The High Court · 2025

...Respondents/Respondents/Respondents/Plaintiff Nos. 1 & 2 I

3. Baddam Nageswar Reddy, S/o Raja Reddy, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Agriculture And Business, Rl/o Joginipelli Village,Korutla Mandal, Presently residing at O.No.A/24, Behind Power Sub-Station, SRSP Camp, Dharoor, Jagtial Mandal. (Died on 09.06.2013)

4. Bale Radha @ Parijatham, w/o. B. Sathyanarayana, Age. 42 years, Occ. Household, Rl/o H.No. 1-5-2o3l3lA, Ganesh Nagar, Jagtial Town, Karimnagar District. (Died

5. Bale Sathyanarayana, s/o. late Parandamulu, Age.50 years, Occ. Business, Ri/o H.No. 1-5-203131A, Ganesh Nagar, Jagtial Town, Karimnagar District. 6. Baddam Prameel, w/o. Late Nageshwar Reddy, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Household, Ri/o Joginipelli Village, Korutla Mandal, Karimnagar District

7. Baddam Goutham Reddy, s/o. Late Nageshwar Reddy, Aged about 21 years, Occ. Student, Rl/o Joginipelli Village, Korutla Mandal, Karimnagar District. B. Baddam Likitha, D/o. Late Nageshwar Reddy, Aged about 20 years, Occ. Student, Rl/o Joginipelli Village, Korutla Mandal, Karimnagar District

9. Baddam Laxmi, w/o. Ra.ia Reddy, Aged about 60 years, Occ Household, Fl/o Joginipelli Village, Korutla Mandal, Karimnagar District

10. Sooraj Swathi Patel, w/o. Bharath Patel, Aged about 44 years, Occ Household, Rl/o. H.No.1-5-203131A, Ganesh Nagar, Jagital Town and Jagtial District '1 l.Vanamala Swetha, w/o. Ramesh, Aged about 34 years, Occ. Household, Fl/o. H.No.1-5-203/3/4, Ganesh Nagar, Jagital Town and Jagtial District.

12. CHiliveri Neelima, w/o. Suman Rathod, Aged about 32 years, Occ. Household, Rl/o. H.No.1-5-2031314, Ganesh Nagar, Jagital Town and Jagtial District ..Respondents/Respondents/Respondents/Defendant No. 3 to 1 2 lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of judgment and decree dated 29-08-2024 passed in O.S. No. 81 of 20'10 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Jagtial, pending disposal of the CRP. lA NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: Neelagiri Sathyanarayana Rao, s/o. Venkat Ramana Rao, Aged about 69 years, occ. Retired Superintending Engineer, Rl/o. H.No. 1-5-175, Govindulapally Road, Jagtial town, Jagtial District. ...Petitioner/Respondent No. 2 AND '1 . Joginipelli Rama Devi, W/o. Ravinder Rao, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No. 2-6-125, Puranipet Locality, Jagtial Town and District. 2 Joginipelli Ravinder Rao, S/o. Raghavender Rao, Aged about 50 years, Occ. Proprietor-cum- Correspondent of Slddarth School, Rl/o H.No. 2-6-125, Puranipet Locality, Jagtial Town and District ...Petitioners/Petitioners I 3 4 Madadi Rajender Rao, s/o. Venkat Rao, Aged about 35 years, occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. H.No. 1-5-2812, Aravinda Nagar, Jagtial town, Jagtial District. Baddam Na.geswar Reddy, S/o Raja Reddy, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Agriculture And Business, Ft/o Joginipelli Viilage,Korufla Mandai, presen v residing _at Q No.fu24, Behind Power Sub-Station, SRSp Camp, Dharooi Jagtial Mandal. (Died on 09.06.2013)

5. Bale Radha Parijatham, w/o. B. Sathyanarayana, Age. 42 years, Occ. Household, Ri/o H.No. 1-5-203131A, Ganesh Nagar, Jagtial Town, Karimnagar District. (Died

6. Bale Sathyanarayana, s/o. late Parandamulu, Age. 50 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No. 1-5-2031314, Ganesh Nagar, Jagtial Town, Karimnagar District. 7. Baddam Prameel, w/o. Late Nageshwar Reddy, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Household, Rl/o Joginipelli Village, Korutla Mandal, Karimnagar District B. Baddam Goutham Reddy, s/o. Late Nageshwar Reddy, Aged about 21 years, Occ. Student, Rl/o Joginipelli Village, Korutla Mandal, Karimnagar District. 9. Baddam Likitha, D/o. Late Nageshwar Reddy, Aged about 20 years, Occ. Student, Fl/o Joginipelli Village, Korutla Mandal, Karimnagar District '10.Baddam Laxmi, w/o. Raja Reddy, Aged about 60 years, Occ Household, Ri/o Joginipelli Village, Korutla Mandal, Karimnagar District

