✦ High Court of India · 25 Oct 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 25 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
25 Oct 2025
Length
1,044 words

4. Kona.Bheemla, S/o. Eerya, Aged Major, Occu. previous Owner of Crime Vehicle, R/o. Jally Mllage, Chennaraopet Mandal, Warangal Rural District. 5. Kona Srinivas, S/o. Bheemal, Aged Mahr, Occu. previous Owner of Crime Vehicle, RIo. Jally Mllage, Chennaraop6t Mandal, Warangal Rurat District. . . . Respondents/petitionet1s ...Respondents/Respondent Nos.2 & 3 Counsel for the Appellants :SRl Y ASHOK RA, Counsel for the Respondent Nos.l to 3: SRI RAPOLU B,r- ASKAR Counsel for the Respondent No.4 & 5 : ___ The Court delivered the following: Judgment TH[, HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR M.A.C.M.A. No.763 ot2024 .IUDGMENT: l-eamed counsel appearing for the appellants reporled that ihe matter has been referred to the Lok Adalat constituted by the I{igh C'our1 t-egal Services Committee, Hyderabad, lor settlement' and alicr due deliberations, the Lok Adalat passed an arvard on i1.09.1025 as per the terms agreed upon by the palties' l. in vicrv of the atbresaid submission, this Appeal is dis;'t'rscti ol- in tenrs ol the arvard dated 13.09.2025 passed by ttrc High Coufi Lcqal Services Committee. No costs.

3. .\s a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending ii' anv shaii ,ctait(!\ ei0Scd SD/- M JAWAHAR REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY'/ To, I l.TheChairman,MotorAocidentClaimsTribunal+um-PrincipalDistrictJudge' Warangal. z. on. cd to SRI Y ASHOK RAJ, Advocate{oPUCl -.. a. o;; cc to snr RAPoLU BHASKAR, AdvocateIoPUC] 4. Two CD CoPies AOK +L (Along with a copy of Lok Adalat Award) L HIGH COURT DATED:2511012025 JUDGMENT MACMA.No.763 ot 2024 1i,i srA o() ?t i.l 21126 z * PF SF/ r * o DISPOSING OF THE MAMCA IN TERM! i OF THE AWARD PASSED BY THE LOK ADALII t WITHOUT COSTS b \a/ 6Ir BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMAAITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD. lunder seclion l9 of the tegol SeMces Authodlies Acl, l?87 (Qentrol Act)l I Date:13-O9-2025 Present: I .Hon'ble Justice Sri G.V.Seethapathy, (Former Judge of ;twhlb An6ra Prade$ High cou.t) Chalrmrn 2.Sri K.Vasanth Rao, Advocate, llember M.A.C.M.A.No. 7 63 of 2024 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) gERVIC€g eJ o LOK$s H\GB I * lhe Slate d. AGAINST M.V.O.P.No.8 56 of 2O17 (On the fite of the Chairman, l'lotor Vehictes Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum- Principa[ Oistrict Judge, Warangat) BETWEEN: 1 . Budigonda Kumaraswamy @ Kitty, S/o. Chandraiah, Aged 36 years, Occ: driver of Crime Vehicte, R/o.H.No.3-11, Gimibavi, H/o. Thogarrai Vittage, Duggondi lvlandal, Warangal Rural District.

2. Kunde Mallaiah, S/o. Sammaiah, Aged: 47 years, Occ: Present Owner of Crime Vehicle & Agricutture, R/o. Chennaraopet vitlage & Mandal, Warangat Rural District. ...Appellants/Respondent Nos.1 & 4 AND

1. Patnati Rama Devi, w/o. Late Sudhakar, Aged 47 years, Occ: Housewife,

2. Patnati Hindhu Priya, D/o. Late Sudhakar, Aged 24 years, Occ: Student,

3. Patnati Abhitasha, D/o. Late Sudhakar, Aged 21 years, Occ: Student, A[[ are residents of Thogarrai Viltage, Duggondi [{andat, WarangaI Rurat District. ....Respondents/Petitioners Occ: Previous Owner of Crime Vehicle, R/o. Jatty Vittage, Chennaraopet Mandat, Warangal Rural District.

5. Korra srinivas, S/o. Bhgeemat, Aged tvlajor, Occ: Previous Owner of Crime Vehicle, R/o. Jatty Vittage, Chennaraopet Mandat, Warangal Rura[ District. (Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 are not necessary parties to this case) ....Respondents/ Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 i t This appeal having been referred for settlement bef.r : this Lok Adatat and after hearing the Learned counsel for the parties and also the l) rties, the following award is passed: Appellant Nos.l and 2 atong with their counsel-! r y.Ashok Raj, Advocate, and the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 along with their cor rset-sri D.Udit Narayan, AWARD Advocate have appeared before the Lok Adatat. Both the parties stated that they have amicably rgsolved the dispute and entered into compromise and fited Joint Memorandum o1 Jompromise whereunder the Respondents have agreed to receive Rs.6,00,ff)0/- (Rupees Six takhs onty) towards futt and final settlement of their claim as agair t the Award amount of Rs.15,00,(m0/- awarded by the Tribunal. The Responden s stated that they have received said amount of Rs.6,00,000/- by way of Demand I raft bearing No.110945, €Es 17-10-2024 payabte at State Bank of tndia, Duggondi ]ranch. l l I I I I ngty, compromise is recorded as per the t(,t l1s set out in the Joint dum of Compromise. The Joint Memorandum r f Compromise shatt be nded to and shat[ form part of the award. + Fo. rh" 6 The award is passed accordingly in terms of the ccr rpromise set out in the Joint Compromise Memorandum. ' ln terms of the compromise arrived at betv een the parties, the l'lAClvlA No. 763 of 2024 sha[[ stands disposed of . The parties are informed that the court fee, if any, : rid on this appeat shaU. be refunded. ln token of consent for the above settlement and a,,rard, the parties and their counse[ have signed this award in our presence. flActr*.Tca lt.zLt' oF*. p6[t-tV Appellant (s) uaw2Q s{ .l,t"r,/*C Respondent (s) t) '< , 'a -,[)J^( t) 12, $ "3":ot rg , P, )*,ah- P3t ,@fu Y,4< |il-d L( &\ 1o rl-o^,f 1td6 \to{ \ Counsel for Appeltant (s) D ct 'ffirtf-f* Counsel for ndent s Chairman SERV .t ittee) E *t

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments