The High Court · 2025

...APPELLANT/PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF AND t Occ. Business Occ- Business Occ. Business '1. Nawab Masood AliKhan, (died on 111:9!:Y), 2. Nawab Bahboob Ali Khan' (died on zo 'uc.'zv.z .t 3. Nawab Mukhtar Ali xn"",'!'61"i" Nawab Mahmood Jung' aged 55 years' 4. Nawab Moizuddin Ali Khan, Uo Late Nawab Mahmood Jung' aged 62 years' 5. Nawab Minhajuddin Khan' S/o Late Nawab Mahmood Jung' aged 45 years' o. inatrzaoi Mushadi Begum(died)' (died) ;. #;;irvrrn,oooie"qum' (died on 16'0e 2uz1\ (RR 3 to 5 are R/o H'N;:'';:'i'2\E/1[' M;t"' Manzil Eden Garden' and iioin.""".".v parties to this appeal) .. B. Mis. Vasavi Nirmaa" P;-'i;;;it;J' om"" at Plot No 59' Street No'3' Road No.2 Sagar societv, B';i;;; niilt' ivo"t"u'd Rep bv its Director Yerram Viiay Kumar slo v"rru,€i'?;il;;i;il;s"d 52 vears"occ' Business' FUo viit r.ro ez, Luxura Greens Bowenpally' Secunderabad , ^ ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS a I M/s Sri Sri Developers, A Regd. .f.a1tqe19frin Firm (Regn. No.6712020) Having its Principar prace of business at#1-12-5g3i3a, strJeiNo + Gagan f\rrahar, Hyderabad - 500 029 Rep. by its Managing partners i. Mr. S. Sunil Kumar S/o S.Dayan-anO Rao ii. Mr. Santosh Kumar Saraiya S/o Kakubhai Saraiya (R'9 impreaded as per court ordei dated 27r12t202t in i.n.No.g ot 20211 ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS lA NO:2 oF 2021 Petition under order 39 Rure 1 & 2 R/w Section of 1 51 Cpc praying that in the circumstances srated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to grant an ao-inteiil injunction ,".t*i.i.g tn" Respondent No B and 9 .herein or their p"i.oni., agents, from arienating or creating any charge or interest over the petition schddure prop".tv arri"g"*," pendency of the present appeal SCHEDULE OF PROPERTY All that the suit schedule property admeasuring about 4500 sq. y(s.bearing H.No.6-3-121Bt6t2ti, situated at e"Srrput, Hvie,r.iaJ*rno bounded as follows -funAanUi!n," North :St. Francis College South:Road East :Neighbours House West :Neighbour's House I lA NO: 1 oF 2022 Between: 1 M/s. Vasavi Nirnraan private Limited, Office at plot No.59, Street No.3, Road No.2 S-agar S_ociety, Banjara Hilts, Hyderaba;. R#. L-y its Oire"to, yerram Vijay Kumar S/o yerram Shankaraiafr, ageOSS yelrs,'Occ. Business, Rl/o Flat No.5, Samridhi Towers, Motilal Nehru N"grr, BJg-;r;"., Hyderabad_500016 M/s. Sri Sri Devetopers, A Regd..,L.Tl"f!i.q Firm (Regn. No.6712020) Havins its Principat place of business at#1-12-5g3i3e, strJeii.ro.+ Gagan Mahal, Hyderabad i. ii. 500 O29 Rep. by its Managing p;;;;- -- Mr. S. Sunil Kumar S/o S.OayarianO nao lvtr. Santosh Kumar Saraiya Slo k"f.rOt Saraiya - 2 "i AND 1 ...PETITIONERS/RESpONDENTS No.8 & 9 Sahebzadi Mubarak Beoum, D/o Late Nawab Mahmood Jung Bahadur, W/o Nawab Naseeruddin Khin. aged 60 V"ro, O".. iousehold, Rep. by her GpA Holder Md Zainuddin Khan-s/o rur*"0 lrr"r""ru"oiin l.ran and sahebzadi Mubarak Begum aged 34 years, Occ Advocate' R/o 'l-8-310' Begumpet' Hvderabad ..-RES'.NDENT/APPELLANT Occ. Business