11.Sooraj Swathi Patel, w/o. Bharath Patel, Aged about 44 years, Occ Household, Rl/o. H.No.1-5-203131A, Ganesh Nagar, Jagital Town and Jagtial District

12.Vanamala Swetha, w/o. Ramesh, Aged about 34 years, Occ. Household, Rl/o. H.No.1-5-203/3/4, Ganesh Nagar, Jagital Town and Jagtial District. '13. CHiliveri Neelima, w/o. Suman Rathod, Aged about 32 years, Occ. Household, Rl/o. H.No.1-5-203131A, Ganesh Nagar, Jagital Town and Jagtial District . Respondents/Respondents Petition under Section 't 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou( may be pleased to vacate the stay in l.A.No. 2 of 2025 in C.R.P. No. 1662 of 2O25 DT 03.9.2025. Counsel for the Petitioners : Sri. Madas Bharath Chandra Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 : Sri G.V. Subramanaym and Sri G. madhav Rao Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5 and 11: Sri Annnampelli Gangadhar The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA CML REVISION PETITION No.1662 of 2O2S ORDER: Ileard Sri Ir4adas Bharath Chandra, learned counsel for thc revision petitioners and Sri G.V Subramanyam and Sri G. Madhav Rao, learned counsel for respondent Nos.l and 2 as vvell as Sri Annnampelli Gangadhar, learned counsel for respondent Nos.5 and 1 1. Perused the record. 2 The present Civil Revision Petition is frled against the impugned order dated 26.11 .2024 passed in LA. No. 248 of 2021 in A.S. No. 50 of 2024 by the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Jagtial (for short, 'the First Appellate Court').

3. The suit uiz., O.S. No. 81 of 2O1O is filed before the learned Senior Civil Judge, Jagtial (for short, 'the trial Court') for declaration of ownership and grant of perpetual injunction by the respondent Nos.l and 2/plaintiff Nos. 1 and 2 has been decreed on 29.O8.2O24. Aggrieved by the same, A.S. No. 5O of 2024 l:,as been prefcrred before tJle First Appellate Court. In the said appeal suit, the impugned I.A. No. 248 of 2024 \s t -.=5 --\ RY,.I cRP 1662 2025 2 Itled for staying the operation of the judgment and decree dated 29.08.2024 passed by the trial Court in O.S. No. 81 of

2010. The said impugned I.A. No. 248 of 2024 was dismissed as respondent Nos.1 and 2 / plaintiff Nos. I and 2 have no intention of frling any Execution Petition seeking any kind of relief as they are already in possession of the suit schedule property. Aggrieved by the said dismissal order, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed.

4. During the arguments, it is elicited that the only apprehension of the revision petitioners is that tl:.e uide judgment and decree dated 29.08.2024 certatn sale deeds have been declared as null and void and therefore, respondent Nos.l and 2 ni.ay take advantage of the same and alienate the suit schedule property the pendency of .during the appeal suit. In this regard, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 has represented that respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have no intention of alienating the suit schedule property as there is an intention to construct a nursing home in the suit schedule property.

5. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 is ready to give an undertaking to said effect that the suit schedule I ------7 RY,J cRP 1662 2025 3 property will not be alienated during the pendency of the appeal. When the apprehension of the revision petitioner is taken care, there is no other issue to be adjudicated in the Civil Revision Petition.

6. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of in view of the undertaking given by the learned counsel for respondent Nos.l and 2 to the effect that respondent Nos.l and 2 have no intention to alienate the suit schedule property during the pendency ol the appeal suit. There shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this petition, shall stand ciosed. ,TRUE COPY/i Sd/. N. SRIHARI DEPUTY REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER \ To,

1. The I Additional District and Sessions,Judge at Jagtial. 2. One CC to Sri. Madas Bharath Chandra, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri G.V. Subramanaym and Sri G. Madhav Rao, Advocate loPUCl

4. one CC to Sri Annnampelli Gangadhar, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies DLiKAM 4e I v11{ \tE S TA C) ? { JAN 2[?l t J HIGH COURT DATED:2610912025 ORDER CRP.No.1662 ol 2025t CRP IS DISPOSED OF 1 6 \,