High Court · 2025

Petition under Artrcle 226 ol lhe constitution of Jndia praying that in the circumstgnces stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to rssue a Writ of [Vlandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Writs' Order or Direction' declaring ttre action of Respondents, more particularly the fourth responlent,inseekingtodeprivethepetitionerofhervaluableptopertyrightsin respectofthelandadmeasuringAc.4.00inSyNo.E3llsl2situatedatKanikki Village, Kourala Mandal, Komaram Bheem (Asifabad) District, aS otherwise than in dueprocessoflaw,asillegal,arbitrary,withoutjurisdictionandContrarytothe provisions of A.P. Scheduled Areas (Land Transfer) Regulations and to forbear the fourth respondenf from interfering with the possession of petitioner over the above land, Award costs. lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in the circqmstanPes stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to issue interim directions to the fourth respondent not to interfere with the possession of petitioner over the'land admeasuring Ac.4.00 in sy No. B3l1Bl2 situated at Kanikki Village, Koutala Mandat, Komaram Bheem (Asifabad) District, pending disposal ofrop Counsel foi the PEtitiONET: SRI K.RAGHUVEER REDDY Counsel fdr the Respondents: AGP FOR REVENUE w.P .NO: 13017 OF 2018 Between: Ramatenki Lakshmi Bai, W/o Buddaji Village,Koutala Mandal, Komaram Bheem aged 65 years B/o Kanikki (Asifabad) District (PreviouslY AND ...PETITIONER Adilabad Dist.) Department at Secretariat, Hyderabad

1. Stale of Te.langana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue 2. Th; District Collector, Komarbm Bheem (Asifabad) District (previously 3. The Revenue bivisional Officer, Kagaznagar Komaram Bheem (Asifabad) 4. The Tah'sildar, Koutala l/andal, Komaram Bheem (Asifabad) District District (previously Adilabad District) (previously Adilabad District) ...RES'ONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a wr'it of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or writs, order or Direction, declaring the action of Respondents, more particularly the fourth respondent, in seeking to deprive the petitioner of her valuable property rights in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.4.00 in Sy No. 83/18/'1 situated at Kanikki village, Koutala Mandal, Komaram Bheem (Asifabad) District, as otherwise than in due process of law, as iltegal, arbitiary, without jurisdiciion and contrary to the provisions of A.P. Scheduled Areas (Land Transfer) Regulations and to.,forbear the fourth respondent from interfering with the possession of petitioner over the above land Award costs. lA NO: 1 oF 2018 petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed il suppo( of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to lnterim directions to the fourth respondent not to interfere with the possession of petitioneroverthelandadmeasuringAc.4.00inSyNo.B3/18/lsituatedatKanikki Village,.KoutalaMandal,KomaramBheem(Asifabad)District'pendingdisposalof W P No. of.2018. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.RAGHUVEER REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER .i -:r THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION Nos.13O15 and 13017 of2018 COMMON ORDER: The subject issue involved in both the Writ Petitions is one and the same. Therefore, both the writ petitions are taken up for hearing and being disposed of by r,t'ay of this l I common order.

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in both writ petitions, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents ald perused the material on record 3, Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that these petitions are hled by the petitioners qucstioning the action of thd respondent No.4 in interfering with the possession of the petitioner in W.P.No.13O15 of 2017, in respect of her land admeasuring to arr extent of Ac.4-00 in Sy.No.B3/ 1Bl 1 and the petitioner in W.P.No. 13017 of 2Ol7 , \ --' 2 1n respect of her land admeasuring to an extent of Ac.4_00 in Sy.No.83/18/I situated at Kanikki Village, Koutala Manda-I, Komaram Bheem Asifabad District, without following due process of law.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioners further submits that while admitting, this Court granted common interim order on 01.05.2018 directing the respondent No.4_ Tahsildar not to interfere with possession of the petitioners from their subject properties without following due process of law. In spite of lapse of more than 6 years, the respondents did not choose to hle counters or vacate petitions in these matters for denying the averments made in the writ afhdavits and requested to direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners, without following due process of law.

5. In view of the above circumstances, these writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondents not to \ \ interfere with the possession of the petitioners iiom their subject properties without following due process of raw. There shall be no order as to costs. 6 Miscellaleous petitions, if any, pending shall staad closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. A. S RINIVASA REDDY ANT REGISTRAR q\ ECTION OFFICER at, Hyderabad, State of Principal Secrelary, Revenue Department at Secre Telangana The District Collector, Komaram Bheem (Asifabad) District (previously Adilabad Dist.) The Revenue, Divisional Offic_er, Kagaznagar Komaram Bheem (Asifabad ) District (previously Adilabad District) The Tahsildar, Koutala Mandal, Koriaram Bheem (Asifabad) District (previously Adilabad District) One CC to SRI K.RAGHUVEER REDDY, Advocate tOpUCl Two CCs to cP FOR RFVENUE, High Court for the'State of Tetangana, at Hyderabad. [bUT] Two CD Copies Y4- To 1 2 3 4 El 7 PSK, CJP HIGH COURT DATED:1310212025 ) COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.13015 AND 13012 of 2O1B 6t1 SIA i tq '( 1 ! q J o o 2 $ l'\[\ mffi , Dsgp6r Crt pO * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITIONS WITHOUT COSTS \o caFq'b W