✦ High Court of India · 19 Jun 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 19 Jun 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
19 Jun 2025
Length
1,368 words

Judgment

1. 2 J The State o1 1-el rngana, Rep' by its Principal Secretary' Schocl Education dept., Secre'ari.rt,HYderabad The Comtnis;sic ner and Director of School Educatiot-l' Gcv't o: Telangana' Hyderabatl Resee rch a nd Training The Direr;tor c,f State Council for Educational' isdr[tiisa,ut of relangana, Hvderabad tVlasab Tank, rl /rlerabad '

4. The Prinr;ip:1, (iovt. lnstitute of Advanced Study 5. The Prirtcitlal District lnstitute of Education 6. The Principal. 3ovt. College of Teacher Education lC T E") Warangal and Tr,aining (DIET) Mahabubnarlar rn Educi'rtion (l.A.S.E.) Hanumakond:r District. ...REISPONDENTS Petitiontlnrjerl\rticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiapra}irgthatinthe circumstancesstrrteiintheaffidavitfiledtherewith'theHighCourtmaybe pleased to issue ar acpropriate Writ, Order or direction more patti';ularly one in thenatureofWriloflvtandamusbydeclaringtheentireactionofth€respondents innotcontinUinglhepetitionersasGuestLecturersintheirrespecii.lelnstitutions as they are discharging their duties at various lnstitutions like' DIETS' CTE' l.A.S.E., etc by re:newing and continuing for the Academic Year 2 025-26' as per the circular Nlenrc.'No. 2826014-Al1o74lA2l1o74iA2/llRNl.\/ll/2024, dt' 15tO112025 of [:inan,;er Dept., as per the seniority and eligibility in Iheir respective subjectbydeclaringtlreactionoftherespondentsinnotrenewingthepetitioners appointment ar; (jue st Lecturers in their respective lnstitutions ir' :learly illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, improper, crear viorative of a, principres of natural justice and apart from being in vioration of various judiciar pronouncements on the subject matter, and (b) consequenfly direct the respondents to forthwith issue the orders by continuing the petitioners as Guest Lecturers in their respective lnstitutions as they are discharging their duties at various rnstitutions rike DTETS, crE, l.A.s.E., etc. by renewing their services for the Academic year 2o2s_26, as per the circurar lrremo. No. 2826014-Ar1074rA2r1074rA2HAril.vtttzozq,,ot. 1510112025 of Finance Dept., lA NO: 1 o F 2025

Petition under section 'r 5'r cpc praying that in the circumstances slated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, ir," Hign court may be preased to direct the respondents to forthwith issue the orders by continuing the petitioners as Guest Lecturers in their respective rnstitutions as they are discharging their duties at various lnstitutions like DIETS, CTE, l.A.S.E., etc. by ."n.riinj th"i, services for the Academic year 2o2s-26, as per the circurar Memo. rvo. 28260 1 4- Al 1 07 4 t A2 r 1 07 4r A2r HRM.V w 2024, Dt. 1 5 / o 1 r 2025 of Finance Dept. by passing appropriate orders on their representations dt. 11-04-2025, 19-04-2025, 1 5-04-2025 and 28-04-2025. lA NO: 2 oF 2025 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, if,u Hign Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to forthwith issue the orders by continuing the petitioners as Guest Lecturers in their respective rnstitutions as they are dischaiging their duties at various Institutions rike DTETS, r.A.s.E., etc. by renewing their services for the Academic year 2025-26, as per the Circutar Memo. No. 2826014_ A/1074lA2l1074rA2rHRrvi.vw2o24, Dt. 1sto1t2o2s of Finance Dept. and the Proc'Rc'No.55/Ni/TSCERT/2020, Dt: 10-06-2025 issued by the 2nd respondent by passing appropriate orders on their representations dt:.r 3-06-2025. Counsel for the petitioner: SRI K.NIRANJAN REDDY Counsel forthe Respondents: Gp FOR SERVICES-I The Court made the following: ORDER I THE HON'BLIiSBI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWA'R RAO WR PE N 4 45 F 2 ORDER: Withth3::orSentofboththeparties,thisWritPetjtionil;taken up for dispos,rl, at the admission stage'

2. Heard Sri K.Niranjan Reddy' learned c'lunsel fcr the petitioners anc le arned Government Pleader for Servi:es-I for the respondent lJor;. I to 6 Perused the material on record

3. Learned cottnsel for the petitioners submitt'rd ttlat the petitioners ;1r,,: r'vt>rking from the last several years as a guest lecturers in the respondent institutions. The respc'ndents have terminated lhrl services of the petitioners as guest loctu'€ rs' Now for the sake of fresh new procer:dings have been issued these circu rr stances, appointment of cuest lecturers' In a representation before the authoritles on petitioners 13.06.202s r.o consider the case of the petitioners 1'or thelr rTlace re-engagenlerlt Learnecl r:ortnsel for the respondents submitted that lre has no

4. objection for Cisr':sal oF the representation dated 13'(16'20'25' In vi{:\ ' o'' the above submissions made by th': both learned 5. counsel, the respondent authorities are directed trl cc'nsider the I I 2 representation dated 13.06.2025 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, as expectitiously as possible, preferably within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6 With the above said observation, the Writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition.. shall stand elosed. To, //TRUE COPY// SD/. A.H.S.GOWRI SHANKAR SISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER \ The Principal Secretary, School Education Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana. The Commissioner and Director of School Education, Govt. of Telangana, Hyderabad 2 3 The Director of State Council (SCERT) Govt. of Telangana, Hyderabad 4. The Principal, Govt. lnstitute of Advanced . Masab Tank, Hyderabad. for . Educational, Research and Training. Study in Education (l.A.S.E.)

5. The Principal, District Institute of Education and Training (DIET) Mahabubnagar. 6. The Principal, Govt. Hanumakonda District College of Teacher Education (C.T.E..) Warangal

7. One CC to SRI K.NIRANJAN REDDY, Advocate tOpUCI 8. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES-|, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad {OUTI

9. Two CD Copies BSR cqTODAY HIGH COURT DATED:1910611'-025 -'.u,t=t;,; F ?[ J]N [15 ( o \ t. a "l: ORDER WP.No.1414t; o12025 DISPOSING ()F THE WRIT PETITION' WITHOUT C OSTS \ )- .\-..----- T ) I I l i

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments