✦ High Court of India · 31 Jul 2025

tril/s. Navadurga Billets v. 1. The Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission'

Case Details High Court of India · 31 Jul 2025

Court

High Court of India

Decided

31 Jul 2025

Bench

NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

Length

36,626 words

Acts & Sections

A ComPany registered under the Comoanies Act 1956 A company registered under the Companies Act 1956 Code of Civil Procedure §1 Code of Civil Procedure §15 Code of Civil Procedure §151 Code of Civil Procedure Constitution of India Electricitv Act 2003 Electricity Act 2003 Erectricity Act 2003 Erectriqity Act 2003 Etectricity Act 2003

Judgment

1. 2 3 The.Southern power Distri ch a i rm a n a n d M a n a s i n g 3#:n.""^f;,8," ry#lr:i,iJ: ?iri +:rd,$1;,; ".1S,:?l The Superintendinq Enoinr n:ryiig,l,#s;1tuil,rfff i,"?:fl ulft +::i"i: The Senior Accounts Offir n:gidJih,Tsfi,#''&".:Rff:d,."",:iu#+f ;["{tJ"?yj;,?j?,,Bli:iJ jJ"?H,{",j.,,,3t[iJ ...PETITIONERS y,j1i#t?,ffi fi#siefli:nxv,"i#.1;,:?:,iino,.l,o3dt"),ro1,s?:i: *: l?i3:flti.tti: i:flffi:r"5Bgt:"t" commission, rep bv its secretary The State of Telanoana req. by its prl. Secretary, Energy Department, '- Telangana Secretaria-t,, ny'OerdOaOl vvvr v(ury ...RESPONDENT Petition under section '1 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim orders dated 03.05.2024 in Wp. No 12784 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. 9 ' Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D'V'NAGARJUNA BABU' Sr' COUNSEL' REP' iiin snr c.cHANDRA SHAKHAR RAo Counsel for the Responderit No'1: SRt P'PRASAD' SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No'2 to 4: SRIN'SREEDHAR REDDY' SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel for the Respondent No'5: SRI A'SUD-ERSHAN REDDY' NOVOCNTE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY WRIT PETITIONNO:1 2808 oF 2024 Between: lvl/s. 460, by ItI ?S)1'#?%5:'SLff ;;"srs oireltor, Prakash Goenka' y,,",,U$f i+iE*);ll3},''{#?t\%"Ji3t*l3ti33: ...PETITIONER AND 1 2 The Telanoana State Electribity Regulatory Commission' rep' by its Secretary' ReO nitts, Hyderabad, Telangana sate' by its The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited' rep' chairman and Managrng ii#i;; Mi;t dompoundlHvderabad' Tela State. 3 The SuPerintending Engineer' OP - ComPanY of Telangana Ltmneo UyOejraU6o Telangana State' 4 The Senior Accounts Officer' OP - io;P*t- of Telangana Limited HyOejraOlO Telangana State' The State of Telangana, rep qy its Prl Secretary' Telangana Secretariat, HyderaDao' 6 eration. the Southern Power Distribution :'h';il"i;;"rsri circle, Nanal Nasar' eration, the Southern Power Dlstribution ]'Hii.jniiinigar Circle, Nanal Nasar' Energy DePartment, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order dated 19' 04' 2024 in O P' No 76/2015 passedbythelstrespondentinrespectofthe2ndrespondentishighlyillegaly' arbitrary, uniust, irrational, without jurisdiction and contrary to the Principles of Natural Justice apart from being violative of Articles 1+' t9(1Xg)' 21 ' 265 and 3004oftheConstitutionoflndiaandconsequentlysetasidethesameinsofar as the Petitioner is concerned ' lA NO: 1 OF 2024 10 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 1g. 04.2024 in o. p. No. 7612015 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2ncJ respondent incruding disconnection of petitioner's power suppry pending disposar of the above writ petition lA NO: 2 oF 2024 Between: 1 The Southern Power Disrribut]ol CqTpgSy of Telangana Limited, rep. bv its and Manasing Director, nrifiicorpii,ij,,Hyderabad, Teiansana Sg?grnr^ The Superintendino Enoineer, .Operqlion, the Southern power Distribution iG#l fi ;#?3 il. T" l;J,Jlr,,S;i,.ir The Senior Accounts Offi6s1, epsralion, the Southern power Distribution N; * i' ig#l: ffJt?! 3X. T", ]""J??P,'3 ?,, i'J" i's"#" c ; ;" i", " i i' i t"t I Hai'j ; i6I, A J; Jd# " b i i" iu: '.",'i' i iu "; N; " " " ...PETITIONERS M/s. Devashree lsoat private Limited,. (RJN- 773), Survey Nos. 44S, 458, 459. 3;3IH:;i#'r''4""x0ff ;';;;gz;'hi)'g;*;dvDl.fi ;i,;;;: f, 9'il"'ff The Telanqana State Electricity Re.gulatory Commission, rep. by its Secretary, Red Hills, Hyderabad, Tetangaha Siie.'- ' The State of Telanoana req Qv its prl. Secretary, Energy Department, Telangana Secretaria"t, HyderdOaOl '?1J6fl 2 3 AND 1, 2 J

,..RESPONDENTS Petition under se'btion 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim orders dated 03.05.2024 in wp. No. 12808 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. counsel for the Petitioner: sRr D.v.NAGARJUNA BABU, sr. couNsEL, REp. FOR SRI G.CHANDRA SHAKHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI p.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC l1 Counsel for the Respondent No'2 to 4: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY' SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel for the ResPondent No'5: SRI A.SUDERSHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY WRIT P ETITIO N NO: 12810 oF 2024 ""*"i;; MMG Steels Private Ltd , Plot No'1.4' IDA' Bollaram' Jinnaram Mandal' 5l?ig;iJ!"ov"blii'i"t nlri' uv iid bi'""toi' Neeraj Kumar Goenka ...PETITIONER AND 1 The Telanoana State Electricity Regulatory Commission' rep by its Secretary' neO Hitts, Hyderabad, Telangana sate' 2. The Southern Power Distribution Co.Tp3ry^g^Ielanoana Limited' rep by its chairman and tuanaffi'Dffii;; Nlifii iompound'"Hvderabad' Telangana State. 3 rhe S uperir!,.Id i.s ComPanY of Telangat State. *fl i1.:ga SBflLX gr, ilB;!:'[?'& B?s,.", J,, ?# ru:::

4. The Senior Accounts officer, operation, , Power Distribution -S"';#teddy' Sangareddy District' Telangana the .Southern Companv of Telangaia"LiHi;b' State. 5 The State of Telangana, rep by its Prl secretary' Energy Department' - ielangana Secretariat, HyderaDao' ...RESPONDENTS PetitionunderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order dated 19104t2024 in O P' No 76i2015 passed by the 'l st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent is highly illegaly' arbitrary, unjust, irrational, without jurisdiction and contrary to the Principles of Natural Justice apart from being violative of Articles 14' 19(1 )(g)' 21 ' 265 and 30oAoftheConstitutionoflndiaandconsequentlysetasidethesameinsofar as the petitioner is concerned' IANO:1O F 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to 12 stay a* further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 1g.o4.2024 in o.p. No. 7612015 passed by the '1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent incruding disconnection of petitioner's power supply pending disposal of the above writ petition. IA NO: 2 oF 2024 Between: 1 2 3 AND

1. 2 3 i[15f#:'#'fi ,,;$',3i#:i].""nf; f,,ry#lo::1iJ:ili".lg:?1+:L.i#,1,: I:;,,.,T,:#i"Jl:iir"":"pl[?3,.a33fi !llslaJl3i3:i::,&B,".tfl,?:I:ru::: The senior Accounts officer,, operation, the southern power Distribution SgHr", of retansana Limited, a;;riiiiiiov,'EJriliJ.oo, District, retansana ...PETITIONERS M/s. MMG Steets private t_jg: sangareddy District Rep. by its Director, rue"Irl'kfila?.,o"n* #:I?13:fl?t3,.:l* ?:ii,.;E,;',IBn"'#', commission, rep bv its Secretary, #ffi:19,9J.I?l?llll[iaJ;'i;,5' its Prr Secretary, Enersv Department, Llot flo 14, IDA, Boflaram, Jinnaram Mandat, Petition under Section 15'r cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim orders dated 03.05.2024 in wp. No. 128.10 0t 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petition"., IIID:y..N4GARJUNA BABU, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. FOR SRI G.CHANDRA SHAKHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI P.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: SRt N.SREEDHAR REDDy, SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRt A.SUDERSHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY 13 WRIT P ETITION NO: 13 117 0F 2024 Between: M/s. Salasaar lron & Steels Pvt. Ltd., (Sgryice Connection bearing No' RJN- 1088) Survey N". 4i;:"F;di iii,,o)-rqooitligidda Villaoe, Farooq Nagar Mandal, nansareoov"tii'siti;f ii; Di;;i;t' Fiiue"en Kumar Asarwal' ...PETITIONER AND 2 1 The Telanqana State Electricity Regulatory Commission' rep by its Secretary' n'ei Hirri, ftva"rabad, Telangana Sate

3. The Superintending Engineer' Operation', the I[:,:"lxf ""'1r",ff:;:r?'J''B';1.,?i,,:",il'B?BJ'1J"1i[:iff':',.Ti':S;+3|;ft'"1': State. rthern Power Distribution Companv of retanga-nX' [ti'' n5"gi'"dily oisirict' Raiendranagar circle' Nanalnagar x Road, il'ii'i -BJ';ri' - 4. The Senior Accounts Officer' Operation" the sorrthern Power Distribution r ci rcr e Hyde'aoao' Telansana State' ' -Sor ft! x:',i :u: !l i: :t'a:fl, ;*, Hffij:8:l P:'','l"J, ":'d?jE:' " "n' 5 The state of Telangana, rep. qy its Prl secretary' Energy Department' Telangana Secretariat' Hyderaoao' ...RESPONDENTS PetitionunderArticle226oflheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order dated 19'04 2024 in O P No 76i2015 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent is highly illegaly' arbitrary, Lrnjust, iffational, without jurisdiction and contrary to the Principles of NaturalJusticeapartfrombeingviolativeofArticlesla,lg(1Xg),21,265and 300A of the Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the same in so far as the Petitioner is concerned IA NO: 1oF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High bourt may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 19'O4 2024 in O P' No' T6t2ol5passedbythelstrespondentinrespectofthe2ndrespondentincluding l4 disconnection of petitioner's power suppry pending disposar of the above writ petition IA NO: 20F 2024 Between: 1 2 3 AND 1 3 The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited., rep. bv its -Mi;t i#fi;lj:iyd;;;i;;, i;i;.6rJ,; S[?I.r" and rManasing Director, llfuitl;ilT3[fl ,flgT,E::s,{fJ:l8Ja,iE,,i."#lnH:iJ"?ffi i,B;'J,Bli:iJ Nanatnasar X Road,*Rethi e,fii, Hyj"ir6J6, i"ijni.in" strt". The Senior Accounts Officer, Operation, the Southern ft :lT,;:U,:ll8:t'ffi ,b11,,:,i;33li3:[-'J',i'&;]g Power Distribution endranagar Circle. tate. ..,PETITIONERS lV/s. Salasaar lron & Steets.pvt. Ltd.,.(Service Connection bearinq No. RJN_ 1088) Survev No. 417 parsi _Roab]-iliog]tigi"id;l''vilrrge, Fardoo Naoar Ma nda t, Ra n ja reddy oistrict. i6 oiilii"r, i;iXrlrB"- 11 m a r Rga n,,ra r. *: l?i3:fl?:3,.:t*,?:iiffi:,"I3ntll", commission, rep bv its secretary, The State of Telanqana. rep. by its prl. Secretary, Energy Department, -- r etangana Secretarial, Hyder;baa: vvv'| v(q'. , ...RESPONDENTS Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 03.05.2024 in rA. No. 01 0F 2024 in wp. No 13117 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. counsel for the Petitioner; sRl D.v.NAGARJUNA BABU, Sr. couNSEL, REp. FOR SRI G.CHANDRA SHAKHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondeiit No.1 : SRI p.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel forthe Respondent No.2 to 4: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDy, SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI A.SUDERSHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY l5 WRIT PETITI ON NO: 13119 oF 2024 Between: M/s. Radha Smelters Private Limited' (fqrmerly M/s Radha Smelters Limited)' Service connection G:"fu-Ki&!"5' No't i27 328' ch' shankarampet by its Chairman' Mr Villaoe and Mandal, rui"i'r'oiitti"t' T6tarigana Sdid' Sunil- Saraf 'ep ...PETITIONER AND

1. The Telanqana state Electricity Regulatory commission' rep by its secretary' Red Hills, Flyderabad' Telangana sate' The southern Power Distribution company of Telangana Limited' rep' by its chairman and tvlanaging iiffii;; Nii;f dompouno'"Hvderabad' Telangana 2 State. rhe superintetg.,s--l"El?Eli, flB".,lil'ff.,lli fiSH:i.:'+:;U;;,?iiiLo"'"" ComPanY of Telangana Ltn rh e s e n i o r. Acco u nts gf fr,:iJa "' " ComPanY of Telangana Lrn The State of Telangana, rep by its Pd secretary' Energy Department' iijLngili secretarial, HYderabad' flejd'.sli ?jL, lll? fi 8H:i: T",:fl u:I "Ddiji'3 n 4 5 ,..RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ot lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order dated 191O4t2024 in O'P' No' 76/2015 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent is highly illegaly' arbitrary, uniust, irrational, without jurisdiction and contrary to the Principles of NaturalJusticeapErtfrombeingviolativeofArticlesra,lg(1Xg),21,265and 300,4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the same in so far as the Petitioner is concetned ' IA NO: 't oF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 1gto4t2\24 in O P' No' 76t2O15 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent including disconnection of petitioner,s power supply pending disposal of the above writ petition. 16 lA NO: 2 oF 2024 Between: 3,[?I-r"

1. The Southern power Di.jnlgtlgl CqTpglV of Tetangana Limited, reo bv fts and Managing Director, tvi;i'io;d;;d, Hyderabad, reians.ana 2 The Superintendino Fngineer, p,peration, the Southern power Distribution companv of rerang"ana r:imit;d, n,'Eilt oi'.triii fr'Joar, retangana state. 3. The Senior Accounrs gIigpr,. operation, the southern power Distribution company of Tetangana Limited, ili"Ej'ri'"oi.tri"i NiEor,,. r"rrnsana State. AND

1. M/s. Radha Smelters prival ...PETITIONERS t[fl,,,:'#*i,-*Fr#:,mi*f,il:stri\%LiisJi,iofl [{i*H"dt *: I?'s:P,?t3,:H:, ?:iiffi:r,I3n tll" " com m iss ion, rep bv its s ecreta ry, +:ffi:X: #"Iil?il?ifii,aJii;,51 its Prr secretary, Enersv Department, 2 3 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim orders dated 03.05.2 024 in r.A. No. 01 0f 2024 in wp. No. 13119 of 2O24 and dismiss the writ petition. ...RESPONDENTS COUNSEI fOr thE PEtitiONEr: SRI D.V.NAGARJUNA BABU, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. _--' "-' ' FOR SRI G.CHANDRA SHAKHAR NNO Counsel for the Respondent No..t: SRI p.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: SRr N.SREEDHAR REDDy, SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel forthe Respondeni No.S: SRI A.SUDERSHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY WRIT P ETITION NO : 13122 O F 2024 Between: Xi?^,","'",fi ',ffi :"fl :,!'i't?f;)"r,T,1|);'lJJn[i',,{',?1""'E?"T,?3ii^$ll3! t7 ...PETITIONER AND J 2 ReO Hitts, -Hyderabad, Telangana sate I The Telanqana State Electricity Regulatory Commission' rep by its Secretary' The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited' rep by its chairman and Managrng ii?;i;; N'li;t-dompound' Hvderabad' Telangana State ;ii ni g a i c i rct e' Reth i Bo u' Power Distribution The Superintending Engineer' Operation' Jl-"- -S^o^'^tlttn ilfu,"ffu, fii"%ilssl+ ;Tp*.5Jn,n* n i ia n-a ge r c i rc I e' Ret h i Bo u I i' The Senior Accounts Ofiicer' Operation' The S-outhern Power Distribution R: xy,"fi#,:di"i#iss":f " The State of Telangana, rep' by its Prl secretary' Energy Department' i;;";;; Stcretarialt, HYderabad ;.;uj'#nssi " 4 5 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order dated 19 04 2O24 in O'P' No 76/2015 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent is highly illegaly' arbitrary, unjust, irrational, without jurisdiction and contrary to the Principles of NaturalJusticeapartfrombeingviolativeofArticlesl+'19(1Xg)'21'265and 300A of the Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the same in so far as the Petitioner is concerned- IA NO :1 oF 2024 petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 19 'O4 2024 in O.P.No.76/2015 passed by the 1"t respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent including disconnection of petitioners power supply pending disposal of the above writ Petition. I l8 IA NO; 2 oF 2024 Between: 1 2 AND The Southern power Disl S[iI,,"andr\,4anasins,-'Bli:ffi .""nf fi ,,H#lJ:,,iJ:ti",,.,S:"o1iBL,$H,: ff Hrf#:flfifsff n;",lUi{f ,"*srtJ,:,i,?:i"B,IB:"h3i:,,,o,Tlri The Senior Accounts Off n:ly;:J,,:i,:f"*fu 5,r;,HuiBs[#si"*:,,:,?,'#"'d,,s::"h"?i:"'tTL:i ...PETITIONERS 1 2 J nli'*i'*,1",,F?"T,i3.,i,^$il:! tlh#jfi'"x[i:"R:,'!11 t?.'a]";,T,1il;'lJJ *: I?i::flXt:.:t*,i:iiffi:r"I3n#"o commission, rep bv its Secretary, its p. secreta ry, E nersy Depa rtment, # id:li: ."J.I?lll)?i ff?,.iijs,3, Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim orders dated 03.05.2024 in rA. NO. o1 0F 2024 inwp. No. 13122 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner: SRI D.V.NAGARJUNA BABU, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. - --' "-' ' FOR SRI G.CHANDRA SHAKHAR NEO Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI p.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Gounsel forthe Respondent No.2 to 4: SRI N.SREEDHAR REODy, , sc FoRTGSPDCL Counsel for the Respondent No.S: SRI A.SUDERSHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY WR]T PETITto N NO: 131 27 0F 2024 Between: M/s. Radha Smelters private_ Limited, (MDK_1395), (Furnace Division), Sv !9.3.341{2, Mirzaparv noao, crr. snl-ridffip.jirv,itle and rvandar) Medak District, Tetanganb Sfate, ,ep uv itJ rrrrrnrgid"r;;$ifi"Mr. Si,,;li S;# ,,'"-" t9 ...PETITIONER l:?l:,lilY.,t?,'"'fj:iB?:'l3y"x"rg!:1'""commission'repbvitssecretary' The southern power Distribution compaly of rerangana Limited, rep. by its chairman and Managrng Sru;i;; Mifit iompound'- Hvderabad' Telangana State. rhe superintendins E-nsineer,3,E:'f,l'tra,,1:i ,f;3H$.:%':;U;'1,?tl','3"'on CompariY of Telangana utn o n r h e s e n io r A"s"{E g[!,"[, ComPanY of Telangana Ltn iig**: s:".'"i:1[nf[?oJ,"f;,!l ?1"?lXl?;i ;,lX? fi : H:L: T"'::[,fl uDdii'8u'' its P. secretary' Enersv Department' ...RESPONDENTS AND 1.

2. J. 4 5 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order oi direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order dated 19'042024 in OP No' 76/2015 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent is highly illegally' arbitrary, unjust, irrational' without iurisdiction and contrary to the Principles of Natural Justice apart from being violative of Articles 1 a' 19(1 Xg)' 21 ' 265 and 3004 of the Constitution of india and consequently set aside the same in so far as the Petitioner is concerned ' tA NO: 1 o F 2024 petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 19'O4 2024 in O P No' 76t2O1spassed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent including disconnection of petitionerJ power supply pending disposal of the above writ petition. lA NO: 2 oF 2024 Between:

1. The Southern Power Distribution CqTpgly ' cn"riit"'r'ri i"d Managing Director' Mint Co of Telanqana Limited, rep. bY its mpound, HYderabad, Telangana State. 20 2 J The superintending Engineer, operation, the southern power Distribution uompany oI tetangana Limited, IVledak District, tVledak, Telangana State. The senior Accounts officer, operation, the southem power Distribution company of rerangana Limited, IViedak Districi, rrrreJri, r"rangi;a stii".-''"" ...PETITIONERS ANO 1 3 M/s. Radha smerters private_ Limited, (t\4DK-i 395), (Furnace Division), sv N9.3.39/ 2, Ir,4irzapaily Road, Ch. ShankirampeiMiraqe anO rfrfanOali-rr/iiaI( ursrncr, retangana State. rep by its Managing Director,-Mr. Sunil Sarat. The Te-langana state Erectricity Repuratory commission, rep. by its Secretary, Red Hills, Hyderabad, Telangaha S-ate. The State of Telanoana. rep. by its prl. Secretary, Energy Department, Telangana Secretaria"t, Hyderjbaa: Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim orders dated 03.05.2024 in l.A. No. 01 of 2024 in wp. No. 13127 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. ...RESPONDENTS counsel for the Petitioner: sRr D.V.NAGARJUNA BABU, sr. couNSEL, REp. FOR SRI G.CHANDRA SHAKHAR RAO Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI P.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI A.SUDERSHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY WRIT PETITION NO: 13128 OF 2024 Between: M/s. Jairaj lspat Limited, Plot No.8, Phase-lll, I.D.A., Jeedimetla, lr/edchal District, Telangana State, rep by its Managing Director, S.K. Goenka AND

1. 2 The Telangana State Eleckicity Regulatory Commission, rep. by its Secretary, Red Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana Sate. The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited, rep. by its Chairman and lvlanaging Director, lvlint Compound, Hyderabad, Telangana State. ...PETITIONER i 2l 3rhesuperir!-"ldi"off CompanY of Telangar fl i[!,"j;gE:'R["#,33"f."#LT:.i""Y,",LPl"i'itt!- 4rhesenior-4's"'t\"!fl!iJr,R?fi lll8xl't3.33,Yjf &ilol"Ji''1n31'""s#u,. 5 The State of Telangana, rep by its Prl' Secretary' Energy Department' - ComPanY of Telangar Telangana Secretariat' HyderaDao' ...RESPONDENTS PetitionunderArticle226oflheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order daled 1g1}4t2024 in O'P No 76/2015 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent is highly illegally' arbitrary, uniust, irrational, without jurisdiction and contrary to the Principles of NaturalJusticeapartfrombeingviolativeofArticlesla'19(rXg)'21'265and 300A of the Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the same in so far as the Petitioner is concerned ' IA NO: 1 oF 2024 petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 1gt\4l2\24 in O P' No' 761201spassed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent including disconnection of petitioner's power supply pending disposal of the above writ petition. IA NO:2 oF 2024 ""T"?1" Sourhern power pistribution compaly of rerangana Limited,leg b_y its chairman rno rrrrrn,J"g'' 5i?;;6;'ffi i;t dompouno I Hvderabad' Telangana State.

2. The Superintending Engineer', Operation' the Southern Power Distribution company ot tetanga;;'IilY'6i, i h' N;tth' Secunderabad'Telangana State 3. The Senior Accounts Officer, Operation' tle Southern Power Distribution company of retanga;aii;'t"4, R:R North' Secunderabad'Telangana State ...PETITIONERS AND 22 1 2 U,tlrii i? JiB:',,'g',':?S ,.:fii,?; ,9,;Iffi;-,J;J"?# s j^i%[ii? Medcha, il: I?E:fli,t3;t* ?:iil;:r,I3n"t:1." commission, rep bv its Secretary, I!ffi:* 3J"Iil1i,1l[i,aJif;,!l its Prr secretary, Enersv Department, Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim orders dated 03.05.2 024 in r.A. No. 01 0f 2024 in wp. No. 13128 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner: :I!_D.YINAGARJUNA BABU, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. ---'"-' ' FOR SRI G.CHANDRA SHAKHAR RAO Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI P.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI A.SUDERSHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY WRIT P ETITION NO: 1 3656 0 F 2024 Between: #L#"ii]!i5;f ;il{{iiil,rffi lxr+a#,"n|2g#*I'il;,;B?; AND ...PETITIONER

1. 2 J 4 *: I?i3:ff?H,|t*,i:iiffi :l53%yll' " co mm issio n, re p bv its Secreta ry, The southern power Distribution company of reranqana Limited, rep. bv its and tVlanasing oirectoi rvrifii i";p;;ffi: Hyderabad, Te,ransana Sl:?Lr* The superintendino Enoineer, _operation, the southern power Distribution fi :[y,fi :u,il{:Lt';:,l,b,i;,:ff Siri8itpJ?*;:;};;H";di?"8ii:iJ The Senior Accounts officer, operation, the southern power Distribution companv of reranoana Lto,'. nS"gii"iiv' EiriiJt, Rajendranaoar circre Nanalnasar X Road,-Rethi aodi, HydJia6JS, ieiJni'ina state. The State of Telanoana rep. by its prl. Secretary, Energy Department, Telangana Secretaria"t. nyAeraOaOl 23 ...RESPONDENTS PetitionunderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith'theHighCourtmaybe pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order daled 1910412024 in O P No 76/2015 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent is highly illegaly' arbitrary, unjust, irrational' without jurisdiction and contrary to the Principles of Natural Justice apart from being violative of Articles 14' 19(1)(g)' 21 ' 265 and 300A of the Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the same in so far as the Petitioner is concerned ' IA NO :1 oF 2024 petition under section .1 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fited in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 1gl\4t2o24 in O P No' 76t2[15passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent including disconnection of petitioner's power supply pending disposal of the above writ petition. IA NO:2OF 2024 2 J AND 1 2 Between: of Telanqana Limited' reP' mpound, HYderabad, teta by its 1 The Southern Power Distribution Company M a n agin g Di recto r' Mi nt co ";-"a cr,"ri i'iJti' State. The Superintending Engineer' Operation' the Southern Power Distribution c rc e ilh'ifu,,"l ffi'd'a:f,, The Senior Accounts Officer, Operation' the . fu xT, fi :u":l is #:fuH' :ilg3rgii P:?:'[:.]i?il3o^"n'r :ff g3i:s:i PJ',:'l?:.lajend Southern Power Distribution ra nas a r c i rcre' i,.s', f".3, ...PETITIONERS M/s Scan Energy and Power Ltd , (Service Connection bearino No RJN-890)' Survev Nos. 34,35' and 5,1 k;;;;;g Vitt'ge' District' iEiiidrti"ttrtE,'i6pl uv lti chibr Executiie ofricer' chiranlib Das' The Telanqana State Electricity Re-gulatory commission, rep by its secretary' Red Hills, Flyderabad, Telangana Sate' -RajendrSnasar

4. a J +!ffi :1i: 3i"I?i1t],?l[i,aJ:iba3v its Pr, Secretary, Energy Department, 24 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim orders dated 04.06.2 024 in wp. No. 13656 0f 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. ...RESPONDENTS Counset for the peririoner: *--' "'' !IIDaITNAGARJUNA BABU, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. FOR SRI G.CHANDRA SHAI('I{AR RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI p.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel forthe Respondent No.2 to 4: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDy, SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel for the Respondent No.S: SRIA.SUDERSHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY WRIT P ET ITION NO: 1 3669 0F 2024 Between: AND 1 2 J 4 Hatfil$"s" j,tT'' JJt ltaited,. .(formerry known f lir af,::*y*:ffi. i[f,f#tg:iiin,I5li L1li,,.i!t:l; j)? ^as Savitri. steers and "ifJ,ffi ...PETITIONER I:: I?i3 :fl?!3.:lx3 ?:iil;:',I3n',:l'" co mm issio n, rep bv its s ecreta ry, The southem Power Distribution company of rerangana Limited , reD. bv its and Manasins oireitoi rr,li[i'6#fi;U: jJyderabad, reians.ana 31:?J.m The Superintendino Enoineer, operation, the southern power Distribution Company of Tetan-gana-t_imiteo. Vir<iiaoid'6isi;ici,'Vikarabad , Tetangana The senior Accounts officer, operation, the Southern power Distribution Company of Tetangana l_imiti:0, Vitaia6ii"Oirirfi, 'iikarabad , Tetangana The State of Telanoana rep. by its prl. Secretary, tnergy Department, '- Telangana Secretaria-t, Uy'OeraOaal " vvv' v'!u' v ...RESPONDENTS 25 PetitionunderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith'theHighCourtmaybe pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order dated 19 04 2024 in O'P' No 76/2015 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent is highly illegaly' and contrary to the Principles of arbitrary, unjust, irrational' without 'iurisdiction Natural Justice apart from being violative of Articles f a' f 9(1Xg)' 21 ' 265 and 300,4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the same in so far as the Petitioner is concerned ' IA NO: oF 2024 1 petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 19'O4 2024 in O P No' 76l2[15passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent including disconnection of petitioner's power supply pending disposal of the above writ petition. IA NO: 2 oF 2024 '"T"?;" Southern Power Distribution comPary^of Telanoana Limited ' rep by its Chairman and ruanaging Director' Mint Compoundl Hyderabad' Telangana State 2 r he s u pe ri l*grry^ j:s i]l ;..e, i;f 1,?l:lSil;ot ComPanY ot I elangi State n3, ot "otni', [" :B:3', ?:Il ru:::

3. rhe senior.4gqo'1:'nuo['ih"iLf"f;[?ll3[;.tn3,r?,.";'Jnii[,["0:3'. ?#:U:l: ComPanY of Telang "PETlrtoNERS AND 1 2 3 M/s Shikhara Steels Pvt' Limited' (formerly .LnPyn ." Savitri Steels and Rerollinq) service conn#iiol'"'Nr5 vk6-rz-gz' . Survev No 147lAA' Somanourthi Vilaqe, pudur iri5"i"i,'Vlr,riiOZO Oi.itl"t, Telahgana State' rep nv iit Oi6"tor' Ralesh Gupta Veloor' The Telanqana State Electricity Regulatory Commission' rep' by its Secretary' neO nitts, The State of Telangana' rep by its Prl iijrang jnu Secretariat, Hyderabad' Secretary, EnergY DePartment, "Hyderabad' Telangana Sate' Z6 Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim orders dated 04.06.2024 in Wp No.13669 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. ...RESPONDENTS Counset for the petitioner: !Xl_D.!.tnGARJUNA BABU, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. FOR SRI G.CHANDRA SHAKHAR RAO ' -' ' Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI p.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: SRt N.SREEDHAR REDDy, SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel forthe Respondent No.5: SRI A.SUDERSHAN REDDy, ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY WRIT P ET ITION NO: 1 3674 AF 2024 Between: #L#"T:i3x,f;i;xiiiliffi "gfl iif .fn,ffi #'U"l?f ?: ...PETITIONER *s li's:flxH,:l1E ?:iiffi:l53gy::', commission, rep bv its secrerary, y,ii#;"'3#:Bll.'"n[,HiBJl,::,fJ:ili",1#:?1+:,,,,tH,: i[?l##:,.ft ',fi AND

1. 2 N ; ; i;; 6,'. k n J,l l'fi ' I:ffiYlr"|.Xl'"i3i:g"*n'Ter, -operation, the Southern power Distribution ;;,n ;;' ; rui; : 4. The Senior Accounts Officer Operation, the Southern power Distribution fi :x:?iiJ,:lIs:t'trxlfrH3:ES:,,PJ', j,;U;#t,JJ11H#j7'3i,:iJ 5. The State of Tetangana,,Igp; gV its prt. Secretary, Energy Department, r b5;,,*,i 133 ISS:I PJilffi,;. T B iill "i? Telangana Secretaria"t, HvberiOaOl ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more particurarry one in the nature of 27 Writ of Mandamus declaring the order dated 19'04 2024 in O P. No' 76/2015 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent is highly illegaly' arbitrary, uniust, irrational' without jurisdiction and contrary to the Principles of NaturalJusticeapartfrombeingviolativeofArticlesl4'19(1Xg),21,265and 300A of the Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the same in so far as the Petitioner is concerned IA NO: 10F 2024 petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant io the order dated 19 04 '2024 in O P No' 761201Spassed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent including disconnection of petitioner's power supply pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO :2 oF 2024 Between: 2 of Telangana Limited ' rep' mpound, HYderabad' teta 1 The Southern Power Distribution Company Cli'rilri,i'i"o Managing Director' It/lint co State. The Superintending Engineer' Operation' the hllTi fh"l Is',t'n:,i', [.s, :#]ffi :: s:, PJ'' :'""J, The Senior Accounts Otlicer Operation' the- Southem Power Distribution r c i rc e' |,* h:xv, ilu Soulhern Power Distribution Rai e nd ra n a e a r c i rcr e' IHl.8? Hg:x P:'' :'J'"J' :l i"i:+di:fl i?jll* "'n' by its "T 5 ' " ...PETITIONERS o*?. *,. Scan Energv and Power Ltd' (Service ' 5til;'iG;. "d+,es' and 36' Konduro yt111 "9$.,"""i:h53llP"Lla#t}f,?31: Telanlana state' rei oi'iil c"nlbt EiJt'iii" offic"er' cnirhnlib Das 2. The Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission' rep by its Secretary' ' ffi iririi, Frvae"oad, Telangana state 3 The State of Telangana' rep qy its Prl' Secretary' Energy Department' -' Telangana Secretariat' HyderaDao' petition under section 15r cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to ...RESPONDENTS 28 vacate the interim orders dated 04.06.2024 in Wp. No_ dismiss the writ petition. 13674 of 2024 and COUNSEI fOr thE PEtitiONEr: SRI D.V.NAGARJUNA BABU, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. FOR SRI G.CHANDRA SHAKHAR RAO--_-' "'' Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI p.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDy, SC FOR TGSPDCL Counset for the Respondent No.5: SRI A.SUDERSHAN REDDy, ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY WRIT P ETITION NO: 1 3684 0F 2024 Between: Xl*',9?; t"" #:1 hi:ll:?'d.:X fl [X?TJll,Sfl ", S a ns a re d d v D i st ri ct, re p. by ir s AND

1. 2 3 4 5 ...PET]TIONER I3s I,1::fr??3;lXE i:ijffi:r"I3gtl,"" commission, rep by its secretary, The Southern power Distri ctrii,riariin!ffi :#i.n,,Bil,"ni",trfl t?J,1J"1;::il;.:,gi,:Sf :8,:ry",1,: ,.B:TSL', operation circre, r=??1"'., i[:. o?iiffi reransanastate. :lansinJii;li;'s;b;;'.;oJrn3,.;::it3:'frrl".X;i The Senior Accounts Offir S,",p:;; i;xd,i,YlliliJo3',,?liii""t.J^8"',"#:L"ilr::"x3;ri:l:lui:: I!Bd:* &l.Iil1ffil[il,Jif;"1, its prr secretary, Enersy Department, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High cou( may be pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the order dated 1g.04.2024 in o.p. No. 7612015 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent is highry iregary, arb*rary, unjust, irrationar, without jurisdiction and contrary to the principres of Natural Justice apart from being violative of Articles 1a, i 9(1)(g), 21 , 265 and 29 and consequently set aside the same in so far 300A of the Constitution of lndia as the Petitioner is concerned ' lA NO: 'l oF 2024 petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 19 04'2024 in O P No' rciZOlSpassed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent including disconnection of petitioner's power supply pending disposal of the above writ petition. IA NO:2OF 2024 ""T"il; Southern Power Distribution comPanl-of Limited ' rep by its chairman ano tvtan'gin"s"5i;;i;;"Mi;t iompounol Hvderabad' Telangana -Telanqana State. 2 .7 AND

1. 2 J ILi,'o?t8itl"#$f"tr rtI'JL?"J;.ffi*?,'""o".f#'"aJr'S'''?3i'3?''t"'""oiil Telangana State. r he S e n i o r_ Acco u nts off i cer;, orffi ?:u ru ::: CompanY of Telangana Ltm State o infi,s..", "tT:lr::#:! '.Tli ...PETITIONERS S a n s are d d v D i stri ct, re p bv its on"" l*:i hiTi,""j;.:xfl lTlgl xl:"r",gls "Xif The Telanoana State Electricity Regulatory Commission' rep by its Secretary' neA Hitts, Hyderabad, Telangana sate The State of Telangana,, rep' by its Prl' Secretary' Energy Department' ilii, ;i Secretaria--t, Hvd e rabad e" "si ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 04'06 2024 in WP No 13684 of 2024 and dismiss the writ Petition. CouNSEI fOT thE PEtitiONET: SRI D.V.NAGARJUNA BABU, ST. COUNSEL' REP. FOR SRI G.CHANDRA SHAKHAR RAO 30 Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI p.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel forthe Respondent No.5: SRI A.SUDERSHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY WRIT P ETITIO N NO: 14189 oF 2024 Between: IVI/s Rayalaseema lndustr Je,.-o_a oi i vi rr;&:' i :b:i: %{l,tll' )^5,f ;., lil ;i;, rerangana State, rep. by its Director, ni6ris#ri.,".,, Survey No. 115/2lAlA. Rangareddy District. AND 1 2 J 4 5 ...PETITIONER I3: I",i3:fl1,H,.:H: ?:iil;:r,I3#1s"" commission, rep by,s Secretary, Ii:,*jl^:'ft ',fi H:g"J',311x3[tf 1fi Brg#,'"1fi !:1ff.:iTffi5,,i:1"?:,1,; [:ryiflHi,ns5ffi ,Fii;?:",,.fJ_?,.s,?,:r"r,i5rffi ;i:.1'Lyiri: The Senior Accounts Offi ff ly,.*ih,Tsir;if{,,fl i[iil":JiU".Br+:i[H]J"?yf ;,Bj,J,Bli:ir #ffi:* fJ.I?i?il,1i[ii,Ji&,51 its Prr secretary, Energv Department, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the order dated 19.04.2024 in o.p. No.76t2015 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent is highry iregary, arbitrary, unjust, irrationar, without jurisdiction and contrary to the principres of Natural Justice apart from being violative of Articles 14, 1g(j)(il, 21 ,265 and 3004 of the constitution of rndia and consequenfly set aside the same in so far as the petitioner is concerned. 31 lA NO: 1 oF 2024 petition under section 151 Cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 19 04'2024 in O'P' No' 76t2O1spassed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent including disconnection of petitioner's power supply pending disposal of the above writ petition. IA NO: 20F 2024 State. ""T"?l; southern Power Distribution companv.of relangana Limited ' rep' by-its chairman and ruanaffi"Di&i;; Mi;t iompoundl Hvderabad' Telangana ' U?",."',i,"''Jl"+g1:flr:lgl::,"i R:rui'",q-'rlq'i?'[l1"['i3iJ'3ll#:''Lll8: XIliS"i'6ri'n,iti,ri e8*li, Hvd"rabad' Telansana state' ,u%g""T":,^?:!x,ll'""?*'iiiRgii*,!!gilij,i,:il"[:iJ"iHlilT''31[iJ NIli5f, i'6ri'n,itLie8;ril Hvd"rabadl relansana state' ...PETITIONERS AND 1 2 J Tii,'""f,xfl T["ilqq'it]:"s#1;'f:fr +';fl iit The Telanoana State Electricity Regulatory Commis "Hyderabad Telangana state' neO Uitts, The State of Telangana, - rep by its Prl' Secretary' ilir".s;, Secretaria-t, HYderabad' Survev No. 115l2lNA' it, Ran'gareddY District, sion, reP. bY its Secretary, Energy DePartment, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section ,t 51 cPc praying that in the circumstances Stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 07062024 in WP' No 14189 of 2024 and dismiss the writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D'V'NAGARJUNA BABU' Sr' COUNSEL' REP' FOR SRI G.CHANDRA SHAKHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent No'1: SRI P'PRASAD' SC FOR TGERC 32 counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: sRr N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI A.SUDERSHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY WRIT P ETIT ION NO: 14192 0 F 2024 Between: u!'o,'fB',3[fl,]]il3li!?."],&;,[Tfl5 i,],]ij,",H,s#Iii.,,i11fix",,11,,, Manda,, cr of Petitioner is amended as per c.o.dt. 02.12.2024 in rA No. 3tzo24. AND .,.PETITIONER

1. 2 *: I?i3:flxt3,:H: ?:iil;:,"x3n.;:1"" commission, rep bv its Secretary, The Southern power Distribution Company of Telanqa GrairmJn ani il;;;sift bi,';-"6;"ifii;I'd#;J?;y,,i?#i:t:i, i:8,?: l,: 3 4 E 3:;.,r'"yfr%i+"Ji,t%":,"9,,??€:'^f"BBL,B?il;,Ji"r:ll,lrf"[,,in?x:,rr;ii,'0,,,n The Senior Accounts Officer,, p,eration, the Southern power Distribution uompanv of rerangana Limiteii, rr,tEoa? 6'istriii rrTJiJr, r"rrnsana state. Iliud:*,iJ"I?i?l],?1ff}i,,i,"3o,31 its Prr Secretary, Enersv Deparrment. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the order dated 191o4t2o24 in o.p. No. 76120.15 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent is highry ilegary, arbitrary, unjust, irrationar, without jurisdiction and contrary lo the principres of Natural Justice apart from being violative of Articles f +, 19(i Xg), 21 , 265 and 3004 of the constitution of tndia and consequentry set aside the same in so far as the petitioner is concerned. 1A NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under section 15 r cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to 33 stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 19 04 2024 in O P No' 76t2015 passed by the 'l st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent including disconnection of petitioner's power supply pending disposal of the above writ petition. lA NO: 2 oF 2024 Between: State.

1. The Southern Power Distribution CoIPgnX of Telanoana Limited " rep by its Chairman ano t'lanafi n!"bi#d"ili"t Compoundl Hvderabad' Telangana 2. The Superintending Engineer' Op-eFligl' the Southern Power Distribution company or retanga# fi'ii""ru"-oirt blstrict' Medak retangana state' 3. The Senior Accounts Officer" pPeration'. the Southern Power Distribution companv of rerung"'iuii'"ii;ii' ilr-elari Diitr.lct' Medak' Telansana state' ...PETITIONERS AND 1 2 3 lvt/s Jeevaka lndustries Ltd., (r\i DK-1 150) chegun"tS- Villaoe and Mandal' r/edak District, Telansana si;t"l%"r;' bi ii;bit;"16;' Mr' Anil Agarwal CT of Petitioner is amended as per C'O'dt' 02",22024 in lA No' 312024' The Telanqana State Electricity Regulatory Commission' rep by its Secretary' Red Hills, Flyderabad, Telangana sate' The State of Telangana, reP qy its Prl secretary' Energy Department' Telangana Secretariat' HyderaDao' ...RESPONDENTS PetitionunderSectionl5lcPCpraying.thatinthecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 07 06'2024 in WP' No 14192 of 2024 and dismiss the writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D'V'NAGARJUNA BABU' Sr' COUNSEL' REP' ' Fon snr G.cHANDRA SHAKHAR RAo Counsel for the Respondent No'1: SRI P'PRASAD' SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No'2 to 4: SRI N'SRE-EDHAR REDDY' SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel forthe Respondent No'S: SRI A'SUDERSHAN REDDY' AOVOCATC GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY 34 WRIT PETITION NO :14193 0F 2024 Between: lvi/s JK Fenner (rndia) Limited, prot Nos. 4 & 22, phase rv, IDA patanchenr Sansareddy Disirict, fetansaria s1iie, iip. uv it-; iii"iiri; 6ii#i]#Iln:; (HR), Amrutha Sarvesh AND ...PETITIONER 1 2 3 4 5 The. Telangana State Erectricity Re.guratory commission, rep. by its secretary, Red Hills, Hyderabad, Telangaha S"ate. The southern Power Distribution company of reranoana Limited, reo. bv its Chairman and Manaoino Director, tt tint dompounO:i]y;,;;ffi ,' i;iii&;:; State. The Superintending Enoineer, Operation Circle, The Southern power Distributibn Comoariv of r"etangina Irriil'sr;;ilddy Distri;t,'S;'";r;"'dd;. Telangana State. The senior Accounts officer, operation, the southern power Distribution Company of Telanqana Limiteij, SangareciAy Oisirict, Sangrreday. i;i;;g;;; State. The State of Telanoana rep. by its prl. Secretary, Energy Department, Telangana Secretaria-t, HyOerdbaOl ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 of rhe constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fited therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the order dated 19.04.2024 in o.p. No.76/2015 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent is highry iilegaily, arbitrary, unjust, irrational, without jurisdiction and contrary to the principles of Natural Justice apart from being violative of Articles i , 19(1)(g), 21 , 265 and 300A of the constitution of ,lndia and consequenfly set aside the same in so far as the petitioner is concerned. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 1glo4l2o24 in o.p. No. 7612015 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent including I 35 disconnectionofpetitionerspowersupplypendingdisposaloftheabovewrit petilion IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Between:

1. The Southern Power Distribution CqTpSly of Telanoana Limited' rep by its chairman and uanaffi"Dil;i;i Mi;adompound,"Hyderabad, Telangana State. Enqineer, Operation Circle, The Southern Power oi'i"Ji ll..rl i n r- [ i, iiL a s, ns, r" d d v D i stri ct' S a n g a re d d v'

2. The SuPerintending Distribution ComPanY Telangana State. The Senior Accounts Officer, Operation, the Southern Power Distribution c',1".'' p"#vlt ili;-d ;;" f hii"b, lran g"tetio v District' sans ared dv relansana State 3 ...PETITIONERS AND 1 I\//s .lK Fenner (lndia) Limited, Plot Nos' 4 and pitanin"rr, Sang'aredciy District, Telangana state' b"nerit Manage (HR), Ahrutha sarvesh' 2 The Telanoana State Electricity Regulatory Commission' rep by its Secretary' - Red Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana Sate' 3. The State of Telangana, rep' QV its Prl' Secretary' Energy Department' -' Phase lV, lDA, by its Associate 22, rep. Telangana Secretarial, Hyderabad' ...RESPONDENTS PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated intheaffidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,theHighcourtmaybepleasedto vacate the interim orders dated 07 06 2024 in WP' No 141 93 of 2O24 and dismiss the writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D'V'NAGARJUNA BABU' Sr' COUNSEL' REP' FOR SRI G.CHANDRA SHAKHAR RAO Counsel for the Responderit No.1: SRI P'PRASAD, Sc FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No'2 to 4: SRI N'SREEDHAR REDDY' SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI A'SUDERSHAN REDDY' ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY \ 36 WRIT P ETITI ON NO i 14466 0F 2024 Between: Y';rlJ,?,1$,,,i:?1t^,9,ovo-0. Limito:cr, (Service -g9t,T"gtign No.RJN-1884), oviiiir,i-"rei"%i,i';..i'3H#iX$l;['ff 4:.r1ufli::1':i-i;L;s;;,5iJi"]l"p ...PETITIONER H: I",i3:flXt3,:t*,?:iil;:y. 5Bn'#'" co m m i ss ion, rep bv its s ecreta ry, The Southern power Distribution Co.mpany of Telangana Limited., reo. bv its Sl:i5-r, and Manasing Direcror, ili;i'd#fi;Uy.nyoeraoao, reians.ana t!fuifl:l_Jfl ds;?iln[,,T:!:i,"s,flu:ft +:jii"i]J.?yf;"3j?,,,3ri:ir The Senior Accounts Offi fi :xy,r:J,,:iJfl ,t#-'ii.:fl Hi,€:1f &l.I?l1l],11[i,i,Ji&"31 |[i#:tu*']*ii%: jJ,?H;,Bj'J''Bri:iJ its Prr secretary, Enersv Department, AND 1 a 3 4 5 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 0t the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the order dated 'rg.04.2 024 in o.p. No. 76/2015 passed by the .lst arbitrary, unjust, irrational, without irr,..,",,", ;; ::"lJjJ ;J::J":;T I Natural Justice apart from being violative of Articles f a, 19( I )(g), 21 , 265 and 3004 of the constitution of India and consequenry set aside the same in so far as the petitioner is conceined respondent in respect of the 2nd lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CpC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to stay a'further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 1g.04.2024 in o.p. No. 7612015 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent incruding 37 of petitioner's power supply pending disposal of the above writ disconnection petition. lA NO: 2 oF 2024 Between: nv of Telanqana Limited ' rep by its 6ompoundl HYderabad, Telangana 1 The Southern Power Distribution Com.pa cn"rit",iJ" i"b Naanaging Director' Mint State. The Superintending Engineer, Operation'. the Soulhern Power Distribution jendranagarcrcre' i:"x:'ifu"",'#l!gflxi;'=,:1;"H[:?:i::ulP,'ff lRa The Senior Accounts Officer, Operation'. the . Southern Power Distribution oistricr n"iendranasar circre' h:"fly,fi :u,ltJ.?llEstriliil*,T:::?s:ii, J ...PETtTtONERS AND I 2 J U d yoq, #X]lll$; M/s A n a n d r sp at . {ii#tli,S8llllf:?l, r}8"t1l:ill .8"'J Ifr [3.'i:'"Jlx'&,,[:'3?[];;i;hiJhji,l,iiAg'*'r The Telanoana State Electricity Regulatory Commission' rep' by its Secretary' ReA Hitt., Hyderabad, Telangana sate' The State of Telangana, rep by its Prl Telangana Secretariat, HyderaDao' Secretary, EnergY DePartment' " ...RESPONDENTS PetitionunderSectionl5,lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 'l 1 '06 '2024 in WP' No 14466 of 2024 and dismiss the writ Petition' counserf orthePetition:',F51";[,t3fi xi,lrfli".f, "^["Ti"-t^'JSEL',REP' Counsel for the Respondent No'1: SRI P'PRASAD' sc FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No'2 to 4: SRI N'SRE-EDHAR REDDY' SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel forthe Respondent No'5: SRt A'SUDERSHAN REDDY' ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY 38 WRIT PETITI ON NO: 15108 OF 2024 Between: 1 2 !'!/s N{-S Aqlrrwat Foundaries privale _Limited., Rama Towers, 5_4_83, 2nd Floor. ooo. Raniouni Bus f)epot, tr,r.c. noaa, sbcunoerauld--soooo'a n"p'riv its Direcior, Mr. P'ramod Agarwal [\/r. Pramod Kumar Agarwal, S/o. Sri Maniklal Agarwal, Aged 60 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o. 'l-8"-673, ' B;ghii;'gip;l;, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500 O2O. Azimauao lntr.i.t"rili'"Ar";, - ...PETITIONERS AND 1 2 3 Telangana State Electricitv R Floor, Singareni Bhavan. Red its Secrelary egulatory Commission, Door No. 11-4-660, Vth Hills. Hyderabad, Telangana - S00 OO4 Rei,. 6, Southern Distribution company of rerangana Limited., TSSPDCL coroorate off ice, Centra t Se creta ria r j kria i ra ta oia," nvir"* uit, r"i"""d;- "516"b?; Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Oiieitoi' The Suoerintendino Enoineer, TSSpDCL, Operation Circte, Medak, Telangana ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 ot the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an order or orders or writ or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of fMandamus decraring the action of .1st Respondent in passing the lmpugned order dated 19-o4.2024, purported to be exercising powers UiSecs. 39(2xdxii), a0(c)(ii) and 42(2) of the Etectricity Act, 2003 (Act, 2003) and determining the cross subsidy surcharge.(css) for the Fy 2015-.r6, to be recovered from the consumers who availed power supply through open access and the consequential action of the 2nd Respondent in levying su rcha rge/inte rest on the recovery of CSS prospectively, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, contrary to Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulation, 2015 - Regulation No. 2 of 2015, in violation of principles of natural justice, besides being violative of the petitioner's rights guaranteed under Article 1a, 19(i Xg) of the constitution of lndia. I 39 IA NO: 1oF 2024 PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of Order dated 19'04 2024 issued by the 1st Respondent in determining CSS for FY 2015-16 and to further direct the 2nd and 3rd Respondents not to take any coercive steps including that of disconnection of power supply pursuant to the order daled 19'04'2024 passed by the 1st Respondent IA NO:2O F 2024 Between: 1 Southern Distribution Company of Telangana. cff il?s"i'*"jil":?'j'h#[elli#s;,ilY' "'.]s:%1

2. The Superintending Engineer' TSSPDCL' Telangana r:i.'"E3g' :368"'r1t Operation Circle, Medak, .,.PETITIONERS ANO 2 1 yli:,,5,f nfi Hil,:iHl:'J3;"[1il%: kut:u5'^Til["#"-L1i.3at'3;f [i it. oiieitot, Mr. P-ramod Agarwal lMr. Pramod Kumar Agarwal, S/o Sri Maniklal Agaruval Aoed 60 Years' Occ' Business, Rl/o. 1-8-673r " X;;;;;-" inout[tiat AreE' Baghlinghpallv' HvO"raoCO, Telangana'- 500 020' li:lrsm,*,'iriff :'l:H"["fi ,li'i'Wr3,"iil:]:?3[]"ffi :]3tJlffi 3;"J] 3 its Secretary ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 18/06/2024 in WP No 15108 of 2024 and dismiss the writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms' CHALLA KIRANMAYEE' REP' FOR M/s. CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent No'1: SRI P'PRASAD' SC FOR TGERC q 40 Counsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3: SRI N.SREEDHAR niOOV, SC FOR TGSPDCL wRt T PET ITION NO: 15 109 0F 2024 Between: snf;*i s1":1 Rolting.Mils privare Limited, Address 13-6_ $&1ff'"*;,X,X lru',:',"r","nf g"f.,r;ry""Jgpiff :T,_X"** j:t"itjjlj:g*, AND

1. 2 J ...PETITIONER ,ii"3:1',J?",;,.*i'=;ff xf ''il"T"fl li,'s:",ry."":j[H:]"'tP,:?:l".JJ;6;'f s;"Jx px;.#:t:ii:*{s#f i##:efliJ#iq:#"i:ilxs:,:i,?33s,",%8"51'' IH"?il,r,"#,iH,il,%jifl.l,?il;,Ifi:ongh,3f,"J:1""i,,f,j!.,13: Rajendranasar, ...RESPONDENTS petition under Articre 226 0f rhe constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an order or orders or writ or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the action of 1st Respondent in passing the lmpugned Order dated 1g.O4.2024, purported to be exercising powers U/secs. 39(2xd)(ii), ao(c)(ii) and 42(2) of the Etectricity Act, 2003 (Act, 2003) and determining the cross subsidy Surcharge (css) for the Fy 2015- .r6, to be recovered- from the consumers who avaired power suppry through open access and the consequentiar action of the 3rd Respondent in revying and demanding surcharge/interest vide Lr. No. SE/op/RJN/SAO/JAO(HTyD No. .1 .r4124, 23. 05. 2024 on the rec-overy of CSS prospectively, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the Erectricity Act, 2003, contrary to Terangana state Electricity Reguratory commission (conduct of Business) Reguration, 2015 - Reguration No' 2 0f 2015, in vioration of principres of naturar justice, besides being violative of the petitioners rights guaranteed under Article 1a, rc(1)(g) of the Constitution of lndia. Ir 4l IA NO: 1 oF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of Order dated 19' 04' 2024 issued by the 1st Respondent in determiningCsSforFY20l5.l6andtofurtherdirectthe3rdRespondentnotto takeanycoercivestepsincludingthatofdisconnectionofpowersupplypursuant to the demand vide Lr' No SE/Op/RJN/SAO/JAO (HTyD No' 1'14124' dated

23.O5.2024. IA NO: 20F 2024 Between:

1. southern Distribution companv of relansanq !;;5:: -H?E?""rt:S58"t1, ' 6i'il,'Ce_niiJt-secretariat, Ktiairatabad' Hvder il;. 6yG Cfirirman and Managing Director 2. The Superintending Engineer' TSSPDCL Operation Circle' Rajendranagar' ' N;;rI N'";;i-i n,o"ot, nienolpatnam' Hvderabad' Telangana' ...PETITIONERS ANO '1 . 2 M/s. Maha Shiv Shakti Steel Rolling . Hg#iJl,? b 55"" t" *, ti,y:m rg,: t' * ll'n^, [: lt . t\Iills ",ll'#'?'f : Private Limited' Address 13-6- raie rfiinavir Prashad Sonthalia iH:ltrt its Secretary j:t:#ffIi:"il$"fl liis:"fi ,??$TJ:'i?i;,P,, *Y,ll ;t;'€3; "J! "?3 ...RESP.NDENTS Petitionund.erSectionl5lCPcprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 18'06'2024 in WP No' 15109 of 2024' Counsel for the.Petitioner: ti,ls' CHALLA KIRANJVIAYEE' REP' FOR M/s. CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent No'1: SRI P'PRASAD' SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No'2 & 3: SRI N'SRE-EDHAR REDDY' SC FOR TGSPDCL 42 WRIT PETITION NO: 151 110F 2024 Between: IM/s. Manasa sarovar rspat rndia private Limited, Address #Door No. 2_1_41 . ,lr?l8f l,n'f ,ifl';,t""""'iil:fi:37S:*1ilflilft ;':,i,'o^65i-R;;"ui'iiJ"o'nl"tli', ...PETITIONER ,ljt!:fJ#i?:xi'i',Ti?,:,H"[:9i ji1,i,y,3gH]:?3,?"?ffi ]3oJlblu€Si'Jf i3}:d",Edd:*{s#f ifl:#:I;f,{,#,?U:jita"*xrs:.ri,'"3ps,:rr8"61,t I!i"?il,r,?.i?'iH,i"%f ffi .+,??i;,l?i,,:?gh,.3f,"J:$3[,..,i1,]3Ra jendranasar, AND

