308, Prakashnagar, Miryalaguda Town, Nalgonda District v. Shriram City Union Finance Ltd., Miryalaguda Branch, Nalgonda.,. District
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, TIRUMALA OEVI EADA
Outcome
Dismissed
Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
'1. B.Venkateshwarlu S/o. Saida Rao, aged about 52 Years, Occ. Ancillary Labour at Food Corporation of lndia at Miryalaguda Town, Nalgonda, Rl/o. H.No. 18-436, Shantihagar Miryalaguda Town and Mandal, Nalgonda Disrict 2. K. Dhanamma, Wo. Krishna, aged about / 52 years, Occ. Ancillary Labour at Food Corporation of lndia at Miryalaguda Town, Nalgonda, R/o. H.No. 35- 308, Prakashnagar, Miryalaguda Town, Nalgonda District ...PETITIONER
/ Judgment Debtor No. 2 & 3 AND 't. M/s. Shriram City Union Finance Ltd.,, Miryalaguda Branch, Rep. by i!9 GPA Holder Mr. K. Phani Kumar Sio. Krishnama Chary, Aged about 48 Yrs., in Shriram City Union Finance Ltd., Miryalaguda Branch, Nalgonda.,. District. ..Respondent
/ Decree Holder
2. Nukala Venkat Reddy, S/o.Narsimha Reddy aged about 56 years, Occ. Ancillary Labour at Food Corporation of lndia at l\Iiryalaguda Town, Nalgonda, R/o. H.tto. 28-127, Housing Board Colony, Miryalaguda Town Nalgonda District. .. Respondnet / Judgment Debtor No.1
3. The Drawing Offrcer, The Divisronal Manager, Food Corporation of lndia, Nalgonda District. (2nd Respondent is not necessary party. . ...RESPONDENT
/ Garnish Order lA NO: 2 OF 2019 Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in suppo( of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in E.P. No. 686 of 2018 in Arbitration Award No. 03 of 2015 on the file of The Vlll Addl. District Court Judge, at Miryalaguda, pending disposal of CRP otherwise the petitioner would be put irreparable loss and harm- and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. K. V. SUBBA REDOY Counsel for the Respondent No.l : SRI MAHESWAR RAO KUNCHEM Counsel for the Respondent No. 3 : NONE APPEAREO The Court made the following
ORDER:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE IION'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA , Civil Revision Petition No.1912 of 2Ol9 ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice Abhtnand Kumar Shttuili) This Civil Revision Petition is frled against the interlocutory order dated O3.08.2O18 passed in E.P.No.686 of 2018 in Arbitration award No.3 of 2015 by the VIII Additional District Court Judge, Miryalguda.
2. When the matter is taken up lor hearing, learned counsel appearing for the respondents has informed the Court that the main E.P. itself was closed, and therefore, no further orders need to be passed in this Civil Revision Petition.
Operative part
3. Recording the said submission, the present Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
4. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. I I To Sd/- P PADMANABHA REDDY I ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I /,TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
The Vlll Additional District Judge' MlYalguda i. d; dC t" SCr K. v sUBBA-REDDY, Advocate.[oPu^q] 5. il; dd i" sni. rl. sRIKANTH GoUD, Advocate [oPUC] 4. Two CD CoPies KUUPR ,s HIGH COURT DATED:1010212025 ORDER CRP.No.1912 of 2019 /, ' ,.' A.{ C) t4 t ;. r Lr,: '"., \;.' !, .\ l: i: -- (a --\ ,:. 't .:. _/.. t?.46"'/ t' ' +l')t ' - ) t !c\\*l' -:- -: --'' DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS @ fl)1 u
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.