Andhra Pradesh High Court · 2004
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Hence the Writ Petition is dismissed for default
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Registration Act, 1908 s. 61
Judgment
Cause title
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.J.VENUGOPAL RAO(not present) Counsel for the Respondent No.2: MR.A.M.QURESHI The Court Made the Following
ORDER:
Operative part
When the case is listed on 24-6-2004 both counsel are absent. Hence the matter is directed to be listed for dismissal today. Even today when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No costs. T. Meena Kumari, J. _____________________ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The District Collector Visakhapatnam Dist. 2 The A.P. State Wakf Board rep. by Spl. Officer, Hyderabad 3 The Joint Sub-Registrar, Visakhapatnam 4. 2 CD copies.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence the Writ Petition is dismissed for default
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Registration Act, 1908 — s. 61.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 01 Jul 2004. The bench was T MEENA KUMARI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.