The High Court · 2025

Sri Raghu, Sub-lnspector of Police, Mominpet Police Station, Vikarabad District. Sri K.Raju, Sub-lnspector of Police, working at S.P.Office, Vikarabad District, Previously working at Mominpet Police Station, Vikarabad District. M.Veeraswamy, Assistant Sub-lnspector of Police, Mominpet Police Station, Vikarabad District. Sri Vasu, Head Constable Working at Mominpet Police Station, Mominpet, Vikarabad District.

10. M.Venkataiah, Head Constable 1958, working at S.P.Office, Vikarabad District, Previously working at Mominpet Police Station, Vikarabad District.

11. K.Shankaraiah, Head Constable 552, working at S.P.Office, Vikarabad District, Previously working at Mominpet Police Station, Vikarabad District.

12. B.Shivaiah, Police Constable 5811, working at S.P.Office, Vikarabad District, Previously working at Mominpet Police Station, Vikarabad District.

13. Raghavender, Police Constable 4372, working at S.p.Cf ice, Vikarabad District, Previously working at Mominpet Police Station, \'ikarabad Diskict. 14.Smt Neeraja, W/o Veerabhadreswar, Aged 33 years, O:; Govt.Employee of Mandal Agricultural Office, R/o H.No 40Z Mulugu Jaya tj rarathi Ca'rOen, ltrloosapet, Hydera bad. '1 5. Veera Bhadreswar Rao, S/o.Not known, Aqed about 4C ,ears. Occ public Servant, R/o.H.No,404 tr,4ulugu Jaya Bhara-thi Garden, I"/ )osapet, Hyderabad ..RESPONDENTS Petrtion under Articre 226 of rhe constitution of lnci r praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the ligh court may be pleased to issue a writ or order more particularly one in he nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in r rt including sections 3O7, 322, 323, 386 and 387 of tPC in the FtR.No.64 of 201, dated 29-5-2017 on the file of the 4th respondent and not taking any crimir i I action against the respondents 5 to 1 5 basing on the FlR. No.64 of 2o1l ir d also not initiating departmental action aqalnst the respondents 4 to 13 for i egal confinement of petitioner and also caused to permanent disability by causir 3 serious damage to petitioner kidneys and also not awarding compensation ir ctuding the medical expenses to petitioner incurred by petitioner for medical treatment as i egat, arbitrary, unjust and also against Article 21 of consti ution of lndia and consequential directrons to the respondents 1 to 3 to initiatr departmentat action against the respondents 4 to 13 for illegal confinement and cr causing danger to life and also health to petitioner including awarding of comp: rsation to the tune of Rs.2 crores for permanent disability by causing damage to tr : kidneys forthwith. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017 (WPMP. NO : 33676 OF 2017) Petition under Section '1 5'1 cpc praying that in the c r ;umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court m;r , be pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to initiate departmentat action against the respondents 4 to 13 for illegal confinement and for causing danger to life arr d also health to the petitioner including awarding of compensation to the tune of Rs.2 crores for permanent disability by causing damage to the kidneys p. rding disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KARUNAKAR REDDy ,. 6F.!Ar +i!} . sY- Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: SRI M. SRINIVAS AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.14 and 15: M/S G. POORNASRI The Court made the following: ORDER t t THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N'TUKAR'PJ IJI UTRIT PETITI ON No.2 7LO6 oF 20L7 o RDER: This Writ Pctition is f-rled under Article 226 tt1' ( onstltutlon of India seeking t)-rc following relief/ s:- '...to issue a urit or ordcr more particularly on-e irl tht: r tturc of writofmandamuscleclaringLheactionofthe.3rd.resp.)denrin not including scctrons 3O7,"322' 323' 386 ana S!] of I F I in ttre FIR.No.64 ol 2Lo1'/ dated 29-5-2017 on the file of Jre 4th . it!'."l agr nst the respondent and lrot tal(lnB any t1-Ti:,"1 .""i."J."r. 5 to 15 basingion the FIR No'64 ol 2ol'l ld also not initiatilg dcpartmentJacdon against the responc ( 1ts '1 lo ia for itteg.-at ctnfinement of pctitioner and :rlso { i usec to "ai".bility by causing serious rlamage [o l etiLioner p".-rt .r.r, rrlso not awardin-g compensation in< 1'l ling the Ld.r.y" "rrd medical expenset tn f"titiot'"t inlurrecl-bv petiti()ner f'r rneclical I rticle 21 treatment as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and a1s9 3qarnst <:o"""q'""tial direcriorr to thc of Constitution ol lndia "rld respondents 1 to 3 to initiate departmental acdon :3'":l ll: .."i""a."o 4 to 13 for iltegal confinement and fr t caustng a-urig..,o Life rrnd also health io petitione,r including av arding of .o-!".r"rtio,, to the tune of Rs 2 Crores for permanent sability by causing darnage to the kiclneys forthwith and to p:1'': "

2. Heard Mr.liamnakar Reddy' learned cor' l sel lor the petitioner and Mr.M.Srinivas, Iearned Assistzr:-r (iovcrnment Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos' 1 to 5'

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner subrnits t lat the cause of action in thc present writ petition no long(r' sul-vives for adjudication and, therefore, prays that the \\ r t petition be dismissed as infructuous- Learned Assistant Government Pleader raisc s no objection to the said subn-rission. 2

5. In view of the submissions made by both learned counsel, and as the cause of action no longer survives, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Therc shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. S .A GOWRI SHANKAR TANT REGTSTRAR iiTRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 J One CC to Sri Karunakar Reddy, Advocate IOPUCI One CC to M/s G. Poornasri, Advocate [OPUC] TwoCCstoGPforHome,HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana'at Hyderabad [OUTI 4 Two CD CoPies TJ PMK ?+ HIGH COURT DATED:1411012025 ORDER WP.No.27106 ot 2017 7i- - ---=::\ .1,1 ..'- Irt,. 0 4 t:i 2gp () : -' r. --^ ri, ;/ DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS (A t\ 1)