P Sunitha Bai v. Bachalakuri Selwyn Jones

Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to the petitioner to file appeal against the order dated 10-3-25 passed inWP 731712025, in the interest of justice. , '' .-. ] .1..- . 3rf+ lA NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition unde - Section 151 CPC praying that in the circunrstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court ma,r be pleased to stay the operation or the order an judgement passed .in WP No 7i11712025, dated 10-3-25. Counsel for the Appellant: SRI Dr. K.LAKSHMI NARASIMHA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI M.BRAHMA REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent No.2 & 3: GP FOR FINANCE The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUNA YARA I.A.No.1of2O25 TN AND WRIT APPEAL No. 5OO of 2O25 JUDGMENT (Per the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice Sujog Paul): Dr" K. Lakshmi Narasimha, learrred counsel for the appellant. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the 2. appeliant should have been impleaded as a party respondent in the writ petition. However, since the learned Single Judge has only directed the official respondents to consider the representations of respondent No'1/writ petitioner dated 12.02.2025 and 1g.O2.2O25, the present appellant will be satisfied if she also be permitted to raise all possible objections by filing representation before the official respondents which may be directed to be decided while deciding the representations I I of t he writ petitioner.

3. Considering the previous round of litigation' the leave application in LA.No. I of 2025 is allowed'

4. The innocuous prayer made by learned cor.rnsel for the appellant is also allowed' I

5. Let Lh t: appellant prefer her representarion t,,ithin seven 2 working dalzs 6sL.. the competent authority, wher::in stre can take all posr;ib1e objections along with a copy of this order. In that event, 1..he competent authority, while taking dec:sion on the representatiorLs ol the writ petitioner, sha_ll also c,tnsider the representatiorL of the present appeilant, provided, :f it is filed within the zLfolesaid time along with a copy of this order. The competent a u thority shall decide the represer tations in accordance rvith law. The outcome of the decision be communicaterl to the parties. 6 With :rforesaid and without expressln€J an-v oplnlon on merits of the case, this Writ Appeal is disposed of. No costs. Interlrr:utory applications, if any pending, shall also stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/. K. SRINIVAS RAO JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER The speciar Shief Secretary to the government, Finance Desartment, Govt of Telangana, TerlanganaSecietariat, HVOerjOaO.'' "" The Directcr Directorate of rnsurance Rr/o Bhima Bhavan tirak Road Abids Hyderabad State of Telangana SO0OOi One CC to iSRt Dr. K.LAKSHIV| NARASTMHA, Advocare [OptJC] One CC to lSRl IV.BRAHTVA REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to Gp FOR FINANCE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [Ot.JT] Two CD Copies t I To, 1 2 3 4 5 6 BSR GJP s I t i I i 's1{aq1$q}r-:1 . -,.:1"-.:";..i,rylBlr!..slnxttiriSaiir .- 'a CC TODAY HIGH COURT DATED: 3010412025 JUDGMENT l.A.No.1 of 2025 IN/AND WA.No.500 of 2025 ALLOWING THE I.A. & DISPOSING OF THE WRIT APPEAI WITHOUT COSTS Crtnio &*,-- Gd ti/ v [ 3446 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA l.A.No.1 of 2025 IN/AND WRIT APPEAL NO: 500 OF 2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Preferred Against the Order dated 10/03/2025 in WP No 731 7 of 2025 on the file of the High Court. Between: P Sunitha Bai, W/o R Ravinder aged about 4B years working as Deputy Director of lnsurance 0/o District lnsurance Office Mahaboobnagar Fl/o H No 7-53l3 Shanker Nagar Pheerjadiguda, Uppal RR District 500-098. ...APPELLANT AND 1 Bachalakuri Selwyn Jones, S/o B Saidulu Age 41 years Occ Deputy Director Directorate of ln6urance O/o Bhima Bhavan Tilak Road Abids Hyderabad State of Telangana 500001 .

2. The State of Telangana, Rep by its The Special Ctrief Secretqry to the Government Finance Department Govt of Telangana Telangana Secretariat Hyderabad

3. The Director, Directorate of lnsurance Fl/o Bhima Bhavan Tilak Road Abids Hyderabad State of Telangana 500001 ...RESPONDENTS lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to grant leave to the petitioner to file appeal against the order dated ',t0-3-25 passed in\NP 731712025, in the interest of justice. lA NO: 4 OF 202s Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circunrstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court ma',' be pleased to stay the operation o'the order an judgement passed in WP No 73,1712025, dated 10-3-25. Counsel for the Appellant: SRI Dr. K.LAKSHMI NARASIMHA Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI M.BRAHMA REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent No.2 & 3: GP FOR FINANCE The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT .): I I I I THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA I.A.No. L of2025 IN AND WRIT APPEAI NO.5OO of2O25 JUDGMENT (Per the Hon'ble the Achng ChieJ Justice Sujog Poul): Dr. K. Lakshmi Narasimha, learned counsel for the appellant. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the 2. appellant should have been impleaded as a party respondent in the writ petition. However, since the learned Single Judge has only directed the official respondents to consider the representations of respondent No.1/writ petitioner dated 12.02.2025 and 1g.O2-2O25, the present appellant will be satisfiedifshealsobepermittedtoraiseallpossibleobjections by filing representation before the official respondents which may be directed to be decided while deciding the representations I I of the writ petitioner.

3. Considering the previous round of litigation' the leave application in I.A.No. I of 2025 is allowed'

4. The innocuous prayer made by learned cor-rnsel for the appellant is also allowed. {

5. Let tht: appellant preler her representarion v,,ithin seven 2 working da5.s before the competent authority, whertrin she can take all posr;ible objections along with a copy of thirr order. In that event, tjre competent authority, while taking decrsion on the representations of the writ petitioner, shall also crtnsicler the representati.rrr of the present appellant, provided, rf it is filed within the aforesaid time along with a copy of this order. The competen t au.thority shall decide the represen tations in accordance tvith law. The outcome of the decision be communicatt-'cl to the parties. 6 With aloresaid and without expressing any- opinion on merits of the case, this Writ Appeal is disposed of. No costs Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall also stand closed ,TRUE COPY// SD/. K. SRINIVAS RAO JOINT REGISTRAR ..\ l , SECTION OFFICER "' The Special 3hief Secretary to the government, Finance Department, Govt of Telangana, Te;langana Secietariat, HVOeTJOaO,''' The Direcbr Directorate of Ins_urance R/o Bhima Bhavan firak Road Abids Hyderabad State of Telangana 500001 One CC to SRt Dr. K.LAKSHMI NARASIMHA, Advocate [OpJC] One CC to rS31 114.3*rMA REDDY, Advocate IOPUCI Two CCs tr: Gp FOR FINANCE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OtJT] Two CD Copies I I To, 1 2 J 4 5 t) BSR GJP 5 l I HIGH COURT DATED: 3010412025 JUDGMENT I.A.No.1 of 2025 IN/AND WA.No.SO0 of 2025 CC TODAY -\ t\ s r4r i.a* /'ri) i. (.) \ :-. '\'2 \ \sr 0 1 rri,Y zlflli E }l \:--._- r(:. l ALLOWING THE I.A. & DISPOSING OF THE WRIT APPEAI WITHOUT COSTS arC+io Q.-,-- (qd