V Bharat Kumar v. The State of Telangana
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Petition under Section 482 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Crime No'109/2024 on the file of P.S ClD, TG Hyderabad (earlier on the file of P.S KPHB, Cyberabad) for the offences under sections 42O ' 370 (3) 406, 409, 419, 467 471 and 120B of IPC. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri lmmaneni Rama Rao, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Additional Public Prosecutor (TG/AP) on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following Order:- I i I i THE HO,}I'ElI,E SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS FL.TO CF]IMINAL PETITION No.6 118 of2O25 ORDER: Wheii t1:: lnatter is taken up for hearing' 1r' rned counsel for hr pttltioner seeks permission of this ( 'ltrt to u,ithdras- tlte i:rrminal petition, on the grouncl t la. the petitioner i'i,Ls rLlready filed fresh petition before this (lourt seekirrg re 1rr rl " ' 'r- " 1'
#2. Perri-.t,;si ri-r is accorded'
#3. Accor':lir'i,h. the criminal petition is clisr'i;st'i as rr'rthdram'- Pencli rE iniscellaleous applications, if al.l shzill stand cios.:l To, //TRUE COPY// SD/- MoHD. ISMAIL DEPU]Y iEGISTRAR SEC TIC}IVOFFICER The Vl Add tiorrzrl Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nampally at Hydc.r rbz d The Station Hcr, se Officer, CID p.S., Hyderabad Two CCs tc, thr: Public prosecutor, High Court for the State of Hyderabad lOl.t--l One CC to isri nrmanen' Rama Rao, Advocate tOpUCl \ Two CD Cop es --elirnaga, 2
#5. VC/gh HIGH COUR'I- DATED:0710512025 () 'I / ra, ---- -I
4.. s -\.N I,l ORDER CRLP.No.6118 of 2025 \ I i I i i I I I ! I I I I I I I ! i I I ; , DISMISSING THE CRLP AS WITHDRAWN f 1.6 Z-zVz<s
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.