High Court · 2025

Petition under Artrcle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.3 to 5 in non-considering the representation of the petitioner dated 03.03.3025 and non-initiating to delete the plot of the petitioner from the prohibited property admeasuring 1372.50 Sq. yards in Sy:No.391 which is situated at Near NIRD Cross Road, Budwel Viliage, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District is highly illegal, arbitrary, u nconstitutiona I in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and also in violation of Articles 14,21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondent No.3 to 5 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 03.03.3025 and to delete the plot of the petitioner from the prohibited property admeasuring 1372.5O Sq. yards in Sy.No 391 which is situated at Near NIRD Cross Road, Budwel Village, Ralendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District I IA NO: 'f OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 to 5 to consider the representa|on of the petitioner dated 03.03.3025 and to delete the plot of the petitioner from the prohibited property admeasuring 1372.50 Sq. yards in sy.No.391 which is situated at Near NIRD cross Road, Budwel Virrage, Rajendranagar rVlandar, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondents: AGp FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PE{ITION No.14724 of 2o25 ORDER: This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief "....to issue on order or direction more particularlg one in the nature of Wnt of Mandamus declaing the action of the respondent Nos.3 ,o 5 in non-considering the representation of the petitioner dated 03.03.2025 and non-initiating to delete the plot of the petitioner from the prohibited property admeasuring 1372.50 Sq.gards in Sy.No.391 which is situated at Near NIRD Cross Road, Buduel Village, Rajendronagar Manda[ Ranga Reddy Distict is htghlg iLlegal, arbitrary, uncqnstitutional in uiolation of Pinciples of Natural Justice and also in uiolation of Articles 14, 21 and 3OOA of the Constitution of India and consequentlg direct the respondent Nos.3 to 5 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated O3.O3.2O25 and to delete the plot of the petitioner from the prohibited propertA admeasuring 1372.50 Sq.gards in Sg.No.391 uthich is situated at Near NIRD Cross Road, Budutel Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and pass....."

2. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and with their consent, this writ petition is being disposed of at the admission stage.

3. It is stated that the petitioner has purchased the land admeasuring 1372.50 Sq.yards in Sy.No.391 situated at NIR Cross Road, Budwel Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District in an auction conducted by the Canara Balk, Ashok Nagar Branch under the provisiqtls of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of I \ \, \ 2 Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securil5r Int(,rest Act, 2OO2. The bank authorities had executed the registered szLle deed bearing document No.11979 of 2027 and handed over tlre same to the petitioner and as such, the petitioner is in enjoymerrt of the subject land. It is further stated that the petitioner approached GHMC authorities and submitted an application and reqrrested them to grant permission for construction of the house, the same was pending for sanction. It is further stated that the petitioner has approached HDFC Bank, Somajidguda for bank loan to an amount of Rs.B,0O,OOO l- for construction, the banker ot>tained all the documents of sale certihcate, link documents and the same was referred to the bank legal officer. The bank legal officer upon verification, has identihed that the subject land was kept in the list of prohibited properties. Upon knowing the said facr, the petitioner has made an online application, dated O3.03.2O25 to respondent Nos.3 to 5 to recti$r and remove the said land from the list of prohibited pioperties, but so far the respondent authorities have not acted upon the said application. Hence, tht: present writ petition.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Reve.nue appearing for the respondents has not disputed that the petitioner has 3 purchased the propert5r in an auction conducted by Canara Bank, Ashok Nagar Branch.

5. Sub-section (4) of Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 19O8 confers the power on the State Government either suo motu or on an application by any person or for giving effect to the hnal orders of the High Court of Telangana or Supreme Court of India to proceed to de-notify, either in full or in part, the notification issued I I under sub-section (2) and rules made under the provisions of the Act. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for 6. the respective parties, the petitioner is permitted to make an appropriate application as per the provisions of Sub-section (4) of Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 19O8 seeking for deletion of the subject property from the prohibited list, In the event of filing such a-rr application, and if the property purchased by the petitioner is complied by the provisions of Sub-section (4) of Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908, the respondents are directed to consider thesameandpassareasonedorderstrictlyinaccordancewithlaw andcommunicateacopyofthesaidordertothepetitionerwithina period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4 7 With the above observations, this Writ petition is disposed of No costs I As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/-MOHD. ISMAIL PUTY REGISTRAR .SECTION OFFICER \ The Principal Secretary. Revenue Department, Secretar at Building, Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana. The Chief Commissioner, CCLA, Telangana, Hyderabad. The District Collector. Ranga Reddy District. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendranagar Division Ranga Reddy District The Tahsildar, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy Dir;trict One CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad IOUT] Two CD Copies To 1 2 3 4 5 Et 7 B PSK. BS HIGH COURT DATE D :0 910612025 I ORDER WP.No.14724 ot 2025 o o c{. t hE S14 /lc 2l Jt]ll 296 tt 5.9n176, ,=' a\ f- DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ell6lrt