✦ High Court of India · 23 Jul 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 23 Jul 2025

"'RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF l.A. NO: 1 OF 2008 (ASMP. N O:1193 oF 2008) Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay f,.th", proc"ed.ings including delivery of possession in pursuant to the of 'll Juagment and Decree oiteo s-+-zooa passed in o.S- No. 1372 ot 2004 on the file of tfie ttt Additional Senior Civit Judge, (Fast Track Court), Ranga Reddy District' pending disposal of the aPPeal. I .A. NO:2 oF 2013(A SMP. NO: 2848 OF 2013 Between: Sri P.A. Shanker Reldy,]S/9 Late p. Agi Reddy, Age:54 years, Occ: Business R/o. plot No. 41, Om Sai Colony, ntwat S-ecunalranaa. AND ...petitioner/Respondent No.3

1. Sri P.Purusno,"rn.Trg,^tlo. Late Jagga Rao, Age:50 years, Occ: Business 2. Sri p. Ganeshwar Rao, S/o.. Late Jrgg;ilr;l Age:52 years, Occ: Reoistered R/o H. No..t 2_ j _1 I C I 1,2,3, Seetharamb-igfr, UiaeraUaA Med ica I practitione r R/o H. N o. 1 2_.1 - i m,i,i', S;i;;;;; r:,;J :;$"j; 3 sri G V S Jasannadham,.i/: L:p -;#"#lH"FJio,[:l:,,Bl,X?.r, Bank Emptoyee R/o. H.No.1_7_383, errgltin;grr, h;;;;;""CortnV, Hanumakonda, Waran_gat District. .].p"titiJr"rn""p."J""iil".r 4. Sri Umapathi Reddy,.S/o.not known, Age:54 years, Occ: Business R/o. plot in S.No.9/1/A, Wardfr,lo. ll, Block No S]Laksnminagar Colony, Saroornagar Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. (4th Respondent is not necesserv rr."+r, +^ *u,^ ^-,..':'ReipondenURespondent recessary party to this petition In view of no'.eiiet i" asked against him) Petition under section r51.cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the- affidavit fired .in support of the p"iitioii, inl'iigh courr may be preased to vacate the interim order _dated i2.10. ZOIZ- in ASMp.No.62.l of 2009 in ASMp.No.1193 0f 2008 in AS.No.535 0rzooa o1 the fire of this Hon,bre court Counsel for the Appellants: Sri G. Sri Lakshmi Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: Sri G. Raj Kumar Counsel for the Respondent No.3: Sri J. Suresh Babu Counsel for the Respondent No.2: None Appeared The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K' SUJANA APPEAL SUIT N0.535 of 2008 ORDER: karned counsel for the appellants filed a memo stating that parties have entered'into Memorandum of tJnderstanding with specific terms and the same is enclosed herewith and sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Appeal Suit'

2. Permission, as prayed for' is accorded' 3. Accordingly, this Appeal Suit is dismissed as withdrawn' There shall be no order as t-o costs' As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions' if any' pending in the Appeal Suit shall stand closed' "'i5'[i[IEitFXtH l //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER 'o',t The lll Additional Senior Civil Judge (Fast Track Court) Ranga Reddy District r l[ l* il]s[frtm*mi""',:','; 4 One CC to Sri J Sur 5. Two CD CoPies (Along with a Copy of Memorandum of Understanding) Karn/PSL HIGH COURT DATED:23 t}il2}2s ORDER AS.No.53S of 2008 't R H s E Te f. 0 1 ALt6 2025 * PAT .t T_HE APPEAL SUIT IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN 8 := EI c I 0 I 1 o -l i\ 1 oo 1 1o1 o o o1oo 1 ooo o 10 1 -t o o1 Oo 10 10 1 t 10 1 o 1. - @e>oto" ea ed.rmr TELANGANA t L,n r.orrorortrrrr.,, Dalc t4 MAY 2025,0,:27 PIU PrEhlJed BY: c-*.s. recaxNeomv sri ltte ne-ue.neo R-/o HYDERABAD ril wto' .iSELF.. BK 728386 !c F-J'1-{6-\s- K RAJNIXANIII LICENSED SIAMPVENDOR Lic. No- 16-01{582012 RerNo- lfil{]Iz(D{ I82. I E,YA MAIAKPEI TTYDERABAI) Ph 9866871124 ME!ilO RANDUII OF IIM)ERSTANDING I'This deed. of memorandum of understanding is executed. on ttris the'$l^ day I of May, 2025 at Hyderabad, by a'1d between: ,.Srl G.V.E.Jalaanadharu S/o late Rama Rao, aged about 69 years' Retked' ! n7. ri", Cozit y*.t"t Residency, Brindavan Colony, Kokapet' { HereinaJter. called the party of the First part, which expressior shall mean .. and include hislher/tieir heirs, legal representatives] executors' i ".r"".r"or", AT{I' assigno and administrators' IPARTY OF THE FIRST PART) t I g E h :i e

1. Smt P.Prameela W/o'Late P.Satyanarayana Murthy, Aged abqut 73 yrs, Occ: Retd' Service, R/o 12-5-74, Murthy Sadan, Vijaypuri Colony' Tarnaka, Secunderabad.

