Smt. Y Sradhavathi, W/o y v. Knshna Rao Aged about
Case Details
Acts & Sections
Smt. P.Annapurnamma. W/o Late p V Kutumbarao, Aged about 85 years Occ House wife, R/o H No 2.90/3 s.noara-n-coi;,ilkoi.ro., posr Vra CBIT, Hyderabad-500025. Y.V Krishna Rao, S/o y Laxmarah Ag_ed about 73 years, Occ Business, R/o H No /-90/4, Brundavan cotony, kokapet poi( Via' CBIT, Hyderabad_ 500075. Smt. Y^Sradhavathi, W/o y V. Knshna Rao Aged about 69 years, Occ House wife, R/o H. No. 7-9014. Brundavan .oio'"Vl f<-o'rr""pit post Via CBtT, Hyderabad-50007 5.
4. P. Ram Prasad. Busrness, R/o H Hyderabad-50007 S/o Late P.V. Kutumba Rao Aqed about 65 vears ocn No. 7-91li, Brundavan colony, "Kot ipei p"-rt'Vir"Ca-li 5' 5. P Shyam Prasad Sro late p.V. Kutumba Rao Aqed about 64 years, Occ Business, R/o H No 13_2_35t1. S n A C.i""pi"x Opp 8,1;- ijd;; Badrachalam Kharllmam Distrrct 6 Smt. Kommareddv laxmr. W;o Late Sudarshan Reddy Aged about 79 years, occ House wrfb. R,o_.H . ruo i g-zgslgz,'"\rl6y, nugur, Hyderabad. Represenred bv rrs cpA rorder IV/J- LegLnd' pnuhe -lto., Represented bv irs tr,4anaqrng o ieitor a r.r"g-u".:*; i Rao, s/o B. chennaiah. "n"giiiJr;E Aged about 45 years oic'eusineis iil.e al ri_3_1238, Sixrh Ftoor. Legend Ap'arrmcnl, nenur,i Eniiaveli"nltpi ru""r.r, 7. Smt. G. Renuka Wro C Sathrshchendar Reddy, Aged about 56 years, Occ B. It4is Ockham l echnotogres pvt. Limited, Rep. by rrs Director, p. prabhakar f^.d!V Slo C Papr Reddy. aged about Z3 ydars blc gus,ness, R/o ptot No. 18, Road No.2 Banlara Hijts. tiyderabad 9. l\,4/s Samishti Farns pvt Lrmrted, Rep by its lVanagrng Direclor Smt. Hylaja Reddv w/o p prabhak,rr Reddv Rio proi No 18.H;a"d wo.z aanlara itittsl 10. I\rlr Ravindar Rao, S/o Subbarao, Aged 55 years, Occ Business R/o plot No. House wi[e. R/o Srrnaqar. candrpeta, nrng, Redby'6litri"t 18, Road No.2, Banjara Hrlls, Hyderaiad. ' '"Estat6s Hyderabad. AND ...PETITIONERS
1. Hyderabad fi4elrooolitan Development Authority. by il, r 6p61rr,oner, District Commerciat comptex. nom,ni.iiai,rl 'i bil,ti'i;l.i"r , . _lyderabad_Z 2. The Government of Telang_ana, Rep. by its princrpal s , retary, Municioal Ad m inisrra r ron a nd Urban beveroprieni ri"piii,.n5it r, i=-[,i, i lvi",#Ibro ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 0r' the constitution of rn,r r praying that in the circumstances stated in the atfidavit fired rherewith, Irr, High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or directton rnc.e particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus cieclaring the action Ol he respolrdents not releasing the layout ior Sy. Nos 36gtp, 377lp .3g0/p, 38:/ ) and 382 of lr,4anchi Revula Vrrrage, Rajendra Nagar lt4andar, Ranga Reddy Disrr rt to an extent of Ac. 33.22 guntas or 162382 Sq. yards or 135tl4.0B Square tll(,t )rs. to the petitioners is illegal nu, and vord and consequen,y direct the 1st resJrr ndert to rerease the approved layout to the petitloner and pass such other order tr or-ders may deem fit and proper in the clrcumstances of the case. t.A. NO 1 0F 2014(W PM P. NO: 401 38 0F 2014) Petition under Section 151 CpC praying that in the Cr_, the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High CoLr.l direct the respondents to release the approved layout ot 377 lP , 3801P, 381/p and 382 of tvlanchi Revuta Vi age, Ra r Ranga Reddy District to an extent of Ac. 33.22 guntas o. l 135774.08 Square l\ileters of tvlanchr Revula Village, Ra1 Ranga Reddy District to an extent of Ac. 33 22 guntas or 1 135774.O8 Square lt4eters to the petitioners and pass suctr ( may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. umstances stated in rnay be pleased to or Sy Nos. 369ip rdra Nagar fVlandal, i2382 Sq Yards or ndranagar Mandal. )2382 Sq Yards or lter order or orders Counsel for the petitioner : SRI V.pREETI REDDy Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI V.NARASTMHA GOt, ). (SC FOR HMDA) Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Gp FOR MCPL ADMN_Ut BAN DEV The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY WRIT PETITION No.3 2lO2 of 2Ol4 ORDER: This r'r,rit petition is I'ilccl sere king follorving rclief: "To declttre the actrcn oJ tlrc respott<1ents not releasinq the lctyout for Sg.No.369/ P, .377/ p, 38O/ p, 38 l/ p ancl 382 of Manchi ReutLla Vitlogle, Rajertdra Nagar MctnclaL, Rangtrreddy Di^strict, to an extent of Ac.33-22 qts to the ytetitioners, cts illetlctl ctru). arlitrunl. "
2. Hcarcl Sri V. Precti Reclcl-v, lcarnccl counscl for thc pctitioncrs and Sri V. N:rrasimher Cioud, learned Stancling counsel for resltondcnt No_ I
3. Learncd counsel for tlre petitiorre rs as well as learnerl Standing counsel for r-cspondcn t No. I u,ould subntit that subsequent to filing ol n.rit petition, pcti[ioners have paid Nala conversion charges and Jayout has also been released ujde proce edings Lr-. No. I 00606 I Mp ) I plgl HMDLI 2Ot4 and permir No.2€>/LO/PlglHMDA/2O16, dirLecl 29.06.2024. Thcrefore, cause in the \\,rit petitiort rlocs nol srtrvive arnd it has become infructuous.
4. Recording the trbove subntission rnade by learnecl counsel for tl'rc petitioners :rs rvell as ie:rrned Star-rding counscl for respondent No. 1, thc Wr-it Petition is clismisscd as infructuous There shall be r-ro orcler ils to cos[s. Miscellatreous peLitions pending, iI ar-r' sh:rl] sland //TRUE COPY// SD/.AHN ASl ED ABDULLA KHAN ISTANT REGISTRAR L-L SECTION OFFICER closed To, 1 2 3 One CC to SRI V.PREETI REDDY, Advocate. [OPUC One CC to SRI V NARSIIVHA GOUD, (SC FOR HMD'\ IOPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR IMCPL ADIVN-URBAN DEV, Higr court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 4 Two CD Copies. BSK SA .5 HIGH COURT DATED:1711012025 ORDER WP.No.32102 of 2014 i i; ) l;11 t ) \r Oo i ti ttB 2026 1) ;(, | 55 .,.. o' y 1''';.: y "' ' \':;; --"7--' WRIT PETITION IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS. (rl7"t5 41" 2r ar\r\rz