High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.6 in interfering into the peaceful life and libe(y of the petitioner and also calling the Petitioner to the Police station and threatening to pay the amount of Rs.g.00 Lakhs to the Respondent No.7 and creatinE panic situations by making the calls to the Petitioner is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of Articles 14, 1 5, 21 and 300-4 of constitution of lndia and also violation of principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondent No.6 not to interfere into the peaceful life and riberty of and not to threaten the petitioner to pay an amount of Rs.8.00 Lakhs to the Respondent No.7 lA NO: 1 OF 2o25 Petition under Section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the Respondent No.6 not to interfere into the peacefur 'riie and liberty of and not to threaten the Petitioner to pay an amount of Rs.g.00 Lakhs to the Respondent No.7 pending disposal of the Writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RApOLU BHASKAR Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 TO 6: Gp FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.7: - The Court made the following: ORDER I I I i I I THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Writ Petition No. t3226 ot 2025 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.l to 6, and with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the padies, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at the admission stage.

2. Having regard to the manner of disposal of the Writ Petition at the admission stage and the nature of /s involved, this Court is of the view that notice to unofficial respondent No.7 is not necessary for adjudication of the present Writ Petition.

3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that though she is not arrayed as accused in Crime No.329 of 2024 dt.27.04.2024 registered on the basis of the complaint made by the 7th respondent herein against one Y.lYahesh, the respondents-authorlties are interfering into peaceful life and liberty of the petitioner by calling her to the 6th respondent police station and threatening her to pay a sum of Rs.8,00,000/- to the 7th respondent, which action ol the respondents it is contended as highly illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

4. Per contra, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing on behall of respondent Nos.1 to 6 would submit that the 7th respondent \-l 2 herein had approached the respondents-authorities and lodged a complaint against one y.Mahesh, complaining that y.Mahesh while workihg with the company, namely GMR Aerospace private Limited, having misappropriated huge amount of the company.

5. Learned Government pleader further submits that on the 7th respondent lodging the aforesaid complaint, the authorities have registered a case, vide Crime No.329 of 2024 and have taken up investigation thereln.

6. Learned Government preader further submits that in the course of investigation, the authorities have tracked flow of money from the accused account into the petitioner,s account in a sum of Rs.14,78,000/_ and from the amounts transferred to petitioner,s account a payment has been made in a sum of Rs.5,70,000/- in Harihara Jewelers, Kadapa, for purchase of five tulas of gold by the petitioner herein.

7. Learned Government pleader further submits that since the flow of funds misappropriated by the accused - y.Mahesh is traced to the petitioner, the authorities have called the petitioner to the police station for the purpose of investigation into the foresaid crime. B. Learned Government pleader futther submits that if the complicity of the petitioner is established in the commission of the aforesaid crime, : 3 the authorities will take further steps to array the petitioner as accused by following due process of law.

9. The aforesaid submission made by the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nbs.1 to 6 is placed on record.

10. In view of the aforesaid submission, since, the petitioner is only a suspected accused in the aforesaid ciime lodged by the 7th respondent herein, this Court is of the view that the respondents-a uthorities are to be directed to follow due process of law, while investigating into the aforesaid crime and take further action strictly in accordance with law.

11. Subject to above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

12. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed \j To //TRUE COPY// SD/. M. OSMAN ALI BAIG ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /;, d$o SECTI Ranga Reddy District. FFICER '1 . The Princip"l99"r"l{V, Home Department, Secretariat. Building, Secretariat, _ Hyderabad, State of Telangana. 2. The Director General of Police, Telangana, Hyderabad. 3. The Commissioner of Police,_Cyberadad Conimissionerate, Hyderabad. 4. The Deputy Cornmissioner of pblice, Shamshabad Division, Shamshibad, 5. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Shamshabad Circle, Shamshabad, 6. The Station House Officer, R.G.l. Airport police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate, Shamshabad, Ranoa Reddv District. 7. One CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate tOpUCI B. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the'State ot Telangana, at . Two CD Copies o Hyderabad. [OUT] Ranga Reddy District. PSK. GJP HIGH COURT DATED:2910412025 ORDER WP.No.13226 of 2025 "ti )' I

1. ., // .,/ I {, \ .\N x\ r_ - tr..1ri rr / -: --. - ---a a;/' DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS