✦ High Court of India · 03 Sep 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 03 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
03 Sep 2025
Length
1,102 words

Judgment

2. 3 Reddamagari Vijaya Laxmi, Wo. Ram Reddy, age.55 y,:ars, Occ. Business, Reddamagari Madhusudan Reddy, S/o. Ram Reddr, age. 37 years, Occ. Business Reddamagari Ram Reddy, S/o. Narsa Reddy, age.61 yr-.ars, Occ. Agriculture, All are Resident of H.No. 14-208, Kistaiiur-Villagr6 Near Barigaramma Temple, Medchal Mandal, Medchal-Malkaigiii District I :,01+01. ...Petitioners/l:lespondent Nos.1 to 3 AND 1 2 3 4 5 Kammari @ Shanala Yadagiri Chary, S/o. Late Kasaia r, age. B0 years, Occ. Black Smith, Kammari @ Shanala Brahma Chary, S/o. Late Kasaia., age. 60 years, Occ. Black Smith, Kammari @ Shanala Ashok Chary, S/o. Late Kasaiah, aqe. 57 years, Occ. Black Smith, Kammari @ thanala Narsimha_Chary, S/o. Late Kasa rh, age.41 years, 0cc. Black Smith, All are Resident of H.N5. 14-207, Kistapr \/illige, Near Bangaramma Temple, Medchal Mandal, Medchal-Mblkajgiri bistrict - S0140l ...Re r;pondents/Petitioners Reddamagarr Narsimha Reddy, Slo. Narsa Reddy, ag,:. 61 years, occ. Agriculture, Resident of H.No. 14-208, Kistapur Villagt l,lear Bangaramma Temple, Medchal Mandal, Medchat-Malkajgiri Districi - 511401. - (Respondent No.5 is not necessary party to this petition) ...Responrle.nURespondent No.4 / / a No: r oF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in O.S. No. 125 of 20'lB, on the file of principal Senior Civil Judge, Medchal-Malkajgiri Diskict, at Medchal, pending disposal of the above CRP. Counsel for the Petitioners in both CRPs :SRl CHEKURI YADAGIRI

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 4 in both CRPs : SRI S PRAVEEN GOUD The Court made the following: ORDER THE TION'BLE JUSTICE MoUSHUMI BHATT,\I]HARYA C.R.P.Ncs.2255 and,2298 of 2025 ORDER: filed by thc rcsltorrdcr r t Tire petitioncrs beforc this court are the defen<] .. rts in the Suit Nos. I to 4/plaintiffs for ca r:cllation of gift deecl and d irccLior-r to thc p<:ti[ion<'rs to h.rncl ov,.- the peaceful possession of tht: suit schedulc properLy

2. Thc petitioni:rs/dclcndant Nos I to 3 arc a. :lricved by the impugned order dated 23_12.2024 b,,,, u,hich the pcrir ..rs tiled by the plaintiffs we re a ito rved ltrr thc purposc of condoning t l ir crctay in filing thc petition undcr Ordcr IX l{rrlc 9 ol .l.hc Codc o[ ,]:r,i[ procedure, 1908 for setting asiCt: 1l-rc orcli:r darccl tj9.02.2023 dis r , ssing thc St_rit fL'rr dciault and for lrcrnritring ttr<: plairrrri[.s ro lcarl tl.rcr r v irlcn ce. ll. Learncd cotrnsr:l ::ppc:rring lbr. thc par.ties ir ,;t. ntade their submiss ions. \ \

4. The impugr-red clockct order datcd 23.t2. sufhcient reasons for t5" 1..tr, Court to allorv the dela- set aside the ordcr datccl O9.O2.2023. The reasons , paragraphs 8 and !i ol t lic impugnod or.der. Thc .l.rral thc evidencc broughl br., thc plainti[s u,irlr r.cgarcl Io the family mcmbcr-s; inclr-rrJing clcaih certifir:aLes an<l show as to whr. tht- plaintiffs corrld not be rcprr particular date i.(.. 09 02 2023. '.O 24 contains r>[ 428 days to r-: inclicated in (-'ourl. refers to [r e' ill-health of nedical bills to ;t:ntcd on the I ./ I n 2

5. The Trial Court was also of the view that since thc Suit is of 2018, the Suit requires to be adjudicated on priority basis to avoid any further delay.

6. The rcasons given by thc Trial Court are cntirely discretionary. The Court which condoncs rhc dclay in filing the proceedings has necessary discrction to allou, or rcjcct such application.

