✦ High Court of India · 02 May 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 02 May 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
02 May 2025
Length
1,321 words

Sri Padamati Anianeya Swamy Devasthanam' Makthal Proper and Mandal' Mahabubnagar District Rep. by its Executive ofilcer ...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER

2. The Joint Collector, Mahaboobnagar, Mahaboobnagar District' 3. The Revenue Divisional officer, Narayanapet, Mahaboobnagar District' 4. G.Sahadev, S/o. Balaiah' aged about 62 ye-ap' Occ not- known to the ' F;tiiililiil.r.to. +_ss, +-ioo", Gunii Road,'Maktal Town, Mahaboobnagar 5. Dr. P. Sriramulu, S/o. Thayappa, aged about 39 years' Ogct \ot known to the " Fltitii,"'"ilri.iliol+:s1o/+,-fr"5Iduiiano, Makthal-rown' Mahaboobnasar District. District.

6. B. Laksmi Narayan, S/o. Narsappa, ?ggq.agoYl 54 years'-Occ' Not known to " th" P;tiiil"i, Ro. N"ur. ers-stlaho, M-akthal village and Mandal' Mahaboobnagar District. g

7. D. Baswaraj, {}/o. Siddappa, aged about 69 years, Occ. Not (nown to the Petitioner. H.trto 4-335/i, l/ad-wara noao, fvia*ndt fown, Vf ,iniOoobn"gi,. District. Fu=.jg Begyf , W/o. A/d. Hussain, aged about 47 ye;ars, O:c. Not known to the Petitioner H. \o.4-316/1 , Makthai to-wn, Mahaboobniglifiis:iitt. 9 Hanumanthu S/o. Lakshma.iah, Age. not known to the petiti.ner, occ. Not known to the F'etition Rr/o. Makthaitown, Mahaboobnagri Di,,,tii.i --- -"' 't0.D. Clandra Sekhar, s/o Sid^d_appq, aged about 49 years, Occ. Not known to the Petitioner RIo. H No.4-337, Cunfi RoaO, fvtaf<tfijit&;; tuir;;il;;;b; District 1 1 . Sri Lakshman, S/o. Hanuma{hu, aged about 50 years, Or;c. Not known to the petitioner, Rt/rr H. No. 4_32ot2, tci +:ototi, Mlttritiii*"ll,liriri,oil#g;; . District.

12.T.Lingamma, W/o. Mallapp-4 aged about 54 years, Occ. Not known to the petitioner, H. tJo. 4_302,. 4js0s t6 a_sOo, NLai eh"-ratl Vio :ij"iii"irr, Mahaboobnallar District. "vrijr,rr,

13.Asmath Begurr, W/o !g!qUg9Q, gSSd about 39 years, Occ. Not known to the Petitioner, Rl/c. H.No. 4-3i3, Makh;r town, rrria-najooc,onigtr:isiri;i. "" * '"' 14.K. Saraswathi W/o. K. Ramulu, aged about 40 years, Occ. N,rt known to the R/o. rVrahesh Horer, NeIr eus iiind ilririi,'"1 t6i^",'il;#il;t"r:b"r,. B3lli3ll"'.

15.7. Shanthappzr, S/o. Bu{{qppa, aged apout4T years, Occ. Nr.rt kno*n,o,n" ." . ," Petitioner. Rl/o. H.No. a_309 ind e-10, Neii-B;s,slln,j, rrrrir,tlii;;;,"

16.Aktar B..ggum, ///o. Abdul.Hafe91, aged about 55 years, Occ. \ot known to the petitioner, pJo. H.No.4-3'r6/1,'M;ith;r town,-r,ii[rtiooun, jri iii.i,',ri.i.'" 17. Jameeludin, S,o. Abdul iql""l, aggd about 44 years, Occ. Nrrt known to the petitioner, Rt/o H.No. 4_313, canjiRord, Miktnit to",h, lrrihirrt"o""ftr; -,' District. lB.Musani Sarala Devi, Wo-. fvl. Balaramaih, aged about 44 yearr;, Occ. Not .Rlio. H.No. +-ati t.-+-si6ln, r.rudirir,.,, .jj'no,'"' known to the petitioner Makthat town, t,/ahabooUnigai Diitrici

19.P. S. hanthi Kunrari, W/o..Ramji, age_d about 65 years, Occ lJol known to the Rr/o. t.r.No. +-ro+, oan! noao, Makd;tilffi Muri;i,,;;b;;'s;''" 8,9.11ff"r

20. Basawarajappe, s/o. Thimmanna, aged about 50 years, ocr;. r,rot known to the.petitioner, ft,o H.No. t_ZtZ, Netiru can;i ifi,r6, frrfrktfrit-id;;,' '-"" ." Mahaboobnag: r District. 21 .V4a.y.a Kumar, Siio. Govinda Fu9,.qqu9 about 55 years, Occ. Nrt known to the peritioner, Rl/o. H.No. 4-101 to +-ro"g, nE-h^;'G-*ii n"l'0, urriti:iii;;;,' '" '"" Mahaboobnagar District.

22.Jaheeruddin, Sic Md. H!g:"!l,aged about 12years,Occ. Nlot known to the Petitioner, Rro. -.r. No. 1 _2 13, N;[i-s;"iihiird, ilHtn, r to*n, Mahaboobnaga - District. 7

23.M. Thailu, S/o. Ivl. Chennappa, aged about 49 years, Occ. Not known to the Petitioner, R/o. H.No. 4-321', Opp-. Bus stand, Makthal town, Mahaboobnagar District.

24.Venkat Reddy, S/o. Chinna Reddy, aged about 57 ye the Petitioner, R/o. H.No. 1-214, Nehru Ganji road, M Mahaboobnagar District. ars, Occ. Not known to akthal town,

25. Naravana Reddv, S/o. late Nagireddy, aged about 45 years, Occ. Not known to th6 Petitioner, Rlo. Opp. Pensiondrs Colony, Yenugonda village and post' Mahaboobnagar District.

26. A.Venkataiah, S/o. Buddappa, aged about 64 years, Occ. Not known to the Petitioner, Fi/o. H.No. 4-331 and 332, Ganji Road, Makthal town, Mahaboobnagar District.

27.Prahlad, S/o. Kistappa, aged about 54 yea1s, Occ. Not known to the Petitioni:r, R/o. H.No. 4-333 to 335, Gunji Road, Makthal town, Mahaboobnagar District.

28. Dr. Parni Kumar, S/o. Sharanappa, aged About 39 years, Occ Not known to the Petitioner, R/o. H.No. 4-342 and 343, tt/adwar rao, Makthal town, Mahaboobnagar District

29.V. Bugganna, S/o. Hanumanthu, ag-edAbout 47 yearc' Occ Not known to the Petitio'n-er, Rl/o. H.No. 4'322 and 323, Gunji Road' Makthal town, Mahaboobnagar District.

30.Janamma, Wio. Hanumanthu, aged about 59 years, Occ Not known to the - - peiitioner,'Ryo. H.No. 1-219 and22o, Nehru Ganji Road, Makthal town, Mahaboobnagar District

31. D. Sharanappa, S/o. Siddappa, aged about 69 years, OcI;. Not knowq tg.lhq " F"titioi"r,Hio.'H.No. +09-30, Suleswar Rice mill, Near Bus Stand, Makthal town, Mahaboobnagar District.

32.Abul Saleem, S/o. Mohd. lsmail, aged about 47 years, Occ' Not known to the Petitioner, Rl/o. H. No. 1-212, Opp. Oafia Complex, Makthal town, Mahaboobnagar District.

33. Pedda Sivanna, S/o. Mall Petitioner, Fl/o. H.No. 4-3 District. aooa. aoed about 61 vears, Occ. Not known to the zbj Ounil Road, Makthal town, Mahaboobnagar

34. Yesuratnam, Sio. Mallappa, aged about 57 years, Occ Not known to the - petitlonei, R/o. H.No. l:izi,dpp. Bus Stan-d, Makthal town, Mahaboobnagar District.

35.Dasari Naoaooa @ Dasari Pedda Nagappa, S/o. late Papanna, aged about 50 years, 6cc. ag-dculture, Rl/o ' D. No.4-22514' Yellammakunta Area' MaKIhal Village, Mahaboob Nagar District. ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under :Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct Respondents No 4lo 35 not to create any third-party rights ir, respect of the subject land admeasuring Ac. 02.27 Gts in Sy. No. 35/A, Ac. 1.1';' Gts in Sy. No. 35/AA, Ac.02.06 Gt; in Sy. No.35/E, Ac.01.18 Gts in Sy. No 35/EE, Ac.02.00 Gts in Sy. No. 35/-, totally admeasuring Ac. 08-24 (its siluated in Makthal Mandal, Narayanpet [)istrict pending disposal of the above Revierry petition in the interest of justice Counsel for the Appellants: SRl. ABHISHEK N Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRt CH SATISH KUMAR SC FOR ENDOWNMENTS TE I.ANGANA Counsel forthe Resoondent NO.s: 2&3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Resrcondent Nos.4 to 35: SRI P. GANGA RAMI RIEDDY The Court made the following: JUDGMENT l i I r THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JuSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HON'ELE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA WRIT APPEAL No.529 .of 2o25 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'bLe the ActirLg Chief Justice Sujog pout) Sri Abhishek N, leanred counsel for the appellants, seeks to withdraw this writ appeal with liberty to the appellants to file a review petition on the impugned order of the learned Single Judge.

2. The other side has no objection

3. Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/-N.RAJGOPAL EPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 3 4 One CC to SRL ABHISHEK N Advocate [OPUC One CC to SRI P. GANGA RAMI REDDY Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRl. CH SATISH KUMAR SC FOR ENDOWNMENTS TELANGANA TOPUC] Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUTI

5. Two CD Copies KKS LS :1 -:= l rr :;r (r€ f 5ii3 l, i ill,i ')025 ' o t o5.q ,, ,6 gi!, S-lJzz- HIGH COUR]T DATED:0210!i12025 JUDGMENT WA.No.529 of 2025 DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS 0 1b ")l

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments