The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 482 of Cr'P C' praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition' the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in Crime No 5'18 of 2021' daled lgto6t2o2lonthefileofllAJCJ.cum-XAddl.MetropolitanMagistrateKukatpa|ly Cyberabad including the appearance of the Accused till the disposal of the Main Quash Petition in the interest of the justlce' l.A. NO: 1 oF 2025 Between: Guduru Samltasiva Rao S/o Late Uma Maheshwar Rao Age 64 years, Occ No 16 3 2it+a at *ii si;sij'N:d;; coronv Kukatpa,y, [il'!?ir5,r1;;\ee ... Peti ti o n e r / R es p o n d e n ts i rrik f;,-8. r. ATr#,l8i[

1. yarramsettv surer AND f 1'rZBirll,",H,?S,.ii,"?i:,:il',,?',1!H"fl18?t,.o8,l j,#i"#S,,,",Ji"1

2. Nagireddi Surva Venkata^Sai Kumar, S/o. Venka.teswara Rao, Age 28 years, Razote Mandat, E.G. occ Software qln a_rao, rraa;i;;il'"G;;'i Disrrict - 53324,) RnOhra ialJeli;"""" """' ' "oprr", ...Respondent / petitioner / Accused No 1 and 3 2 0f 2o2s cvberabad Rep b/ its p,rbri.E;;;;,;i* "H[il b;t,r dJil"diJsi.*riilolianao 3 rhe state of rerangana, the slation House officer, ^r,Tr'l;IJ;l& ' . . Res po n den t.,^:^ff .qTi.:f |&; Petition under {iection 359 (2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the l/lemorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High r]ourt may be pleased to permit trr: petitioner/de-facto comprainant to compor-rnding of the offence registered in C:r No S1B of 2021 dt 19_6_2021 under Sec 4.,21i lpc, 4, 20, 21 ITGA, 6 IWTA agairst the respondents/petitioners/accused 1 an,J 3 on the fite of ll AJCJ-cum-X Add lvtetropolitan Magistrate Kukatpally, Cyberabad (Now lV AJCJ-cum-XV Addr. -rudiciaJ Magistrate of First crass, Medchar_Markajgiri District at Kukatpally) in the irrtr:rest of justice. l.A. NO:2 oF 2025 Petition under rSt-'ction 35g (2) of BNSS praying that rn the circumstances stated in the Memorardum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High rlourt may be pleased to permit the cetitioner/defacto comprainant to record the r:ompromise offence registered in Cr No 518 o, 2021 dt 1gt6t2,21under Sec 420 lpc, 4, 20, 21 lrGA, 6 IWTA against the respondents/petitioners/accused 1 and 3 on the fire of Ir AJCJ-cum-X Addr. Metrrporitan Magistrate Kukatpaily, cyberabad (Now rV AJCJ cum.xvAddl'JudicialMagistrateofFirstClass,lr/ledchal.trilalkajgiriDistrictat Kukatpally) in the interest of justice' ThisPetitioncomingonforhearing,upon.perusingtheMemorandumof Grounds of criminar petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri Rama Mohan Palanki, Advocate for the Petitioners and Sri E Ganesh' Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No 1 and of Sri Ch Srinivas' Advocate for the Respotdent No.2. The Court made the following Common Order : l 1a THE IIONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL I.A.Nos.1 and2of 2025 IN and c RIMINAL PETITION No.55O5 of 2021 COMMON ORI) IlRl The presient Criminal petition is filed seeking to quash the proceedings penling against the petitioners/ accused Nos. 1 and 3, in Crime No.518, c ated 19.06.2Cl21 on the file of II Additional Junior civil Judge-curn X Adriitionai Metropolitan Magistrate, Iir,rkatpaly, cyberabad (novr IV Additional Junior civil Judge-cum-XV rrdditional Judicial Magistre te of the First class, Medchar-Markajgiri District at Kukatpally).