1. 2 a\, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 0f rhe constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an order or orders or writ or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the action of 1st Respondent in passing the lmpugned order dated 19.04.2024, purported to be exercising powers U/secs. 39(2xdxii), ao(c)(ii) and 42(2) of the Etectricity Act, 2003 (Act, 2003) and determining the Cross Subsidy Surcharge (CSS for the Fy 20.15-16, to be recovered from the consumers who availed power supply through open access and the consequehtiar action of the 3rd Respondent in revying and demanding surcharge/interest vide Lr.No. sE/op/RJN/'A./JAO(HT)/D.No.1 12124, dated 23.05.2024 on the recovery of CSS prospectively, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the Erectriqity Act, 2003, contrary to Terangana state Erectricity Reguratory commission (conduct of Business) Reguration, 2015 - Reguration No 2 0f 2015, in vioration of principres of naturar justice, besides being viorative of the petitioners rights guaranteed under Articre 1a, r 9(1xg) of the constitution of lndia 43 IA NO: 10F 2024 petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of Order dated 19'04 2024 issued by the 1st Respondent in determiningCSSforFY20l5-l6andtofurtherdirectthe3rdRespondentnotto takeanycoercivestepsincludingthatofdisconnectionofpowersupplypursuant to the demand vide Lr'No' SE/Op/RJN/SAO/JAO (HT)/D No 112124' dated

23.05.2024 IA NO: 20F 2024 Between: 1 s o uth e rn D i stri buti o n co#fl Office, Central Secrr H;;.ivG Ch'irman and Managing Director ll,,?:,]8:Tt fi?3 531 .l?a?! 3gt :s68" t13 "illil

2. The Superintending. Engineer' TSSPDCL' Operation Circle' Rajendranagar' Nanal Nagar x naoos]'rrienoip'atn"' Hyderabad' Telangana' .,.PETITIONERS AND 1 2 -Sb ? o, to'*1, i:;:Y,t:# T' ntha l i a, S/o tvl u ku n d l a l As a rwa t M /s. M a n a sa s a rova r' Tobaco Bazar, Secunderal il"r"Citit r,-rir r" i r reransana State_Erectricity":"fii\l'i.i;7r3."jil:I:?3i)"?:3: |3aJ lf;'33i,Y[] Floor,-Singareni Bhavan, R' its Secretary b XtJ"R? ooBi''ll" r?1",T'; t33 ...RESPONDENTS PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 18 06 2024 in WP No 15111 of 2024' Counsel for the Petitioner: [Vls' CHALLA Kllfll[lYEE' REP' FOR M/s. CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel forthe Respondent No'1: SRI P'PRASAD' SC FORTSERC Gounsel for the Respondent No'2 & 3: SRI N'SREEDHAR REDDY' SC FOR TGSPDCL 44 WRIT P ETI TION NO : 15114 0F 2024 Between: Uf i,ll?[i1iflT''?5-:e3:"Jrivate- L im ited' Add ress Deer No 7 -3't 2t 1 t A, :fl ti,;jX% jzz f r; iv'it Directo r, Mi c;, #, i i il;, 3,,i?i:Lf ,fi ^t3ffi AND 1 2 J ...PETITIONER Telangana State Electrici Floor, Singareni Bhavan. its Secretary Southern Distribution C.-p?ly of Telangana Limited, TSSPDCL, Coroorate 35,*;,?€tl?i,,.'f,",i"ixt'il[[alt't6t#o*r;#li,:r"r*gi,i'--506"b?5 H"I"ffi i1'ft% 3,?H] : ?Si]"?ff: l8o J ho;uf S; uJf I?i,?il,"?.j?'i"f; ,il,%5i7.1,?il;,1:ilongh,3f""J:+:tfi :",i?Ra jendranasar, circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, pleased to pass an order or orders or writ or direction nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the lmpugned Order dated 19.O4.2024, purported U/S ecs. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the the High Court may be more particularly one in the 1st Respondent in passing to be exercising powers 39(2xd)(ii), aO(c)(ii) and 42(2) of the Erectricity Act, 2003 (Act, 2003) and det ermining the Cross Subsidy Surcharge (CSS) for the Fy 2015-.16. to be recovered from the consumers who availed power supply through open access and the consequentiar action of the 3rd Respondent in revying and demanding surcharge/interest vide Lr.No. SE/op/RJNisAo/JAO(HT)/D.No.1 11r24, dated 23 05 2024 0n the recovery of css prospectivery, as ilegar, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the Erectricity Act, 2003, contrary to Terangana state Erectricity Regulatory commission (conduct of Business) Reguration, 2015 - Reguration No 2 of 201s, in vioration of principres of naturar justice, besides being viorative of the petitioners rights guaranteed under Articre 14, 1 9(1 xg) of the constitution of lnd ia lA NO: 1 oF 2024 Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to 45 siay tne operation of Order dated 19 04 2024 issued by the 1st Respondent in determining CSS for FY 2015-16 and to further direct the 3rd Respondent not to take any coercive steps including that of disconnection of power supply pursuant to the demand vide Lr'No' SEiOp/RJN/SAO/JAO(HT)/D'No'1 11124' dated

23.05.2024. lA NO: 2 oF 2024 Between: ""11"1""*:'agf Hlji. oviG Cr,"rirman ano Managins Director riu:;.g;:l:ilil,i:,E!{:?i,1"'Js:?1Jj:I"':::s6ts"[,1t 2. The Superintending Engineer' TSSPDCL' Operation Circle' Raiendranagar' Nanal Nagar x naooi'frienOipatnam' Hyderabad' Telangana ...PETITIONERS AND 1 2 H[#H",1'il+Tii{'lU;:iffidffi?:t4#[i#iiB]'":3l]klt:it ifl":'"1,'ffi ;ff ,i':f :l1'ils"fi ;i'i'w.3,"#l]:?:[,,"?:3:|3oJld;'83i,"Jl its Secretary ...RESPONDENTS petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 18'06 2024 in WP' No 15'1 14 of 2024' Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms' CHALLA KIRANJ'JIAYEE' REP' FOR M/s. CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent No'1: SRI P'PRASAD' SC FOR TSERC REDDY' Counsel for the Respondent No'2 & 3: SRI !.SIEIPHAR SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT PETITION NOI 15115 oF 2024 Between: M/s. Jagriti Steel Private Limited' Address Pol" Nt 22-6-206 ' Pathergatti' Hvderabad, tetansan';'I 5o0"bi" i"p uv its 6irector' Mr' Navneet Kumar A6irwat, S/o. Krishna Kumar ...PETITIONER 4 AND 46 1 Z 3 ty Regulatory Commission, Door No 11-4-660, Vth Red Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana SOO OO+ nJp.-OV Telangana State Eleckici Floor, Singareni Bhavan. its Secretary Southern Distribution comp-any of rerangana Limited, TSSPDCL corporate office, Centrat Secretariat. kni'galiuaO Hli"iu-or,i,1llrngana 500 022 Rep. by its Chairman and lvlanaging OireCtoi' The Superintendino Enoineer, TSSpDCL, Operation Circle, Rajendranagar, Nanat Nasar X Raods. Mehdip;tn;m, Htd;*-f;, i;tansana ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High cou( may be pleased to pass an order or orders or writ or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of tvandamus decraring the action of 1st Respondent in passing the lmpugned Order dated 1g.04.2024, purported to be exercising powers U/secs 39(2xd)(ii), a0(c)(ii) and.42(2) of the Erectricity Act, 2003 ( Act, 2003 ) and determining the Cross Subsidy Surcharge (CSS) for the Fy 2015-16, to be recovered from the consumers who availed power supply through open access and the consequentiar action of the 3rd Respondent in revying and demanding surcharge/interest vide Lr.No. sE/op/RJN/sAo/JAo(HTyD. No..101/24, dated 23'O5 2024 0n the recovery of css prospectivery, as iregar, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the Erectricity Act, 2003, contrary to Terangana state Erectricity Regulatory commission (conduct of Business) Reguration, 2015 - Reguration No 2 of 2o1s, in violation of principres of naturar justice, besides being viorative of the peti(ioner's rights guaranteed under Articre 1a, 19(1)(g) of the constitution of lndia. lA NO: 1 OF 2o24 Petition under section 'r 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to stay the operation of order dated 19t04t2024 issued by the .r st Respondent in determining css for Fy 2015 - 'r6 and to further direct the 3rd Respondent not to take any coercive steps incruding that of disconnection of power suppry pursuant to the demand vide Lr.No. SEOp/RJN/SAO/JAO (Hr)/D.No.101 t24, dated 23105t2024. n+ 4'7 lA NO: 3 oF 2024 Between: --';:- j"-l:::u"il','i'3:::Jl,?:[:k?:'ri:J""j:lr'rT"1#:]l'f;'J"""?3?b"'"#"i3i: 5'v its bniirmrn and Managing Director

2. The Superintending Engineer' TSSPDCL' Operation Circle' Rajendranagar' ' N;ri N"r;;i'i nio"oi ttier'alpatnam' Hvderabad' Telansana ..,PETITIONERS AND 1 a M/s. Jagriti Steel Private Limited, Address Do91 N9 22-6-206' Pathergatti' Hvderabad. Telanqana - .0'0"b"d' Rie; by its-Director' Mr' Navneet Kumar Aganaral, S/o. Krishna Kumar' jl'sL*:li#ff X,f ''["t"fl liiS:",flr.:?sTJ:1?L,3,,?:"LtBJlal'83;"J! its Secretary .,.RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 1 51' CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 18'06'2024 in WP' No 15'1 '1 5 of 2O24 ' Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms' CHALLA KIRANMAYEE' REP' FOR M/s. GKR ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent No'1: SRI P'PRASAD' SC FOR TSERC Counsel for the Respondent No'2 & 3: SRI N'SREEDHAR REDDY' SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT PET ITION NO:15137 oF 2024 Between: lvl/s. Biniusaria lspat Private Limited'- C--1. G^ovt lndustrial Area' Chandulal Baradari, Hyderabad,i:j;;is;;';bo"odi. n"p by its Director, Mr. Hitesh Kumar Kedil, S/o. Sri Vinod Kumar Keora ..,PETITIONER AND 1 IiJSl'sll#:i:,=ilff [,\:''x"T"glil3:"fi .:?#TJ:*3,3*l3oJh';'€34',J] its Secretary 2 Southern Distribution Company of Telangana. Limited' TSSPDCL Corporate office. central secretariat,'Kf,tiii'tli'JJi Hvaerabad'' Telangana '5oo 022 ilijp."oviti Cniirman and Managing Director 48

3. The Superintendinq, Engineer, TSSPDCL, OO_e1a[o1 Circle, Rajendranagar, Nanat Nagar X noa?s, rrienoipb6;;, -Hft;;#rd, retansana ,..RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an order or orders or writ or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the action of 1st Respondent in passing the rmpugned order dated 1gro4t2024, purported to be exercising powers U/secs. 39(2Xdxii), a0(c)(ii) and 42(2) of the Etectricity Act, 2003 (Act, 2003) and determining the Cross Subsidy Surcharge (CSS) for the Fy 2015_.16, to be recovered from the consumers who availed power supply through open access and the consequentiar action of the 3'd Respondent in revying and demanding surcharge/interest vide Lr.No. sE/op/RJN/SA./JAO(HT),D.No.10B r24, dated 2310512024 on the recovery of CSS prospectively, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the Erectricity Act, 2003, contrary to Terangana state Erectricity Regulatory commission (conduct of Business) Reguration, 2015 - Reguration No' 2 0f 2015' in vioration of principres of naturar justice, besides being viorative of the petitioner's rights guaranteed under Articre 1a, 1g(1xg) of the constitution of lndia lA NO: 1 oF 2024 Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of order dated 1g.04.2024 issued by the 1st Respondent in determining css for Fy 20-r 5-16 and to further direct the 3rd Respondent not to take any coerciv e steps including that of disconnection of power supply pursuant to the demand vide Lr.No. SE/Op/RJN/SAO/JAO (HTyD.No.108/24, dated 23.05.2024. lA NO: 2 oF 2024 Between: 1 phT!6]kt",.{l*ls:fi l#,rj{,qa,:8,31'1t1",#:%1I:,:X&?:efd8"61, 49 2 The Superintending Engineer, TSSPDCL' Operation Circle' Raiendranagar' N;;ri N"r;;ii noa"ai Menoipatnam, Hvderabad' Telansana ...PETITIONERS AND 1 2 M/s. Biniusaria Ispat Private Limited, C-1 , G-ovt' lndustrial Area' Cha'ndulal Baradari. Hvderabad, rerania-ria"--sob-05a. nep by its Director, Mr. Hitesh Kumar Kedi6. S/o. Sri Vinod Kumar Kedia Telanoana State Electricity Reoulatory Commission' Door No' 11-4-660' Vth iiJ;;:5i;;r"';;i er';ir;", ftd,i FiriJ, r-r'voeianaa, reransana -500 004 Rep bv its Secretary ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated intheaffidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,theHighCourtmaybepleasedto vacate the interim order dated 18'06'2024 in WP No 15137 of 2024 ' Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms' CHALLA KIRANMAYEE' REP' FOR M/s. CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent No'1: SRI P'PRASAD' SC FOR TSERC Counsel for the Respondent No'2 & 3: SRI N'SREEDHAR REDDY' SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT PETI TION NO: 15 2210F 2024 Between: I\//s. Survalata SPinning Secundeiabad 500 003. Kumar Agarwal Mills, lt's Regd. Office 105, Sardar Patel Road i"ii. bv'iG Joi-ni tvtanaging Director, Sri Mahender ...PETITIONER AND 1 2 3 4 E Department, Rep. by its Special Chief ad. The State of Telangana' EnergY Secretary, TS Secretariat, HYderab The Telanoana State Electricity Regulatory Commission' Hyderabad' Rep by iis Secretalry, Red Hilld, HYderabad The Southern Power Distribution company.Limited o1 Telangana state' rep' ilTt#ili-; X''ii r',rZ"igi"sbirectol, r'tiht compound' Hvderabad' The Superintendent of Engineer, TSSPDCL, Operation Circle' Nagarkumool' Nagarkurnool District. The Senior Accounts officer, TSSPDCL, Nagarkurnool, Nagarkumool District' ...RESPONDENTS 50 Petition under Articre 226 0t the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ direction order or orders decraring the order dated 1g-04_2024 in o P'No 76 0f 2015 passed by the 2nd respondent fixing the cross subsidy surcharge in respect of the 3rd respondent DISC.M as whory arbitrary iregar withou[ jurisdiction offending the principles of natural justice and void consequently set aside the same. IA NO: 10F 2024 Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to stay a'further proceedings pursuant to the demand Notice dated 31-05-2024 in LR.No. SE/OP/NG[</SAO/JA0(HT)S AtD.No.183t2o24 issued by the 4th respondent the superintendent Engineer demanding payment of barance of surcharge and interest there on. lA NO: 2 oF 2024 Between:

1. The Southern power Distribution Companv Limiter oy its Cnair-man X,,ii'vZnrsins Director. r,rri;t corpl,?lo]",i?tg?I3 :rr,", ' Iffif."rl.itt%dent,of Ensineer, TSS PDCL,. operation circte, Nagarkumoot, 3. The Senior Accounts Officer, TSSpDCL, Nagarkumool, Nagarkumool District. ,."0 AND

1. 2 2 ...PETITIONERS yi:,"t0:7331'u88't8ig#,.r rtl: Besg. orrice 105.- Sardar pater Road "p by its Joint Managing lJrrector. sri. Mahender KumarAgaMal S::."tiil: rg.l?ifl#:i'r,.J3igildDepartment, Rep. bv its speciar chier [3 3 J"?5,:ffi T f, , 5 f"r[SlyrRes "?fl u I a t o ry c o m m i s s i o n, H vd e ra b a d, R e p. by ...RESPONDENTS 51 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated intheaffidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,theHighCourtmaybepleasedto vacate the interim order dated 24 06'2024 in WP' No 15221 of 2024' Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M'P'CHANDRA MOULI' Sr' COUNSEL' REP' FOR SRI E.GANESH Counsel for the Respondent No'1: SRI A'SUDERSHAN REDDY' ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent No'2: SRI P'PRASAD' SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No'3 to 5: SRI N'SREEDHAR REDDY' .SCFORTGSPDCL WRIT PETITION NO:1527 2o-F 2024 Between: IVI/s Survalakshmi Cotton lvlills Ltd' SuryaTowers' 6th Floor'' 1O5' Sardar F;i"iil;'r;, s;"r"otij'i''o- cjllndp ov iti; President' R'Lakshmi Naravana' ...PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Telangana, Energy Department, Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary, TS Secretariat, Hyderabad' The Telanqana State Electricity Regulatory Commission' Hyderabad' Rep' by lis Secretalrv, Red Hills, Hyderabad' The Southern Power Distribution company.Limited of Telangana state' rep' ;fit.:dffi# liii r",rr. is, is bireCtol, tt'tiht compound' Hvd era bad The Suoerintendent of Engineer, Operation.Circle' TSSPDCL' Rajendernagar' Nanalnigar X Road, Rethibowli' Hyderaoao' The Senior Accounts Officer, TSSPDCL, Rajendernagar' Nanalnagar X Road' Rethibowli, HYderabad. 2 3 4 5 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article' 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstancesstatedinth€affidavitfiledtherewith'theHighCourtmaybe pleased to issue a writ in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ direction order or orders declaring the order dated 19-04-2024 in O.P.No.76 of 2015 passed by the 2nd respondent fixing the cross subsidy surcharge in respect of the 3rd respondent DISCOM as wholly arbitrary illegal I 52 without jurisdiction offending consequently set aside the same the principles of natural justice and void 1A NO: 't OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stared in the affidavit filed in suppo( of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the demand Notice dated 23-os-2o24 in LR No' sE/op/RJN/sAo/JAo/(HT)/D,No.105/2024 issued by the 4th respondent the superintendent Engineer demanding payment of barance of surcharge and interest there on pending disposal of the writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Between: b y its C h a i rm a n A n d Nll a n i g i ng l The southern power Diskibutiox company Limited of rerangana state. reo. 2. The Superintendent of Engineer, Operation Circle, TSSpDCL, Rajendemagar, t -oi r*i" il [,ti'" t Z o ri.l"p o, n o, H yd e ra b ad. N a n a I n a g a r X Ro a o, Retn iuowt i.' n-y'o rss PDCL, Rajendernasar, Nanalnasar X Road, rlbi o l " "'', " #?ri""ilrq: ff33ij;:3o''er' AND 1 2 J ..PETITIONERS yj?"i#y#:5'"xT,l.::jfJ..yf The State of Telanoana Secretary, TS Secret5riat, Hyderd5aO--""i!i"vr*'! -.jfl: &lx"",l:ru"",*, Rl[,[i"n"*,,13?;r3fi:1,, ,E1erg.y Department. Rep. by its Special Chief I\eP' IJ 3 J"?'f,:t;"fi i'fi'r'J':lyrRes "T?ii u I a to ry co m m i ss i o n, H vd e ra bad, Re p bv .-,RESPONDENTS Petition under section r51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in suppdrt of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim order dated 20.06.2024 inWp. No. 15272 of 2024. Counsel for the petitioner: SRI M.p.CHANDRA MOULt, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. FOR SRI E.GANESH Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI A.SUDERSHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY 53 Counsel for the ResPondent No'2 SRI P.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No'3 to 5: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY' SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT PETITI ON NO: 15756 oF 2024 """yg*f Between: g3,'^ift 5'iJi'lf.''L*lL{li1l{'^"^'l'?'5:?[X&!i:?.""'da rrilaridat, nrngrr"ooy b[i]rci, ;;;.'by iit Manager (Finance and Accounts)' I Maheswar. ...PETITIONER AND Red Hills, Hyderabad' lelangana rare'

1. The Telangana State Electricity Re^O-r1l-atorV Commission' rep by its Secretary' 2. The Southern Power Distribution CqrIpPlY of Telanoana Limited' rep by its chairmanandnltanaffi'5i?;;i;;Mi;tdompound'"Hvderabad'Telangana State.

3. The Superintendrng Engineer" -Operation' ' Rlfufr fu J[ifirllsil,ild1,5i:: +ii:lu, the southern Power Distribution d stria' naiend ranaga r circre' ilXlili"i'6"i'n,itni eBilri, Hva'irabadlrelansana state' 'u?";,""T":,^?:1;,11""?n'iiiR6ll;qni:ii&i:i:"#',J"%Y:I'B:'J','3i':iJ q The State of Telangana, rep' by its Prl secretary' Energy Department' " ietrng"n, Secretariat' Hyderabao ' .,,RESPONDENTS PetitionunderArticle226ollheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order daled 19104t2024 in O P' No 7612015 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent is highly illegaly' arbitrary, unjust, irrational, without iurisdiction and contrary to the Principles of Natural Justice apart from being violative of Articles 14' 19(1 Xg)' 21' 265 and 3004oftheConstitutionoflndiaandconsequently,setasidethesameandalso the notice in Letter No, sE/OP/RJN/SAO/JAO(HTyD'No'113124 dated 23tOSt2O24 in so far as the petitioner is concerned' IA NO: 1 oF 2024 54 Petition under section 'r51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to stay arr further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 19.04.2024 in o.p. No. 7612015 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent incruding disconnection of petitioner's power suppry pending disposar of the above writ petition. IANO:2O F 2024 Between: 1 2 3 AND 1 2 3 [ffi ,*il':fr 'fi ];irft,,,8#:il.."#fr ,,8";lr::,iJ:il?],$,:"o1i:LJrH,: H:fuiTJ"jf:I:;,,"n,5ts'n?l"x?ffi The Senior Accounts Offic fi :r,fr dliJfi 1,5'#l;5*f i[:1"gU,.?+#[H:iJ.%yf;,?i?,,Bti:iJ jJ"?y,:,{,?j?,,,81fl iJ U:?,}€jlH: ...PETITlONERS il*,:lf#i{,}rfl l,iJti"il,{*l,,,'tufl i:il,#,.*,,x:".hylrH:;fl8 *: IilS:fl?la,.:H8 ?:iil;:l53g1;,", commission, rep bv its secretary, I!g__9!rt" ^of Secretary, E nergy Department, r erangana Secretariat, Hyderabad. Tetangana, rep. by its prr ...RESPONDENTS Petition under section 15'r cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit. fired in suppJrt of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim orders dated 24.06.2024 in Wp. No 15756 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. counsel for the Petitioner: sRl D.v.NAGARJuNA BABU, sr. couNSEL, REp. FOR SRI G.CHANDRA SHAKHAR RAO Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI p.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC 55 Counsel for the Respondent No'2 to 4: SRt N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel for the ResPondent No'5: SRIA.SUDERSHAN REDDY' ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY WRIT PETITION NO: 16610 0F 2024 "= "il:."r:,1*r?[ffiBll8,l'"3i3id],1*[?t Between: iCommercial) Y Sathiralu' ?'iil3'1'.'J,$]' Xlli8i;' '^i:1{:1%?: ...PETITIONER AND 2

1. The State of Telangana,. Energy Department, Rep. by its Special Chief i Jit"-triryl rs Secretl riat, Hvd erabad' The Telanqana state Electricity Regulatory commission' Hyderabad' Rep by iii'6d"t"tr"w' ned Hills, Hvderabad The southern Power Distribution company Limited of Telanqana State' rep' ;ilTt##i#; A'; j rtd",giil"D'JJtol n'tii't Com pound' Hvd e ra bad' The Superintending Engineer' (Operation) TSSPDCL' Mahaboobnagar' Mahabo6bnagar District' The Senior Accounts Officer' lvlahaboobnagar District' (Operation) TSSPDCL, Mahaboobnagar' 4 3 5 ...RESPONDENTS PetitionunderArticle226oflheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ direction order or orders declaring the order dated 19-04-2024 in O.P.No.76 of 2015 passed by the 2nd respondent fixing the cross subsidy surcharge in respect of -the 3rd respondent DISCOM as wholly arbitrary illegal without jurisdiction offending the principles of natural justice and void consequentlY set aside the same' IANO:1O F 2024 Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to stay all fu(her proceedings pursuant to the demand Notice dated 03-06-2024 in Lr.No. SE/OP/MBNR/SAO/JAO-HT-1/SA- 1/D No'234/2024 issued bv the 4th 56 respondent the Superintendent surcharge and interest there on. Engineer demanding payment of balance of 1A NO: 2 oF 2024 Between: 1 z The Southern power Distributiorr Company Limited of Telangana State. reo by its Chairman And tVanagingbir".t,jili,tii,t c"ffiil;d Hyderabad. The Superintending Enoineer, (Operation) Mahaboobnagar Disjrict. " TSSPDCL, Mahaboobnagar,

3. The Senior Accounts Mahaboobnagar District Officer, (Operation) TSSpDCL, Mahaboobnagar, AND

1. ...PETITIONERS [fi.,?:H,,,'r&lB3].!:'[""? ?i,.1l3,xlT,$l,, xl,isB,'^r:*1%1: The State_of _Telangana, Energy Department, Reo. ri I ivr r(! I \eP by its Speciat Chief Secretary, TS Secretrriat, HyAer55aO.-"-' The Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission its Secretary. Red Hills, HyOerdOaOI -'- r --"""'uu'|u Hyderabad, Rep. by a ...RESPONDENTS Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim order dated 28.06.2024 inWp. No. 16610 ctt 2024. Counsel for the petitioner: SRI M.p.CHANDRA MOUL|, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. FOR SRI E.GANESH Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI A.SUDERSHAN REDDy, ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI p.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the-Respondent No.3 to 5: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDy, SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT PETITION NO : 16758 0F 2024 Between: M/s surya Udav soinnino Mirs^private_ Limited., It's Regd. office Ar Brock. 2nd floor, '105, Surva rn,i,erJ, saioli-i,rllii'ii5io','ie;i,.,r;";H; ;'0dffiI: Rep. by its Director,-Sri. Ujwat kjmar n.r**j. ''"""' "' '.o 5l ...PETITIONER AND 2 I The State of Telangana, Energy Department, Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary, TS Secretariat, Hyderaoao' The Telanqana state Electricity Regulatory commission, Hyderabad' Rep by iii sdcleia-rv, Red Hills, Hvderabad' The Southern Power Distribution Company.Limited of Telangana State' rep' il?r:diliilil [iiJ rr,r;AE"sj oi'e"toil wtii't compound' Hvderabad' The Suoerintendent of Engineer, TSSPDCL' operation Circle, Yadadri, Yadadri i3huvanagiri District' The Senior Accounts officer, TSSPDCL, operation Circle, Yadadri, Ydadri Bhuvanagiri District. 4 5 J ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ in the.nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ direction order or orders declaring the order daled 19-04-2024 in O.P.No.76 oI 2015 passed by the 2nd respondent fixing the cross subsidy e in resPect of the 3rd respondent DISCOM as wholly arbitrary illegal surcharg the principles of natural iustice and void jurisdiction offending without consequentlY set aside the same' tA NO: 1 oF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the demand Notice dated 21-06-2024 in Lr.No. SE/OP/YDD/SAO/JAO-HT-1/SA/D No 347i2024 issued bv the 4th respondenttheSuperintendentEngineerdemandingpaymentofbalanceof surcharge and interest thqre on pending disposal of the Writ Petition as otherwise the pdtitioner will suffer serious and irreparable loss and hardship' IANO:2OF 2O24 Betv\reen: 1 TheSouthernPowerDistributionCompany-LimitedofTelangana i;Tt.:dilil# Xiii vZ"ig i"s birecto l, tr,t iht co m po u nd, H vderab State, reP. ad. 58 2 J The Superintendent of Engineer, TSS,DCL, Operation Circle, yadadri, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District. The Senior Accounts Officer, TSSpDCL, Operation Circle, yadadri, ydadri Bhuvanagiri District. AND ..PETITIONERS 1 2 J M/s. Surya Udav Soinnino Mills^private_ Limited., lt,s Regd. Office Al Block, 2nd ftoor, 105, Surva Toriers,-sardai'Fri.ii'iioJo,'becunderabad 500 003. Rep. by its Director,-Sri. Ujwal kumar ndr;;. '-""' " The State of Telanoana r'rrv'|rr', \eP Secretary, TS Secretlriat,'HyOerd5aO.--- The Telanqana State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Hyderabad. Rep. by its Secretary, Red Hilts, Hyderdbad: '- , vv"""'|uJ'|\J ,E1erg.y Department, Rep. by its Special Chief ...RESPONDENTS Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim order dated 01 .07 .2024 in Wp. No. 1 6758 ot 2024. Counset for the petitioner: SRI M.p.CHANDRA MOULI, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. FOR SRI E.GANESH Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI A.SUDERSHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI p.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No.3 to 5: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDD', SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT PE T!TION NO: 1676 3 0F 2024 Between: !/s NCL lndustries Limited, Mattapally Village, Mattampa,i Mandal. Natoonda District, Tetangana State, ,ep. oilis Ai,t;.Jui Sil:'t"-.y ir;.1$it kr;;?""" ...PETITIONER AND 1 The Telanqana State Erectricity Reguratory commission, rep. by its Secretary, 2 Red Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana SZie.-- ' The Southern Power Distribution Limited, rep. bv its Chairman anO nlli,iagiig Hyderabad, Tetdngana State. . Company of Telangana Government Mint Compound, -bir."ttor, I 59

3. The Superintending Engineer, Operation, The Southern power Distribution Company o^f Telangana Govemment Limited, Suryapet, Nalgonda District, Telangana State.