2.SrlP.PuflrshotaaRaoS/olateJaggaRao,Agedabout6Tyears,Occ: Retd. Service, R/o [I.No. 12- L- I I C I L,2,3, Seetarambagh, Hyderabad' - C.frntd....2 .-.?(G r 7 S x-P ? P,* .', 'I )

3. Sri p.Ganeswara neta.servicelil;i j#?:;,';,ffi Ra ,i:l;L-jijil;i,r,:i;I?"::",

4. :ri I:Sri Rama Murthy, S/o.Late Jagga Rao. Retd.'seryice , R/o nai'zo;; T,:'J:F: Tjo, lg.o about 75 3rrs, occ: _ zsrrwiiitdz:'ili'ff #11,1,::,ifdHtrl"fXfl *";",iil;;:."_ o1..1{:'1ii'"ee Ruo,

5. Sri p.Krtshaa Adlses Retd. service, or" vanasrharipur"-,,rro.?"Tr*iil;ff 'ffi;'if;1;3:":3T;":I:

6. Sri p..Ianardh"n yrs, Occ: Retd. Kanva,,,^""**i:il:;;li:";?.:l:;fr7:/1tr;tr#ffi i'"Ji;: Satya Sal Baba, S/o.Lat second Pa "a,n"-"..1"1'.ais Hereinafter called the parri,.c ^r +L^ d mean and include xx;$::ffi "yJ:{*LT#r.LT#td3:rqff.rffi"f; "","?1",:.o{'the WHEREAS the Firsr p the nePhew of 2 t Murthy ..*"i**,.",,.;f, f ff .lilT",trT*i1+"JfrH,f ,i:.#T?,,T: The lirst part was n,..,,----"..1':"'"'-:'z up bv tus n p.Ratnamanikyu- *n"o::1*t grandmother I'ate ,nt'r't-i oi? ,l"ut"*al mother of the parry "t the second part' The "f i*'^"-9: lornuv purchased so4 3:.1:t part Gellianir;; r,..r,i".i_"i"il;; j_1i*eyards",,",i'#i11iiXi;l#Hf.yff managed the prc original "J.i..r"l,,arflryT ownerafter,n.o**lil,l'#l*f to 6 of the second part. o flT];3;lt: "i#,:':i"'H#["ff 1:j*-"..*." a dispure raised by 2 and 3 par.. sffi ,':i*i#;:: :ffi f :l:l.Ti o r *o ffi Tii:[r*if#i#i for declaration of I that the "o""-".",'"i "'.t,t*"l with dereriiaii""'i'J,o*^" said to have been en possession or *," s"ilJ*; ;.n;: ilt""f. "J,fl1ht'#.#".1;f#T; 7J Cr, Rq a Contd.....3 (f"B&& Fe-.*n_ 3 the matter was conteste d by 2'and 3 parties of the second part and they slaimed right over the property. The said suit was decreed in favour of the First Party of the first part and a decree and judgment was passed therein. Having aggrieved with the judgment the 2nd and 3d parties of the Second Part have preferred AS. No' 535 of 2.o0a on the file of the Hon'ble High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad. During the pendency of the appeal the parties had talks with each other at the instance of Well-wishers and in consequenc'e of the same the present MOU is being executed. NOW THIS DEED OF MIMORAI{DI'M OF UNDERSTANDII{G WITNESSEf,H AS FOLLOWS:

1. Both parties herein agree that the party of the lirst part shall execute a Registered Gift Deed or any other similar docurrrent by conveying the 50% of the Schedule Property to 1 to 6 padies of tlle second part.

2. I to 6 parties of the second part hereby agree and accept the tifle of the party of the first part over the schedule property and *rey shall undertake that they vrill not interfere with the title and peacefi'rl possession of the schedule property of the first part.

3. The party of the first part hereby undertakes that he will execute a gift deed or arry other conveyErnce in favour of parties 1 to 6 of the second part as early as possible aJter dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn. '4. That in the event of fajlure of registration by the first party, 1 to 6 of the second part are entitled to approach the court for securing a registered document in their favour.

5. Both parties hereby agree to cooperate with each other for fixing the boundaries, for construction of the compound wa1l, etc.

6. Tlne 2 and 3 of the second part hereby undertake to withdraw AS. No. 535 of 2OO8 on the file of Hon'ble High Court for the State of Telangana by Iiling a rvithdrawal memo. .9 a R Contd. ...4 \ \ t. e***L I I 'l : . i ,i :: 4 :: Z. Both parties ag1s. possessio' "r; #;:T:# each other in order take vacant g. The incidental expenses shall be borne by par -'" "J parties of the second part 9' Both parties agree to ah;)^ , ff;:H:.T:, :H J;r }#,Iffi :T [:I,jT:.]: Both parties agreed to ,lou, *o u,fr;;."':I tf rhe above tern Hyderabad. *"'r sienatures on ,;r"''o;_":'.::,T,, rn rerter and aay of May, 2o2s at All that part qrl6 parcel 6f agrrcul tural .land adme srve of wire fencin ornagar yards equival ent b 42 r. rf4 Se. mtrs iq.1, Survey No situated at Saro Saroornagar, ad, East urbaa vacaat Iarrd in Laxmi Nagar colo Grad Muru.cipuli ty, na]r8a Reddy f;5pi" e/ 1/A, Hyderab Hydera bad Distuct ny of Saroo t) arrd bounded rnagar, by: qsuring S04 sq. I and kadryas in under Gram Panchayat residenda] (Presently Special Selectjon ep tty belon Setty Rarnulu n Rao By Mad By North '/ av, P r'po X 8rn N boUr to Drt Contd....5 P- e^'-:1- 5 And covered by Registered sale deed No' 4123 of 197 6 in the office of the Sub Regrstrar, HYderabad East' Tlitness I 2 ts\"'-,P to-.,*rUf^,, af 3 ? }tr',,"-11" 5.{L (f-DUouwr S7sftu) I P.0.-:L

2. R"R\1_-. a.R 3 4 5 6 K V- Parties of the Second Part bL.-

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments