Y. Suryanarayana v. P. Uttam Kumar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
2. The State of A.P., (through Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad. Respondent/Petitioner(Accused) Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated therein, the High Court will be pleased to quash the order in Crl. MP. No. 3975 of 2003 in C. C. No. 930 of 2001, dated 11-06-2004 on the file of the V Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and Memo. of grounds filed in support thereof and orders of High Court dated 17-06-2004 ,1.7.2004 & 08-07-2004 and made herein and upon hearing the arguments of
Mr. Vedula Venkata Ramana, Advocate for the petitioner and the
Mr. T. Jagdish Advocate on behalf of R1 and of Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 2 . THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING
ORDER:
Heard the counsel for the Petitioner. At the request of the counsel for the respondent post on 13-08-2004 ‘For Orders’. Interim stay granted earlier is extended till further orders. // TRUE COPY // ASSISTANT REGISTRAR for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To
The V Metropolitan Magistrate, at Hyderabad.
P. Uttam Kumar S/O Late P. Gnaneswar, R/O C – 16, Road No. 9, Film Nagar, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad.
Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A. P., Hyderabad. (OUT)
One Spare Copy.
One CC to Mr. Vedula Venkata Ramana, Advocate (OPUC) Skm HIGH COURT CYS,J DATED 10.08.2004 NIOTE: POST ON 13.08.2004 ‘FOR ORDERS’ ORDER CRL.P.NO. 2448 OF 2004 INTERIM STAY GRANTED EARLIER IS EXTENDED SKM DRAFTED ON : 11-08-2004 HIGH COURT CYS,J DATED 10.08.2004 NIOTE: POST ON 13.08.2004 ‘FOR ORDERS’ ORDER CRL.P.NO. 2448 OF 2004 INTERIM STAY GRANTED EARLIER IS EXTENDED
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.