2. I.A.No. 1 of 2O2S is filed by the petitioner / de facto complainant seeking to comporrnd the offences registered in Crime No.51li of 2O2l under Section 4!l(r of the Indian penal Code, 1g6O, Sections 4,20 and 2 1 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1985 and Section 6 of th,: Indian wireless Telegraph Act, 1933 to record the compromis,: arrived between the parti:s in terms of the Memorandum of Corrrl>romise, dated 30.12.2024.. t \

3. I.A.No.2 of 2O2S is filed by the petitioner / de facto complainant seeking to record compromise and dispose of the Criminal pr:t_ition in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise, dated 30.12.2024, entered into between the parties, which is annexed to the appltcation. t t ,i 2

4. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee' submitted a report dated 23'01'2025 stating that both the parties were present in-person before the High Court Legal Services Committee on 23.01.2025 and they were identilted by their respective counsel All the parties in principle have agreed to compromise the matter in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise' d'ated 30'12'2024 ' entered into between the Parties' In view of the same' I A Nos'l and 2 of 2Cl25 are allowed and 5. the Criminai Petition is allowed in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise,dated30l2'2o24'andtheproceedingspendingagainst the petitioners/ accused Nos. 1 and 3, in Crime No'518' dated tg.O6.2o2l on the file of II Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-X Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally, Cyberabad (now IV Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-XV Additional Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Medchal-Matkajgiri District at Kukatpally), are quashed.

6. Registry is directed to annex the Memorandum of Compromise' dated 30.12.2024, entered into between the parties, to the present order. Miscellaneous aPPlications pgl-din-C-, l! any, shall stand. closed' SdI. A.V.S. PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER l.ThellAdditionalJuniorCivilJudge-cum-XAdditionalMetropolitanMagistrate KukatPallY, CYberabad

2.ThelVAdditionalJuniorCivilJudge-cum.XVAdditionalJudicialMagiskateof ' rii.t'i rlil,''rr,rlJirrif rvtatrais iri DEtrict at Ku katpal lv I \ To,

3.TheStationHouseofficer,KPHBColonyPS,CyberabadDistrict 4. T,vdo CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana' Hyderabad [OUTI .i: .! :a li ,ti

5. One CC to Sri Rama A/lohan Palanki, Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to Sri Ch Srinivas, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CD Copies Along with thr: Copy of the Memorandum of Compromise \ VA/gh v I I $-*: -.*1..*-r"?',:! * ?' a': HIGH COUR'I- DATED:28l01tz\Zs \ \ t I GOMMON ORIDER l.A. Nos. 1 ancl 2 of 2025 in / and CRLP.No.5505i of 2021 TA 14. t !' 0 5 tlii;i 21125 q o o. ALLOWING THE CRLP AND l.A. Nos. 1 and 2 of 2025 l Ttj t x{, i IN THE HIGH COI]RT OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD r.A.Ng, OF 2o2g' IN cRL P No 5505 0F:2021 t Between; And i I 2t .,.,,;' l:. j::,,',,,:R9!pdna&lgia ac6&ii.rqbiii.Aaiii MEMORANDTIM OF COMPROMISE The petitioners and the Respondent No 2 who is complainant in Cr No 5 18 of

1. 2)2lunder misconception lodged a cornplaint with 1"t respondent police simply for the reason that the petitioners have not responded to his phone calls suspecting that the petitioners/accused have taken his premises on rent to use for illegal purposes. Later the complainant realized that the petitionerS/accused since not available in City when he has visited the rental premises and called them over phone they could respond his calls and not lor any other reason and also the petitioner/accused have taken his premises on lease for genuinely using for their licensed business and they have obtained all necessary permissions from tle departments concerned. Therefore on the advise of elders and well wishers the respondent No 2/defac complainant has 4L t G.f, .w )a. t. Y

2. ^1. c. t) - e K ^'^"^''t

31. -rt ',- decided to s.,e.< pcrrrrission olih;. r-r^..r-,^ ^ of this I{on'ble court for c< ^ the petitionersza.cused .,*'* by v :' 0"" this'ioint t""t;'^";::*"' and the 2nd respondenr /delct'r s6mplninant have sputes betrveen them and no claims rvhat's ." a"u. a*rr., ":'.ry The per.ir i oner/a."u,uu1 declared that thcr.e rr. no o,,to each other. 3 The pct it ioners ,accrjse,"t ;**l; **: :#I;J::,:_J:HI',"" j.l ,r-,1 ,i.^ 1Dd respondenr/de1a.u, .o.prui,ll,L "'r*::T: compo,nd the orr:nce ond orrash ;-;--: /accused in the inrerest "rjJfln Hence this comprornise memo I{yderabad anq the 2!d 1"ff::i":::^ccused "'r'> nofl ble court 10 permit them to the crime No 518 of 2021""i*i ,o;oiii"r... ** ff:; ,;H:l:'*, lY' 4^''\!/$4)- 2 Ps'V%4<t*"d1 Petitioners/AI and a3 , .\1 t-l '/.C 6W /t' Couns ei for pt:titioner/A 1 &A3 30-12_2024 a', / 6 h.,-L^ pondent No 2 fRes t4 Counsel for responde;lt No 2 I I