The High Court · 2025

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particurarry one in the nature of lvlandamus by decraring the action of the Respondent No. 5 in interfering into the Petitioner's peacefur possession oi land to an extent of Ac.0-26Gts in sy. No. 206/AAl2',which is situated at rakkeilapahad viilage of Miryarguda r\,4andar, Nalgonda District and trying to mutate the petitioner,s land on the name of Respondent No- 6, is'highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of Articles 14, 15,21 and 300-4 of the constitution of rndia and arso vioration of the Principles of Naturar Justice and consequentry direct the Respondent No. s not to interfere into the Petitioner's peacefur possession and not to transfer her rand on thenameofFles0CndentNo.6withouthavinganyjurisdictiorandwithout following the due Prr::ess of law. IA NO: 1 OF 20 25 Petition un,ler section 151 CPC praying that in the circr' mstr.trrces stated in the affidavit filt;d irr support of the petition, the High Court nay be pleased to direct the Res,ponl:nt No.5 not to interfere into the Prtiticnsr's peaceful possessionancnotcltTansferherlandonthenameofRespordertNo.6w|thout having any jur sdi,:t on and without following the due process cf law' pending d isposal of Wril Petilion. Counsel for thr: Petitioner : SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for th,: Res pondents No.1to5 : ASST. GP FOR REVENU[: Counsel for th': Res Pondents No.6 : - The Court macle the following: ORDER ,?t HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETI TION No.13894 of 2o25 ORDER: This writ petition has been hled seeking to declare the action of respondent No.S in interfering into the petitioner's peaceful possession of land to an extent of Ac.O.26 gts., in 06lAAl2, situated at Takkellapahad Village, Miryalguda Nalgonda District and trying to mutate the petitoner's on the name of respondent No.6, as illega1, arbitrary and 4pproPriate reliefs tated that the petitioner is the owner and possessor land admeasuring Ac.O.26 gts., in 2, situated at Takkellapahad Village, Miryalguda da District, having purchased the same under ed bearing document No.3B4 of 2022, dated o er stated that the name of the petitioner e revenue records and pattadar passbook the provisions of [he Telangana Rights in s Books Act, 2O2O (for short 'the Act, k No.T28170091O46 , Khata No.6O335. It is .:::l'. Land 2020'l further stated' incenlives san e petitioner is also receiving various by the Government as investment .. itt ..' lii:;.'14:7 )!d-* :::xrye-- 2 subsidies for :ultivation of the land. The grievance rf the petitioner is r.h lt ilt the instance of respondent No.6 rcsp< r:dent Nos.4 and 5 rrr rl their supporting staff are frequently interf :ring with his pos ;,:ssion over the subject .1and anrl c. ursing inconveni,-'r'rc:: or enjoyment of the same. 3, Considcr:d tho submissions of the learned r:ourLst:l br lhe petitioncr lc:r r r,ed Assistant Government Pleader for Rt venue appearing f,r - '.:spondent Nos.1 to 5 and perused the reoord. Since 1e arnccl c ounsel appearing for respondent No.6 hrrli not filed vakala r- o a caveat, he is not having locus to a ppe u and defend rer;pc: ( ont No.6.

4. Piract iit:'e. the contents of the writ afhdavrt would reveal that Lhere iLr- scrious disputes between the petil-ion( r and respondent \1, , 6 and the said disputes are civiL in I te ture. Therefore thrr t eve nue authorities are not having anv pt,\ er or authoritl, tr) in.,rrfere with the civil disputes betr.l,r:en the rirrties and it rs onl'. [ar: competent Civil Court to decide tk e d s rutes with rega -d t,l ['t]e and possession over the property.

5. In 'zier,r rf the above, this Court deems it appropr itrte to dispose o thc ,r'r;t petition directing the respondent N os.z lLnd 5 not to inlcrf(.:r : u.ith the peaceful possession ancl en joyr.rr,nt of / J I I t i the petitioner over the subject property, except following due process of 1aw. It is needless to observe that if the petitioner is having any dispute with respondent No.6 in respect of the subject property, he has to take necessary steps by approaching competent Civil Court, in accordance with law. It is made clear that this order does nol prevent the revenue authorities to discharge their functions for granting mutation/ succession/ amendment of the revenue records, strictly in accordance with law. 6 Accordingly, the Writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed //TRUE COPYII SD/- A. SRINIVASA RE DDY SS TANT REGISTRAR I To, SECTION OFFICER '1 . The Princi pal Secreta ry, State of Telan gana, Reven e Department, Secretaria J ecretariat Buildi ng, Secrefary, Hyderab ad 2. The Chief Commissioner, CCLA, Telangana, Hyderabad_ 3. The District Collector, Nalgonda District, Gadwal. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Miryalaguda Division, Nalgonda District 5. The Tahsildar, Miryalaguda Mandal, Nalgonda District. 6. One CC to SRt RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate. [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to Gp FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana. 8. Two CD Copies. g BSK GJP I HIGH COURT DATED:01 105t2025 1H: ljT s( \:- ,ru-) 5 ( a ) ) :/Y 18 Itll,l zEir D es ,', ,'. , ,A' ,. *i 2' ORDER WP.No.1389a'of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOU-T CI)STS t,9 (rc'f'- Qo-,', .<[6v