✦ High Court of India · 03 Sep 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 03 Sep 2025

Smt. Bala Manasa. Wo SriIV. Ir,4anas Karthik, Aged about 35 years, Occ_ House wife R/o H No .13/360, b.si;;;;;i;icL',i:;;;a crub, cudiwada, Krishna Districl, Andhra pradesh. ... Petitioner/Respondent AND Sri M. Manas Karthik, S/o. Sri._Muni Kumar Babu,. Aged about 37 years, Occupation- private employ"", n7JSrr"It,5'priau Apartment, Flat N6.202, Near Masjid. Katyanpuri botbny. ...RespondenUpetitioner Petition under Section .1 51 of CpC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavrt fired in su.pport or tne pltitr"on. the High court mav be pteased to vacate the stav order passeJ i; cirp.i!;.ioso''"iio'!*s,"i'r,". 2710612025, for stavino the execution oi-tne oiOer passed by the learned Principal District and L rog"-"rr-i"a,n]iv corrt t\4edchar-Markaiqrri, Kushaisuda in t A No.304 of 2024 i" icop r.ro.l tt#.t zoiz.;;d ;6iiiil6,;; lA NO: 3 oF 2025 "sess-ions Petition under section 151 0f . cpc praying that in the circumstances stated rn the affidavit fired in, support ot tne petiiion. the High court may be gl_eased to send the Respondel'tHr.Ornol-h;;; ,n rhe civit prison for non_ payment of expenses of Rs.4,000/- to the peiitio;;r (wife) ro,. tne -app"ar""n.""on 3010612025 in FCOp.No.1732-ot 2022., O"rore ir,J're"rned principar District and Sessions Judge-cum Family Court, f,rf _lfrf rf f,iigiri, Xushaiguda, as directed by the Hon,bte Court in CRp No .1650 "a.f.,rf of ioZs, ort# 27rc6/2025. CIVIL REV ISION P ETITION N O:1571 OF 2025 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the Order dated 10to2t2025 passed in rA No.303 I"',#i," of the Principar District and Sessions .luogl-crm-rl;1iry court,-nreJ.rr.rr_Na"ii rlg,rr "r District, Kushaiguda 2014 iliibF N; i;;;;ii Between: Sri M. Manas Karrhik. S/o. Sri._Muni Kumar Babu. Aged about 37 vears. ft ::ii,"j::lll:ff ,:TBS6X?8,,"*1:,1"][%'r,1li+f,g;:.,"A'.,x?Ti: i Permanent address: Flat Nacharam HYderabad. No.E-203, May flower park apartments' near ...Petitioner AND iT,l.3fl f; ,Yfl ,lla'H:,i?is,ysJls:i[f 5+!]s'i1s:"i'"i:d"'e''*',::: i<,iir,"" iiittti"t. Andhta Pradesh ...Respondent IA NO :1 oF 2025 petition under section 1 51 0f cpc praying that in the circumstances stated tn]e Hiorr Court mav be pleased to n No sosrzoz+ in FCoP drincipar District and Sessions Judge' at in the affidavit filed in sup'jort "tihJpJii"t1 stav the order dated ii'ioi'iciii'"i"t"o in .l No..1732t2o22, on the fite liHilI" lriledcha l, lVl alkaj g i ri District' iJsnriguo ", IA NO: 20F 2025 Between: iT,i,3ilft ,Yfl,1:f, HSill$,y3il3:i"1ytl3$f ,$,33:'3:B',3il'h?33' ffi;h;; iiiiiti"t' Rnar"a Pradesh' ...petitioner/Respondent AND Sri M. Manas Karthik, S/o Sri Occuoation. Private emp^loyee' Near'Masjid KalYanPurt L;olony' tvluni Kumar Babu, Aged about 37 ye-ars R/""sr;;Ih; eiioe npirtment, Flat No 202' ' ...ResPondenUPetitioner petition under section 151 0f cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supiort ttii" pJfi"^l-oL I':n Court mav be pleased to vacate the sta1, order p'J;; i;"CnF'No rozr ot,iozs' dated 27t06t2025' for staying the execution " ''n"" "'i!' put"LJ nv *t",learned Prlncipal District and -'cLu.t, - H,rdo"r,ul-Malkaigiri, Kushaiguda' in sessions Judge- "rrn-rlilif 1.A.No.303 ol 2024 in rcop r'rolrz32 of 2022', dated 1010212025' lA NO: 3 oF 2025 Petition under section 15'1. of cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fi'ed in sunport of the petiiion, tni'H-igr-r court may be preased to 1en! fre Respondent rFiusband) nuLin in if,uiivit prisor for non_payment of monthry maintenance for the month Lr"",idzl of Rs6,000r (Rupees six "i Thousand only) which woutd be paid b;for; i;,i"ilrly, 2025, asdirected bv the Honorabte court in cRp.No.167i of 202td;te; zi'tianozs Counsel for the petitioner: SRI RAVI KUMAR GADIpE Counsel for the Respondent: SRI B PEDDIRAJULU The Court made the following: ORDER ., THE HON,BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACTIARYA C.R.P.Nos .165O ard. L67 1 of2025 SriRavil(umarGadipe,lcarnedcounselappearingforthepetitlonei Sri B.Pcddiraju, lcarned counsel appearing for the respondent- ORDER: ThesetwoCivilRevisionPetitions('CRPs')ariseoftheorders datect lO'02.2025 passed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge-cum-Family Cour[, Medchal'Malkajgiri District, at Kushaiguda, respectively in t A Nos 303 and 3O4 of 2024 in FCOP.No. 1732 of 2022' These matters have been heard on several occasions' It is clear 2. that on every occasion, the petitioner through his counsel has raised one contention or the other with regard to the changes in calculation with regard to the arrears which the petitioner is due to pay to the respondent. A Co-orrlinate Bench on 27 06 '2025 passed orders granting stay 3. of operation of the rmpugned orders subject to the petitioner paying Rs.4,0OO/- to thc respondent towards expenses on every date of her appearance in the FCOP and Rs 6'OO0/ per month towards interim mainlenance to the respondent on or before 1Oth of every succeeding month.

4. Counsel appearing for the respondent has frled a calculation Memo which shows that arrears of Rs'1'76'OOO/- is due to be paid by I I @'$"..iai \ 2 the petitioner in terms of the orders passed by the Co_ordinate Bench on 27.06.20,.25. The Memo shows that the petitioner has paid a total amount of Rs.12,800/_ till daLc

5. Counst:l appearing for the petitioner at this pornt submits that there is an crror in the calslrlation Mcmo filed by the respondent.

6. Il is cr idcnr that lhe pctilioner sceks ro buy timc anrl rake adv:rntage of the order of stay by pointing out various loopholes in the amounts .g,hic:h are due to the respondcnt. I{cnce, this Court is inclined to vac.rte the orders dated 27.06.2O25 passcd by the Co ordinate Bench granting stay of opcration o[ Lhe impugnecl orders The respondent shall be at liberty to take appropnate steps with regard to execution of the impuened orders 7 . The petitionc r,s l:ona fides are in question since the petitioner continues to bc in violation of the drrection passed by the Co_ordinate Bench.

8. CRP.Nos t 6it0 and I (r7 1 of 2025 arc accordingly dismissed. Interim orders ciated 27.06.2025 are vacated. Miscellaneous if an1r, 5[s11 stancl closed_ There shall be no applicaLions pending, order as to costs. 1 SD/-M.OSMAN ALI BAIG ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 The Principal District and Sessions Judge-cum-Family Court, Medchal_ Markaiqiri District. Kushaiquda. . * r- rT-5:*l fr;ix,". ,/

2. One CC to Sri Ravi Kumai Gadipe, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri B Peddirajulu, Advocate IOPUC] 4. Two CD CoPies ,/ ABK/PSL l l t I i t HIGH COURT DATED:03/09/202S ORDER CRP.Nos.1650 and 1671 or 2025 \ o '9. \.\. x.t-. DISMISStNG THE CRps / 1z ./< - ,//, 07 0[T M .c; i _ii I :i ':' r,.i1,;,,,.ii| ;)_;,i' ,.. *-- ..:,J,. - .,i \ -.:.,',.. t I I i4 .i

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments