✦ High Court of India · 01 Jul 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 01 Jul 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
01 Jul 2025
Length
1,535 words

Nalla Vagu (Rs z 4,J )r-), Sakalonikunta (Rs.g0o/-), GouravanLrkr_rta (Rs..1400/1 , Medabai Kunta (lls i oo/-), total amount of Rs. 55,420l_ as per the resolution daled 14-03-20 2tr: ;; :;sed by the primary Fishermen Co.rperati,r< Society Ltd., Nagarkurnoor - \'er r :rbefla for the Fasri year 2024-2021i, a s irrr gal, arbitrary, unreasonabre rrrro,. stitutionar, against the principres of natura ustice and to consequenfly d ro.1 rre respondents by receive the rease irm()rlnt and issue fishing rights fo.r-e 'irsri year 2024-2025 0f the petitione.ii sooiety lA NO: 1 OF 2025 petition urrJe' rection 151 cpc.praying that in the circun siances stated in the affidavit fi t:d ,- support of the petition, the High Cor.rrt ntay )e pleased to direct the Respc nde r. ; to consider the resorution dated 14-oi\-21),.r5 passed by the Primary Fishermrr.r cooperative society Ltd., Nagarkur.noo - y:ndabera for the Fasri year 2)?'4'2 (t25 and recoive the rease amounts of r(esa ri samudram (Rs.43,560r), Str va r'.1g, (Rs.4,430/-), Nara Vagu (Rs.4,430i _), s akaronikunta (Rs B00r), Gour.r'/arr..rkunta (R!.1400/-), Medabai Kunta (Rs.80or), totar amount of Rs 55,420l- zir'J s s ue fishing rights for the Fasri year 20i,4-2_1125. pending disposal of writ ptrt tio, Counsel for the petiticrrer: SRI D.L.PANDU Counsel for the Respcndent No.l to 4, 6 & 7: Gp FOR ANIMAL HUSBANDARY Counsel for the Resp,rrdent No.5: Gp FOR REVENUE WRIT PETITION NO: 14284 0F 202s Between: The , Prima.r E:ishermen _C-ogperative Society Ltd. N;:gerr Kurnool _ Yendabefla, rir-.c rJo H-D1 1968, Rep by its predioeni e verir%-t:rirr b)o"[ate Chandraiah,,a.gi:r about 45 years. AND 1 The State (,' T,' . ngana, Rep by . its principal Secre tary De lartment of Animat Hu;trar rv. Dairy'Deveropment'and--Fisiei,,sl-H"liLiliiri, Hyderabad, Ir:la I l ana

2. The St Agricult ate r,1 Tr:r;ngang, R9O. by its principal Secre:ary. De rartment of ure a'(' (.' (,peratrve, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telirnjana ..,F.ETITIONER

3. The Director of Fisheries, The State of Telangana, Road No. 4, Shantinagar Colony, Masab Tank, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500457

4. The Commissioner for Cooperation And Registrar of Cooperation Societies, Cooperative Department, Opp. Gandhi Bhavan, Hyderabad, Telangana.

5. The Diskict Collector, Nagarkurnool, Nagarkurnool District. 6. The District Fisheries Officer/ Assistant Director of Fisheries, Nagarkurnool, Nagarkurnool District.

7. The District Cooperative Officer, Nagarkurnool, Nagarkurnool District. 8. Dokuri Balaiah, S/o Muthyalu, Aged about 60 years, Occ. Fishermen F|/o Uyyalawada, Nagarkurnool Mandal, Nagarkurnool District.

9. Dokuri Venkataswamy, S/o Balram, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Fishermen Rl/o Uyyalawada, Nagarkurnool Mandal, Nagarkurnool District.

10.Dokuri Kashanna, S/o Balaiah, Aged about 42 yearc, Occ. Fishermen Rl/o Uyyalawada, Nagarkurnool Mandal, Nagarkurnool District. '1 '1 . Kondamoni Anjaneyulu, S/o Lakshmaiah, Aied about 50 years, Occ. . Fishermen Fl/o Nagarkurnool Mandal, Nagarkumool District. l2.Kondamoni Ashok, S/o Balaswamy, Aged about 39 years, Occ. Fishermen R/o Nagarkumool Mandal, Nagarkurnool District.

13. Pittala Jangaiah, S/o Yellaiah, Aged about 65 years, Occ. Fishermen Fl/o Yendabatla, Nagarkurnool Mandal, Nagarkurnool District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or dtrection more in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the official Respondents No. 3 to 7 in not consrdering the representation of the petitioner daled 07 -04-2025 and not removing the unoTficial Respondents No. 8 to 13 from the official records, as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, u nconstitutional, against the principles of natural justice and to consequently direct the respondents to remove the unofficial Respondents No. 8 to 13 by considering the representation of the petitioner. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No. 3 to 7 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 07-04-2025 and remove the unofficial respondents No. B to 13 from the official records, pending disposal of writ petition. Counsel for ttre P,:':itioner: SRI D.L.PANDU Counsel for the R -.;pondent No.1, 3 & 6: GP FOR ANIM.AL HUSITANDARY Counsel for the R :;pondent No.2, 4 &7: GP FOR AGRI|:ULfUR - & ]OOP. DEPT. Counsel for the R,:;pondent No.S: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for ttre R ;;pondent No.8 to 13: Ms. P.SUMALATHA The Court nrad() fhe following: COMMOI.i ORDER THE HO NOURAB LE SMT. JUSTI CE T. MADIIAVT DEVI WRIT PETITIO N Nos.l 6138 & 142A4 oF 2025 coM MON ORDER: In these writ petitions, the petitioner is seeking a direction to permit the petitioner society to catch the fish and also to remove the names of the unofhcial respondents from the officia'l records of the societY. LearnedGovernmentPloaderforFisherieshasproducedthe copy of Memo dated 26 'q6 '2025' whereunder it is stated that as per Pre-Litigation Case No'28 of 2025 '' tine petitioners and the respondents therein have filed a memo stating that the sub- contract executed in favour of Sri P' Krishnaiah is cancelled and that both the parties do not want to proceed further' It is alleged that the petitioner society had given the fishing rights to third party in violation of the leasing rights ' Therefore' they are not permitted to do the frshing, but in view of the Memo dated' 26'06'2025' if the petitioner society makes a fresh application' the same would be considered- It is further submitted' that in W'P'No' 1428 4 of 2025 the unofficial the petitioner societ5r is ' seeking a direction to remove membershiP of the societ5z oniy on the respondents from the ground tlr-'t )r:y rl.arlted to do fishing themse'lves' an 1 they were objecting [c, tlr ] contractor doing fishing' in vie rt' r,l the fact that the sub-contract rvith th: contractor has alreaclr' ;:en cancelled ald a'11 the mem:>ers of the society' including the ':spondents 8 to 13, are entitled to rlo f shing in the water boc\ r.l-is Court does not find any merit rn rM'l) No' 14284 of 2025 aod. a c<:c r dingly, the same is dismissed' W.P.lio I tr138 of 2025 is disposed of wittr lilrerty to the petitioner sror i:t,v- to make a fresh representation to the respondents in the lig1rt c,' l,4emo dated.26.O6.2025 and on such re presentation being recr:ir','rl respondent No.2 shall consiier lor extension of lease perir>cl. f possible, after taking an ur der''aki lg from the petitioreer r:o( i( ti- that only members of the so< iet1 sh;tll do fishing and thert'rr [t,: t receive the lease amount as pre scrilletl' There shall be no ord e r il ' Lo costs Misc:,:11i, .reous petitions pending, if any, shzi1l s tand closed' No order zr:; 1:) losts' ,/TRUE COPY// L?iH'[ts?HXA ^8'J{f+ .l IiECTION OFFICER Dairy To, r ft* -,,Ll ri'l,Rx"o'.i3i?"13; .3"?Bill[iil*1*11'+l "E:::'.".''' 4 Shantnagar ccronv' Masab rank' Road No 4' ' l!?Jll;;i?!"t5J'*"JJ"fu;il; ' :ff ;,ll:l : [':la: gx;:If, :i"+*t'"'.";ffi "'li!:1i"1'JiI i9?36^

4. The Deputy Director of Fisheries (ln-lands), The State of Telangana, Road No. 4, Shantinagar Colony, Masab Tank, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500457.

5. The District Collector, Nagarkurnool, Nagarkurnool District. 6. The Diskict Fisheries Officer/ Assistant Director of Fisheries, Nagarkurnool, Nagarkurnool District.

7. The Assistant lnspector of Fisheries, Nagarkurnool, O/o District Fisheries Office, Nagarkurnool, Telangan6.

8. One CC to SRI D.L.PANDU, Advocate [OPUC] 9. One CC to Ms. P.SUMALATHA, Advocate [OPUC] '10.Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

11.Two CCs toGP FOR ANIMAL HUSBANDARY, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

12.fwo CCs to GP FOR AGRICULTURE & COOP. DEPT., High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

13.Two CD Copies BSR GJP HIGH COL'Fi'T DATED:01 lC;712025 \ COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.1613,8 and 14284 ot 2025 I}C TODAY / /l (i l. '- -' l i --.. \ :i:' ,) ::.\ '1 ;+ rr I lil" ?025 "),- :.. -t, , ,| D|SPOSIN(3 OF THE W.P.No.16138 of 2025 & DISMISSING THE W.P.No.14284 of ZO2S, WITHOUT CI:ISTS ,4 /-'5 I ,/^t

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments