Smt Chenna Nagamani v. 'l . The State of Telangana

the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Cr>urt may be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to further process the rroposals vide Lr. RC No.El722lCPT 12022 dated 07lO7l2O22 based on tre application dated 3O11112021 of the petitioner for compassionate appointme rt, ltending disposal of the above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KANDI RAMCHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.l TO 3 & 5: GP FOR SERVICES-I/ GP FOR SERVICES.III Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI K.PRADEEP REDC Y. SC FOR ZPP The Court made the following: ORDER THE IION'BLE SRI JUSTICE NA]UAVARAPU RA.IESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.14837 of 2o25 ORDER: Heard Sri K. Rarnchandra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Services-I and III appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5, and Sri K. Pradeep Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Zllla Praja Parishad, appearing for respondent No.4.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Writ Petition is liled questioning the inaction of the respondent authorities, particularly respondent Nos.3 to 5, in providing compassionate appointment to the petitioner under the scheme provided by the Government in G.O.Ms.No.687 GAD, dated

03.1O.1977 arrd G.O.Ms.No.612 GAD (Ser.A) Department, dated

30. 10. 199 I by considering the petitioner application, dated

30.11.2021 u,hich has been in pending before the authorities about more thal 4 years. 2(i) Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that petitioner's mother named Chenna Laxmamma, W/o. Chenna Sambaiah died on 12.02.2021 while she was working as an office subordinate at MPPS, Thimmapur at Thimmapur village at Chennampet Mandal of Nalgonda District, leaving two .Lrr ') married ,laughters and one married son as hr:r. dependants. The petitioner's father is predeceased of her nrotner, and after death of petitioner's mother, her elder br-other died on

16.O5.2otl,l leaving his wife and children. 2(ii) Learned counsel for the petitioner ll_rr.ther submits that the petitioner acquired the quarification oI I)r:;t Graduation i.e., M.Sc., Physics. The petitioner being a cl,,pendant of her mother, rrvith consent of her elder sister, made :r n erpplication on 30.11.2021 to the 5rrr respondent to co rsiCcr her for compassionate appointment under the schr nrr, in G.O.Ms No.687 GAD, dated 03.lO.lg77 since she rrlls under the scheme of compassionate appointment. 2(iii) Learned counsel lor thc petitioner lirrther submits that the Sth respondent b1, keeping petitiorr r.r-':; application dated 30.1 l.2O2L pending about 7 months, Ionvarded the proposals to the 4th respondent through lris letter vide Rc.No.E/722lCW/2022, dated O2.07.2022 sr:rring that as there are no earning members in the familv ol the deceased employee and requested to consider her requ(.:il in providing employment under compassionate appointmenL :jcl^eme. .\ \

3. Learned counsei for the respondent No.4 fiied counter stating that the certificates of the petitioner are due for examination. Meanwhile, their office had received an objection, dated O7.06.2023 to the applicatior-r of the petitioner by one Sandhya stating her objections for appointing the petitioner on the ground of compassionate appointment. In view of the objections againsl the petitioner, the application of the petitioner is pending for adjudication.

4. Per contra. lcarned coutrscl for the petitioner brought to the notice of this Court that though the authorities had already I ( rejected the objection made by saicl Sandhya earlier, they have not considered the case o[ the petitioner till date. Accordingly, prayed to allor,r, the Writ Petition.

5. On the othcr hand, Iearned counsel for respondents submit that t[-Ie .rtlthorities u'hile disposing of the objection raised by Sandhl a, r,r.ould pass appropriate orders, in accordance law. "vith

6. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for respective parties, the 4'n respondent is directed to consider the case of the petitioner for compassionate appointment, u'hile disposing ,'f tht objcctions made by one 4 Sandhya, and pass appropriate orders, in accor-deLnce u,ith larv, rnithin a period of eight (08) r,i.eeks from the ditlr: rtf receipt of a copy of th is order. 7 . Wittr the above direction, this Writ petirion i:; dispose<1.of. There shall be no order as to costs. Misr:ellaneous applications, if an1, penrlinrl, shall also stand closed SiD/- L.VIJAYA LAXMI ASSIS ANT REGISTRAR II 'i $e CTION OFFICER to ,t. ,n" Princrpal Secretary, Panchay-at RaifltT:f' DJlerooment Department' Buildin ts Hvderabad' state ,!"Iiffi illt,:lp^l.?ft[:1..:vt3;S1i,ilS"T,T]!??tfl"Ei;i''"'Department Dr B R. Ambedkar ':il;s:;;5i;;'itc'"ia'i't /TTRUE COPY// anand Naoar Colony I ;*iH-:fl*trtEflffi s+tHf;*],'J+,$.}ii:tdffi ::,1,:, - ?Ii"3r33t t?'rB- sERVtcES-,t, Hish court for th€ state of relansana, at 9. OhC CC tO SRI K.PRADEEP REDDY, SC FOR ZPP [C)PUC] 10.Two CD CoPies Hvderab.rd. [OUTI PSK. rKS (24 HIGH COURT DATED:2210712025 ORDER WP.No.14837 of 2025 tiI -i -- rif,im '2 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ',,otd(A k-*