4. The Senior Accounts Officer, Operation, The Southern power Distribution Company o_f_ Telangana Government Limited, Suryapet, Nalgonda District, Telangana State.

5. The State of Telangana, rep by its Prl. Secretary, Energy Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased lo issue a writ or order of direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order dated ',lg.04.2024 in O.p. No. 76/2015 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent is highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, irrational, without jurisdiction and contrary to the principles of Natural Justice apart from being violative of Articles ia, t9(t)(g), 21 , 265 and 300,q of the Constitution of lndia and consequenfly, set aside the same and also the notice in Letter No, SE/OPiSRPI/SAO/JAO/HTtD.No.73t24 dated 20.06.2024 in so far as the petitioner is concerned. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 19.04.2024 in O.p. No. 7612015 passed by the 1 st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent including disconnection of petitioner's power supply pending disposal of the above writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Between:

1. The Southern Power Distribution Limited, rep. by its Chairman and Hyderabad, Telangana State. Company of Telangana Managing Director, Mint Government Compound, , The Superintending Engineer, Operation, The Southem Power Distribution Company of. Telangana Government Limited, Suryapet, Nalgonda District, Telangana State. 60 a The Senior Accounts Officer, Operation, The Southem Power Distribution d;;;y ;i i"iriisir"J cJ"b,i["''t Li'it"d' suryapet' Nalsonda District' Telangana State. ...PETITIONERS AND 1 2 J M/s NCL lndustries Limited, Mattapally Village' Mattampalli IMandal' Nalgonda iiLiiili iliir"grni strt"' rep. ovliJAl't'orided sisnatory'ch Anil Kumar' The Telanqana State Electricity Re-gulatory Commission' rep' by its Secretary' ReO Hitts, Hyderabad, Telangana Sate' The State of Telangana, rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Energy Department, Telangana Secretarial, Hyderabad' ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated intheaffidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,theHighcourtmaybepleasedto vacate the interim orders dated 0'1 07'2024 in WP' No 16763 of 2024 and dismiss the writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D'V'NAGARJUNA BABU' Sr' COUNSEL' REP' FOR SRI G.CHANDRA SHAKHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent No'1: SRI P'PRASAD' SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: SRI N'SREEDHAR REDDY' SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel forthe Respondent No.5: SRI A'SUDERSHAN REDDY' ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY WRIT PETITI ON NO: 16885 0F 2024 Between: M/s. Sarwottam lspat Limited, (Service-Connection No MCL-302) PloINos B jiO s, i"dilitri"iEitIi",'lrt"dinai, rMatxa;giri District rep. bv its Director' Subhash Goenka ...PETITtONER AND

1. The Telanoana State Electricity Regulatory Commission' rep by its Secretary' Red Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana Sate' 2 The Southern Power Distribution t-imiteO. rep. bY its Chairman and Hyderabad, Telangana State. Comoanv of Telangana Managiirg Director, IVIint Government Compound, 61 "l}l,*i:?1,:!{",,ffi ff fi !"":'3:1':?x-.?',"Lh"Ili.'"3:lgi:LJ":#"-: -i[-**f ";r*nt,U*3i'"i*li'nr'f'%tl"'R'5ffi ''*rl?Lfi * Prr secretary' Enersv Department' , +!i,,:#: S:*lUrftru:;n,:l ...RESPONDENTS passed by the 1st Petition under Article 226 ol lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order daled 1910412024 in O P No 76/2015 in respect of the 2nd respondent is highly illegaly' arbitrary, uniust, irrational' without iurisdiction and contrary to the Principles of Natural Justice apart from being'violative of Articles 1a' 19(1)(g)' 21 ' 265 and 300A of the Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the same and also the notice in Letter No' SE/OP/MDCL/SAO/AAO/JAO/HT/D'No OVl()sl2()z|in so far as the petitioner is concerned ' 76/A dated '"'pond"-nt IANO:'l OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circum intheaffidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,theHighCourtmay stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 19104120 76t2l15passed by the lst respondent in respect of the 2nd respo disconnection of petitioner's power supply pending disposal of stances stated be Pleased to 24 in O.P. No. ndent including the above writ petition. IA NO: 20 F 2024 Between: tion ComPanY and Managing 1 The Southern Power Distribu ' r-i.it"O' r."P bY its Chairman ff VOdra6aO, f eldngana State' 2 The SuPerintending E-ngineer' oistriUuii'on Company of Te-langa SLiunu6iauao' Telangana State' "?03:1':?,1.""1..,"1-h',:!:r:8:lgi:t,,::#?: of Telanqana Government -birector,- Mint Compouno' 62 The Senior A Company of Secunderabad:::Hfu gilt,"G:?:ffi li"J;,rnf ,,,:,??f:"'f,,JflH:i,'BlliJ:"t ...PETITIONERS ,"i,rfl #i,,3ffi };fldt,.T,ltl-",,fu Jifff *3l",i3:flil8,.:lXs ?:iJl3:lXBn#." commission, rep by its Secretary, +!i,.::11: fJ.I?i?i],11[?i,Jij;,P its prr Secretary, Energy Departmenr, !it#,,B?.i8iy&itll,:"J,i:H"i AND

1. 2 J petition under Section j 51 CpC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim orders dared 02.07.2024 in wp. No. 16885 0f 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. ...RESPONDENTS Counset for the petitioner: IIIDa!,NAGARJUNA BABU, Sr. COUNSEL. REp. FoR sRr c.cHANDRA sHAKHAR neo----' '.-' Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI p.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI A.SUDERSHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY WRIT PETITION N O: 16925 0F 2024 Between: yd:T:.}ffi;'fl RllHhiT:,,i5,,ffi [i[:,p3u?;$,:,$';.;,["o.,,"' jSl,lsi]e AND ...PETITIONER 1 The Telangana state Erectricity Re.guratory commission, rep. by its secretary, Red Hills, Hyderabad, Tetangaha S"ate.

2. The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Government Limited, rep. by its Chairman and lvlanaging Director, Mint Compound, Hyderabad, Telangana State. 63 J 4 5 *i.r',Y3"".3f.l$'l& 5"+ffi;,": t"#l*3""T;''I!i *33!li"ilL'::#?: S.cunaiiiarao. felangana State' The Senior Accounts Officer, Operation' The Southern Power Distribution comoanv of tetangana""Gii"li'ni""t Limited' Medchal' Gunrock' SectinOeiaOaO, Telangana State' The State of Telangana, rep by its Prl secretary' Energy Department' i;fa"g;; Secretariait, HYderabad' ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order dated 19 04'2024 in O P No 76/2015 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent is highly illegaly' arbitrary, unjust' irrational, without jurisdiction and contrary to the Principles of NaturalJusticeapartfrombeing.violativeofArticlesl4'19(1Xg),21,265and 300A of the Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the same and also the notice in Letter No SE/OP/MDCL/SAO/AAO/JAO/HT/D No'76 dated 06.O5.2024 in so far as the petitioner is concerned' tA NO: 10F 2024 PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 19 O4'2O24 in O P No' 761201spassed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent including disconnection of petitioner's power suppry pending disposar of the above writ petition IA NO: 20F 2024 Between: CompanY HYderabad, Teldngana State'

1. The Southern Power Distribution . ' iir""lt"O, *P. UY its Chairman and 2 The Superintending E-ngineer, Operation Circle' .The Southem Power t-imiteo' Medchal' Gunrock' '"ri'n'g'"ni"doi'linm"nt Distribution Company or Secunderabad, Telangana State' Managing Government Compound, of Telangana Director, Mint 64 3 The Senior Accounts officer, operation, The Southern power Distribution v ;d;; i' "'6fi ili l in i'i: nt 33&3?:L r;J, rl,"JfiJ3fi l'.,,co?e "'ii'.,Ii#' AND

1. 2 J ...PETITIONERS M/s. Sarwottam Isoat timitsfl., (9".ryiS" Connection No. MCL _1527) plot No. ,2tu.,.,r'Estaie, Medc-har, inir,'jiiii,i5i.'iili'IJ;];y its Director,.subhash *: I",13:flXt3,.:'#: i:iiffi:,"58?t11", commission, rep bv its Secretary, *Ed:1i:,$.IillHli,?a.l,"i;,31 its Prr Secretary, Enersv Department, Petition under section 151 Cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim orders dated 02.07.2024 in wp. No. 16925 0f 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. ...RESPONDENTS COUNSCI fOr thE PEtitiONEr: SRI D.V.NAGARJUNA BABU, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. _--' "-' ' FOR SRI G.CHANDRA SHAKHAR RAO Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI p.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: sRr N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel forthe Respondent No.S: SRI A.SUDERSHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY WRIT PETITION NO; 17092 0F 2024 Between: M/s. Rama Spinners private Limite_d, Address_ Door No. 5_4_83,2nd Floor "j b li, *:f tlt";ac1{ t";n';ff;,,e 3f. frl'; t?:t' - -opp -i;"s AND

1. 2 ...PETITIONER Telangana State Electricitv Reg.ulatory Commission, Door No_ .l 1_4_660, Vth Bhavan, ("0 riirls,'nioJ,l;;i:i;i;,;",, _ 500 004 Rep. by ,il"S:"PJ?"ni,""i BliJT:s"',",:i:iin,ff i,:(i1fi.fi:T'fi ?e"., Hep. by its Chairman ano N/lanaging di;;to;,""'""-"' jnjs:JHE?,?"358"61,i 3 The SuPerintending Telangana 65 Engineer' TSSPDCL' Operation Circle' Medak' ...RESPONDENTS ","".n"0 petition under Articre 226 or the constitution.or l['iffi'::".I':[t:: stated in ff::il'-l::, H:,:1."," o'n'"''"'' *:I:-':" "',",..i,n'"' decraring the action of lst Respondent in passrng pt"""o to pass:1."Y:r. n"tur" ot Writ of Mandat" o":]:t]::'^"'," to be exercising powers the rmpugned order dated 1gto4t2o24' outoon"l."i,, *,, ,oo, (Act, 2003) U/secs. 3e(2xd)(ii)' ao(c)(ii) and 42(2) of the Electncnv;;'t";"; t6' to be croJ:"i'ooo' t"n'rge (css) for the FY 2015-16' to who availed power supply through open access and determining 'h" the 3rd Respondent in levving and demanding recovered from the "ont""" and the consequential J;;;;' -"'*"' 755/D.No 91/202a' dated 20 06 2024 on the recovery of CSS prospectively' as surcharge/interest ''0""" "" "' "j]:"-t', :::"'lilil#t l; T::'il' *" tl tt i I res ar, a rbitrarr' "i ,"Lnnunu State Electricity Regulatory Commts u - *tn''ution ftfo Z of 2015'in violation of principles of natural justice, besides being violative of the petitioner's rights guaranteed under Article 14, 19(1 Xg) of the Constitution of lndia' sE/oP/MDt(sAo/JAo(HT)/F " o ;" Regulation, No'MDK- 'o'' "" IA NO: 10F 2024 Petition under Sect ion 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be Pleased to stay the operation of Order daled 1910412O24 issued bY the 1st Respondent in determining CSS for FY 201 5-16 and to further direct the 3rd ResPondent not to take any coercive steps including that of disconnection of Power suPPlY Pursuant AO/JAO(HTYF.No.MDK-755/D'No to the demand vide Lr'N9' SE/OP/MDl(S .g1 t2O24, dated 20.06'2024' IA NO: 20F 2024 Between: --';l-j",*1n jf :1''s:s#ffi lfl H$]6yG C["irman and Managing Director ",fl :,Eltii:"ijiii3l,Ii?E?g':s58"61' 2 AND

1. z 66 I33nnl;g"''nt"",nn Engineer, TSSPDCL, Operation Circle, Medai, ffm,;ro*;m i,6'Sp,*l',"*:Tj[,H"T",giif ,fi%S8[S:?S,hffij]S;J61.€S;,Ji H#fiqffpsd *r tuIi,r t" -,, ffi petition under section .r6i r.D.. _ "'RESPONDENTS in the circumstances stated in the arridavit,,,.n,,,,iJJn';ffi vacate the interim orders .;*;;;":"::'::'.tn:.''nn court may be preased to in rA No 01 or 2024 in wp rrro 17oe2 ot 2024 ando,,r,* l,lj",l,. i,ipiJrrZi,, i,i#,n;n]l' Counsel for the petitioner , ffi . ""h13J3:ffitYEE, REP FoR Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI p.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT P ETITIONNO:17168 0F 2024 Between: M/s. Sitaram Spinners private Limited, 5_4_83, 2nd Floor, TSK Chambers. 5fl S?"/,"#,.:'E#"o;??,?l;..3i",:iirk**lrug],xa,#rffi iH'$1",'L'd ...PETITIONER AND 1 2 :?l:'i'""uj,,:'H"E:9ii!l'i,%s,:Tr}:?B,}.?ff :}BoJlbo;u8giuJ} il:.E::Ssf southern Distribution company of rerangana Limited, TSSPDCL corporate Office, Central .secretariat, ftiaiiatiuat,"ilvi";;U;, retansana _ soo 022 Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Directoi 3. The Superintending Engineer' TSSPDCL' Operation Circle, SiddiPet' Telangana. ...RESPONDENTS 67 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleasedtopassanorderorordersorWritordirectionmoreparticularlyoneinthe natureofWritofMandamusdeclaringtheactionoflstRespondentinpassing the lmpugned Order dated 1gl}4l2}24, purported to be exercising powers U/Secs. 39(2xdxii), a0(c)(ii) and a2Q) of the Electricitv Act 2003 (Act' 2003) anddeterminingtheCrossSubsidySurcharge(CSS)fortheFY20'15-'16'tobe recovered from the consumers who availed power supply through open access andtheconsequentialactionofthe3rdRespondentinlevyinganddemanding surcharge/interest vide Lr.No. sE/OP/SDPT/SAO/JAO(HT)/F No SDP- 106'1/D.No.87/ll2O24,daled2olO}t2024ontherecoveryofCSSprospectively' asillegalarbitrary,contrarytotheprovisionsoftheElectricityAct'2003'contrary to Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulation,2015-RegulationNo2ot2OlS'inviolationofprinciplesofnatural justice,besidesbeingviolativeofthepetitionersrightsguaranteedunderArticle 1a, 19(1Xg) of the Constitution of lndia' IA NO: 10F 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated intheaffidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,theHighcourtmaybepleasedto stay the operation of Order daled 1gto4l2o24 issued by the 1st Respondent in determiningCSSforFY2ol5-l6andtofurtherdirectthe3rdRespondentnotto take any coercive steps including that of disconnection of power supply pursuant SE/OP/SDPT/SAOiJAO(HTyF.No SDP- to the demarid vide Lr'No' 1 06 1 /D. No.87l 1 t2024, dated 20 106 12024 tA NO:2OF 2024 'c""iijr Southern Distribution Company of Telangana Limited, TSSPDCL Cgnole!9 seiretariat,-Riiaiiataoao,"Hyderabad, Telangana - 50o 022 6i,ilij. Rep. 6y its Chairman and Managing Director The Superintending Engineer, TSSPDCL, Operation Circle' Siddipet' Telangana. ...PETITIONERS Between: 1 2 AND 68 1 z M/s. Sitaram Spinners private Limited, 5-4_g3, 2nd Floor, TSK Chambers. Rama Towers, M.G.Roarr $;u;d;;Lj i;ijns';;" _"50b b63'. H# ffit Director, lrrtr. pramod xumar, s7o. [ii" sri'H,,tr"n"ir,iXii6r*ar Telanqana State Electricitv Regulatory Commission, Door No. 1i_4_660, Vth [l[!.Pj?,?""i Bhavan' n"o tiitti'nioJi'b;i, i;i;";,", - 500 004 R;b.'d; ...RESPONDENTS Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim orders dated 03.07.2 024 in lA No. 01 of 2024 in Wp. No 17168 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. Counsel for the petitioner: Ms. CHALLA KIRANMAYEE, REp. FOR M/s. CKR ASSOCTATES Counsel for the Respondent No..t: SRI P.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel forthe Respondent No.2 & 3: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT PETITto N NO: 17290 0F 2024 Between: M/s. KDA lsoat private Limited, Regd. Off Doorlrlo.l -_8_206, Masetty plaza, 2nd floor, p.G.Road. secundrabad rlirng;na"5"oooo5. ne-pE ii"J riiil'JtJr fur. Sushit Kumar Agan,rrat, S/o. j.C.;g;*;l:'"" "" Having its Unit Sv.No. 358/5, pragnapur Village, Gajwel Mandal, Siddipet District, Telangana ...PETITIONER e,qyfatgy Commisqion, Door No .t1_4_660, Vth r-rtls, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 004 Rep. by Telangana State Electricitv R Floor, Singareni Bhavan, Red its Secretary Southern Distribution como-any of rerangana Limited, TSSPDCL corporate office, centrar secretariat Kha,iratabao, H"vd"ir-#i.i"rrngana soobziii6pl by its Chairman anO lVanaging b6t;;' The Superintendino Enoineer, TSSpDCL, Operation Circle, Siddipet, Telangana r'vv svsvr I \ AND 1 2 3 Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an order or orders or writ or direction more particurarry one in the j- ...RESPONDENTS 69 nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of '1st Respondent in passing the lmpugned Order dated 1910412024, purported to be exercising powers UiSecs. 39(2xdxii), 4o(cXii) and 42(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (Act' 2003) and determining the Cross Subsidy Surcharge (CSS) for the FY 2015-16, to be recovered from the consumers who availed power supply through open access and the consequential action of the 3rd Respondent in levying and demanding surcharge/interest vide Lr.No. SE/OP/SDPT/SAO/JAO(HT/F.No.SDP-1 140/D.No. 8712t2O24, dated 20.06.2024 on the recovery of CSS prospectively, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the Electricity Act' 2003, contrary to Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulation, 2015 - Regulation No. z ot zols, in violation of principles of natural justice, besides being violative of the.petitioners righls guaranteed under Article 14, 19(1Xg) of the Constitution of lndia. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of Order dated 1910412024 issued by the 1st Respondent in determining css for FY 2o15 - 16 and to further direct the 3rd Respondent not to take any coercive steps including that of disconnection of power supply pursuant the demand vide Lr.No.SE/OP/SDPT/SAO/JAO(HT/F.No.SDP- 1 1 40/D.No.B7l21 2024. dated 2O10612024. IA NO: 2 OF2024 Between:

1. Southern Distribution Companv of Telangana Limited, TSSPDCL Corporate Office, Central Secretariat, khairatabad, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 022 Rep' by its Chairman and Managing Director

2. The Superintending Engineer, TSSPDCL, Operation Circle, Si(dipet' Telangana AND 1 Mis. KDA lspat Private Limited, Regd. Off Door No1-8-209,fi1q.."Q plaza,2nd floor, P.G.Road,secundrabad Telangana 500003. Rep by its- Director,- JVlr. Sushil Kumar Aganrrral, S/o. J.C. Agarwal, Having its Unit Sy.No. 358/5' Pragnapur Village, Gajwel [Vlandal, Siddipet District, Telangana .,.PETITIONERS 70

2. Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Door No 11-4-660, Vth Floor, Singareni Bhavan, Red liills, Hyderabad, Telangana S0O 004 R;p.-bt its Secretary Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated O4.07.2024 in lA. No. 0.1 of 2024 in Wp. No. 17290 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. CHALLA K|RANMAYEE, REp. FOR M/s. CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI P.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDy, SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT PETITION NO: 17293 0F 2024 Between: Vll Pl Reddy's Laboratories Ltd, Regd Ofl. 8-2-337, Road No.3. Baniara Hrtts, Hyderabad 500 034 Rep. by its ASsistant General Counsel, Sri. Gofiata Krishna Gangavelli !11t, CfQ 5, Peddadevulapa.lli Villa^ge_ 508207. Service Connection No.NLG-225 ' Mandal, Nalgonda District -Tripuraram ...PETITIONER AND

1. Jgtgnggla State€lectricity Regulatory Commission, Door No. 1.1_4-660, Vth Ftoor, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 004 Rep. by its Secretary 2 3 Southern Power Distributio_n Company of Telangana Limited, TGSPDCL _C910^o1qtq Office, C_entrat Secretariat,'Khairatabad', nyOeri6iO, TJ;;g;;; 5O0 O22 Rep. by its_ Chairman and Managing Directoi The Suoerintendino Enoineer, TGSPDCL, Operation Circle, Nalgonda, Nalgondi District, T5langina ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of rhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an order or orders or writ or direction more particularty one in the nature of writ of lr/andamus declaring the action of 1st Respondent in passing the lmpugned Order dated 19.O4.2024, purported to be exercising powers l1 U/Secs. 39(2xdxii), 40(cXii) and 42(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (Act' 2003) anddeterminingtheCrossSubsidySurcharge(CSS)fortheFY2015-,16,tobe recovered from the consumers who availed power supply through open access and the consequential action of the 3rd Respondent in levying and demanding surcharge/interest vide Lr.No. SE/OP/NLG/SAO/JAO/SA/HT/D.No.326124' dt- 21 .06.2024 on the recovery of cSS prospectively, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, contrary to Tetangana State Electricity Regulatory commission (conduct of Business) Regulation, 2015 - Regulation No. 2 of 2015, in violation of principles of natural justice, besides being violative of the petitioner's rights guaranteed under Article 14, 19(1)(g) of the constitution of lndia IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay the operation of order dated 19.04.2024 issued by the 1st Respondent in determining css for FY 2015-16 and to further direct the 3rd Respondent not to take any coercive steps including that of disconnection of power supply pursuant to the demand vide Lr.No. SE/OP/NLG/SAO/JAO/SA/HT/D.No. 326124, dl 21 .06.2024. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Between: 1 . southern Power Distribution company of Telangana Limited, TGSPDCL coroorate office, central Secretariat, Khairatabad, Hyderabacl, lelangana 5OO O22 Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director

2. The Superintending Engineer, TGSPDCL' Operation Circle, Nalgonda' Nalgonda District, Telangana ' ...PETlrloNERS AND 1 M/s. Dr. Reddv's Laboratories Ltd, Regd Otf . 8-2-337, Road No'3' B-anjara Hills, Hyderabdd 500 034 Rep. by its Assistant General Counsel, sn' Gopala Krishna Gangavelli Unit: CTO 5, Peddadevulapalli Village, Tripuraram Mandal, Nalgonda District 508207 . Service Connection No.NLG-225 Telanoana State Electricitv Requlatory Commission, Door No. 11-4-660' Vth ir""i,"5i"sr6iahirin, fuea Hitts, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 004 Rep' by its Secretary 2 72 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated o4.o7.2024 in lA. No. 01 of 2024 in wp. No. 17293 ol 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. CHALLA KIRANMAYEE, REp. FOR M/s. CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI p.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3.: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDy, SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT PETITION NO: 1 7296 0F 2024 Between: 141: PI. .R"9dV'g Laboratories Ltd, Regd Otf 8_2-337, Road No. 3, Baniara r-flIs, HyoeraDao, Ierangana - 500 034 Rep. by its Senior Legal counsel, sri Gopala Krishna Gangavelli Unit: CTO -1, SV Co- operative lndustrial Estate, Bollaram Village, Jinnaram Mandal, Medak District, Hyderabad, Telangana SO2 ii1.- S"*i." Connection No. SGR- ',l23 U-nit: CTO - 2, SV Co- operative lndustrial Estate, Bollaram Village, Jinnaram Mandal, Medak Distriit, Hyderabad, Tetangana _ SO2 i2i.- Seri." Connection No. SGR- 127 U.nit: CTO - 3, SV Co- operative lndustrial Estate, Boltaram Village, Jinnaram ft/andal, tVledak Distrii! Hyderabad, Telangana - SO2 i2-I;.- Se*iru Connection No. SGR- 217 ..,PETITIONER AND 1 2 f91910311 StateElectricity Regutatory Commission, Door No .1 1_ 4_ 660, Vth l-roor, l;tngareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana _ 500 004 nep. Oy its Secretary Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited, TGSPDCL _C^o1o^o1qtg Office, Central Secretariat, (nairatabadlHvo"raOio, f"finejrni: 5O0 022 Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director

3. The Su District, perintending Engineer, TGSpDCL, Operation Circle, Sangareddy Telangana Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an order or orders or writ or direction more particularly one in the ...RESPONDENTS 73 nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Pt Respondent in passing the lmpugned Order dated 19.O4.2O24, purported to be exercising powers U/Secs. 39(2xdxii), O(c)(ii) and 42(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (Act, 2003) and determining the Cross Subsidy Surcharge (CSS) for the FY 2015- 16, to be recovered from the consumers who availed power supply through open access and the consequential action of the 3rd Respondent in levying and demanding surcharge/interest vide Lr. No. SE/OP/SGR/SAO/AAO- HT/JAO/D.No.263124, dt.

25.06.2024, Lr.No.SE/OPiSGR/SAO/AAO-HT/JAO/D.No.265124, d|.25.06.2024, Lr.No.SE/OP/SGR/SAO/AAO-HT/JAO/D.No.262124dt.25.06.2024 respectively, on the recovery of CSS prospectively, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, contrary to Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulation, 2015 - Regulation No. 2 of 2O15, in violation of principles of natural justice, besides being violative of the petitioners rights guaranteed under Article t a, 19(1Xg) of the Constitution of lndia. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of Order dated '19.04.2024 issued by the 1st Respondent in determining CSS for FY 20'1 5- 16 and to further direct the 3rd Respondent not to take any coercive steps including that of disconnection of pwer supply pursuant to the demands vidb Lr.No.SE/OP/SGR/SAOiAAO-HT/JAO/D. No. 263/24, dt. 25.06.2024, Lr.No.SEiOP/SGFySAO/AAO-HT/JAO/D.No.265124, d|.25.06.2024, Lr. No. SE/OPiSG R/SAO/AAO-HT/JAO/D. N o.262 I 24. dt. 25.06.2024. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Between:

1. Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited, TGSPDCL Corporate Office, Central Secretariat, Khairatabad, Hyderabad, Telangana - 5OO O22 Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director

2. The Superintending Engineer, TGSPDCL, Operation Circle, Sangareddy District, Telangana ...PETITIONERS AND 74 1 2 M/s. Dr. Reddys Laboratories t-!9, BgS! Otf .8'.2-337, Road No. 3, Banjryq uiri, Hvoeraudd, Telangana - 500 034-Rep. by its Senior Legal Counsel, Sri Gopala Krishna Gangavelli Unit: CTO -'1 , SV Co- operative lndustrial Estate, Bollaram Villag-e-., Jinnaram HlTinOit, trilebak Distribt, Hyderabad, Telangana ' 5o2 325. Service Connection No. SGR- 123 Unit: CTO - 2, SV Co- operative lndustrial Estate, Bollaram Villqg-e-, Jinnaram VinOat, Medak Distriit, Hyderabad, Telangana - 5O2 325. Service Connection No. SGR- 127 Unit: CTO - 3, SV Co- operative lndustrial Estate, Bollaram-Villag^e-, Jinnaram tr/indal, Ii/edak Distriit, Hyderabad, Telangana ' 5O2 325. Service Connection No. SGR- 217 Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Door No 1'1- 4- 660' Vth Ftoor,"Singareni Bhavan, ReO Fitts, Hyderabad' Telangana - 500 004 Rep. by its Secretary ...RESPONDENT Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders daled 04.07.2024 in lA. No. 01 OF 2024 lN WP. No' 17296 ot 2O24 and dismiss the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. CHALLA KIRANMAYEE, REP. FOR M/s. CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI P'PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel forthe Respondent No.2 & 3: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT PETITIO N NO: 17323 OF 2024 Between: M/s.Viiavalakshmi Spintex Limited, Survey No. 4 to 38, Kondamadugu Village, Bibinaldr i/andal, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District rep. by its Director, A. Rajeswar Rao. ...PETITIONER The Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission, rep. by its Secretary, Red Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana Sate. The Southern Power Distribution Company Limited, rep. by its Chairman and Managing Hyderabad, Telangana State. The Superintending Engineer, Operation Circle, Distribution Company of Telangana Government Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District, Telangana State. of Telangana Director, [t/int Government Compound, The Southern Power Limited, Bhuvanagiri, AND 1 2 3 ! 75 4 The Senior Accounts Officer, Operation, The Southern Power Distribution Limited' Bhuvanagiri' Yadadri comoanv of relansana b;;;;;;"i Bhuvanagiri District, Telangana State. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Energy Department' Telangana Secretarial, Hyderabad. 5 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCourtmaybe pleasedtoissueawritororderofdirectionmoreparticularlyoneinthenatureof Writ of Mandamus declaring the order dated 19 04 2024 in O P No' 76/2015 passedbythelstrespondentinrespectofthe2ndrespondentishighlyillegaly, arbitrary,unjust,irrational,withoutjurisdictionandcontrarytothePrinciplesof Naturat Justice apart from being violative of Articles 1+, t 9(1)(g), 21 ' 265 and 3004oftheConstitutionoflndiaandconsequentlysetasidethesameandalso the notice in Letter No. SE/OPIYDD/SAO/JAO/HT-I|/SA/D.No.34312024 daled 21 .06.2024 in so far as the petitioner is concerned ' IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 19'04'2024 in O P' No' 76t2O15 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent including disconnectionofpetitioner'spowersupplypendingdisposaloftheabovewrit petition and Pass IA NO: 20F 2024 Between: Company of Telangana Managihg Director, Mint

1. The Southern Power Distribution Limited, reP. bY its Chairman and Hyderabad, Telangana State' The Suoerintendino Enqineer, Operation Circle, Distributibn Company oT Telangana Government Yadadri Bhuvanaiiri District, Telangana State. The senior Accounts officer, operation, The southern Power Distribution Companv of Telangana Governmeni Limited, Bhuvanagiri, Yadadri Bfruvana-giri District, Telangana State. The Southern Power Limited, Bhuvanagiri, Government Compound, 3 ...PETITIONERS 76 AND

1. 2 J M/s.Vijayalakshmi Spintex LimjJgd, Survey No. 4 to 38, Kondamaduqu Villaoe. Bibinagar_Mandat, yadadri ehuvinasii biitii.i ;'p.' by-ii; Diy;"i;;:T. Rajeswar Rao. The Telangana State Electricity Re.gulatory Commission, rep. by its Secretary, Red Hills, Hyderabad, Tetangaha S;ie. The State of Telanoana rep. by its prl. Secretary, Energy Department, Telangana Secretaria-t, HyaerdUaAl - ' ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section -r 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim orders dated 05.07.2024 in rA.No. 01 of 2024 in wp. No. 17323 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. counsel for the Petitioner: sRr D.v.NAGARJUNA BABU, Sr. couNSEL, REp. FOR SRI G.CHANDRA SHAKHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI p.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDy, SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI A.SUDERSHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY WRIT PETITlo N NO: 1735 7 0F 2024 Between: Vishwanath Spinnez lndia..Sy.No.601/4, peddavorra Village and Mandal. Natgonda Disriicr, Rep bv its rrrtdnaging bii'"&"i x.b",iiri,ri R;"d;i"- AND ...PETITIONER

1. The State of Telan'oana .Elergy Department, Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary, TS Secret5riat, UvOerS5aO.---

2. The Telanqana State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Secretary, Red Hills, Hyderdbad"

3. The Southern Power Distributior. Cgrp?ly Limited of Telangana Stale, rep. by its Chairman And Managing Directoi, tvtihtbompouno, nvo""iJSrI'-'"' '"" 4. The Superintendent of Engineer, Operation Circle, TSSpDCL, Nalgonda District

5. The Senior Accounts Officer, TSSpDCL, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 0f rhe constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ direction order or orders decraring the order dated 1g-04_2024 in o P No 76 0f 2015 passed by the 2nd respondent fixing the cross subsidy surcharge in respect of the 3rd respondent DrscoM as wholy arbitrary iflegar without jurisdiction offending the principles of natural justice and void consequently set aside the same. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the demand Notice dated 21-06-2024 in Lr.No sEioP/NLG/sAo/JAo/stuHT/D.No.32512024 issued by the 4th respondent the superintendent Engineer demanding payment of barance of surcharge and interest there on. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Between: l The Southern Power Distributiorr. cgmp?ry Limited of rerangana state, rep. by its Chairman And tVtanaging Oireclori rrrtiirt Co."pornO, Ht;6;;br;*''' '"" 2. The Superintendent of Engineer, Operation Circle, TSSpDCL, Nalgonda Diskict

3. The Senior Accounts Officer, TSSpDCL, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District ...PETITIONERS AND

1. 2 3 Vishwanath soinnerz rndia, .sy.No,601/4, Narsonda Distiict, Rep ov its'Nadnagins biibit"i r.briiria, ne"oov - The State of Telanoana Secretary, TS Secreti riat, HVOeri5aO-. The Telanoana State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Secretary, Red Hills, Hyderdbad" .E1erg.y Department, Rep. by its Special Chief peddavorra viflage and Mandar, --- ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 1si cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to I 78 vacate the interim orders dated 05 07 2024 in lA 17357 oI 2024 and dismiss the writ petition' No. 01 of 2024 in WP' No counser forthe Petition"'' ?EJtt.iJAXRE3,.l""t' Sr' couNSEL' REP' counser ror the Respondent No'1 : iStHXiEt?LHXf HI'ro* ENERGy Counsel for the ResPondent No'2 SRt P.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY' Counsel for the Respondent No'3 to 5: SC FOR TGSPDCL T PETITION NO: 17485 0 F 2024 wRl ""*""n;;, sus1, ?"T"^1t:#o,u5fno3l "Venkatappa Reddv Hvderab-ad, Telangz ilHXiii"ri,liov s/o HavinqitsUnitMattampalliMandal'SuryapetDistrict,TelanganaH.T.SC.No UFi:ieft#twnG Nlb-t et ) t?"1,*kAR' il?1",,?,,'3i: t*'Sl,.)S;LlJa AND ' IiJSi:3lli,?:1i'?ff5['[5"fll1 its Secretary ...PETITIONER latorv Commission, Door No '11-4-6-60' Vth i!]"H'vo""iru;;'-Giansana-so0 004 Rep bv

2. Southern Distribution Co Office, Central Secretarl ilJP. uV its Chairman and

3. The .suPerintending Engineer' Telangana :li''1ilr",',[?3l:ilft "'[il'""8+3:1""?:936"""1t Managing Director TSSPDCL, OPeration Circle' SuryaPet' ...RESPONDENTS PetitionunderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstancesstatedinthdaffidavitfiledtherewith'theHighCourtmaybe pleased to pass an order or orders or writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 1St Respondent in passing the lmpugned Order dated 19'04 2024 ' purported to' be exercising powers U/Secs. 39(2)(d)(ii), a0(cXii) and 42(2\ of the Electricitv Act' 2003 (Act' 2003) and determining the cross Subsidy surcharge (csS) for the FY 2015-16' to be recovered from the consumers who availed power supply through open access 79 and the consequential action of the 3rd Respondent in levying and demanding Surcharge/interestVideLr.No.SE/oP/SRPT/SAo/JAo/HT/D.No.72l24,daIed 20.06.2024 on the recovery of css prospectively, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, contrary to Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulation, 2015 - Regulation No. 2 of 2015, in violation of principles of natural justice, besides being violative of the petitioner's rights guaranteed under Article 14, 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of lndia. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 petition under Section 151 CPb praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fited in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to Staytheoperationoforderdatedlg.04.2024issuedbythelstRespondentin determining cSS for FY 2O15-16 and to further direct the 3rd Respondent not to take any coercive steps including that of disconnection of power supply pursuant Lr.No. SE/OP/SRPT/SAO/JAO/HT/D.No.72124, dated to the demand vide 20.06.2024. A NO: 2 OF 2024 Between: 1 Southern Distribution Company of Telangana. Limited, TSSPDCL Corpora^te 6i'il, C""tr;i-SLcr"taiijti Khairatabadl Hyderabad, Telangana -50O o22 Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director The Superintending Engineer, TSSPDCL, Operation Circle, Suryapet' Telangana 2 ...PETITIONERS AND 1 M/s. Sagar Cements Ltd, Reg. Off Plot No.111, Road No 10, Jubilee- Hills, iuJ"r"oZo. Telanoana -sgO"Oga, Represented by its AGM (Legal), Sri' elnir-nebO, S/oi Venkatappa Reddy Having its Unit 1Vlattamolalli^ly.andal, Survapet oistiict, Telangana H.T. SC. No. SPT-I31 (erstwhile NLG-131) Telanoana State Electricitv Requlatory Commission, Door No 11-4-660, Vth ftoor,tingareni Bhavan, ReO Fitts, Hyderabad, Telangana-S0O 004 Rep. by its Secretary 2 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 80 vacate the interim orders dated 08.07.2024 in wp. No. -17485 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. CHALLA KIRANMAYEE, REp. FOR M/s. CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI P.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDy, SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT PETITION NO: 175O2 OF 2024 Between: [,XfJi'=iiff :fi:tJloffi I,f l[]'"$aJ'?XiL')f.Tlli'X['.n"%,"?;Z?,',T# (Commerciat) Y. Sathira-ju. ...PETITIONER AND 1, 2 J 4 5 . Energy Department, Rep. by its Special Chief The State of Telanoana Secretary, TS Secretlriat, nvtera"tjao. The Telangana State Electricity. Regulatory Commission,, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Secretary, Red Hills, Hyderabad- The southern Power Distribution company Limited, of reranoana State. reo. by its Chairman And Managing Directoi, fr/int Com[ounO, Hft"ei;'br;*''' ''" The. Srrperintending Engineer,, (Operation) TSSPDCL, Sanga Reddy, Sanga Reddy District The Senior Accounts Officer,, (Operation) TSSPDCL, Sanga Reddy, Sanga Reddy District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in_.the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ direction ordlr or orders declaring the order dated 19-04-2024 in O.P.No.76 of 2015 passed by the 2nd respondent fixing the cross subsidy surcharge in respect of the 3rd respondent DlscoM as wholly arbitrary illegal without jurisdiction offending the principles of naturat .iustice and void consequently set aside the same. 8l IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the demand Notice dated 25-06-2O24 in Lr.No.SE/oP/SRD/SAo/AAo-HT/JAotD.No.26612024issuedbythe4th respondent the Superintendent Engineer demanding payment of balance of surcharge and interest there on. tA NO: 2 OF 2024 Between:

1. The southern Power Distribution company Limited, of Telangana state, rep. uv its Cf iirman And Managing Directoi, Mint Compound, Hyderabad'

2. The Superintending Engineer,, (Operation) TSSPDCL, Sanga Reddy, Sanga Reddy District

3. The Senior Accounts Officer,, (Operation) TSSPDCL, Sanga Reddy, Sanga Reddy District. ...PETITIONERS AND 1 M/s GTN Engineering (lndia) Limited,, (SGR-075) Chitkul V^illage, Patancheru Manoir, 5r;g, Retciy oiitrict, nep. uy its Assist. General Manager' (Commercial) Y. Sathiraiu. The State of Telangana,, Energy Department, Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary, TS Secretariat, Hyderabad. The Telanqana State Electricity Regulatory Commission,, Hyderabad, Rep by its Secretary, Red Hills, HYderabad ? 2 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim ordeis dated 08.07.2024 in WP. No. 17502 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.P.CHANDRA MOULI' Sr' COUNSEL' REP' FOR SRI CH.SATYASADHAN Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI A.SUDERSHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI P.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC ,r +i,l Counsel forthe Respondent No.3 to 5: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT PETITION NO: 17 510 0F 2024 Between: M/s. Hariom.Pipe lndu_stries Limited, (MBN-724) Address. Sy. No.62 and 63, Sheriguda Village, Pedda.ipalli, Gram Pan'chayat, Bal.anagar tt/andal, l\/ahabubnagar District, Telangana -5O9 2O2. Ri:p by its Atcounts incj Finance lVlanager, And Authorized Signatory, Mr. Nitesh Gupta. ...PETITIONER AND 1 2 3 Telanggna State_Electricity Regulatory Commission, Door No. i 1-4-660, Vth Floor, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500 004 Ref. Oy its Secretary Southern Distribution Company of Telanqana Limited. TSSPDCL Coroorate Telangana - SOIO 022 Office, Central Secretariat, Khairatabad, Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director- The Superintending Engineer, TSSPDCL, Operation Circle, Mahabubnagar, lelangana -Hyderabad, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an order or orders or writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 1st Respondent in passing the lmpugned Order dated 1910412024, purported to be exercising powers U/Secs. 39(2xd)(ii), a0(cXii) and 42(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (Act, 2003) and determining the Cross Subsidy Surcharge (CSS for the Fy 2015-1 6, to be recovered from the consumers who availed power supply through open access and the consequential action of the 3rd Respondent in tevying and demanding surcharge/interest vide Lt.No. SE/oP/tvtBNR/sAo/JAo-HTtisA-t/D.No.238t24, dt. 03.06.2024 on the recovery of CSS prospectively, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, contrary to Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulation, 2015 - Regulation No. 2 of 2015, in violation of principles of natural justice, besides being violative of the petitioner's rights guaranteed under Article 1a, 19(1Xg) of the Constitution of lndia. IANO:1O F 2024 83 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to stay the operation of order dated 19.04.2024 issued by the 1st Respondent in determining cSS for Fy 2o1s-16 and to further direct the 3rd Respondent not to take any coercive steps incruding that of disconnection of power suppry pursuant to rhe demand vide Lr.No. sE/.'/MBNR/.A./JAO-HT,/SA-,/D.No.238 t24, dt.

03.06.2024. IANO:2O F 2024 Between: 1 2 AND

1. 2 southern Distribution comoany .of Telangana Limited, TSSPDCL coroorate offi ce, Centra I Secrera ria r' kh'a iii tlui?,'[yi# iiIE]'r;',i'si;- td6" b?I Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Diie;to; -- *"-"' #E"tn:,rT'"""d ing Engineer, TSS PDCL, operation circte, Mahabubnagar, ...PETITIONERS M/s. Hariom Pioe Industries Limited, (MBN_724) Address. Sy. No. 62 and 63. Sheriquda Vitiaoe. perrrraipjrri,--b'ia;'F;;6;;; Batanagar Mandat, Mahabubnagar District, Tetingjna-_sos rdr. "ile;',by its Accounts and Frnance Manager, And Authoriz-ed signaioryl M;. ruiiJsfr 6upta. Telangana State Electricitv Regulatory Commission, Door No. 1 1_4-660, Vth 13:":J?rni*"i Bhavan, neo Hirrs,'nrioei'b;i, i;H.;r", _ 5oo oo+ HJp "dy ...RESPONDENT Petition und'er section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim orders dated 08.07.2024 in Wp. No. 17510 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. Counsel for the petitioner: Ms. CHALLA KIRANMAYEE, REp. FOR M/s. CKR ASSOCTATES Counsel for the Respondent No..t: SRI P.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel forthe Respondent No.2 & 3: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL 84 WRIT P ETITION NO: 178 24 oF 2024 Between: M/s. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd' Regd^ Off 8'2-337 ' Road No 3' Banjara Hi[s. Hvderabad 506"b1;"i;p]'iv' it." sJior-Legal bounsel, sri. Gopala Krishna'Gangavelli UNIT: FTO-3 Bachupally, Medchal tr/alkalgiri District -500 090 Service Connection No. MCL-696 UNIT: IPDO Bachupally, Medchal Malkajgiri District -500 090 HT Service .Connection No. MCL-1357 ...PETITIONER AND 1 2 J IiJSl'sili"":1li,5l:i5i:''#"flY,i::w&?ffi t'li"Jl;P&T,*&;J3at'€3;"[] its Secretary Southern Power Distribution company. of. Telangana Limited' TGSPDCL ##;;i;'d+i;;, c;;Grr El.i"t"i-ut' kt''iratabad' Hvderabad' relansana Soo"tiiI'n"p. uVit. Chairman and Managing Director The Suoerintending Engirieet, TqqiPg!' Operation Circle' Medchal' Gr;.;k,"5;hderibad, Telangana 5oo o1 5 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or orders or writ or direction more particularly one in the natureofWritofMandamusdeclaringtheactionoflstRespondentinpassing the lmpugned Order dated 19 04 '2024 ' purported to be exercising powers U/Secs. 39(2xdxii), a0(c)(ii) and 42(2) of the Electricity Act' 2003 (Act' 2003) and determining the Cross Subsidy Surcharge (CSS) for the FY 2015-16' to be recovered from the consumers who availed power supply through open access andtheconsequentialactionofthe3rdRespondentinlevyinganddemanding surcharge/interest vide Lr.No.SE/OP/MCL/SAO/AAO(HTyJAO(HTyD No'1 96' dt' 1 8.06.2024, Lr No.SE/OP/NhCL/SAO/AAO(HT)/D No l 95' d1'1 8 O6'2o24',on the recovery of CSS prospectively, as illegal' arbitrary' contrary to the provisions of Regu latory the Electricity Act, 2003, contrary to Telangana State Electricity Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulation, 20'1 5 - Regulation No inviolationofprinciplesofnaturaljustice,besidesbeingviolativeofthe petitioners rights guaranteed under Article 14, t 9(1)(g) of the Constitution of lndia. 2 ol 2015, 85 lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of Order dated '19.04.2024 issued by the 1st Respondent in determining CSS for FY 2015-16 and to further direct the 3rd Respondent not to take any coercive steps including that of disconnection of power supply pursuant to the demand vide Lr.No. SE/OP/MCL/SAO/AAO (HTyJAO(HT/D.No.196, dt. 1 8.06.2024, Lr. No. S E/OP/TUCLiSAO/ AAO( HT)i D. No . 1 I 5, dt 1 8.06.2024. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Between:

1. Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited, TGSPDCL Corporate Office, Central Secretariat, Khairatabad, Hyderabad, Telangana 50O O22 Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director

2. The Superintending Engineer, TGSPDCL, Operation Circle, Medchal, Gunrock, Secunderabad, Telangana 500 015 ...PETITIONERS AND 1 M/s. Dr. Reddys Laboratories Ltd, Regd OIt. 8-2-337, Road No.3, B_anjala Hills, Hyderabad 500 034 Rep. by its Senior Legal Counsel, Sri. Gopala Krishna Gangavelli UNIT: FTO-3 Bachupally, Ir4edchal tt/alkajgiri District -500 090 service Connection No. MCL-696 UNIT: IPDO Bachupally, Medchal fi/alkajgiri District -500 090 HT Service Connection No. MCL-1357 Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Door No. 11-4-660, Vth Floor,-singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 004 Rep. by its Secretary. 2 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Seetion 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the inteiim orders dated 04.07.2024 in lA. No. 01 of 2024 in WP. No. 17290 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. CHALLA KIRANMAYEE, REP. FOR M/s. CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent No.'l: SRI P.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC 86 Counsel forthe Respondent No.2 to 4: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT PETITION NO: 18070 OF 2024 Between: IVI/s Srinath Spinning Mills Pvt. Limited Ranga Reddy District - 501 401, Rep Kumar Aganval Sy No.859, Plot No. 12, IDA Medchal, its Managing Director, Sri. Preme ...PETITIONER AND 1 2 2 4 5 The State _o^f _Telangana, Energy Department, Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary, TS Secretariat, Hyderabad. The Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Secretary, Red Hills, Hyderabad. The Southern Power Distribution Company Limited of Telangana State, Rep. by its Chairman And Managing Director,.Mint Compound. Hyderabad. The Suqerintending Engineer, (Operation) TSSPDCL, tDA, Ivledchat Ranga Reddy, Ranga Reddy District. The Senior Accounts Officer, (Operation) TSSPDCL, lDA, IMedchal Ranga Reddy, Ranga Reddy District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ direction order or orders declaring the order dated 1910412024 in O.P. No.76 of 2015 passed by the 2nd respondent fixing the cross subsidy in respect of the 3rd respondent DISCOM as wholly arbitrary illegal without jurisdiction offending the principles of natural justice and void consequenfly set aside the same. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pteased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the demand Notice dated 0110512024 in Lr.No.SE/OP/MDCL/SAO/AAOiJAO/HT/D.No.5412024 issued by the 4th respondent the Superintendent Engineer demanding payment of balance of 87 surcharge and interest there on as otherwise the petitioner will suffer serious and irreparable loss and hardship. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Between:

1. The Southern Power Distribution Company Limited of Telangana State, Rep. by its Chairman And Managing Director, [\ilint Compound. Hyderabad.

2..The Superintending Engineer, (Operation) TSSPDCL, lDA, Ivledchal Ranga Reddy, Ranga Reddy District.

3. The Senior Accounts Officer, (Operatlon) TSSPDCL, lDA, Medchal Ranga Reddy, Ranga Reddy District. ...PETITIONERS ANO 1 2 2 M/s Srinath Spinning Mills Pvt. Limited, Sy.No.859, Plot No. 12, IDA Medchal, Ranga Reddy Distri-ct - 501 401, Rep. by its Managing Director, Sri. Preme Kumar Agarwal The State of Telangana, Energy Department, Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary, TS Secretariat, Hyderabad. The Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Secretary, Red Hills, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 101712024 in IA.No.'l ot 2024 in W.P.No. 18070 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.P.CHANDRA MOULI, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. FOR SRI CH.SATYASADHAN Counsel for the Respon(ent No.'l: SRI A.SUDERSHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the-Respondent No.2: SRI P.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No.3 to 5: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL 88 WRIT PETITION NO: 18121OF 2024 Between: AGI Greenpac Limited, (Formerly HSIL Ltd) Amin Off. Glass Factory Road, Off. Motinagar, P.B.No.'1930, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 018 Represented by its Chief Financial Officer, Mr. O.P. Pandey S/o. Late K.N. Pandey HAVING ITS UNIT: Glass Factory Road, Off. Motinagar, P.8.No.1930, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 018 HT Service Connection No. BJH-369 ...PETITIONER AND 1 2 3 Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Door No. 11-4-660, Vth Floor, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 004 Rep. by its Secretary. Southern Distribution Company bf Telangana Limited, TSSPDCL Corporate Office, Central Secretariat, Khairatabad, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 022 Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director. The Superintending Engineer, TSSPDCL, Operation Circle, Banjara Hills, GTS Colony, Telangana 500 045. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or orders or writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 1st Respondent in passing the lmpugned Order dated 19.O4.2024, purported to be exercising powers U/Secs. 39(2xdxii), a0(c)(ii) and 42(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (Act, 2003) and determining the Cross Subsidy Surcharge (CSS) for the FY 2015-16, to be recovered from the consumers who availed power supply through open access and the consequential action of the 3rd Respondent in levying and Demanding surcharge/interest vide Lr.No.SE/OP/B'HILLS/HYD/SAO/AAO(HT/JAO/D.No.109 12024, dt. 19.06.2024 on-the recovery of CSS prospectively, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions pf the Electricity Act, 2003, contrary to Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulation, 20 15 - Regulation No. 2 of 2015, in violation of principles of natural justice, besides being violative of the petitioner's rights guaranteed under Article 1a, 19(1Xg) of the Constitution of lndia. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 89 Petition under section 'l 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to stay the operation of order dated 19.04.2024 issued by the 1 st Respondent in determining csS for FY 2o1s-16 and to further direct the 3rd Respondent not to take any coercive steps incruding that of disconnection of power suppry, pursuant to the demand vide Lr.No.sE/op/B'HTLLS/HyD/sAo/AAo(HTyJAo/D.No. 109t2024, dt. 19.06.2024. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Between:

1. southern Distribution company of relangana Limited, TSSPDCL coroorate office, centrar Secretariat, knairataoao, n"yoeraoao, rrihnganJ 50-oi;5'iEp. by its Chairman and Managing Director. z rLu- Superintending Enginee^r, GTS Colony, Telangana 5OO 04S. -TSSpDCL, operation circre, Banjara Hiils, ...PETITIONERS AND 1 AGI .Greenpac _Limited, (Fo-rmerly HSIL Ljd ) Amin Off. Glass Factory Road, Off Motinagar, P B.No.'t030, Hyd'erabad, feiangina 5oObi8 R6;;;;"i;;y its Chief Financiat Officer, Mr. Ci.e. eanO6y Sio."Gte k tt. CjnoJi HAVING ITS UNIT: Glass Factory Road, Off. Motinaoar. p.B.No.1S30 Hyderabad, Tetangana 500 O.l8 HT Service Connection'frjo]eiH_ao1 Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Door No. .l 1_4-660, Vth Floor, Singareni Bhavan, ReA Hiils, UVOeraOaO,-feilngan, 500 004 H,;p.'dt its Secretary. - ...RESPONDENTS Petition under section i5i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in sgpport of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 10.07.2024 in lA. No. 01 of 2024 in wp. No. 18121 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. CHALLA KIRANMAYEE, REp. FOR M/s. CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI P.PRASAD, SC FOR TSERC Counsel forthe Respondent No.2 & 3: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL 90 WRIT PETITION NO : 18133 0F 2024 Between: M/s. Gland Pharma Ltd' Factory at SyNo 143-148,. 150. ?n9. 1,!11, ry9ar GandimaisammaXRoads,D.P.Pally.QutbullapurMandal'HyoeraDao- iOObSS]i"p Oy-its Obputytenerqt Maiage(Legai;, Sri.T. Girish Subba Raju HT Service Connection No.MCL-766' ...PETITIONER ANO 1 The Telanoana State Electricit Red Hills tiyderabad Telangan The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited'rep by its Cniiim'an inO Managing Director Miht Compound Hyderabad Telangana State egulatory Commission, rep by its Secretary ate. yR aS

3. The Superintending Engineer, Operation .Circle, The - Dlslribut'on Compa"ny of- Telangana Limited Gunrock, Southern Power Medchal tvlalkajgiri District, 4. The Senior Distribution District, Accounts Officer, Operation Circle, The..Southern Power Company- ot- ielangan'a Limited Gunrock, Medchal Malkajgiri

5. The State of Telangana, re p Telangana Secretariat, HYdera b ad. by its Prl Secretary Energy Department ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of lrr,landamus declaring the order dated 19.04.2024 in o.P. No. 76/2015 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent is highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, irrational, without jurisdiction and contrary to the Principles of NaturalJusticeapartfrombeingviolativeofArticlesla,lg(1Xg)'21'265and 300A of the constitution-of lndia and consequently set aside. the same in so far as the petitioner is concerned. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 19 04.2024 in o.P. No. 76t2O15 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent including 91 disconnection of petitioner's power supply pending disposal of the above writ petition A NO: 2 OF 2024 Between: 2

1. The Southern Power Distribution Coqlp?ny of Telangana Limited' rep by its chairman and wtanaglnt""oiillt"i Hrtihi 6ompound" Hyderabad Telangana State The Suoerintending Engineer, Operalion .Ciple' The oilirio]uiibn com-pi"ny of" Telangana Limited Gunrock' District, 3. The Senior Distribution District, Accounts Officer, . Operation Circle, The Compiny of Telangana Limited Gunrock, Southern Power Medchal lv'lalkajgiri Southern Power lvledchal Malkajgiri ...PETITIONERS AND -'o.F.' 1 M/s. Gland Pharma Ltd, Factory at SyNo"143-148' 1 50 and 1 51 ' Near cl"oiilriii.*" x-noair., eJtty'outbullapur- Mandal' .Hvderabad - ;dijbss. Fi;p.bvlts Deputv eenerat N/ihage(Legai), Sri r' Girish subba Raju HT Service Connection No.MCL-766. The Telanoana state Electricity Regulatory commission, rep by its secretary Red Hills tiyderabad Telangana Sate. 2

3. The state of Telangana, rep by its Prl secretary Energy Department Telangana Secretaria{, Hyderabad' ..,RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 't 0.07'2024 in lA No' 01 of 2024 in WP No' 181 33 of 2O24 and dismiss the writ petition' Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT R.SHAILAJA Counsel for the Responden't No.1: SRI P.PRASAD, Sc FoR TGERC Counsel forthe Respondent No.2 to 4: SRI N'SREEDHAR REDDY' SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel forthe Respondent No.S: SRI A.SUDERSHAN REDDY' ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY 9Z WRIT PETITION NO: 181 46 0F 2024 Between: M/s Gland Pharma Ltd, Unit-ll, Plot No.42 to 52, Sy.No.168 and .171, phase- ll, Pashamailaram Village, Patancheru Mandal, -iG Deputy ceneral IVlanaoe(Legal), Sri.T. Girish Subbi RajJ HT Sehrice Cohndction No.SGR-1 953. -Sanoareddv. neo.Ov ANO 1 2 The Telangana State-Electricity Regulatory Commission, rep by its Secretary Red Hills Hyderabad Tetanganb Satb. The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telanqana Limited. reo bv its Chairman and lrlanaoino Director Miht Compound" Hyderabad TehnSianJ State ...PETITIONER 4

3. The Superintending E ngineer, Operation Circle, The Southern power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited Sangareddy, Sangareddy Medak. The Senior Accounts Officer, Operation Circle, The Southern power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited Sangare'OOy, SangaieOdt Med;k. Telangana, rep b.y its prl. Secretary, Energy Department, Jhe State Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad'. ^of E ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of l\4andamus declaring the order dated .19.04.2024 in O.p. No. 76/2015 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent is highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, irrational, without jurisdiction and contrary to the principles of Natural Justice apart from being violative of Articles I , 19(1 Xg), 21 , 265 and 300A of the constitution of lndia and consequenfly set aside the same in so far as the petitioner is concelned. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings -pursuant to the order dated 19.04.2024 in O.p. No. 7612015 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent including disconnection of petitioner's power supply pending disposal of the above writ petition. 93 tA NO: 2 oF 2024 Between:

1. The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telanoana Limited' rep by its Chairman ano rrran!frn'g"bi;;;i"i Mihi 6ompound- Hvderabad relansana State 2. The Superintending Engineer' Operation Circle The Southern Power i'.jffi;;diiiiit"- s"ngut"ddv' Sangareddv trledak 3. The Senior Accounts Officer' Operation Circle' The Southern Power Distribution co*p"nv'Jr r""i;;;";i;it;o bangare'dov' sangareddv Medak ...PETITIONERS Distribution companf, "? AND

1. Ir//s.GlandPharmaLtd,Unit-ll,PlotNo.42.to52,SyNo.168and171,Phase- il. pashamaitaram Viilage,'ilriiitirL";,j-M-unoit,'sanoareddv. Rep.by its 'suuo5 Ralti HT service Deoutv General Manage(Leg;D: Cohndction No.SGR-1 953. -5; i Giri'h 2 The Telanoana state Electricity Regulatory commission, rep by its secretary - R;a nitii niyoeraoao Telangana Sate' 3. The State of Telangana' rep pV its Prl Secretary Energy Department -' i"tang"na Secretariat-, Hyderabad' ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 10'07 2024 in lA No'0'1 of 2024 in WP No l8146 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition' Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT R'SHAILAJA Counsel for the Respondent No'1: SRt P'PRASAD' SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No'2 to 4: SRI N'SREEDHAR REDDY' SC FOR TGSPDCL c o u n s e I f o r the Re s po n d e nt N o. 5 : isl,t 3Ni== E?LHX.t 13 J', o * E N E RGy WRIT P ETITION NO: 18164 oF 2024 Between: Mis. lnox Air Products Private Limited; Having^ its unit at P]o! No 38' IDA' i;ffi .; ji;'i;;d";trua;,'i jiin"r,"i,-r"rr"ar,,i?.Ennil.s.o,r;;l!i$lp"l{}il31": si 5-R"pre.enteo'Oy its Authorized-Signatory' IV B husu rapal l i ven xa u'b"waiiv w-ni s"'ii"" -C6hnectio n No SG R-769 a 94 ...PETITIONEFl AND 1 2 3 Ielangana State Electricity 1e.9g...............Jat9V Commission, Door No. 11_4_660, Vth Floor, Singareni Bhavan, Red Fiills, Hiderabad, Telangana _500 004 R;p.'b, its Secretary. Sg-uthern Distribution Company of Telangana Limited, TGSPDCL Coroorate Secretarral, Khairatabad, Hyderabad, Telangana - SdO 022 uttrce, Centrat Kep. by its Chairman and Managing Director. The Superintending Engineer, TGSpDCL, Operation Circle, Sangareddy, Ielangana. . ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of rhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an order or orders or writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of lVlandamus declaring the action of 1st Respondent in passing the lmpugned order dated 19.o4.2024, purported to be exercising powers U/Secs. 39(2xd)(ii), a0(cXii) and 42(2) of the Etectricity Act, 2003 (Act, 2003) and determining the cross Subsidy surcharge (csS) for the Fy 2015-16, to be recovered from the consumers who availed power supply through open access and the consequential action of the 3rd Respondent in levying and demanding surcharge/interest vide Lr.No.sE/op/SRD/sAo/AAo-HT/JAo/D. No. 27 Bt24 dt. 25.06.2024 on the recovery of css prospectivery, as iflegar, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, contrary to Telangana state Electricity Regulatory commission (conduct of Business) Regulation, 2015 - Regulation No. 2 of 2o15, in violation of principles of natural justice, besides being violative of the petitioner's rights guaranleed under Article 1a, 19(i )(g) of the constitution of lndia. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Sectio.n 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of order dated 19.04.2024 issued by the 1 st Respondent in determining cSS for FY 2015-'16 and to further direct the 3rd Respondent not to take any coercive steps including that of disconnection of power supply pursuant I 95 to the demand vide Lr.No.SE/OP/SRDiSAO/AAO-Hf/JAO/D.No. 27BlZ4, dt. 25.06.2024. Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. CHALLA KIRANMAYEE, REP. FOR M/s. CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent No.'l: SRI P.PRASAD, SC FOR TSERC Counsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT PETITION NO: 18183 OF 2024 Between: Mis. Suven Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Corp. otfice. 2O2, A-wing, Galaxy Towers, Plot No.1, Hyderabad Knowledge City TSllC, Raidurg, Serilingampally, Rangareddy Districl, Hyderabad- 500081 , Telangana, lNDlA. Represented tiy its Plant Manager, Mr. E. Esakki Ramkumar, p_NlT. ilot No 262-271, lDA, Pashamailaram, Patancheru (M), Sangareddy (D) - 502 307 Service Connection No.SGR-813 AND 1 Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Door No. 11-4-660,51h Floor, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500 004 Rep. by its Secretary ...PETITIONER 2 So_-uthern Distribution Company of Telangana Limited., TSSPDCL Corporate Office, Central Secretariat, Khairatabad, Hyderabad, Telangana - SdO 022 Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director 3. The Superintending Engineer, TSSPDCL, Operation Circle, Sangareddy, Telangana ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in-.the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or orders or writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lvlandamus declaring the action of 1st Respondent in passing the lmpugned Order dated 19.04.2024, purported to be exercising powers U/Secs. 39(2xdxii), a0(c)(ii) and 42(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (Act, 2003) and determining the Cross Subsidy Surcharge (CSS) for the FY 201 5-16, to be recovered from the consumers who availed power supply through open access and the consequential action of the 3rd Respondent in levying and demanding surcharge/interest vide Lr.No.SE/OP/SRD/SAO/AAO-HTiJAO/D.No.273124, 96 d1.25.06.2024 on the recovery of CSS prospectively, as illegal. arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, contrary to Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulation, 2015 - Regulation No. 2 of 2015, in violation of principles of natural justice, besides being violative of the petitioner's rights guaranteed under Articte 14, 19(1 )(g) of the Constitution of lnd ia. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of Order dated 19.04.2024 issued by the 1st Respondent in determining CSS for FY 2015-16 and to further direct the 3rd Respondent not to take any coercive steps including that of disconnection of power supply pursuant to the demand vide Lr.No. SE/OP/SRD/SAO/AAO-HT/JAO/D.No.273124, dt. 25.06.2024. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Between:

1. Southern Distribution Company of Telangana Limited., TSSPDCL Corporate Office, Central Secretariat, Khairatabad, Hyderabad, Telangana - 5OO 022 Rep. by its Chairman and lvlanaging Director

2. The Superintending Engineer, TSSPDCL, Operation Circle, Sangareddy, Telangana ...PETITIONERS AND 1 2 tvl/s. Suven Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Corp. office. 2O2, A-wing, Galaxy Towers, Plot No.1, Hyderabad Knowledge City TSllC, Raidurg, Serilingampally, Rangareddy District, Hyderabad- 500081, Telangana, lNDIA. Represented by its Plant Manager, Mr. E. Esakki Ramkumar, UNIT: Plot No. 262-27,1, lDA, Pashamailaram, Patancheru (M), Sangareddy (D) - 502 307 Service Connection No.SGR-813 Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Door No. 11-4-660, sth Floor,-singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500 004 Rep. by its Secretary ...RESPONDENTS 97 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 'l 1.07.2024 in l.A.No.01 of 2024 in WP.No.1B183 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. CHALLA KIRANMAYEE, REP. FOR M/s. CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI P.PRASAD, SC FOR TSERC Counsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT PETITION NO: 18311OF 2024 Between: M/s Sri Ram Spinnin Rep. by its Managing s D Mills Limited, 0/o 3-6-168/4, Hyderguda, Hyderabad irector, Sri Sushil Kumar Sancheti. ...PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Telangana, Energy Department, Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary, TS Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Hyderabad, Rep by its Secretary, Red Hills, Hyderabad.

3. The Southern Power Distribution Company Limited of Telangana State, rep by its Chairman And Managing Director, Mint Compound, Hyderabad.

4. The Superintending Engineer, Operation TSSPDCL, Medchal Gunrock, Secunderabad.

5. The Senior Accounts Officer, (Operation) TSSPDCL, IMedchal Gunrock, Secunderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 2,26 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of a Writ of lV'landamus or any other appropriate writ direction order or orders declaring the order dated 1910412024 in O.P.No.76 of 2015 passed by the 2nd respondent fixing the cross subsidy surcharge in respect of the 3rd respondent DISCOM as wholly arbitrary illegal without jurisdiction offending the principles of natural justice and void consequently set aside the same. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 98 Petition under Section '1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the demand Notice dated 06-05-2024 in Lr.No. SE/OP/MDCL/SAO/AAO/JAOlHrlD.No_7712024 issued by the 4th respondent the Superintendent Engineer demanding payment of balance of surcharge and interest there on pending disposal of the writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Between:

1. The Southern Power Distribulion Company Limited of Telangana State, rep by its Chairman And Managing Director, Mint Compound, Hyderabad.

2. The Superintending Engineer, Operation TSSPDCL, Medchal Gunrock, Secunderabad.

3. The Senior Accounts Secunderabad Officer, (Operation) TSSPDCL, Medchal Gunrock, ...PETITIONERS AND 1 M/s Sri Ram Spinning fMills Limited, O/o 3-6-168/4, Hyderguda, Hyderabad Rep. by its Managing Director, Sri Sushil Kumar Sancheti. The State _o^f -Telangana, Secretary, TS Secretariat, Hyderabad Energy Department, Rep. by its Special Chief 2 The Tela_ngana State. Electricity Regulatory Commission, Hyderabad, Rep by its Secretary, Red Hills, Hyderabad. Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orde$ dated 12.07.2024 in lA. No. 01 of 2024 in Wp. No. '1831 1 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.P.CHANDRA MOULI, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. FOR SRI CH.SATYASADHAN Counsel for the Respondent No.'t: SRI A.SUDERSHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI P.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC I 99 Counsel forthe Respondent No.3 to 5: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY' SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT PETITION NO: 18345OF 2024 Between: M/s. MRF Limited, Regd. Off. MRF House, New No.114 (Old No. 12!) Greams Road, Chennai, Tamilnadu - 600 006. Having its Unit at- PB.No.2, Sadasivapet, Sangareddy District, Telang ana -502291 , Represenle-d by its General Manager, Mr.Shibu Sam HT Service Connection No.SGR-488. ...PETITIONER AND 1 2 3 Telanqana State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Door No. '1 'l -4-660, Vth Floor,-Singareni Bhavan, ReO tlilts, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500 004 Rep. by its Secretary Southern Distribution Company of Telangana Limited,, TGSPDCL Corporate Office, Central Secretariat, Khairatabad, Hyderabad, Telangana -5OO O22 Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director The Superintending Engineer, TGSPDCL, Operation Circle, Sangareddy, Telangana ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or orders or writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 1st Respondent in passing the lmpugned Order dated 19.04.2024, purported to be exercising powers UiSecs. 39(2xdxii), aO(cXii) and 42(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 ("Act, 2003") and determining the Cross Subsidy Surcharge (CSS) for the FY 201 5-16' to be recovered from the consumers who availed power supply through open access and the consequential a_ction of the 3rd Respondent in levying anddemanding surcharge/interest vide Lr.No. SE/OP/SRD/SAOiAAO-HT/JAOlD.261l24, dl.25tO\t2024 on the recovely of CSS prospectively, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, contrary to Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulation, 2015 - Regulation No. 2 of 2015, in violation of principles of natural justice, besides being violative of the petitioner's rights guaranteed under Article 1 a, 19(1 Xg) of the Constitution of lndia. IANO:1OF2 024 100 Petition under Section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to stay the operation of order dated 19.04.2024 issued by the 1 st Respondent in determining css for Fy 2o1s-16 and to further direct the 3rd Respondent not to take any coercive steps incruding that of disconnection of power suppry pursuant to the demand vide Lr.No. sE/opisRD/sAo/AAo-HT/JAo/D.No.26.1 r24, dt. 25.06.2024. lA NO: 2 oF 2024 Between: 1 2 southern Distribution company of rerangana Limited,, IGSPDCL coroorate office, Centrat Secretariai, khairrilb;d:-FivoEil'ijrt,' iJing"rir' :s"o6"b?i Rep. by its Chairman and lvianaging Oireiior'' -- --*"' The Superintendino Enoineer, TGSpDCL, Operation Circle, Sangareddy, Telangaha AND 1 2 M/s. MRF Limited, Regd. Off. MRF_House, New No.114 (Old No..124) gre.ams Road' chennailrflnrtnaou: 600tG. iiving its uniilt. pb.rrr,i-21 Sadasivaper, Sangaredily oistriJt,lelan-giiJ _'sdily, Represented bv its Generat Manager,-Mr.Shi6u Sam nr Se.rfte con",ie-&bri r.r".scn:+ba: "' ''' Telanqana state Erectricitv Regrratory commission, Door No. 11-4-660, vth Froor, sinqareni Bhavan. Rea fiiiis, Hioe;b;,j, i;a.;rna _ 5oo 004 Rep. by its Secretary ...PETITIONERS ...RESPONDENTS Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim orders dated' 12.07.2024 in rA. No. 01 0f 2024 in wp. No. 18345 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. CHALLA KIRANMAYEE, REp. FOR M/s. CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI p.PRASAD, SC FOR TSERC Counsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDy, SC FOR TGSPDCL l0l wRtT PETITION NO: 18742 OF 2024 Between: M/s. Gleneagles Healthcare lndia Pvt Ltd, (Formedy known as Ravindrananth GE Medica'i Associates Private Limiteid) D.No.6-1-1070 and 107014' Lakdikapool, Hyderabad - 500004 Rep. by its Authorized Representative, Dr. Ashwini Amareshwar. ...PETITIONER AND 1 Telangana State Eleckic Floor, Singareni Bhavan, its Secretary. itv Reoulatorv Commission, Door NO- I1-4-660, Vth ReO Hitts, Hyderabad. Telangana - 500004. Rep. by

2. Southern Distribution Companv of Telanqana Limited, TSSPDCL Corporate Office, Central Secretariat, Khairatabad,- Hyderabad, Telangana - 5OO022' Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director

3. The . Superintending Engineer, TSSPDCL, Operation Circle, Hyderabad Central, Hyderabad.

4. Transmission Corporation Director, Vidyut Soudha, Telangana-500004. of Telangana Limited, Rep. by its Khairtabad Road, Khairtabad, Managing Hyderabad,

5. lnd Bharath Energies Limited, Plot No.30-A, Road No.'1 , Film Nagar, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500033, Rep by its Managing Director. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to grant an order, direction or writ, more so in nature of lVlandamus, declaring the lmpugned Notice vide Lr.No. SE/Op/ HDC/SAO/AAO(HTyJAO-HT- l/SAi D.No.190Ol24 dated 23.06.2024 issued by the Respondent No.3 demanding a sum of Rs.84,06,987.93/- towards Cross Subsidy surcharge from the Petitioner as arbitrary, illegal, u nco nstitutiona I, without jurisdiction and in violation of principles of nature justice, besides being violative of petitioners rights guaranteed under Article 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of lndia and Sub- Section (2) of Section 56 of Electricity Act, 2003 and consequently, set aside the same. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to t02 suspend the lmpugned Notice of demand dated 23.06.2024 vide Lr.No- SE/Op/ HDC/SAO/AAO(HT)/JAO-HT-liSA/D.No.1 900/24 issued by the Respondent No.3, pending disposal of this writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Between: 1 Southern Distribution Company of Telangana Limited, TSSPDCL Corporate Office, Central Secretariat, Khairatabad, Hyderabad, Telangana - 5OO022 ' Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director The Superintending Engineer, TSSPDCL, Operation Circle, Hyderabad Central, Hyderabad. 2

3. Transmission Corporation Director, Vidyut Soudha, Telangana-500004. of Telangana Limited, Rep. by Khairtabad Road, Khairtabad, its Managing Hyderabad, ...PETITIONERS AND I 2 3 M/s. Gleneagles Healthcare lndia Pvt Ltd, (Formerly known as Ravindrananth cE Medica'[ Associates Private Limited) D.No.6-'1-1070 and 107014, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad - 500004 Rep. by its Authorized Representative, Dr. Ashwini Amareshwar. Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Door NO- 11-4-660, Vth Floor,-singareni Bhavan, Red Fiills, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500004. Rep. by its Secretary. lnd Bharath Energies Limited, Plot No.30-A, Road No.1, Film Nagar, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500033, Rep by its tVlanaging Director. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying. that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 16.07.2024 in WP. No. 18742 ot 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner:'SRl ROHIT POGULA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI P.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL 103 WRIT PETITION NO: 18750 OF 2024 Between: M/s Suryavanshi Spinning Mills,6th Floor, 105, Sardar Patel Road, Secundeiabad, Rep. by its General Manager, K.S.Murthy. ...PETITIONER AND 1 2 J 4 The State of Telangana, Energy Department, Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary, TS Secretariat, Hyderabad. The Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Secretary, Red Hills, Hyderabad. The Southern Power Distribution Company Limited of Telangana State, rep. by its Chairman And Managing Director, Mint Compound, Hyderabad. The Superintending Engineer, Operation TSSPDCL, Medchal Gunrock, Secunderabad.

5. The Senior Accounts Officer, (Operation) TSSPDCL, Medchal Gunrock, Secunbderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ direction order or orders declaring the order dated 19-04-2024 in O.P.No.76 of 2015 passed by the 2nd respondent fixing the cross subsidy surcharge in respect of the 3rd respondent Dlscolv as wholly arbitrary illegal without jurisdiction offending the principles of natural justice and void consequently set aside the same. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the demand Notice dated 01-05'2024 in Lr.No.SE/OP/MDCL/SAO/AAO/JAOiHT/D.No.5312024 issued bv the 4th respondent the Superintendent Engineer demanding payment of balance of surcharge and interest there on pending disposal of the writ petition. t04 lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Between: 1 The Southern Power Distribution company Limited of relanoana state. reo by its Chairman And lVanaging Director, Miirt Compound, ntd;;;bad.---' -" The Superintending Enoineer, Operation TSSpDCL, lvledchal Gunrock, Secunderabad. 2

3. The Senior Accounts Secunbderabad. Officer, (Operation) TSSPDCL, Medchal Gunrock, ...PETITIONERS AND ,| M/s Suryavanshi Spinning Secundeiabad, Rep. by its 6 Road, 2. The State of Telangana,. .E1erg.y Department, Rep. by its Speciat Chief eneral Manager, K.S.Murthy. Mills, 6th Floor, 105, Sardar patel Secretary, TS Secretariat, HyderS6ad. '

3. The Telangang S!q!9, Electricity Regulatory Commission, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Secretary, Red Hills, Hyderdbadi Petition under Section i 5i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interrm orders dated 16.07.2024 in wp. No. 187s0 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. ...RESPONOENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.P.CHANDRA MOULI, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. FOR SRI CH.SATYASADHAN Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 : SRI A.SUDERSHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI p.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No.3 to 5: SRI N.SREEDHAR REODy, SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT PETITION NO: 19000 0F 2024 Between: It4ll ?t Reddy's Laboratories Ltd, Regd Oft- 8-2-337, Road No.3. Baniara Hi[s, Hyderabad - 500 034 Rep. by its Senior Legal Counsel, Sri. Gofata Krishna Gangavelli UNlr: cro - 4 Bachuparry, Medchar Markajgiri District -500 090 HT service Connection No. MCL-295 105 rVledchar rr/atkajsiri District -s00 0e0 Hr Service 3)ll;38lr|\U:Bachup.aily, uNrr: cPS Bachuoarv- Medchar Markajgiri District -500 090 HT service Connection No. MCL-S66 AND 1 2 ...PETITIONER Telanoana State Electricitu Regulatory Commission, Door No- .l 1_4-660, Vth Bhavan, n"o tiitr.,'HioJ,lb;i, i;i;";""" - soo oo+ n"p."dv [1"3:.:J?rT,*"i Southern Power Distributign CgTpaly of Telangana Limited, TGS'DCL Co rpo rate off ice, Centra I secretJriStl h rl ;tJ;i: iiya ur'i] r"r J',ijriJ I 500 o22 Rep. by its Chairman ano rvrihrijin'g-Dlrtlioi ', The Superintendino Enoine_el TGgl^Dg.L., Operatron Circle, Ivledchal, Gunrock, Secundera-bad, felangana _ 500 01d "E ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an order or orders or writ or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the action of 1st Respondent in passing the lmpugned order dated 19.04.2024, purported to be exercising powers U/secs. 39(2xdxii), ao(c)(ii) and 42(2) of the Etectricity Act, 2003 (Act, 2003) and determining the cross Subsidy surcharge (css) for the Fy 2015-16, to be recovered from the consumers who availed power supply through open access and the consequentiar action of the 3rd Respondent in revying and demanding surcharge/interest vide Lr.No.sE/opiMCL/sAo/AAo(HTyJAo(HTyD.No.197, 18.06.2024 and Lr.No. SE/OP/MCLiSAO/AAO(HT/JAO(HT)/D.No.198, 18.06.2024 and Lr.No SE/Op/MCL/SAO/AAO(HTyJAO(HT)/D.No.200/4, dt. 18.06.2024, on the recovery of CSS prospectively, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of th6 Erectricity Act, 2003, contrary to Terangana state Electricity Reguratory comrnission (conduct of Business) Reguration, 2015 - Regulation No. 2 of 2o1s, in vioration of principres of naturar justice, besides being violative of the petitioners rights guaranteed under Article 1a, I 9(1 Xg) of the Constitution of lndia. dt. dt. t06 lA NO: 1 oF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Courl may be pleased to stay the operation of Order dated 19'04 2024 issued by the 1st Respondent in determining CSS for FY 2015-16 and to further direct the 3rd Respondent not to takeanycoercivestepsincludingthatofd|sconnectionofpowersupplypursuant to the. demand vide Lr,No SE/OP/MCL/SAO/AAO (HT/JAO(HT)/D'No 197' dt' 18.06.2024 and Lr.No SE/OP/MCL/SAO/AAO(HTy JAO(HT)/D No 198' dt 18.06.2024 and Lr.No SE/ OP/MCL/SAO/AAO(HT)/JAO(HT)/D No 200/A' dt' 18.06.2024. IA NO: 20F 2024 Between: 1 . Southern Power Drstribution Company of Telanoana Limited ' TGSPDCL Coroorate oftice, ce'n't'r!i'b1lr"a"ii5tl (hairalabadiHyderabad' Telangana - Soil"tiiz'n"p uv ltJ ch'it'an and Managing Director 2. The Superintending Engineer' TGqP-Dg!-: Operation Circle' IVIedchal' - c;;.;k,"Secundera"bad, ielangana - 500 015 ...PETITIONERS AND 1 2 B-?-3tl Road No 3' Baniara tvl/s. Dr. Reddvs Laboratories Ltd, Regd ^Oft. Hitts Hvderabad - 500 os'iR"dl'ov16-senioi Legal Counsel' Sri Gopala Krish na'G a ngavelli UNIT: CTO - 4 Bachupally, Medchal Malkajgiri District -500 090 HT Service Connection No. trilCL-295 UNIT: Bioloqics Bachupally, Medchal Malkajgiri District -500 090 HT Service Connection No. MCL-743 UNIT: CPS Bachupally, Medchal tr/alkajgiri District -500 090 HT Service Connection No. MCL-598 Telanoana State Electricity Regulatory Commisgion' Door No- 11-4-660' Vth ii#i:'5iffir",ilieffi'r;.' ii",i'liili'"nio"'aoao' relansana - 500 004 Rep' bv its Secretary ..,RESPONDENTS PetitionunderSectionl51CPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High bourt may be pleased to vacate the interim orders date 18 07 2024 in WP' No 19OO0 of 2024 and dismiss the writ Petition. { I r07 CouNSEI fOT thE PEtitiONET: MS. CHALLA KIRANMAYEE, REP. FOR M/s. CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRt P'PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Gounsel forthe Respondent No.2 & 3: SRI N'SREEDHAR REDDY' SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT PETITIO NNO :19312OF 2024 Between: AGI Greenpac Limited, (Formerly HSIL Ltd) Amin Off Glass-Factory Ro.ad' ii} rrrr"tinafiar. P.8.No.1930, Hvd',eraOaO, Teiangana 500 018 Represented by [J'cni"iii,i"n'.i"i-om"er, tr,ti. o.p. Pandev s/o.Late K N Pandev HAVING ITS UNIT: Glass lndustry, Tukkapur Road, Ailnglito), Telangana HT Service-Connection No YDD-594 (M)' Yadadri- -Bho^ngir ...PETITIONER AND 1 2 Reoulatorv Commission, Door No. '1 1-4-660' Vth ea ftitts, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 004 Rep. by Telanqana State ElectricitY Floor,-Singareni Bhavan, R its Secretary. Southern Distribution Company of Telangana Limite!, TSSPDCL C-o-rp 6i'il;. b";tr;i Seiietariat, khairatabad' HiTderabad, Telangana 5oo o22 by its Chairman and Managing Director Rep.

3.TheSuperintendingEngineer,TGSPDCL,OperationCircle'YadadriBhongir' Telangana. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an order or orders or writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of '1st Respondent in passing the lmpugned Order dated 1glo4t2o24, purported to be exercising powers U/Secs. 39(2xdxii), aO(c)(ii) and 42(2) of the Electricitv Act, 2003 (Act' 2003) and determining the cross subsidy surcharge (csS) for the FY 2015-16, to be recovered from the consumers who availed power supply through open access and the consequential action of the 3rd Respondent in tevying and demanding su rcharge/interest vide Lr. No.SE/OPI/DD/HYD/SAO/ JAO- HT/D. No .3421 2024, dl,2lto6t2o24ontherecoveryofCsSprospectively,asillegal,arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, contrary to Telangana state Electricity Regulatory commission (conduct of Business) Regulation, 2015 I r08 - Regulation No. 2 of 2015, in violation of principles of natural justice, besides being violative of the petitioner's rights guaranteed under Article 1a, 19(1Xg) of the Constitution of lndia. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of Order daled 1910412024 issued by the l st Respondent in determining CSS for FY 2015-16 and to further direct the 3rd Respondent not to take any coercive steps including that of disconnection of power supply, pursuant to the demand vide Lr.No.SE/OP/YDD/HYD/SAO/JAO-HT |D.No.34212024, dt.

2110612024. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Between:

1. Southern Distribution Company of Telangana Limited, TSSPDCL Corporate Office, Central Secretariat, Khairatabad, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 022 Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director

2. The Superintending Engineer, TGSPDCL, Operation Circle, Yadadri Bhongir, Telangana. ...PETITIONERS AND I AGI Greenpac Limited, (Formerly HSIL Ltd) Amin Off. Glass Factory Road, Off. Motinagar, P.8.No.1930, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 018 Represented by its Chief Financial Officer, Mr. O.P. Pandey S/o. Late K.N. Pandey HAVING ITS UNIT. Glass lndustry, Tukkapur Road, Bhongir (M), Yadadri-Bhongir (D), Telangana HT Service Connection No. YDD-594 Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Door No. 11-4-660, Vth Floor, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 004 Rep. by its Secretary. 2 .".RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the order dated 22.7.2024 passed in l.A.No. 1 of 2024 in W P No. '19312 o'( 2024, in the interests of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. CHALLA KIRANMAYEE, REP. FOR M/s. CKR ASSOCIATES t' 109 Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI P.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT PETITION NO: 19474 OF 2024 Between: M/s. SMS Life Sciences lndia Ltd., having its Registered office at Plot No. 19- lll, Manikanta Towers, Road No. 71, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 096 Rep. by its Executive Director Mr. T.V.Praveen, and having its lndustrial Unit at Sy. \o 180@ lndustrial Estate, Khazipally (V), Jinnaram (M), Sangareddy District. HT Service Connection No. SGR586 ...PETITIONER AND 1 The Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Rep. by its Secretary, Red Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana State.

2. The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Ltd., Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, Mint Compound, Hyderabad, Telangana State.

