Sri Mohd. Ismail v. The Station House Officer, Kanchanbagh P.S., Hyderabad
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 08 Sep 2004
- Bench
- G ROHINI
Outcome
Disposed of
the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent not to interfere with
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Cause title
Sri Mohd. Ismail S/o. Fathe Mohammed R/o. 18.12.419/C/1996, Hafeez Baba Nagar, Hyderabad. AND The Station House Officer, Kanchanbagh P.S., Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER
RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to Issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondent in threatening to close down the plastic unit i.e., M/s. Shaik Salam Omer Plastic Works, situated at H.No. 18-12-419/C/1996, Hafeez Baba Nagar Hyderabad without thee being any sufficient Cause as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and without jurisdiction. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.M.LAYEEQ KHAN Counsel for the Respondent : GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI
WRIT PETITION NO.14924 OF 2004
ORAL ORDER :
Operative part
This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action of the respondent in threatening to close down the plastic unit i.e., M/s. Shaik Salam Omer Plastic Works, situated at H.No.18-12-419/C/1996, Hasfeez Baba Nagar, Hyderabad as arbitrary and illegal. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Home who under instructions states that no crime is pending against the petitioner as on today in connection with any offence and that the respondent is not interfering with the lawful business activities of the petitioner in any manner. The statement of the learned Government Pleader for Home is placed on record and the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent not to interfere with the lawful business activities of the petitioner without following due process of law. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. Note:- Issue CC by tomorrw. (B/O) Gbs ___________________ 25th August, 2004. To
The Station House Officer, Kanchanbagh P.S., Hyderabad.
Two CCs to G.P. for Home, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. (OUT).
3.2CD copies THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO.14924 OF 2004 25th August, 2004.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent not to interfere with
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 08 Sep 2004. The bench was G ROHINI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.