The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumsta,rces stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction, more particulady one in the naturer of Writ or Mandamus, declaring the Proceedings in F.No. / DSSH/Auc/ NZB/ 201t)-Suppl Z-lll, dt. 03-05-201 I ofthe 1st respondent herein appointing the respondents 2 to 6 herein as Fateh Khawans to perform the services of Mujawars as being illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and authority as well in violation of the acc;rued rights of the petitioner apart from being in violation of Section 32 (2) of the A.P. Wakf Act, and consequently set aside the same. O:1OF M :257 oF 2011 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstanoes stated in the affklavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Proceedings of the 1st respondent in F.No. / DSSH/AuC/ NZB/ 2010-Suppl z-lll, dt.03-05-2011 with a direction to continue the petitioner as Mujawar of the the Dargah Hazarath Syed Saadulhh Hussaini Rh. Bada pahad Village, Vami Mandal, Nizarirabad District, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. Counsril forthe Petitioner: Ms. A VARALAKSHMI Counset forthe Respondent No.l: SRI K' RAGHUVEER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2to6: Ms' NAZEEM ARA' SC FORWAQF BOARD The Court made the following: ORDER THE IIOIY'BLE SilT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DE1TI WRTT !t f,o.21139 oF 2(}11 ORDER: Hr:ard Ms.Nazeem Ara., learned Standing counsel appearing for Waqf Board.

2. .Learned counsel appearing for the unoffrcial respondents has h1ed.a orpy of the impugned order to demonstrate ttrat tJ:e respondents No.2 to 6 were appointed as Fateh Khawans to peiform the services of Mujawars, only for a period of one year and since the said period is lapsed, ttie cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and has becorne infructuous.

3. In view of the said submission and having perused the interim order, t.ris. Court is satisfied that this writ petition has become infi'uctuous.

4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed as infruchrous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed. SD'- A.SREENIVASA REDDY SISTANT REGISTRAR /TTRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, One CC to Ms. A. VARALAKSHMI, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRl. K. RAGHUVEER REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Ms. NAZEEM ERA, SC FORWAQF EOARD IOPUC] Two CD Copies 1 2 3 4 BM TKS P|{q. HIGH GOURT DATEI):1311012025' ORDER WP.No.21139 of 2011 S Te ? I JAll 2026 (.; ( + :,i CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS tttr-\r{