M/s Sai Sri Projects Pvt. Limited v. N. Andalamma
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 30 Nov 2011
- Bench
- GHULAM MOHAMMED
Outcome
Disposed of
Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. 39 rr. 1, 2
Judgment
Cause title
M/s Sai Sri Projects Pvt. Limited, represented by its Managing Director AND ..... PETITIONER
N. Andalamma W/o N. Narasimha .....RESPONDENT
ORAL ORDER:
Operative part
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed complaining non-passing of orders in I.A.No. 2403 of 2011 in O.S.No. 600 of 2011 on the file of II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad. Petitioner herein is the plaintiff in O.S No. 600 of 2011 and he filed I.A.No. 2403 of 2011 in the said suit, under Order 39, Rule 1 and 2 of CPC, seeking temporary injunction restraining the respondent and her associates from entering the petition schedule property. It is stated that the Court below is not disposing the I.A and the same is still pending consideration before it. As the main grievance of the petitioner is that the court below is not disposing of the I.A, without going into the merits or otherwise of the matter, the Court below is directed to dispose of I.A viz. I.A.No. 2403 of 2011, within a period of four weeks from today. Till such time, there shall be ad-interim injunction as prayed for. With the above observation, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J DATE: 30.11.2011 KA // TRUE COPY // ... REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To
2 CD copies.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. 39 rr. 1, 2.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 30 Nov 2011. The bench was GHULAM MOHAMMED.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.