The High Court · 2025

Petitron under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the judgment and decree dt.19.01.2018 passed in OS No. 192 of 2009 on the fite of the XX Additionat Chief Judge, City Civil Court, at Secunderabad pending disposal of the main appeal. -=.- .is_,.-*r*7 IA NO 2 0F 2018 : Between: Y VIJAY KUIIAR S/0. y Vishweswara Rao, Occ Busine; ;. Rlo.9_1_15ZlA Ptor No 54 ,otd), o0o st patrick-High 3"ni,ir -s"r"o!!tiliii Secunderabad t"o . . .. pet t lner/Respondent AND U RAJESHWAR, S/0. Late Ba,lraj, Occ. Business. R/o plot No.37 and 38 Kiran Enciave, gunrock, Sikh Viilag'; a;;r.-d";;il;' "" Respond,: rUAppellant Petitron under section .1 51 cpc praying that in the circ r mstances stated in the affidavit filed rn support of the petition, the High Courl ray be pleased to vacate the order dt 13.04.20j8 passed rn I.A.No. j of 20.18 ir ) C.C A.No. 106 of 20'18 and dismissed the above appeat. Counsel for the Appellant : Counsel for the Respondent : The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT SRl. SRICHARAN TELAPRT: _U VENKATESH DESHPANDI: l i I I I j l I 1 t i ,i I ; I i .L ---@':ry .,/ ,,/ I t I I I I I I I i THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON,BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY CITY CIVIL C OURT AP PEAL NO 106 0F o18 ]UDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Srr lustrcc Abhrnand Kumar Shavili) This appeal is filed aggrieved by the judgment and decree, dated 1B.01.201B,passedino'S.No.lg2of2009bythelearnedXXAdditional Chief Judge, Secu n de ra bad .

2. Heard Sri Sricharan Telaprolu, learned counsel for the appellant/defendant and Sri Venkatesh Deshpande, learned counsel for the res po n de nt/ P la intiff 3-BoththepartiesarepresentintheCourtandtheyareidentified by their respective counsel. Both the parties have stated that they have amicably settled the dispute outside the Court and they have entered into a Joint Memo, dated 23.O9 '2025 '

4. Today, learned counsel for the appellant has handed over two DemandDraftsworthofRs.20,00,000/-ie'DemandDraftNo10256' dated 23.09.2 O25, for an amount of Rs'3,00,000/- and Demand Draft No.10246, dated 20.09.2O25, for an amount of Rs'17,00,00O/- drawn on Axis Bank, to the respondent in the presence of learned counsel for the respondent. The respondent has stated that he has compromised the subject matter of the appeal with the appellant and that he has -l i I I I I I L. I i I I accepted Rs.20,00,000/- as full and final se -, lement towards the 2 AKS,.I & VRKII,.. C C.C-A N"o.106 of 201ii \ decreetal amou n t.

5. Learned counsel for the appellant has furnrr hed the Joint Memo, dated 23.09.2025, along with photocopies of the s rid Demand Drafts to the Court. The same is taken on record.

6. In view of the same, the appeal is J sposed of with an observation that the subject matter of tr: appeal has been compromised between the parties. There shall be ro order as to costs. Miscellaneous Applications, if any, pendinr in this appeal, shall sta nd closed. SD/. N SRIHARI I =PUTY REGISTRAR '- ---/ SECTION OFFICER \ )" /TTRUE COPY// To, 1 The XX Additional Chief Judge' City Civil Court' Secur c erabad 3PUCI 2. One CC to SRI SRICHARAN TELAPROLU Advocate 3 One CC to SRI VENKATESH DESHPANDE Advocat() 4. Two CD CoPies AlJng $ith cupr ol'thc J''int Melno ol the curnprolnisc OPUC] ASR/PSL w HIGH COURT DATED:24l0gl2025 # + JUDGMENT CCCA.No.106 of 2018 t\E ST ; ) I ( ( '\r 15 $tt ili?5 'Q.rqgr,s: 6T { *., ,// DISPOSING OF THE APPEAL -'?eA coY Y*' #@ '=.F-. IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD ut cA i.lo 106 0| 2018 Between U Rajeshwar AND Y.Vijay Kumar Ap pella n ti Defe nda nt RespondenUPlalntiff JOINT MEMO FILED ON BEHAL OF THE APPELLANT AND THE RESPONDENT It rs submrtted that the Appellant filed the above appeal aggneved by the Judgment and Decree, dated 18-01-2018 passed in O S'No 192 of 2009 on the file of the Hon'ble XX Addrtronal Chief Judge, Crty Civil Court at Secunderabad' tn decreeingthesurtinfavouroftheRespondentWhilethematterstoodthus'due to intenvention of the well wrshers of bothsldes, the parties have settled the disputes amicably out of the court. Srnce the Respondent/Plaintiff has already received/withdrawnanamountofRs.4'1'00'35Sldepositedbythe AppellanuDefend ant pursuant to the rnterlm order passed by this Hon'ble Court' agreedtoreceiveafurtherSumofRs,20,00,000/.towardsfullandfinalsettlement pertaining to Judgment and Decree, dated 18-01-2018 passed in OS'No 192 of 2009 on the file of the Hon,b|e XX Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Secunderabad and the AppellarluDefendant agreed to pay the same' Accordingly' the Appellant has drawn two DDs from the Axrs Bank Dtamond Potnt' SecunderabadBrachInfavouroftheRespondentVidel)DemandDraft No.010248, dated 20-09-2025 fo( an amount of Rs 17'00'000/- (Rupees Seventeen Lakhs) and 2) demand Draft No 010256' dated 23-09'2025 for an amount of Rs.3,00,001 (Rupees 1-hree Lakhs)' totalling to Rs'20'00'0001 Respondent and (Rupees Twenty Lakhs) and hereby handover the same to the 'rL__ he acknowledged the same Hence, the Joint Memo t4' T APPE r\il L Hyderabad, Date . 23-09-2025 Counsel fo r the RESP NDE nt- Counsel for the Respon en IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY CITY CIVIL COURT APPEAL NO: 106 OF 2018 Between: U RAJESHWAR. S/o Late balraj, Occ Business. R/o Plot No.37 and 38 Kiran Enclave, gunrock, Stkh Village, Secunderabad. APPELLANT AND Y VIJAY KUMAR, S/o. Y Vishweswara Rao, Occ Business, R/o. 9-1-152lA, Plot No.54 (old), Opp.St.Patrick High School, Sabastian Road, Secunderabad RESPONDENT Appeal filed under Section 96 of C.P.C, aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree, dated 18-01-2018 passed in O.S.No.192 of 2009 on the file of the Hon'ble XX Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Secunderabad. ... ORDER: This appeal coming on for hearing and upon pcrusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the L0$er Court aod tbe material papers in the Petition ar|d upon hcaring the argumcnts o[ Sri Sricharan Tclaprolu, Advocate for the appellant and of Sri Venkatcsh Deshpande for thc respondent. That this cou( doth Order and Decree as lollo*'s: I. That this appeal is bc hereby disposed of $'ith an observation that the subject matter of the appeal has been compromised benveen thc parties

2. That there shallbe no order as to costs //rP-\r r caPY l/ To SD/. N SRIHARI D PUTY REGISTRAR fotr.l o.ffa{E tr l. The XX Additional C'hicfJudge. Cliti"Ciril Coun. Secund 2. Two CD Copies ASR/PSL Y*- HIGH COURT DATED:24lOgl2025 DECREE CCCA.No.106 of 2018 DISPOSING OF THE APPEAL Ltareq(f z.r o\ '