ac.5-00gts, belonging to the petitioner situated in the limits of Talakondepally village and Mandal, Rangareddy District.. without issuing any notice and without acquiring the same by issuing a notification and paying compensation, as illegal, arbitrary, violation of 7 principles of natural justice and contrary to the specific provision contained under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparence in Land Acquisitron' Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and has the effect of violation of fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioners u/s 14, 21 and 300-4 of the constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 to 8 authorities not to undertake the work of widening of the road through the lands of the petitioners i.e., Land bearing sy.No.324lca/1 t1t1l1 exlenl Ac.2-14 gts, sy.No.325l@1111 extent Ac.7-14gts belonging to the .1"1 petitioner and Sy.No.325/4,/1/1 extent Ac.5-00gts. belonging to the 2nd petitioner situated in the limits of Talakondapally village and Mandal, Rangareddy District., without acquiring the same by issuing a notification and paying compensation as required under Right to Fair compensation and Transparence in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act' 2013 and pass lndia and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 to 8 authorities not to undertake the work of widening of the road through the lands of the petitioners i.e., Land bearing sy.No.324ler l1l1l1l1 extent Ac.2-14 gts, Sy.No.325l@ l1l1 extent Ac.7-14gts belonging to the 1"t petitioner and sy.No 325/@/1/1 extent Ac.5-00gts, belonging to the 2nd petitioner situated in the limits of Talakondapally village and Mandal, Rangareddy District., without acquiring the same by issuing a notification and paying compensation as required under Right to Fair compensation and Transparence in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 lA NO: 'f OF 2024 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 to 8 authorities not to undertake the work of widening of the road through the lands of the petitioners i.e., Land bearing sy.No.324l er t1t1t1t1 extent Ac.2-14 gts; sy,No.325lN111 extenl Ac.7-14gts belonging to the 't st petitioner and Sy.No.325l @ l1l extent Ac.S- 00gts, belonging to the 2nd petitioner situated in the limits of Talakondapally village & Mandal, Rangareddy District., without acquiring the same by issuing a notification and paying - compensation as required under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparence in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 20'13 lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Between:

1. The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Roads and Buildings, Secretariat, Hyderabad. ! !1ec1!iye Engineer, R and 8., Shad Nagar, Rangareddy District. 3. The Dvisional Engineer, R and B, Shad-Nagar, Rangarirddy District. 4 Asst. Engineer, R and B., Shad Nagar, Rangareddy District.- 5. Junior Engineer, R and 8., Shad Nagar, Rahgaredty District. .....PET|T|ONERS/RESPONDENTS AND '1. Panduranga Reddy, S/o Late Janga Reddy Age 60 years, Occ. Agriculture, o D.No. 2-84, Talakondapally village and Mandal, Rangareddy District. 2 Sridevi, Mo Panduranga Reddy Age. 54 years, Occ. Household and Agriculture, rlo D.No. 2-84,' Talakondafally village and Mandal, Rangareddy District. ...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS

3. The District Collector, Rangareddy District 4. The Gram Panchayat, Talakondapally village, represented by its Executive 5. The Mandal Parishad Officer, Talakondapally Mandal, Talakondapally, Officer, Talakondapally village, Rangareddy District. Rangareddy District ...RE''.NDENTS/RES'.NDENT' Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order Dated: 13-06-2024 passed in W.P.No. l4943 of 2024 and dismiss the Writ Petition, in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. K. VENKATESH GUPTA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1,3,4,5&6: GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS Counset for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 7&8: SRI P.KISHORE RAO, SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEM,APAI{A UIRIT PETITION No.14943 of 202.l ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted a letter to the Registrar (Judiciall on O2.OI.2025 seeking to list the writ petition under the caption "for withdrawal". Hence, it is Listed today.

2. Petitioners are permitted to withdraw the writ petition.

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order granted on 13.06.2O2+ shall stand vacated. No costs. To, //TRUE COPY// SD/. K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR N OFFICER Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

1. One CC to SRI K. VENKATESH GUPTA, Advocate IOPUCI 2. Two CCs to GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS ,High CoJrt for the State of 3. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE High Court for the State of Telangana, at 4. One CC to SRl. P. KISHORE RAO, SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies Hyderabad [OUT] BM PSK s t HIGH COURT DATED:0610112025 ORDER WP.No.14943 o12024 ( o \ Hf- S14 rC: 1 0 5 Ftrl 2825 o * llt -spntCHgO I DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS ,,''rco0tB L) ,{ 5

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments