The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of lr/landamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in furnishing the petitioners caste particulars for the purpose of Police enquiry vide Dated 31.01.2019 vide Lr. No. E/ 391/2019 against the provisions of the A P Schedule caste Schedule Tribes and B c s Regulation of issue of community certificate Act 1993 and without conducting reasonable hearing to the petitioner and without considering the petitioners application dI. 24.03.2019 as illegal unreasonable and inviolatron of principles of natural justice also violation of article 14,21 oI constitution of lndia and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to consider the petitioners application dated 24.03.2019 u/s 3 of the A P Schedule Caste Schedule Tribes and B cs Regulation of issue of community certificate Act 1993 for issuance of caste certificate. {l ). ' -::*r::-.n- -"" IANO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ::ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court ray be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in Lr No Dated 31.01.2019 vile Lr. No. E/391/2019 issued by the :lrd respondent as against the provision of A P Schedule Caste, Schedule Tribes and B Cs Regulation of issue of Commur ity Certificate Act '1993 by considering the petitioner's application dt. 24.O3.201() for issuance of caste certificate forthrruith, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI M.A.ALEEM MAJID Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFAFIE The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESII BIIEEMAPAI{A WRIT PETITION No.14053 of 2019 ORDER: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare appearing for respondents

2. This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is hled seeking the following reiief ". - -.to issae a urit, order or directton more particularlg one in the nctture of Writ of Mandamus declaing the qction of the 3d respondent in furnislLing the petitioners caste porticulars for the putpose of Pohce enquiry uide dqted 31.O1.2O19 uide Lr.No.E/391/2O19 against the prouisions oJ the AP Schedule Caste Schedule Tibes and BCs Regutotion of issue of Communitg Certificate Act, 1993 and without conducting reasonable hearing to the petitioner and ulithout consideing the petitloners application dt 24.03.2019 as itlegal, unreesonable and iru uiolqtion of principles of natural justice ctLso uiolation of article 14 and 2 I of Constitution of India and consequentlA direct the 3d respondent to consider the petitioners application dqted 24.O3.2019 u/s 3 of the AP Schedule Caste Schedule Tnbes qnd BCs Regulation of issue of CommunitA CefliJicate Act 1993 for issuance of caste certificate ..."

3. It is the case of the petitioner that he belongs to Scheduled Caste community (Mala) and he possesses a valid caste certificate issued on 01.09.1990, and later he applied for renewal of his caste certificate. The petitioner further states that he lodged a police complaint against three persons namely, Kudumula Satyanarayana, Nayani Sairam and Vidya Ravi before the Sub Divisional Police Officer, Yellareddy, Kamareddy District, and 1 I 2 pursuant thereto, the police registered an FIR No.1il8 of :)018 dated 07 .I2.2OL8 against the said three accused. Duri::tg the course of investigation, the Investigation Officer addresse,d a letter vide Lr.No.E/3!)1/2019, dated 31.01.2019 to respondent No.3 mentioning hls caste as BC(c) converted Christlan from SC (Mala), therefore petitioner submltted representation dr,rted !14.03.2019 before the MRO requesting to issue caste certiltcater as SC) (Mala). It is the case of the petitioner that without conducr.tng enquiry and without issurng notice 3.d respondent declared zrs he belot-tgs to BC(c) converted Christian from SC (Mala), which ,he action of the

3.d respor:.dent against the Andhra Pradesh (Sc:hedu1,:d Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes) Regult:tion of Issue of Community Certilicates Act, 1993.

4. Learned Government Pleader for Social Welf:rre appearing for respondents placed instructions dated 25.07 .2019 of r:espondent No.3 wherein rt is stated that the Sub Divisionrrl Pol-ice Officer, Yellareddy has requested to furnish the caste particulars of the petitioner vide letter dated 09.12.2018 and on enq,lipy it was found that the petitioner previously applied for caste certilicate under BC- C (Converted Christian). On verification responrlent No.3 issued BC-C certilicate vide Cast Certificate No.A5/2181,i 2001 and based on the sai<1 certificate, the petitioner contested as iVard rnember for 3 the ward No XIII in 2001 under Grama Panchayath BC category I loca1 body election in Yellareddy and was elected, and once again he contested in local body electing in 2006 in ward No. XVII under BC category, and was elected as ward member based on the previous issued certificate and on loca1 enquiry it was reported to Sub Divisional Police Ofhcer, Yellareddy thal the petitioner belongs to BC-C (Converted Christian). A copy of the G.P Wards and Reservations Information for the year 2OO 1 and 2OO6 is enclosed with the said instructions.

5. In view of the same, the writ pelilion filed is devoid of merits and is dismissed, accordingly. No order as to costs As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed SD/. AHMED ABDULLA KHAN TANT REGISTRAR AS ,TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER To, 1 2 . One CC to SRI IT,4.A.ALEEIU IVAJlD, Advocate [OPUCI . Two CCs to GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] . Two CD CoPies. BSK .t TKS ''-: - I HIGH COURT DATED:1710712025 r'..'=+r . q, E 5t,; -.1 ,zi'it\ :i\ .C\ !.a t) 1 Er SEP ?025 // t)r - ,/' ORDER WP.No.14053 of 2019 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ,r