2. Nawab Masood Ali Khan, (died on 1710612021) 3. Nawab Bahboob Ali Khan, (died on 26'03'2021) 4. Nawab Mukhtar Ali Khan, S/o Late Nawab Mahmood Jung, aged 55 years' 5. Nawab Moizuddin Ali Khan, S/o Late Nawab Mahmood Jung' aged 62 years' 6. Shahzadi Mushadi Begum(died)' (died) 7 . Sahebzadi Mahmooda Begum, (died on 16'09'2021 ) tnn s to 5 are R/o H.No.3--5.12ilE/1/6, Mumtaz Manzil Eden Garden, and not necessary parties to this appeal) Occ. Business ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS PetitionunderSectionlslCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Coy{ [fV 99^pl"^"::9 ' vacate the stay orders passed in l.R' No 2 of 2021 in C'M'A' No 533 I 2021 dt' 06-01-2022. IANO:2 OF 2O22 Between 1 . Sb. Sajida Sullana wio Late Nb. Masood Ali Khan' Aged TfuYrs' R/o H No' 1- 8-320, Patigadda, Begumpet, Hyderabad, Occ House hold' 2. Nawab sultanuddin Khan S/o Late Nb. Masood Ali Khan, Aged. 58 Yrs, Rl/o H.ttfo. r-e-aZO, Patigadda, Begumpet, Hyderabad, Occ' business' 3. Nawab Amanuddin Khan S/o Late Nb' Masood Ali Khan' Aged' 57 Yrs' R/o H.f.fo. f -A-aZO, Patigadda, Begumpet, Hyderabad, Occ business 4. Sb. Nikhalunissa Begum D/o Late Nb Masood Ali Khan' Aged 55 Yrs' R/o H.Nfo. r-A-ezO, Patigaddi, Begumpet, Hyderabad, Occ' Household' 5. Nb. Rizwanuddin Khan Sio Late Nb' Masood All Khan' Aged 53 yrs' R/o H'No' 1-8-320, Patigadda, Begumpet, Hyderabad, Occ business' 6. Afzaluddin Khan S/o Late Nb. Bahbood Ali Khan, Aged. Major,'occ business' T.SabahatunissaKhanw/oMumtazHussainKhanandDioLateNb.BahboodAli Khan, Aged. Major, Occ. household' S.SadiaunissaKhanW/oFauzanAlladin,Aged.Major,occ.Household. 9. Shujauddin Khan S/o Late Nb. Bahbood Ali Khan' Aged Major' Occ' business' ... Petitione rs/Proposed R-10 to R-18 (All R/O 1-B-31511, Opp. American Consulate, patigadda, Begumpet, Hyderabad) - AND 1. Sahebzadi lVlubarak Begum D/o Nb. Mahmoud Jung, Aged.57 yrs, R/o H.No. 1-B-310, Patigadda, Hyderabad, O"c. nousenoiO.- 2. Nb. Masood Ali Khan (died per L. Rs petitioners 1 to 5) 3. Nb. Behbood Ali Khan (died per L.Rs petitioners 6 to 9) 4 Nb MukhrarAri Khan s/o Nb. Mahmood Jung, Aged.54 yrs, occ Landrord. 5. Nb. Moizuddin Khan S/o Nb. Mahmood Jung, Aged. 50 yrs, Occ. business. 6. Nb. Minhajuddin Khan S/uo Nb. Mahmoud Jung, Occ. business. (AIl R/O 3-5-121tE/1t6, IVumataz Hyderabad) Manzil, Eden Garden, King Kothi Road,

7. Sb. Mushadi Begum (died) f,":,;#,Xlr"oda Besum D/o Late Nb. Mahmood Juns, Ased 60 Yrs, Occ. (All R/o H.No Hyderabad) 3-5-121|E/1/6. Mumtaz Manzil, Eden Gagden, King Kothi,

9. Vasavi Nirmaan (p) Ltd, Office at ptot No. 59, Street No.:1, Road No. 2, Sagar Society, Banjara Hills, HyderabrO ,"p OV itt Oirl'#, yur.r, Vijay Kumar. 1 0. M/s Sri Sri Develooers , Office at 1_12-593/3g, Street No. 4, Gaganmahal, Hyderabad, rep by it,s partners S. Sunil Kumar & Santosh Kumar. . Petition under o.der 1 Rure 10 (2) R/w Section 151 CpC r;rTr?inr?i""i;: circumstances stated in the affidavit fitd i; ;;;ilof the perition, the High court may be pleased to pass 11 order irpf"rJing the petitioners 1 to 9 herein/proposed respondentr,ryo:.^io t; ;;;;;noents No.1a herein as the Respondents 1o to '18 ir the subject cMA and a-tt-tie penoing apprications. Counsel for the Appellant: M/s C. KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.B & 9: M/s. SUNIL S GANU, S.C. counser for the petitioners in r.A.No.2 0f 2022: M/s. RAKESH The Court detivered the following: JUDGMENT , 'ANGHT I ; 0I THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA CMA. No.533 of2O2L JUDGMENT: $ter Hon'ble Si Justice T.Vinod Kumdr) Learned counsel for the appellant addressed a letter dt.03.03.2025 to the Registrar(Judicial) High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad, seeking to withdraw this CMA stating that during the pendency of the appeal' the parties have settled the matter out of Court by way of compromise, and thus, the present Appeal has becortie' infructuous. When the matter is taken up in the open Court, learned counsel for the appellant reiterate{'the said request.

2. Sri Sunil, S Ganu, learned Senior Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.8 & 9 does not dispute the aJoresaid submission made.

3. Therefore, granting permission as sought for' this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn' Interim order, if any, granted earlier in this Appeal stands vacated. No order as to costs. \_ 2 },

4. Consequently, miscellaleous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPYII SD/. M VIJAYA Bfi KER, JOINT REG TRAR. SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The XXV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad 2. one CC to tVt/s. Rakesh Sangrri no"olrl" iop"ucj '", 3. One CC ro Sri C. Kumar, no,Tocate lOeUCi-' 1. 9n" CC to Mrs Sunit S. Ganu, RAvocatu f6pUCi 5. Two CD Copies a- t' HIGH COURT DATED:0 610312025 I \\? o l TJo $i u'li tS C-r ^i t i' -t Dls" r a JUDGMENT CMA.No.533 of 2021 DISMISSING THE C.M.A. AS WITHDRAWN. { \ry\