Chalapathi Chit Fund Pvt. Limited, with its office situate v. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, O/o the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Padmavathi
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file appeal
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the Procs. No.AP/19413/7Q/SRO/GNT/2068 and AP/19413/7Q/ SRO/ GNT/ 2069, dated 12-2-2001 issued by the respondent herein, and to quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.V.SESHA SAI Counsel for the Respondent : MR.R.N.REDDY FOR RVAK. The Court made the following :
ORDER:-
Operative part
WRIT PETITION NO. 10161 OF 2001 Heard both the learned counsel and at their request the main writ petition itself is taken up at the stage of Interlocutory Application. Petitioner herein filed this writ petition, inter alia, seeking to assail the order dated 12-2-2001 passed under Section 7 Q of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, which is an appealable one as provided under Section 7-I of the said Act. Having regard to the same, I do not find any justification to entertain this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file appeal under section 7-I of the Act within a period of four weeks from today and on filing of the same, the same shall be disposed of on merits in accordance with law after giving opportunity to both the parties. It is needless to mention that the conditional interim order granted by this Court shall remain in operation till the disposal of the appeal. No costs. 22—07—2004. Stv/- To
The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, O/o the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Padmavathi Buildings, Laxmipuram, Guntur, Guntur District.
Two CD copies.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file appeal
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 22 Jul 2004. The bench was B PRAKASH RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.