3. The Superintending Engineer, Operation Circle,The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Ltd., Sangareddy, Sangareddy District. 4. The Senior Accounts Officer, Operation Circle, The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Ltd., Sangareddy, Sangareddy District. 5. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Energy Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ot lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tb issue a Writ or Order of direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order dated 1910412024 in O.P. No. 7612015 AND O.P. 7712015 p-assed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent is highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, irrational, without jurisdiction and contrary to the Principles of Natural Justice apart from being violative of Articles 1a, 19(1Xg), 21 , 265 and 300A of the Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the same in so far as the petitioner is concerned. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to ll0 stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 1910412024 in o.P. No. 7612015 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent including disconnection of petitioners power supply pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.NAGA DEEPAK Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI P.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel forthe Respondent No.2 to 4: SRt N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel forthe Respondent No.S: SRI A.SUDERSHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY WRIT PETITIO N NO:20551 OF 2024 Between: M/s. Covalent Laboratories (P) Ltd, Having its Regd. Office 3-677118, 2nd Fioor,-SX.o- Nagar, Yerrilri:ddyguda, Flyderab-d, Telangana -5000.73 Havirio its factory a-t S.No.374, Gundla 1vlachinoor Village, Hathnoor lVlandal, Meda[ District, Telangana Rep. by its Sri. K Prabhakar Reddy With Service Connection No.SGR-805. ...PETITIONER AND 2 1 Telanoana State Electricitv Requlatory Commission, Door No 11-4-660' Vth f loor,"Singareni Bhavan, ReO tlitts, Hyderabad, Telangana- 500 004 Rep. by its Secretary Southern Distribution Companv of Telangana Limited, TSSPDCL CgJPoFtg -Hyderabad, Telangana - 5OO O22 Office, Central Secretariat, Kliairatabad, Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Directol The Superintending Engineer, TSSPDCL, Operation Circle, Sangareddy; Telangana 3 ...RESP.NDENT. Petition under Article,226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thd circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bQ pleased to pass an order or orders or writ or direction more particularly one in thd nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 1st Respondent in passinq the lmpugned Order dated 1g.O4.2024, purported to be exercising powersi U/Secs. 39(2)(d)(ii), ao(cXii) and 42(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (Act 2003) and determining the Cross Subsidy Surcharge (CSS) for the FY 2015-16, to be recovered from the consumers who availed power supply through open access and the consequentiar action of the 3rd Respondent in revying and demanding surcharge/interest vide Lr.No.sE/op/sRD/sAo/AAo-HT/JAo/D.No. 27 1 t24dt. 25.06.2024 on the recovery of CSS prospectively, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the Erectricity Act, 2003, contrary to Terangana state Erectricity Regulatory commission (conduct of Business) Reguration. 20.15 - Reguration No 2 0f 2015, in vioration of principres of naturar justice, besides being viorative of the petitioner's rights guaranteed under Articre 1a, r 9(1xg) of the constitution of India. lA NO: 1 oF 2024 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to stay the operation of order dared 19.04.2024 issued by the 1st Respondent in determining csS for Fy 2015-16 and to further direct the 3rd Respondent not to take any coercive steps incruding that of disconnection of power suppry pursuant to the demand vide Lr.No.sE/op/sRD/sAo/AAO-HT/JAO/D. No.271 r24, dr. 25.06.2024. IA NO: 20F 2024 Between: 1 2 AND ihtE";",,:dri:*{s#f ifl :,'IieftfiH:*le".,iBrs:,:i"ilt",."168"61,; r:ia;5fi:r''"ndins Engineer, rssPDCL, operation circte, sansareddy, ...PETITIONERS

1. M/s. Covalent Laboratories ffif;ftI{+"i1ffi{t'r-$=Xffi ,,-"j,,ffi ;tll;a !:,w,3,:T:]:?3t],3ff :_T",Jh1T3;"Jl ui,"T:f ,H"Tffi ft:E::ffl?r,:xf 2 ...RESPONDENTS

1.t2 Petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 31 .07.2024 in WP. No. 20551 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. CHALLA KIRANMAYEE' REP. FOR M/s. CKR ASSOCIATES CounSel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI P.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT PETITION NO: 21662 OF 2024 Between: M/s. Sifco Metal lndustries, Address. Door No. 2-1-41 , f obacco Bazar, Secunderabad, Telangana -500 003 Rep by its Proprietor' Mr.Mukundlal Agarwal, S/o Late Sundermal ...PETITIONER AND 1 Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Door No. 1'1-4-660' Vth Floor,-Singareni Bhavan, Red tlills, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500 004 Rep. by its Secretary 2 a Southern Distribution Company of Telangana Limited, TGSPDCL Corpora-te Office, Central Secretariat, Khairatabad, Hyderabad, Telangana - 5OO 022 Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director The Superintending Engineer, TGSPDCL, Operation Circle, Habsiguda Circle, Hyderabad, Telangana .,.RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in, the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or orders or writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MandamuJ declaring the action of '1 st Respondent in passing the lmpugned Order dated 19.04.2024, purported to be exercising powers U/Secs. 39(2XdXii), 40(c)(ii) and 42(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (Act, 2003) and determining the Cross Subsidy Surcharge (CSS for the FY 2015-'l 6, to be recovered from the consumers who availed power supply through open access and the consequential action of the 3rd Respondent in levying and demanding surcharge/interest vide Lr.No.SE/OP/HBG/SAO/JAO-HT/AAO- ll3 HT/D.No.296/2024, dt. 24.07.2024 on the recovery of CSS prospectively, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, contrary to Telangana state Electricity Regulatory commission (conduct of Business) Regulation, 2015 - Regulation No. 2 of 2015, in violation of principles of natural justice, besides being violative of the petitioner's rights guaranteed under Article 14, 19(t )(g) of the Constitution of tndia. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 15'l cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay the operation of order dated 'r 9.04.2024 issued by the '1st Respondent in determining cSS for FY 2015-16 and to further direct the 3rd Respondent not to take any coercive steps including that of disconnection of power supply pursuant to the demand vide Lr. No.sE/opiHBG/sAo/JAo-HT/AAO-HT/D.No.296/2 o24, dt. 24.07.2024. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Between: 1 2 so--uthern Distribution company of relangana Limited, TGSPDCL coroorate uttrce, Uentrat Secretariat,. Khairatabad, Hyderabad, Telangana _ SO;O 022 Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Directoi IE lypgtjrL"lding Engineer, TGSpDCL, Operation Circte, Habsiguda Circte, HyderaDad, I elangana AND 1 Z M/s. Sifco Metal lndustries, Address. Door No. 2-1-41 , f obacco Bazar, secunderabad, Telanqana -s00 003 Rep by its proprietor, n,lr. rrrrur<unaTai Aganrval, Sio Late Suniermal Jglgng^a1a StateElbctricity Regulatory Commission, Door No. 11_4_660, Vth Ftoor, singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana _ 500 OO4 Reil. by its Secretary I ...PETITIONERS Petition under section I51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 08.08.2024 in wp. No. 21662 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. ...RESPONDENTS 1r4 Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. CHALLA KIRANMAYEE' REP. FOR M/s. CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI P.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT P ETITION NO: 24520 OF 2024 Between: M/s. Sri Luxmi Tulasi Agro Paper Pvt Ltd., D.No.25-2-20, Ammireddy Bhavan, J.x puram. RaiahmunErv. Edst Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. Rep. by its Director,'Sri P. Ramakiishna Reddy S/o. P. Satyanarayana Reddy Having its unit at. Aswaraopet, Khammam District, Telangana - 507 301 Servic-e Connection Number. KIVIM 305 ...PETITIONER AND

1. 2 Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission OqElRg)' Door No. l1-4- 660, Vth Floor, Singareni BhavEn, Reij Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500 004 Rep. by its Secretary Northern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Ltd., (TGNPDCL), Regd Otf. 2-5-31t2, Vidyut Bhavan, Nakkalagutta, Hanamkonda, Warangal, Telangana - 506 00i, Represented by its Chairaman and Managing Director

3. The Superintending Engineer, Operation Kothagudem District. Telangana

4. The Senior Accounts Officer, Operation Kothagudem District, Telangana. Circle, Kothagudem, Bhadradri- Circle, Kothagudem, Bhadradri- ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or orders or writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lvlandamus a) Declaring the action of 1st Respondent in passing the lmpugned Order dated 19.04.2024, purported to be exercising powers U/Secs. 39(2XdXii), 40(c)(ii) and 42(2) ot the Electricity Act, 2003 (Act, 2003) and determining the Cross Subsidy Surcharge (CSS) for the FY 2015-16, to be recovered from the consumers who availed power supply through open access, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, contrary to Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulation, 2015 - Regulation l15 No' 2 0f 201 5' in vioration of principres of naturar justice, besides being viorative of the petitioners rights guaranteed under Articre 14, 19(1xg) of the constitution of lndia, and consequen,y set aside the lmpugned Order dated 19.O4.2024, and b) Direct the 2nd Respondent not to raise any Demands pursuant to lmpugned Order dated 19.O4.2024 passed by the 1st Respondent. lA NO: 1 oF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to stay the operation of order dated 1g.04.2024 issued by the 1st Respondent in determining cSS for Fy 2015-16 and further direct the Respondents 2-4 not to taken any coercive steps incruding disconnection of power suppry in pursuance of any demands raised for payment of CSS for Fy 2O15_16. Counset for the petitioner: Ms. CHALLA KIRANMAYEE, REp. FOR M/s. CKR ASSOCTATES Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI P.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel forthe Respondent No.2 to 4: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT PETITIO N NO: 24712 0F 2024 Between: sae,rys[5a1ffiesg5;sa;fs-1ffiffi AND ...PETtTIONER

1. 3::,:,'Sffii[ff]?lt3lli3i, bv its principa r s ecreta ry, Enersy Depa rtment, 2 *: I?'s: flXt3,t"t*, ?3iiffi :'. 5 B?ils" t co m m i s sio n, re p bv its s ecreta ry, Company Ltd., of Telangana, Rep bv its The Southem power Distribution uharrman and Managins Director, Mfii 6;ifi;j, iiyoerabad. . 3 116

4. The Superintending Engineer' Operation' the ,southern Power company of relangana"'lio]'eifiiirat'illd circle' GTS colonv' Hyderabad 5 u?.,*]"kT:B'.1':"3T?3:',?Hij*iiil3;.::S.%""t",#':I? Hyderabad. Distribution Erragadda, istribution rragadda, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction' more particularly one in the nature of WRIT oF MANDAMUS declaring the Common order passed by the1St Respondent in O.P. 76 and 77 ot 2015 dated 19 '04'2024 determining the Cross Subsidy Surcharge (CSS), purported to be exercising powers under Sections 39(2xdxii), aO (cXii) and 42(2) of the Electricitv Act' 2003 (Act' 2003) for the FY 2015-'16 and 2016- 17(al ) to be recovered from the consumers who availed power supply through open access and the consequential demand notice dated 22-07-2024videLr.No.SE/oP/B.Hills/SAo/JAo/F'DemandNotice/D.No.141l24 issued by the 4th respondent in pursuant to the said common order' as arbitrary' illegal, contrary to the provisions of the Electricity Act' 2003' Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulation' 2015 - Regulation No 2 of 2015, in violation of principles of natural iustice' besides beingviolativeofthepetitioner'srightsguaranteedunderArticlel4'19(1Xg)of the Constitution of lndia and consequently set-aside the Common Order passed by the 1st Respondent in O'P 76 and 77 of 201 5 dated 19'04 2024 as well as the demand noticedated 22-07 -2024 issued by the 4th respondent' IA NO: 10F 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supp6rt of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of Order dated 19 04'2024 issued by the 2nd Respondent in determiningCSSforFY20l5-16&2016-17(o1)bydirectingthe3rdRespondent nottotakeanycoercivestepsincludingthatofdisconnectionofpowersupplyto petitioner pursuant to the demand vide Lr'No SE/OP/B'Hills/SAO/JAO/ F'Demand Notice/D.No.141t24 daled 22-07-2024 issued by the 4th respondent' lt7 lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Between: C ha irma n a nd Ma na g i n g o i reiio i, rrrri ni'iJmbo-u'IJ, Hyoera oao.

1. The Southern power Dis]ribution Company Ltd., of Telangana, Rep bv its 2 The superintendino Fngineer,_operation, the southern power Distribution reran"sana" Lta 'ei[iir.ii,;rH ci[rJlEc c;id;t, Eft;i1tYi] 3 The senior -Accounts officer, fffi?Sillo"t the southern power Distribution fiillo#ilo" rerangana Lta, eihr,,.ai,iirl Cii.rEltis i"fi, E;il;",t'd"; : -operation, AND ...PET|T|ONERS 1' Greenpark Hoters and^ Resorts Ltd., (Formerry known as Diana Hoters Limited) 2nd Ftoor,. gprpgoj" bmt"l, ?_i_zd, ciilJ"lJ',,',1.I'"a"s,lrn0",, Hvderabad, reoresented ov its sLnioi'irilhager Legat and Admin, Sri Ven(ata Itrl'l.ylrlFeo Vemuri, s/6-.!a1;5; V V-s,iErlnrrnyam, ased 51 years, Rl/o 30 -26 s I 8 t7 o t 3, Road No. 4, Ceetani ga r, Ot J Sinig uJi, S;":r,;d" ;b#:' "' 2. The State Of Telangana,-[eO bV its principal Secretary, Energy Department, '' '- --virer \ Secretariat, Hyderabad, i.S.' t *:Ii's:fl?ti,:t* i:iiffi:',58?iis"" commission, rep' bv its secretary, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under section 'r 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim orders dated 06.09.2024 in wp. No. 24712 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI p.LAKSHMA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI A.SUDERSHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI P.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No.3 to 5: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT PETITtoN NO: 26197 0F 2024 Between: M/s. Kekule Pharma Ltd,. Reg. Off Door No. 8_3_680, LIC Colonv. Yellareddyguda, Hyderabad, 1_dtaru1nq-:s"oO' dig. Represented bv iis Generar Manaser sri.G.Rania r<,.isr,ii sl".k"i"#;; Fi;5' ri;r'i'',ij itl,un'i 1t8 MlA, Khazipally Village, Jinnaram Mandal' Sangareddy District' Telangana H.T. SC. NO. SGR.491 ...PETITIONER AND 1 2 Ie,J3:?S,i''f,1ff :'l:-ffi"'rY,13:flr3"'##31?3i,?331)"'ll-i"f i'YIil"?* Secretary Southern Distribution Company of Telangana. 6i";;.' i";i;;i -5e"retatiat, Khairatabad' Hvd HJb. uv lti Chiirman and lvlanaging Director Limited. TGSPDCL CorPorate eiJoaa, Telangana '50o o22'

3. The SuPerintending Engineer, Telangana TGSPDCL, OPeration Circle, SangareddY, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or orders or writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 1st Respondent in passing the lmpugned Order dated 19'O4'2024' purported to be exercising powers UiSecs. 39(2xdxii), a0(c)(ii) and 42(2) of the Electricity Act' 2003 (Act' 2003) and determining the Cross Subsidy Surcharge (CSS) for the FY 2015-16' to be recovered from the consumers who availed power supply through open access andtheconsequentialactionofthe3rdRespondentinlevyinganddemanding surcharge/interest vide Lr'No SE/OP/SRD/SAO/AAO-HT/JAO/D'No 28Ol24'dl' 25.06.2o24ontherecoveryofCSSprospective|y,asillegal,arbitrary'contraryto the provisions of the Electricity Act' 2003' contrary to Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulation' 2015 - Regulation No. 2 of 2015, in violation of principles of natural justice' besides being violative of the petitioner,s rights guaranteed under Articre ia, 19(1xg) of the constitution of lndia lA NO: 1 oF 2024 Petition under Section '1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of Order dated 19 04'2024 issued by the 1st Respondent in determiningCSSforFY20't5-l6andtofurtherdirectthe3rdRespondentnotto takeamcoerciveStepsincludingthatofdisconnectionofpowersupplypursuant 119 to the demand vide Lr.No.SE/OP/SRD/SAO/AAO-HT/JAO/D.No.280124.dt 25.06.2024. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Between:

1. Southern Distribution Company of Telangana Limited, TGSPDCL Corporate Office, Central Secretariat, Khairatabad, Hyderabad, Telangana -5O0 022. Rep. by its Chairman and fvlanaging Director

2. The Superintending Engineer, TGSPDCL, Operation Circle, Sangareddy, Telangana ...PETITIONERS AND 1 M/s. Kekule Pharma Ltd, Reg. Off Door No. 8-3-680, LIC Colony, Yellareddyguda, Hyderabad, Telangana -500 073. Represented by its General Manager Sri.G.Rama Krishna S/o.Koteswara Rao Having its Unit IVllA, Khazipally Village, Jinnaram Mandal, Sangareddy District, Telangana H.T. SC. No. SGR-491

2. Telangana Electricity Regulatory Commission, Door No 'l 1-4-660, Vth Floor, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana- 500 004. Rep. by its Secretary ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders daled 21 .09.2024 in lA.No.O1 OF 2024 lN WP. No. 26197 ol 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI DEEPAK CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI P.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel forthe Respondent No.2 & 3: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT PETITION NO: 27694OF 2024 Between: M/s. Neuland Laboratories Limited, Rep. by its Authorized Signatory G. Rama Krishna Rao, S/o G. Subba Rao Aged about 64 years, P/o. PIot No. 5734- 111, 11th Floor, 5th Office Level. Phoenix IW building, Poad No. 82, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500033. ...PETITIONER AND * 120 2 1 Telanoana State Electricity Regulatory Floor,-Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills' Hydera Southern Distribution Company of Telangana Limited TSSPDCL Corporate office. centrat Secretariai] kr,iirjtuuJd, Hyteraoao-s00022. Rep.by its Chairman and Managing Director The Superintending Engineer, Operation Circle, TGSPDCL' Sangareddy Commission, H.No.11-4-660, sth bad-500004, T.S J ...RESPONDENTS P€tition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith'theHighCourtmaybe pleased to pass an order or orders or writ or direction more particularly one in the natureofWritofMandamusdeclaring'theactionoflstRespondentinpassing the lmpugned Order dated 1g.O4 2024 purported to be exercising powers U/Secs. 39(2)(d)(ii), 40(c)(ii) and 42(2) of the Electricitv Act' 2003 (Act' 2003) and determining the Cross Subsidy Surcharge(CSS) for the FY 2015-16' to be recovered from the consumers who availed power supply through open access and the consequential action of the 3rd Respondent in levying and demanding Surcharge/interestvideLr.No.SEioP/SRD/SAo/AAo-HT/JAo/D.No.276124' dated25.06.2024,ontherecoveryofcsSprospectively,asillegal,arbitrary' contrary to the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003' contrary to Telangana StateElectricityRegulatoryCommission(ConductofBusiness)Regulation'2015 -RegulationNo.2of2015,inviolationofprinciplesofnaturaljustice'besides being violative of the petitioner's rights guaranteed under Article 1a' 19(1Xg) of the Constitution of lndia. lA NO: 1 oF 2024 PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in suFport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of Order.dated 19'O4 2024 issued by the 1st Respondent in determiningCSSforFY20l5-l6andtofurtherdirectthe3rdRespondentnotto take any coercive steps including that of disconnection of power supply pursuant tothedemandvideLr.No.sE/oP/sRD/SAO/AAO-HT/.JAO/D.No.276124,dated

25.06.2024 121 IA NO: 20F 2024 Between:

1. Southem Distribution C 3[f,il,*ifu"t janiffi #,J,:,il;: ii,:'J:i;:a l33[,?!'*?ilBi,il3

2. The Superintending Engineer, Operation Circle, TGSpDCL, Sangareddy. AND 1 2 ...PETITIONERS #iri"-*'.?3"61'Ur'r:'E::'tESS,'J"'4il'[:.,=:."%:E8fl*tTi&: 111' 11th Froor. Sth office Levei pri,i,l.il"rw EJirii"t, poad No. 82, Jubiree Hills, Hyderabad-500033. Ifl siKl3",'"'flBn5,f".,?['fl Yofi fi 3fJEy,."o"""flJBBBb"{,rt*",1-4-660,5th ...RESPONDENTS Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim orders dated 04.10.2024 in Wp. No 27694 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. Counsel for the petitioner: SRI KOKA SAWANARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI p.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT PETITION NO:2775 6 0F 2024 Between: [ikl":Il"il"i:.ffi g"!:!*ll,[ii,i#:,fr,rft ',+];!'Ira#'^* AND

1. Telangana State Southern ioygr. Distribution Company Htde;o'iiil"'iiljp."[v it. compound, secretariat Road, Managing Director. - ...PETITIONER Limited, Chairman Mint 3xffi,liltE l,.i[sr otJ,n t?"J;, 3f,i'?,.,?j,, & ;.1"' B a nj a ra H i,s, TG S p DC L, crs t22 ..RESPONDENTS PetitionunderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or orders or writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the action of Respondents in issuing demands for payment of cross Subsidy surcharge (css) for the FY 2015-16 and FirstQuarterofFY2016-17videLr.No.SE/oPiB'Hills/SAO/JAo/HT/F.Demand Notice/D.No. 142t24, dl 22'07'2024' issued by the rd Respondent' purported to be based on the Tariff Order dt' 19 04 '2024 issued by the Telangana Electricity Regulatory Commission determining the CSS for FY 2015-16' as arbitrary' illegal, contrary to the Judgement dl' 19 J22023 of this Honourable Court in W.P.No. 149 t 8 of 2006 and batch' provisions of the Electricity Act' 2003' besides being violative of the petitioner's rights guaranteed under Article 14' r 9(r ) (g) of the Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the same' lA NO: 1 OF 2024 petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to take any coercive steps including that of disconnection of power supply pursuant to the demand notice vide Lr'No' SE/OP/B 'HiIIs/SAO/JAO/HT/F' Demand Notice/D'No '142124' dl 22'07 2024 issued bY the 2nd ResPondent' IA NO: 20F 2024 Between: 1 . Telanqana State Southern Power. Distribution Company Limited' Mint comoound, s""r"tii[i"i'ori,"lvo"-*"oid,-'R"p by' its' chairman and Maniging Director' 2 SLroerintendinq Engineer, Operation Circle' Banjara Hills' TGSPDCL' GTS - -oiony, Erragadda, Hyderabad' lelangana AND Ir//s. TAJ GVK Hotels and Resorts Ltd, Unit llolel Tai Krishna' Dr'No 6-3- 24st1o,Road No r, erniar"'HliiJ, Hv@"q;d.retangaria - 500 034 Rep' bv its CFo and companv $#E'v;'S;i-J' srinivasi Murthy With Service Connection No. BJH-108. ...PETITIONERS t23 ...RESPONDENT Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim orders dated 04.10.2024 in wp. No. 27756 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner; Ms. CHALLA K|RANMAYEE, REp. FOR M/s. CKR ASSOCTATES Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDy, SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT PETITION NO:27875 0F 2024 Between: M/s- lndira Constructions, Having its office at Door No. 6_3_251, GVK One Mall, Road No.1. Baniara Hills, H-yoerauio _ sboi"i+,'i"ri"s;;'n"p. tiii, r,tu n rr prasfiant 35*",:,,.ft1^.6r#l3y"#I"fl lXi ;:rtjfr+rSA^ril'bro AND ...PETITIONER 1 Telangana_9tate Electricity^ Regulatory Commission, Regd. Niyantran Bhavan, G.T. S.'Coton"y, ki li,rn r.tiglil'"rila"rad"o Telangana Rep. by its Secretary - Telangana_ State Southern power Distribution Company Limited, compound, secretariat Road, Htdei;b;J,-'ilp.-6y' itr, ctJiirii] Managing Director. ' 2 Off. Vidyut - 500 045, l\/int ' 3:r"",1il 93i [L% 5xg] i-,TJb 3ffi: +"J, fJ',"I? B a n ja ra H i I I s, rG s p D c L' Grs ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in*the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an order or.orders or writ or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ oi Mandamus decraring the action of 1St Respondent in passing the lmpugned order dt. 1sto4t2o24 in o.p. 76 and77 of 2015, determining the Cross Subsidy Surcharge (CSS ), purported to be exercising powers under Sections 39(2XdXii), a0 (cXii) and 42(2) of the Etectricity Act, 2003 ( Act, 2003 ) for the FY 2015-16 to be recovered from the consumers who avaired power supply through open access, and the consequential action of the 3rd Respondent 124 payment of CSS vide Lr'No SE/OP/B' issuing demand for NoticeiD.No.152124, dl 22tO7l2O24' as arbitrary' Hills/SAO/JAO/HT/Demand illegal, contrary to Andhra Pradesh Solar Power Policy' 2012' orders issued by Telangana Electricity Regulatory Commission ( TGERC )' provisions under Telangana Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulation' 2015 - Regulation No 2 of 2015, the provisions of the Electricity Act' 2003' in violationofprinciplesofnaturaljustice,besidesbeingviolativeofthepetitioner,s rights guaranteed under Article 1 4' 19(1 Xg) of the Constrtution of lndia and consequently set aside the same' lA NO: 1 oF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated petition' the High Court may be pleased to in the affidavit filed in support of .the stay the operation of Order dt 1gt)4l2)24 issued by the 1st Respondent in determiningCSSforFY20l5-'l6andtofurtherdirectthe3rdRespondentnotto takeanycoercivestepsincludingthatofdisconnectionofpowersupplypursuant tothedemandvideLr.No.SE/oP/B'Hills/SAo/JAo/HT/Demand Notice/D. No. 1 5 2t 24, dl. 22107 12024' IA NO :2OF 2O24 Between:

1. Telanqana State Southern Power. Distribution Company ' a;;;%;;;, -s"J'a"iri n"ad,- Hvderabad' Rep' bv its Limited, Chairman Mint Managing Director. Suoerintendinq Engineer, Operatior-r Circle' Banjara Hills' TGSPDCL' GTS Coiony, Yousulguda, Hyderabad, I elangana ...PETITIONERS ttl/s. lndira Constructions, Having its office at-Do^or.No 6-3-251' GVK One tvlall. Road No.1, Banjara HilL,"H'yA;r;b;d - 500 034' Telanoana Rep bv its Authorized siqnatory, rvrt.'liiJr''Fiilfiil 5?;"1"' 5lo Laie Mr' Prashant ijriiir"lwtn strvice Connection No BJH-1262 IiJSl?,:l"i:x"""T$:5"1"""T"?t:'i1""flr,""",fl ui?:",lid#:85d9toou',SlHl Telangana ReP. bY its Secretary ...RESPONDENTS 2 AND 1 2 125 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim orders dated 04.10.2024 in wp. No.27875 0f 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. Counsel for the petitioner: M/s. CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI p.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDD', SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT PETITION NO:279120F 2024 Between: Hili,"tr"ry,lff i*18:lTii{!5*i?55,:ds!':Aff 'tii,,T"313"J* Secretary, Sri J. Sriniv"asr-Murthy viiin s'".rice Connecrion No. ;j,lEBB, AND 1 2 ...PETITIONER Telangana State Southern poygr. Distribution Company Compound, Secretariar noaO, HyOeraOi.j,-'ii"p."[V it. Managing Director. Limited, Chairma n Mint 3 3t"'liltE l,.', J3. o=i,n lr%Ti, fff '?[?i,, 3 l']" B a n ja ra H i I I s, rG S p D c L, G rs ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 0t the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an order or orders or writ or direction more particurarry one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondents in issuing demands for payment of tross Subsidy surcharge (cSS) for the Fy 201 5-16 and First Quarter of Fy 2016-17'vide Lr.No. sE/op/B'Hi*s/ sAo/JAo/HT/F. Demand Notice/D No. 138t24' dt.22-07.2024, issued by the 2nd Respondent, purported to be based on the Tariff Order dt. 19.04.2024 issued by the Telangana Electricity Regulatory commission determining the cSS for Fy 201 5-16, as arbitrary, illegar' contrary to the Judgem ent dt. 19.12.2023 of this Honbre court in w P'No' 14918 0f 2006 and batch, provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, t26 besides being violative of thl petitioners rights guaranteed under Article 14' 19(1Xg) of the Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the same' lA NO: 1 oF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated t filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to including that of take anY coercive stePs notice vide Lr.No. pursuant to the demand dt. 22.07.2024 not to supplY Notice/D.No.13B/24, in the affidavi direct the ResPondents disconnection of Power SE/OP/B'Hills/SAO/JAO/HT/F Demand issued bY the 2nd Respondent' IA NO: 2 oF 2024 Between:

1. Telanqana State Southern Power. Distribution Company Limited' Mint uv' its' Chairman and comobund, s".r."tiili""no'a'-'Hvo"i'i''o' ndp Managing Director'