7. The impugned ordcr rcflccts the rcasons for the Trial Court to allow the apptication for condorration of delav.

8. In any cvcnt, the pctitloners have not been divested of any valuablc right in terms o[ contcstrng the Suit.

9. CRP.Nos.2255 ancl ,2298 of 2025 arc accordingly dismisscd. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. .[.herc shall be no order as to costs. .PONNA KIRSHNA TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 3 4 The Principal Senior Civil Judge, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at Medchal One CC to SRI CHEKURI YADAG|Rt, Advocate TOPUCI One CC to SRI S PRAVEEN GOUD, Advocate [OpUC] Two CD Copies ADK/GR Yr"- \ \ HIGH COURT DATED:0310912025 ORDER CRP.Nos.2255 and 2298 ot ZO2S '\:. , \.. .:. r { 0ilT 2ffi5 ',' '' ,;:''' ,2" I i I I I I I DISMISSING THE BOTH CRps WITHOUT COSTS GrQ(d &*

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 4 in both CRPs : SRI S PRAVEEN GOUD The Court made the following: ORDER THE TION'BLE JUSTICE MoUSHUMI BHATT,\I]HARYA C.R.P.Ncs.2255 and,2298 of 2025 ORDER: filed by thc rcsltorrdcr r t Tire petitioncrs beforc this court are the defen<] .. rts in the Suit Nos. I to 4/plaintiffs for ca r:cllation of gift deecl and d irccLior-r to thc p<:ti[ion<'rs to h.rncl ov,.- the peaceful possession of tht: suit schedulc properLy

2. Thc petitioni:rs/dclcndant Nos I to 3 arc a. :lricved by the impugned order dated 23_12.2024 b,,,, u,hich the pcrir ..rs tiled by the plaintiffs we re a ito rved ltrr thc purposc of condoning t l ir crctay in filing thc petition undcr Ordcr IX l{rrlc 9 ol .l.hc Codc o[ ,]:r,i[ procedure, 1908 for setting asiCt: 1l-rc orcli:r darccl tj9.02.2023 dis r , ssing thc St_rit fL'rr dciault and for lrcrnritring ttr<: plairrrri[.s ro lcarl tl.rcr r v irlcn ce. ll. Learncd cotrnsr:l ::ppc:rring lbr. thc par.ties ir ,;t. ntade their submiss ions. \ \

4. The impugr-red clockct order datcd 23.t2. sufhcient reasons for t5" 1..tr, Court to allorv the dela- set aside the ordcr datccl O9.O2.2023. The reasons , paragraphs 8 and !i ol t lic impugnod or.der. Thc .l.rral thc evidencc broughl br., thc plainti[s u,irlr r.cgarcl Io the family mcmbcr-s; inclr-rrJing clcaih certifir:aLes an<l show as to whr. tht- plaintiffs corrld not be rcprr particular date i.(.. 09 02 2023. '.O 24 contains r>[ 428 days to r-: inclicated in (-'ourl. refers to [r e' ill-health of nedical bills to ;t:ntcd on the I ./ I n 2

5. The Trial Court was also of the view that since thc Suit is of 2018, the Suit requires to be adjudicated on priority basis to avoid any further delay.

6. The rcasons given by thc Trial Court are cntirely discretionary. The Court which condoncs rhc dclay in filing the proceedings has necessary discrction to allou, or rcjcct such application.

7. The impugned ordcr rcflccts the rcasons for the Trial Court to allow the apptication for condorration of delav.

8. In any cvcnt, the pctitloners have not been divested of any valuablc right in terms o[ contcstrng the Suit.

9. CRP.Nos.2255 ancl ,2298 of 2025 arc accordingly dismisscd. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. .[.herc shall be no order as to costs. .PONNA KIRSHNA TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 3 4 The Principal Senior Civil Judge, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at Medchal One CC to SRI CHEKURI YADAG|Rt, Advocate TOPUCI One CC to SRI S PRAVEEN GOUD, Advocate [OpUC] Two CD Copies ADK/GR Yr"- \ \ HIGH COURT DATED:0310912025 ORDER CRP.Nos.2255 and 2298 ot ZO2S '\:. , \.. .:. r { 0ilT 2ffi5 ',' '' ,;:''' ,2" I i I I I I I DISMISSING THE BOTH CRps WITHOUT COSTS GrQ(d &*

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments