N. Sudershan v. Ranga Reddy District
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ss. 10, 12
Judgment
3 Smt. Padmasree, Mandal Revenue Officer, Medchal, Ranga Reddy District. 4 Sri Venkateswara Rao, Junior Engineer, R&B, Department, Medchal .....Respondents Contempt Case Under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue summons to the respondents and upon due enquiry punish the respondents under Section 10 & 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for violating the orders dated: 31-10-2003 passed in WP. No. 23011 of 2003 and batch; C.C. NO : 1535 of 2003 Between: T. Lingaiah S/o. T. Hanumaiah, Occ: Agril., R/o. 9-276 Medchal, RR Dist. AND ..... Petitioner 1 Ansari, Executive Officer, Grampanchayat Medchal Grampanchayat, RR Distrct. 2 Rajeswar Goud, Sarpanch, Medchal Grampanchayat, R.R. District. 3 Smt. Padmasree, Mandal Revenue Officer, Medchal, R.R. District. 4 Venkateswara Rao, Junior Engineer, R&B Department, Medhcal .....Respondents Contempt Case Under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue summons to the respondents and upon due enquiry punish the respondents under Section 10 & 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for violating the orders dated: 31-10-2003 passed in WP. No. 23010 of 2003 and batch; Contd.. ..2.. C.C. NO. 1536 of 2003 Between: U. Anand, S/o. Badhraiah, Occ: Business, R/o. 1-79, APHB Colony, Medchal, RR Dist. AND ..... Petitioner
Ansari, Executive Officer, Grampanchayat Medchal Grampanchayat, RR Distrct.
Rajeswar Goud, Sarpanch, Medchal Grampanchayat, R.R. District.
Smt. Padmasree, Mandal Revenue Officer, Medchal, R.R. District.
Venkateswara Rao, Junior Engineer, R&B Department, Medhcal .....Respondents Contempt Case Under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue summons to the respondents and upon due enquiry punish the respondents under Section 10 & 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for violating the orders dated: 31-10-2003 passed in WP. No. 23012 of 2003 and batch; C.C. NO. NO: 1537 of 2003 Between: T. Laxmaiah, S/o. T. Viswanatham. AND ..... Petitioner
1. Ansari, Executive Officer, Grampanchayat Medchal Grampanchayat, RR Distrct.
2. Rajeswar Goud, Sarpanch, Medchal Grampanchayat, R.R. District. 3. Smt. Padmasree, Mandal Revenue Officer, Medchal, R.R. District.
4. Venkateswara Rao, Junior Engineer, R&B Department, Medhcal .....Respondents Contempt Case Under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue summons to the respondents and upon due enquiry punish the respondents under Section 10 & 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for violating the orders dated: 31-10-2003 passed in WP. No. 23013 of 2003 and batch; C.C. No. 1538 of 2003 Between: T. Anjaneyulu, S/o. T. Lingaiah, Occ: Business, R/o. 1-337 & 338, Medchal, R.R. District. ..... Petitioner contd.. ..3.. AND
1. Ansari, Executive Officer, Grampanchayat Medchal Grampanchayat, RR Distrct.
2. Rajeswar Goud, Sarpanch, Medchal Grampanchayat, R.R. District. 3. Smt. Padmasree, Mandal Revenue Officer, Medchal, R.R. District. 4. Venkateswara Rao, Junior Engineer, R&B Department, Medhcal .....Respondents Contempt Case Under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue summons to the respondents and upon due enquiry punish the respondents under Section 10 & 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for violating the orders dated: 31-10-2003 passed in WP. No. 22986 of 2003 and batch; These Contempt Cases coming on for hearing upon perusing the cases and the affidavits and the counter affidavits filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri B. Vijaysen Reddy, Advocate for the petitioner in all the C.C. Nos. 1534, 1535, 1536, 1537 and 1538 of 2003 and of Sri G. Shiva Kumar Goud, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 and of Smt. Jyothieswar Gogineni, Advocate for the Respondents 1 and 3 and of Sri J. Ramachandra Rao, Advocate for Respondent No. 4 in all the Contempt Cases, the Court made the following ORDER:
Sri Ansari, first respondent, Executive Officer, Medchal Grampanchayat shall present in this Court on 24-10-2008 along with relevant records pertaining to issuance of notice on the Writ Petitioners in the above Contempt Cases. Post on 24-10-2008 for his presence
. // TRUE COPY // DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To 1 Ansari, Executive Officer, Grampanchayat, Medchal Grampanchayat Ranga Reddy District. (BY RPAD) 2 Rajeswar Goud, Sarpanch, Medchal Grampanchayat Ranga Reddy District. 3 Smt. Padmasree, Mandal Revenue Officer, Medchal, Ranga Reddy District. 4 Sri Venkateswara Rao, Junior Engineer, R&B, Department, Medchal. (ADDRESSEES 2 TO 4 BY RPAD) 5 One CC to Sri Sri B. Vijaysen Reddy, Advocate (OPUC) 6 One CC to Sri G. Shiva Kumar Goud, Advocate (OPUC) 7 One CC to Smt. Jyothieswar Gogineni, Advocate (OPUC) 8 One CC to Sri Sri J. Ramachandra Rao, Advocate (OPUC) 9 One spare copy. Ksv Ksv Date of drafting: 30-09-2008 HIGH COURT AGRJ DATE: 26-09-2008 NOTE: POST ON 24-10-2008 FOR APPEARANCE OF R1 C.C. NOS. 1534, 1535, 1536, 1537 & 1538 of 2003 DIRECTION
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.