2. Suoerintending Engineer' Operltion Circle' Banjara Hills' TGSPDCL' GTS ' 6;ffi;:'E;..;gSooalHYce"bad' relangana - ...PETITIONERS AND fvl/s. TAJ GVK Hotels and. Resorts Ltd ' Unit Hotel-Taj Baniara' Road No 13' Hih?'r"Ns,,*[l;"3e.i;#[#^,;:nl*X*:s:ff ;"0[JL'"f"[3"1[1 BJH-oso' "'RESP.NDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 04 10 2024 in WP No 27912 of 2024 and dismiss the writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms' CHALLA KIRANMAYEE' REP' FOR M/s. CKR ASSOCTATES Counsel for the Respondents: SRI N'SREEDHAR REDDY' SC FOR TGSPDCL 121 WRIT PETITI oN NO:2792 5 0F 2024 Between: M/sapollo Hospitals Enterprise Limited, having its Business Address at Road No.72 opp. Bhirativa viova ehava; s;h"",'iidi[Jiiirr., ii i;;;ffi ri;il; its Authorised Signalory M;. B. Bhaakar ReaOv. '""- ' AND ...PETITIONER 1 2 3 Telangana State Electricity Reg-ulatory Commission, Door No 1.1_4_660, Vth Floor, Sinqareni Bhavan n'eo Hirrs, Hy'dt;b;J,"i;i;gana _ sbo 004 fi;p.'d; its Secretary. Southern Distribution comoany of rerangana Limited, TSSPDCL corporate office, centrar Secretariat krriiraiaoaa, i'vo"irEl,i,'i"ur"ngrn, soo-o2iiiEp] by its Chairman Managing Director The Superintendino Enoineer, TGSpDCL, Operation Circle, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 ot the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an order or orders or writ or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the action of 1st Respondent in passing the lmpugned order dated 19.o4.2024, purported to be exercising powers U/secs. 39(2)(d)(ii), ao(c)(ii) and 42(2) of the Erectricity Act, 2003 (Act, 2003) and determining the Cross Subsidy Surcharge (CSS) for the Fy 201S_16, to be recovered from the consumers who availed power supply through open access and the consequentiar action of the 3rd Respondent in revying and demanding surcharge/ interest vide Lr.No.SE/op/B'Hilrs/sAorJAorHTrF. Demand Notice D No 14ol24' dated 22.07.2024 as iilegar, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, contrary to Telangana State Electricity Regulatory commission (conduct of Business) Reguration, 20'r5 - Reguration No. 2 of 2o1s, in violation of principres 6f naturar justice, besides being viorative of the petitioner's rights guaranteed under Articre 1 4, 19(1 xg) of the constitution of lndia and consequenfly set aside the same. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 1s'r cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to r28 stay the operation of Order dated 19'04'2024 issued by the 1St Respondent in determining CSS for FY 2015-16 and to further direct the 3rd Respondent not to take any coercive steps including that of disconnection of power supply pursuant to the demand vide Lr'No SE/OP/B'Hills/SAO/JAO/HT/F'Demand D.No.140/24, daled22 07 2024' Notice/ tANO:2 OF 2024 B"T"::r,h",nDistribution.c."f ,93ly-:lJ:l'L?,1:?,h'#ttt,J"t"?lr'3b.%"#?l3il office. Central Secre ;';'i6bh;iiil" Manasing Director

2. The Superintending Engineer' TGSPDCL' Operation Circle' Banjara Hills' Hyderabad AND 1 2 .,.PETITIONERS 11:""",,4ff Bi il!'#ls"iilf ltffi s'J''trfiBLi#i""s,"A*'t?i;1t3''iir':'':fi i";$f sff1,"Sr"';ff $"'g"f lq,',1:1:i,i:s:tTllli&?l"i%Jla';'gb"Jl its Secretary' "'RESP.NDENTS Petition under Section '1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 04 10 2024 in WP No' 27925 oI 2024 and dismiss the writ Petition' Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s' INDUS LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondeirt No'1: SRI P'PRASAD' SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the ResPondent No'2 & 3 SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY' SC FOR TGSPDCL WRIT P ETITION NO: 32615 oF 2024 ""*"i;: vijav lron Foundry Private Ltd ' (SGR-922).Plot No 8-6211 ' s No 17l-172', IDA Bollaram, uangj,"ddy oistriit,. rep. uy its.*rrlriniging Director, Suresh Singhal 129 ...PETITIONER AND 1 2 3 4 5 The Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission, rep. by its Secretary, Red Hills, Hyderabad, Tetangaha Siate. ' The southern Power Distribution company of reranoana Limited, rep. bv its 3,1:iI-". a nd Ma nas i ng Di recto r, Mifi i iorpo, nu:iift ,ilil;;,' i;Hsr, ;: The superintending Enoineer,. operation, the southem power Distribution n, or re ta ns"a na [im ited, S; ;#a'd i:' srft ;;;ad y ott,i"t, T"i"'" g JX;, SgH" The senior Accounts officer, o-peration, the Southern power Distribution Company of Tetangana Limiteii, Sangaredot,'b*giiliov o6tritt, T"i:rrdJ.i' The State of Telanoana. rep. by its prl. Secretary, Energy Department, Telangana Secretaria"t, UyberaOaOl ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the order dated 19.04.2024 in o.p. No. 76i2015 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent is highry iflega y, arbitrary' unjust, irrationar, without jurisdiction and contrary to the principres of Natural Justice apart from being violative of Articles 14, 1g(1)(g), 21, 265 and 3004 of the constitution of rndia and consequenfly set aside the same in so far as the petitioner is concerned. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 15r cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 19.o4.2024 in o.p. No. 7612015 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the 2nd respondent incruding disconnection of petitioner's power suppry pending disposar of the above writ petition. 130 lA NO: 2 oF 2024 Between:

1. The Southern Power Distribution Cqq'lpgtly of Telanoana Limited' rep' by its chairman and tvtanaffi ' 5i;;i;; Mi;t- dompouno'- Hvderabad' Telangana 2. The Superintending Engineer' Operation'. the Southern Power Distribution companv ot retangaria'Iiil:tt;a' E;;g;'A'dv' sangareddv District' Telangana State. State. 3 r he s e n io r A"eo' ",T, ?l;:?Ji, ?t ?-ii..?t. ll "r,??'"*?'.& B"'S,.", J,, ? # :U :: : ComPanY of Telang: State ...PETITIONERS AND 1 2 3 lgiU's,t',',"#,'3:lty,IJtf'Blllal',3X Singhal The Telanqana state Electricity Regulatory commission' rep by its secretary' "7],3'"^l)":3;u;'l''?)3;l'J;lJ3; nli irirri, "nvaerabad, Telangana state' The State of Telangana, rep by its Prl secretary' Energy Department' i;t"fi; Secretariat, HYderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 21 11.2024 in WP'No 3261 5 of 2024 and dismiss the writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT K'JAYASREE Counsel forthe Respondent No'1: SRI P'PRASAD' SC FOR TGERC counsel for the Respondent No'2 to a: sru ru'sf;reisoltff-neoov' Counsel for the Respondent No'5: SRI A'SUDERSHAN REDDY' EOVOCITE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY WRIT PET ITION NO :4466 oF 2025 Between: A Comoanv reqistered under M/s. Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages P..\i( Ltq I the companies act, r55oI lio-ni"urg its registered office'at s9'1, Mayapuri tndustrial nrea, pnasEli'r'fl'i odrni: ito "oO+, And local office-at.44-69' " o+6l" ter;;s';;'' Rep bv its Authorised Mouliali, uyoeranai" soo 131 representative Facto_ry Manager Mr. Kasaraneni S rinivasa Rao,S/o K. Laxman Ilo.,. 4S9_d about 55 years, Fl/o _710, A-Block. Mayfair Aiartments, 27_ 1/SJ/504/R555, Osman Nagar Road, Opp. tnfiniti- Hor;;sl -i;[;p,;r, Sangareddy - 502032. ...PETITIONER AND 1 Telangana Singareni Secretary, _State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad 500 004, 11-4-660, Sth Floor, Represented by its

2. Southern Power Distribrtion Company of Telangana Ltd, Mint Compound, Hyderabad. Rep. by its Chairman ahd Managing D'irector.

3. Northern Power Distribution _Company of Telangana Ltd, Vidyut Bhavan, Nakkalagufta, Hanamakonda, Waranag'al, Rep. byits Cnairman iirO Dire;tor ' 4. Superintending Engineer, Southern power Distribution Comoanv of Ielangana Ltd.. Operation, Habsiguda Circle, Uppal. Hyderabad 5 I!: Slale pf Telangana,.Rep. by its prt. Secretary, Energy Department, I elangana Secretariat, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the order dated 19.04t2024 in o.p.No.76/2015 and 7712015 passed by the 1st Respondent commission and the subsequent demand notice bearing Lr.No. sE/op/HBG/SAO/AAO-HT/JAO/HT/D.No.284t24 dated 16.07.2024 issued by the 4th Respondent as illegal, arbitrary, irrational and without jurisdiction and conlrary to the principles of natural justice apart from being violative of Article 1a, 19(1Xg), 21 , 26s, 300A of the constitution of tndia and consequently set-aside the order dated 19.04.2024 in o.p.No .76t2015 and 7712015 passed by the '1st Respondent commission and the subsequent demand notice bearing Lr.No SE/op/HBG/SAO/AAO-HT/JAO/HTiD.No.284124 dated 16.07.2024 issued by tne +tn Respondent. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in ihe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay the operation of the demand notice bearing Lr.No. SE/op/HBG/sAo/AAo- t32 HT/JAO/HT/D.No.284124 dated ',t6.07.2024 issued by the 4th Respondent pending disposal of the present writ petition in the interest of justice IANO:2OF 2O25 Between: 1 Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Ltd, Mint Compound, *yderabad. Rep. by its Chairman and ltrlanaging Director' Suoerintendinq Enqineer, Southern Power Distribution .Company of ietl"grniLtO:. Opeiation, Habsiguda Circle, Uppal. Hyderabad ...PETITIONERS M/s. Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages P\d. Ltd., A ComPany registered under the Comoanies Act, 1956, And having its registered ottice at u 91' Mayap-u-n il;r;iri;[Ar*, ptiase-t, New Delhir 110 664, And local office at 44-69, - soo 040, Telangana, Rep bv its Authorised ivi"riiJril nWiraoau reoresehtative Factory Manager [\Ir.Kasaraneni Srinivasa Rao,S/o K Laxman n-i.-7oJrj iooui s5 vearsl F:/o 710, A-Block. Mayfair Apartmelts-, 27- iiSllsoilnsss, osman Nagar Road, opp lnfiniti Homes. lellapur, Sangareddy - 502032. Telanqana State Electricity Regulatory Commission, 1 '1-4-660, 5th Floor' sffi;i;;i- ahivan, Red Hills, iyderSoad 500 004. Represented bv its Secretary, Northern Power Distribution Company of Telangana. Ltd, Vidyut qhavan, f.iif<f<lf jguti, Hanamakonda, Waranagal, Rep. by its Chairman and Director The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Prl- Secretary, Energy Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS 2 AND

1. 2 3 4 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the order dated 14.2.2025 passed in l.A.No. 1 of 2025 in w.P.No. 4466 of 2025, by dismissing the above writ petition, with costs, in the interests of justice. COUNSCI fOr thE PEtitiONET:,SRI M.S.SRINIVASA IYENGAR, ST' COUNSEL, REP' FOR SRI HIRENDERNATH Counsel for the Respondent No.'l: SRt P.PRASAD, SC FOR TGERC Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: SRI N.SREEOHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI A.SUDERSHAN REODY, ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY 133 WRIT PETITION NO: 4468 OF 2025 Between: M/s. Hindustan coca_-cola Beverages pvt. Ltd, A company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, And haVing its resGtered offi." it riitil naivlirri lndus]rial Area, phase_{, New Dethi_ rio oo+iAno lo";i ;i+;; , D'-i,'3ii;y No. 1 69, l nd ustriar Est_ate, Ame_en pu r Vi r ia ge, ijriancne * rrrri Sr-"binjilv District. Telanoena 502319 Telinqana,"AuthonseO representative Factory Manager,MrXisaranenJ Srintvr* R;;, S/;K-"Lr*rrn Rao, Aged about 55 years, _R/o 710, A-Btock, Mayfair Apartments, 27_1iSJ/SOaln"SSSl-OJman Nagar Road, Opp. tnfiniti Homel, Teilapur, SjngireOAy _ 5OiO'52""-' -"" '' "or'r, ..PETITIONER AND

1. 2 3 4 5 11-4-660, 5th Ftoor, Represented by its €tate Electricity Regulatory Commission, Bhavan, Red Hitts, Hyderabad 500 004, Telangana Singareni Secretary, southern Power Distribution company, of rerangana Ltd, Mint compound, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Chairman aha Managin[O]o"tor. Northem Power Distribution .Company. oI Telangana Ltd, Vidyut Bhavan, Nakkalagutta, Hanamakonda, waranag'ar, nep. uviti cnairman iiro'oitector." Southern power Distribution Company of Superintending lelangana Ltd., Operation Circle, TGSpDCL, Sangareddy. The State of Tetanoana Rep. by its prl. Secretary, Energy Department, Telangana Secretaria"t, HyOera'Uad-.' ^Engineer,- ' ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 of rhe constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the order dared19to4l2o24 in o.p.No.76/20.15 and passed by the 1st Respondent Commission and the subsequent 77t2015 notice bearing Lr. No. sE/op/sRD/sAo/AAo-HTiJAotD.No.3TOt24 demand dated 2510712024 issued- by the 4th Respondent as illegal, arbitrary, irrational and without jurisdiction and contrary to the principles of natural justice apart from being violative of Article 1a, 19(ixg), 21 ,26s,3ooA of the constitution of tndia and consequently selaside the order dated 19t0412024 in o.p.No.7612o15 and 7712015 passed by the 1st Respondent commission and the subsequent demand notice bearing Lr. No. sE/op/sRD/sAoiAAo-HriJAotD.No.3z0t24 dated 2510712024 issued by the 4th Respondent. t34 IA NO: 10F 2025 Petition under Sectlon 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated intheaffidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,theHighcourtmaybepleasedto stay the operation of the demand notice bearing Lr' No SE/OP/SRD/SAO/AAO- HT/JAO/D.No.37Ol24 daled 25'07 '2024 issued by the 4th Respondent pending disposal of the present writ petition in the interest of iustice' IA NO :2OF 2025 Between:

1. Southern Power Distribution Company. of Telangana Ltd' Mint Compound' ' Hvilirijro' nep. by its Chairman ahd Managing Director' 2. Suoerintending Enqineer, Southern fowqr Distribution Company of ' Y;ffis;;;-Liol, op"iation bircle, TGSPDCL' sangareddv ...PETITIONERS AND 1 2 3 4 M/s. Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages P\'/'t Ltd' A Comnanv reoistered under 'at B-91, Mayapuri the companies Act, 1956, ffii h;vi";'iti'iegidtereo offlce H;trili-ft"r" Fnuse-r, r.re* o"rnf rio 064;And local office at ' D-2' survey i.#i"6'9:i;ifii.ili Eii-"i", aii"znprr vilrse, i,atancheru Mandal, sans_areddy iitil'[i,' T;;;;;;;-btzb-1 s Tei5ng'ni, "Authorised reoresentative Factory firanaoer Mr.Kasaranent tini,Jl]''nlo,'s/o k laxman iiao' Ag-ed about 55 ;;:;:i/;' ;iil-n-elo"k,'rvrivt,i' Apirtments' 27 -1 ts rt 504tR555' osman il"rffii i;;,'of,b.'rniiiiti Homet', Tellapur, sangareddv -- 5o2o32 Telanoana State Electricitv Regulatory Commissio-n 1 1-4-660' sth Floor' iru;Y;;i B"h;;;":'Fa- iiirr.*'rivoJ'6uad 500 004' Represented bv its Secretary, Northern Power Distribution company of Telangan-a Ltd, VidyutShavan, ii&ii'iil,itt-r, Hanlmll[onir, wi|.ahis'at, Rep bvits chairman and Director' The state of Telangana, Rep by its Prl. Secretary, Energy Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS PetitionUnderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in suppJrt of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the order dated 14.2.2025 passed in l'A'No 1 of 2025 in W.P No 4468 of 2025, by dismissing the above writ petition, with costs' in the interests of iustice' CounselforthePetitioner:SRIM.S'SRINIVASAIYENGAR'Sr'COUNSEL'REP' FOR SRI HIRENDERNATH Counsel for the Respondent No'1: SRI P'PRASAD' SC FOR TGERC 135 Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel for the Respondent No.S: SRI A.SUDERSHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY WRIT PETITI ON NO: 138 83 0F 2025 Between:

1. M/s Bhavana power _pvt. Ltd., Obulapur . Village, Utkur f\rtandal, yr3;l"r??"rnrr District, reranganJ btat"li.#ov its rrrriiZge;Ait",r,"t!jIrr.: 2. lV/s NBTR Memoriat 91"qt Foundation and Research.Certer, (BJH_698). Road No. 14. Baniara Hiils, HvdeiibaJ-i+lr"i.'uv its chief Finaniiar officer, Alwar Narayanan. ' AND ...PETITIONERS

1. The Telangana State Electricity^ legulatoV Commission, rep. Vidyut Niyanrrana Bhavan, Gsi"-C"lo,iv, livdli"'rjlo_soo State. by its Secretarv. 045, Telangan'a 2 The southern power Distribution company of rerangana Govt., Limited . reo. by its chairman and Manasins-DiI;;iU' Ml;i -C;;fi;l;,-riii?;ti55: Telangana State.

3. The superintendino Fngineer, operation, the southern power Distribution compariy of retan6ana bo"t.' Liriitui,'6is' i"riit, r;;;sr;;;: fififfi;Xl Telangana State. " 4 The Senior Accounts officer,. operation, the Southern power Distribulion company of Tetanoana eovt.' t_irfriGJ, cfs"c"#;, Erilsrd,ir, H-yd";riH: Telangana State. - 5. The State of Telanoana, rep. by its prl. Secretary, Energy (RES_A1) Department, Telangani Se'crei5ria['Hv]"rruiol""' ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 of rhe constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in-, the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring notice in Letter No. sE/opiB'HILLS/SAOiJAO/HT_ ll/D.No.470, dated 24.03.2025 of the 3rd respondent as highry iilegar, arbitrary, unjust' irrational, void and arso viorative of the petitioner,s rights guaranteed under Articles 1a, i 9(i )(g) 21 , 26s and 300-4 of the constitution of lndia and consequently, set aside the same 136 lA NO: 1 oF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant SEiOP/B'HILLS/SAO/JAO/HT-ll/D No 470' respondent including disconnection of power supply of the 2ncl petitioner pending disposal of the writ Petition' to the notice in Letter dated 24.03.2025 of the No. 3rd IA NO: 20F 2025 Between: '1 . The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telanoana Govt ' Limited ' rep' bv its chairmrn uni'"'rt'rZiu!i;;"DG;i".' Mint tompound' Hvderabad' T'elangana State. 2. The Superintending Engineer, Operationr^the Southern Power Distribution company ot retangan'a %tV" Li"ilt"i' cts Cotonv' Erragadd a' Hvderabad' Telangana State. 3- The Senior Accounts Officer' Operation' ^the Southern Power Distribution company ot relangi"nJilitt' Ll"inlo' cts- cotonv' Erragadda' Hvd erabad' Telangana State. ...PETITIONERS AND 1 2 3 IVI/s Bhavana Power PVt. Ltd., obulapur .. Villaoe. Utkur l\ilandal, iiLi,fJ;il:;; r o iiiirii, r;6;s;;' btai"l iil ov its M a"nase r (Acco u nts ), M r. P. Prasad. lril/s NBTR Memorial Cancer Foundation and Res.earch Center' (BJH-698)' Road No. 14, Baniara nilrs,'iviEilf:at-a+,1"p' ov its chief Finaniial officer' Alwar NaraYanan. -tsi"Jxl3K:"fi T"?33,ia-,iio3I'1"T31,"J3fl; I[eyJ,"'il]ysL?f#'?F:",?ff State. 4 The State of Telangana' Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad. rep. bY its Prl. Secretary, Energy (RES-A1) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacatetheinterimorderdated0l.05'2025inl.A.No.1ol2025inW.P.No.13883 ...RESPONDENTS of 2025. Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT K'JAYASREE 137 counser for the Respondent No.1: sRr p.PRASAD, sc FoR TcERc counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: sRr N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel for the Respondent No.S: SRI A.SUDERSHAN REDDy, ADVOCATE GENERAL / GP FOR ENERGY The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA 1311 't- t3 119 t4 51 7 4l 1 1 7S o 45 183 247 L2 t7 7a . ta7 26 N o. t22 13 .13 4t s2 7

7. 13 1 1 21'l 2A- I 1 1 1 11 5 1 7 674 1 1 IID .13 I 1 1 1 |n 48 1 .1 a1 368 4- 15 15 1 t7 1 1 a 42 .1875 27 a1 1 77 I 1 1 1 193 12. 19474. 2055 1. 21662.2 4520 '18 F 6 a 1 a3 COMMON ORDER: Heard Sri D' V Nagarjuna Babu' letrrned Senior Counsel on behalf of Sri G' Ckraucira Shekar Rao' Sri M P Chandra Mou1i, learned Senior Counsel on behalf of Sri tr' Ganesh and Sri Ch Satyasadhan ' Sri M'S- Srinivasa Iyengar' learned Senior- Counsel for Sri Hirendernath' Ms Challa Kiranmayee , counsel repre sentirrg i'vI/ s CI(R Associates' learned cor-rnscl lor petitioners and Sri A Sirdershan Reddy' learned Advttcate General, Sri P' Prasaci' l':arned Standing Counsel for TGERC and Sri N. Sreedhar Reddly, Iearned Standing Counsel for TGSPDCL Having considered the respective submissions and 2. perused the record, it may be ncted that the in-rpugned order dated 19.04 2024 passed by the l't respondent-State Electricity Regulatory Commission in O'P'No'76 and 77 of 2O 15' t ,t I 2 determining the Cross Subsidy Surcharge (CSS) for F inancial Year 2O15 16 at Rs.1.32 per unit (33 Iq and Rs.0.94 per Unit (132 KV), despite the 2nd respondent's proposal of Rs.O.3O and Rs.O.11 per Unit, respectively; is challenged on the ground of jurisdiction, contending that the Commission has no h jurisdiction to formulate its own proposal, the Commission failed to follow due p.o.."". acted contrary to thc orders of remand of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and also violated the principles of natural justice. The said contention is controverted by Respondents 1 to 4 contending that they complied wirh the orders of the Hon'ble Suprerne Court, in that the Authorities issued draft proposals, held pr-rblic hearings, and that petitioner has an alternative remedy before the Appellate Tribunal for trlectricity under Section 1 1 1 of the trlectricity Act, 2OO3.

3. It is relevant to note, at this juncture, that under Section 62 ol tlrre Act, the Clommissioh alone may determine tariff, including CSS and Section 111 provides an Appeal to Appellate Tribunal against such orders. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in PTC India,Ltd.'s case (supra) held that tarilf fixation is a quasi-legisiative/ technical function vested in specialized regulatory bodies and that Courts should discourage bypassing L I, \ \ { l Petitions. Likewrse, rn of statutory remedies through Writ u. Sci RPPr, the Courl Transmission CorPoration o;f A'P' emphasized that judicial review of tariff decisions is limited and the Courts would not interfere unless the impugnr:d action of ,t theCommissionisarbitrary,illegalorcontrarytothr:Act. Though rn Mafatlal Industries Ltd' a' llnion of

4. India2,Whirlpoolcofpordtiona.Registro:foJTradeMarks, Industrial Consumers' Association u' KSERC' it was held that there is no bar to entertain a Writ Petition under Article 226 despite exlstence of an alternative remedy' it may be noted thatnatureofgrievanceespousedplaysapil.otalrolein exercising writ jurisdrction despite availability of alternative remedY 5 At this juncture, it is reievant to note Linat it Jaipur MB Power (Madhga Supreme Court had Vidgut Vitran Nigam Limited vs' Pradesh) Limiteds, the Hon'ble categoricalLY held as follows:

128. We find that th'e High Court u)os n'ot " justified in entertaining tle petition' The Constitution Bench of this Court in PTC IPTC India Ltd u' CERC' ' (2ol l) II scc i4 ' AlR Online ls96 SC 1268 ' 1zo2a1 s scc s t: \ b ,* 4 (2O1O) 4 SCC 6OJ: 2O1O rNSC t46l has hetd. that the Electicity Act is an exhaustiue cod.e on all matters concerning electricitg. Under tLrc Etectricity Act, all issues dealing u.tith etecticitg haue to be considered fig the authoities cortstituted und_er the said Act. As tteld by tl-te Constitution Bench of this Court, the State Electicitg Commission and the lea nted APTEL haue a.mple pouters to adjud.icate in the matters utith regard_ to electricitg. No only that, these Tibunals are tibunals consisting of experts hauing uast experience in the field of electrici.tg. As such, ue find that the High Court ened in directlg entertaining the uit petition uthen Respondent 1 i.e., tLrc utit petitioner before the High Court had an adequate alternate remedg of opproaching the State Ele cticitg C ommis siott. " 6 the Act has power determination; and The Regr-rlatory Commission, under Section 6l of to frame terms and conditions for tarilf under Section 62, has the power to determine tariff on a generating an Application made by company or a licensee. Further, the remand Order clated 07.17.2023 of the Hon,ble Supreme Court was concerned with the justifiability or otherwise of the CSS rates fixed at Rs.7.29 / Rs.0.93 given the DISCOMs, proposal of Rs.0.30 / Rs.O. 1 1. tn view of the nature of grievance espoused by the petitioner with L t, L t. r' I t 5 regard to the alleged jurisdictional overreach stating tl-iat the 1st respondent-Commrsslon cannot determine tariffs without there being proposals lrom the generating company/DISCOM' the wrtt petition is Per se maintainable ' 7 . Having said so' it is to be noted that in the matters j udgments ofthisnature,pertainingtoelectricitytariffs,andCrossSubsidy Surcharge levied by the electricity authorities/ regulatory bodies distribution lines to the for wheeling Power using the Court in the very same consumers, the Hon'ble SuPreme in Jaipur Vidgut vitrol7- Nigalm Limited (supra) India Ltd (suPra) furtirer he ld that the Tribunals of experts have vast experience in r--he freld of electricity and the High Court erred in directly entertaining the Writ Petition when respondent No 1 i e writ petitioner therein before the High Court had an adequate alternate remedy of approaching the State Electricity Commission' consisting ANd PTC

8. In light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble SupremeCourtintheabovetwo-iudgments'thisCourtisnot inclined to entertain the Writ Petitions' bypassing the primary statutory remedy before the Appellatte Tribunal' 'l ,t ,t ,( 6 9

10. Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed. No Consequently, the interim orders as extended from time to time shall stand dissolved automatically. //TRUE COPY// SD/. P.PONNA KRISHNA ASS STANT REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER

1. 2. J. 4. 5. tl- 7. o_ o '10. tt. 12. '13. 14. '15. '16. 17. '18. 9n" 99 to SRI G.CHANDRA_SHAKHABEAO, Advocate tOpUCl One CC to SRI E.GANESH, Advocate fOpUCl' - --- 9ne 99 to SRI CH.SATYASADHAN, n'ovocali: IOPUCI One CC to S[I/T R.SHAILAJA, Advocate IoPUCi - One CC to SRt ROHTT POGULA. Advoca'G roFitcr Qne QC to SRt M.NAGA DEEeAK, novocjt6loFubr 9n" 99 to M/s. CKR ASSoCIATES, novoiat6loFubl 9n" 99 to SRt p.LAKSHMA REQDY, novociid top-utl Qne QC to SRt DEEpAK CHOWDARY, novocat6lOFubl Qne QC to SRt KOKA SATYANARAYATn nAO, n'Ovoiatir 1OeUCl Qne QC to M/s. TNDUS LAW FlRtM, Advocate ftjpUti- - -' One CC to SMT K.JAYASREE. Advocate tOpili:r One CC to SRI HTRENDERNATH. Advocaie fOpLCr one CC to SRt p.pRASAD, SC rOn rCrni ioCtrir one cc to SRt N.SREEDHARREDDY, sc FoR TGSPDCL IOPUC] 9n" QQ to SRt R.VtNoD RFDDY, SC FoR rsrnaNsco tb'p0ct-' Qne QC to SRt zAKtR ALt DAN|SH, sc ron Npocllbp0al --' Two CCs to GP FOR ENERGY, High Court foi tJ Strtu oitetangana at Hyderabad [OUTI Two CCs to ADVOCATE qENERAL, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] w 91 To, BSR ( ( 139 HIGH COURT DATED: 3110712025 ..i i-)i1 )r-, '(, COMMON ORDER 2sAIJE& :; ti i'ti 'a/ IsPATCH -t) ,9 L I WP. N os. 1 2440, 12456, 1 277 8, 127 84' 1 2808' 1281 0' ti'ltt , 13119, 13122, 13127 , 131?9,13656, 13669' ilai+, 1 3G84; 1 41 89, 1 4192, 1 4193, 1 4466, 1 51 08' i si og, 1s111 , 1s114, 15115, 151?7-, 15221, 1527?' titsa,16610, 16758, 16763, 16899, 16925, 1709?' ii'l aa, fi 2g0, 17 2g3, 17 296, 17 323,'17 357' 17 48?' 17 502:, fi 51 o:, 17 824, 1 8070, 18121, 1 8 1 33' 1 81 !6-' ie16i,18183; 18311, 18345, 187!?, 18750, 19009' igl'tz, 1947 4:,, 20551 , 21662, 24??0-, 24712, 291?! : . zl ag t, 27 7 56;, 27 87 5:, 27 g 1 2, 27 925, 3261 5 oF 2024; 4466,4468, AND 13883 0F 2025 DISMISSING ALI. THE WRIT PETITIONS, WITHOUT COSTS n Aod 'tb ,b O\a,t\

Find similar cases Start drafting free

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments

Judgment

More cases under A ComPany registered under the Comoanies Act 1956