✦ High Court of India · 02 May 2025

V Y. Bql,pab u Slo v. Ravinder, Agel

Case Details High Court of India · 02 May 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
02 May 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,175 words

The State of Tetangana, Rep by its Plincipql Secretary Power and Energy Deoartment Secretariat. Hvderabad-500022. ih5 $Jth"tn Power Distri'bution Company of Telangana State Ltd, Rep. by iis b[riimin and Managing Director hhving its Corporate office at 6-'1-50, Mint Compound, HYderabad 500063. i'ne Supe?inie"din{ Engineer, Operation/ Habsiguda Circle TGSPDC L' Habsiouda ine Divisionat Engineer, Operation/Sainikpuri Division TGSPqC L, Hvderabad ifr" AiJlit"nt Divisional Engineer, Operation/ Malkajgiri Sub - Division TGSP DC L, Hyderabad ine Assistant Engineer, SE/O/RR East AE tt/irjalguda, TGSPDC L' Hvderabad t6"Gieitur Hyderabad Municipal Corporation,, Rep by the Commissioner' gecunderabad Zone. __.REspoNDENTs Petition under Article 226 ot the constitutlon of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of wRlT oF MANDAMUS directing the respondents 2 to 6 to provide electricity connection supply to 12Nos.3-Ph each SKW Domestic Load over and the above existing I No'3-Ph5KWTemporarySupplyLoadofSCNo.2gol023T4thus,makingatotal load of 65KW Connection to the Residential Building in H No l6-13211' in Survey Nos.762l5,763/T,admeasuring62TSq.Yards,situatedatMirzalgu{a'Malkajgiri Circleand(M),Medchal-MalksjgiriDistrict,TS,boundgdbyNorth-Neighboprs House, South- Mirzalguda Road/Neighbours House, East. t\Iirza|guda Road/ Neighbours House beating No.11-86 (New 16-133), West- Neighbours House - -'v bearing No.1'1-85 (tlew '16-132). Without insisting upon occupanc,/ certificate from the 7th respondent by holding that the refusal to provide electric ty connection to the above referred p remises is illegal and arbitrary lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition unde'Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circums,tanees Etated in the affidavit filed in riupport of the petition, the High Court may be cleased pleased to direct the respcndents 2 to 6 to provide electricity conne:tion Supply to 12Nos.3-Ph each 5KW Domestic Load over and the above exi ;ting 1 No.3-ph 5KW Temporary Sucply Load of SC No- 2901 02374 thus, making a total load Of 65KW Connection to the Rpsidential Building in H No.16-1i,2/1 , in Survey Nos.762l5, 163/7, aJmeasuring 627 Sq. Yards, situated at Mirzalguda, Matkajgiri Circle and (M), Mecr:hal-Malkajgiri District, T.S., bounded by Nolh: Neighbqur,s House, South- lVlir;:alguda Road/Neighbour's House, East- Mi.zalguda Road/ Neighbour's House bearing No. 1 1-86 (New 16-1 33), West- Nei:lhbourrg Hqggg bearing No.1l.B5 (New 16-132) Without insisting upon occupancl.Egrtifigate frqm the 7th respondent rending disposal of main writ petition and mily deem fit and proper in thq circumr,tance of the case Counsel forr the Petitioner: SllflT. THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Counsel for Respondent No. 1: GP FOR ENERGY Counsel fo( Respgndent No. 2 to 6: SRt N. SREEDHAR, SC FOR ISSPDCL Counsel for Respondent No 7: SRt G. MADHUSUOHAN REDDY The Court ryade the following; ORDER ,.1 I Ir F i- t; t! n, ; I fI I THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No.14301 OF 2025 ORDER: With the consent of both the parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself

2. This Writ Petition is h1ed, under Article 226 of tlre Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: "...to issue unt order or direction more porttcularlq one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS directiv the respond.ents 2 to 6 to prouicle electricttg connection SuppLA to 12Mos.3-Ph each SKW Domestic Load ouer ancl the aboue eisting 1 No.3'Ph 5KW Ternporarg Supplg Lodd of SC No: 2901 02374 thus, rrruking a totdL load oJ 65KW Connection to the Residentiat Buitding in H.No.16 132/1, in Surueg Nos.762/5, 763/7, admeasunng 627 Sq. [email protected], situated at Mirz.dtguda, MaLkajgin Circb and (M), Medchat-Malkajgiri Distict, LS., bountied bg North: Neighbour's House, Sourfu Mirzalgudo Road/ Neighbour's House, Ed.st: Mirzalguda Road/ Neighbour's Hol6e beaing No.11-86 (Neu 16-133), West: Neishbour's House bearing No.l1 85 (Neu 16- 132). Withnut in-ststirLg upon occupqncA certificate from tle 7h respondent bU holding thal the refusaL to prouicle electicitg connectiotl to the aboue rekrred premises is illegal and arbitrarv and poss.-."

3. Heard Smt.Thakur Roopa Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Govcrnment Pleader for Energz for respondent No.1; Sri N.Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited, for respondent Nos.2 to 6; ancl Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned t Standing Counsei for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, for respondent No.7. +. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order of this 2 . ,.. PIi,J \rp 14301 2025 Court in W.P.1,1c.6030 of 2O2O, dated 20.O4.2020, zrnd 'equested this Court to l)ilss similar order in the present Writ PcL tion also. The same is r rot seriously disputed by the learne<l Gc rzernment Pleader as rvell as learned Standing Counsel for the respo rdents.

5. In vieu, cI tl-re above submissions and for the reasor s alike in the order of th s; Court in W.P.No.603O ol 2O2O, dated 2C.O4.2O2O, this Writ Petition is drsposed of directing the respondr:nts to release the power supp,ly to the premises of the petitioner subj:ct to the compliance of the terms and conditions and on lurn shing an undertaking 1c, produce the occupancy cerlificzrtc :rom the concerned NIurr rcipal Corporation within a prcscribed per od, and if no such occupa nc). certihcate is produced within sur:h pr:riod, it is open to the re;pondents to take appropriate action in a,rcordance with 1a\ .. Miscell:rn,:ous petitions pending, if any, sha11 star Ld closed. There shall bc t-- o order as to costs. //TRUE COPY/I SD/ A. PRATHIMA DEPUTT REGISTRAR ,/,/. ,, sEC-flgtrr6FFrCER

1. The Principal Secretary Power and Energy Department Secretirriat, Hyderabad-50C 022.

2. The Southern F'ower Distribution Company of Telangana State Ltd, Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director having its Corporate office at 6-1-50, Mint Compounrl. Hyderabad 500063.

3. The Superintending Engineer, Operation/ Habsiguda Circle TG SPDC L, 4. The Diiisional [:ngineer, Operation/Sainikpuri Division TGSPDT] L, 5. The Assistant [)ivisional Engineer, Operation/ Malkajgiri Sub - I)ivision TGSP Hyderabad Habsiguda DC L, HYderaba,J t- I l To, o 7 o. q 10 11 12 The AEsistant Engineer, SE/O/RR East AE Mirjalguda, TQSPDC L, Hyderabad The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation,, Rep. by the Commissioner, Secunderabgd Zone. One CC to Smt. Thakur Boopa $ingh Advocate TOPUCI Two CCs to GP For Energy ,fligh Coud for the State of felangana. [OUT] One CC to Sri N. Sreedhar. Advocate (OPUC) One gq to Sri G. ltll4dhueudhan Reddy, Advocate (OPUC) Tyro CP Copies MBC BS / ,].i:, i** ; !11 :: F F,li l; e EX . T t I : a : I CC TODAY r' HI(3H COURT DATED: 0210512025 ,-.''' ''- ()r .s ,,$ .!. -.i \ \ .., I t. I > ]j i ORDER WP.No.143,01 of 2025 ,/, 4,4 2 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOfl,JT COSTS

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments