Sangepu Kavitha v. The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.5 in interfering into the peaceful power consumption through vide S.C. No.152902894 and trying to disconnect the power connection in House No.3-2-320, Plot No.159, S.B.H. Colony, Venture-2, L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District and trying to disposes the Petitioner from the house of the Petitioner without issuing any notice and without following the due process of law by colluding with the Respondent Nos.6 and 7 is illegal, arbitrary, u nconstitutio n a I and violation of Articles 14, 15.21 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia and also violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondent No.5 not to interfere into peaceful power consumption and not to disconnect power connection of the Petitioner through vide S.C.No.1 52902894 in her residential house bearing No.3-2-320 in Plot No.159, which is situated at S.B.H. Colony, Venture-2, L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District during the pendency of criminal CASCS. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151'CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent trlo.S nbt to interfere into peaceful power consumption and not to disconnect power connection of the Petitioner through vide S.C.No.152902894 in her residential house bearing No.3-2-320 in PIot No.159, which is situated at S.B.H. Colony, Venture-2, L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District during the pendency of criminal cases pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 5: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No. 13262 oF 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Artrcle 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: ''.-.to l-ssue utit, or<\er or tlirec1ion, more p.Lrticularlg one in nature of Wit of M(utdctnus to declore the octiort of respondent No.S in interJeing into tlrc 1te-ac<ful potLter consunption tlrouglt uicle S.C.No.1529O2894 dnd lrlJing to rJisconnect tlTe pouer ionnection iit House No.3 2 32O, ptot No.159, S.B.H Colo !t, Venture 2, L.B.Nag(lr, Ranga Reddg Distict and trytng to disposes. llle petitioner Jrom the ttousi of tlrc petitioner utithout issuing anll ttolre Qnd tuiLl@ut follotqitLg tlle due process i7 latu bg coltudtrtg t itlt tlle respon'lent Iy'o-s 6 an.a 7 is ittegal, arbitrarll, uncotistitutional and uiolation of Articles 14,- 15, 21 oncl 3OO A of Conititution of India and uiol(ttion of Pirtciples o.f Natur..l Juslice atld consequentlg direcl the respondent No.S not to interfere ittto peoce,fttl Txtwer consuitption antd rtot to disconnect potl)er contlectio't of the pet ioner tltrough uide S.C.No 1529()2894 ard pass..."

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government pleader for Energr for respondent No.1 and Sri N.Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel lor respondent Nos.2 to S. 3' Respondent Nob.2 to 5 have hled counter stating as follows "In reply to the auennents made in the afftdauit filed in support of the utrit petition, it is submitted that these respondents neuer interfered uith the olleged peaceful potDer consumption of the petitioner nor tried to disconnect the potuer supplA to the House beaing No. 3-2-320 in Plot No. 159 situated at SBH Colony, Venture-2, L.B Nagar, Raruga Red.dg Distri.ct, as alleged bg the petitioner- It is submitted- that tLLe Ser-uice Connection No. 1529O2894 is in I I 2 the t'Ldme of S.Ramesh. Kumar (6th Respondent herein) residing at H.No-2-1O7, L.B.Nagar, SBH Venture II, L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District. There is no influence exerted by Responden /Vos.6 and 7 on Respondent No.S, as alleged in the affidauit filed in support of the writ petition. Respondent No.5 herein neuer colluderl' utith Respondent Nos.6 and 7 at ang point of time nor tried t'o interfere tuith the alleged peaceful poluer consumption of the petitioner much less disconnecting the pouter supplg to the residential house of the petitioner."

4. In view of the counter affidavit Iiled by respondent Nos.2 to 5, no further ordcrs are required to be passed in this u'rit petition

5. Accordingly, [his wnt petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions pending, it any, st-rall stand closed. Therc shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// SD/.S. MALLIKARJUNA RAO S ittAiii^'cEceiB4 -/- j SECTION OFFICER To, hairman and Mana tion ComPanY Ltd

1. The PrinciP al Secretary, Power and EnergY DePa m ent, Secretariat Building' Director, Telang ana State Southern Power Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana (TG SDPCL), Telangana' Hyderabad.

2. The C Distribu 3. The SuPe rintendent Eng ineer, Telang ana State Southern Power Distribution ComPanY Ltd , (TGSDPC L), Ranga Reddy District. 4 The Divisional Engineer, Telang ana State Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd (TGS DPCL), Saroorn agar Division , Ranga ReddY D strict' 5. The Assistant Eng ineer, Telang ana State Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd., (TGS DPCL), L B.Na gar Circle, Ranga ReddY Dist OnC CC tO SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, AdVOCAtE [OPUCI ONC CC tO SRI N SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL [OPUC] TwoCCstoGPFORENERGY,HighcourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hyderabad [OUT] 7 I RSR Two CD CoPies I .a. HIGH COURT DATED:0710712025 ORDER WP.No.13262 of 2025 '- - , .-. -:-_\l- lrlc:/4 $.J( t * r1r 2 5 JUL 2025 *' .rr', fil i DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS