The High Court · 2025

Commissionarate, (Medchal-Malkajgiri District). 7. The District Collector, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. B. The Central Adoption Resource Authority, tVlinistry of Women and Child Development Government of lndia West Block-8, wing-2, First Floor, Ramakrishnapuram, New Delhi-1 10 066 .. RESPONDENTS lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Sir>ction 151 CPC praying that in the circumstences stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court mav be pleased to suspend the order p assed by the Single Judge of . thr: Hor'bl'e High Court d1.271O112025 in WP No 37068 of 2O24 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI VEERA BABU GANDU Counsel for the Resp,:ndent Nos.1 to 4 and 7: MS. MANI DEEPIK.F,, GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WEI.-FARE Counsel for the Respr:ndent Nos.5 and 6: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respr:ndent No.8: SRI B. NARASIMHA SHARMA, ADDITIONAL SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA The Court Delivered tlre following: JUDGMENT I l l THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF WSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA WRIT APP EAL No.S17 of 2025 JUDGMENT @er the Hon'bte the Acting Chief Justice Sujog paul): Sri G. Veera Babu, learned counsel for the appellants; Ms Mani Deepika, rearned Government preader for women Development and Child Welfare, for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and 7; and Sri B. Narasimha Sharma, learned Additional Solicitor General of India, for respondent No. B. 2 With the consent, frnally heard.

3. This Writ Appeal takes exception to the order dated 27.01.2025 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P. No. 37068 of 2024. The said order became subject matter of review ar:d the review was also decided by order dated 24.O2.2025. 4 . Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the review Bench was informed that by a proceeding/order dated 19.O2.2O25, the appellants, request has been rejected, whereas the said document No. CARM/ lg6/24, dated 19.02.2025 shows that it is not a rejection order. Instead, by this order, the appellants wer'c directed to wait for their turn. Thus, the learned Single Judge I as gone wrong in the review order, v'hereby she gave liberty tc chalienge this order. Whereas, in the absence of any -rej eetion order, there is no occasion for the appellalts to challenge it. Iiis last submission is that sirailar u.'it petitions were pending consideration before the Writ Court- anC therefore, the impugned,rrder may be set aside and all thost: r.tatters may be directed to tre heard analogously. 5 The prar.er is opposed by Sri B. Narasirnha Sharma, learned Addit ional Solicitor General of Inrlia, ;rpoearing for respondent lo. B, by contending that if the crder dated 19 .O2.2O25 is not treated as 'rejection ordel ' bv al rpellants, it may be obserired that whatever is mentioned in that order will hold the fie1d and rt is the choice of the appellimts io challenge it or not. So far the second contention of appellants is concerned, it is argr-red r.hat during the pendency of writ petition, no application or ,lrayer was made for linking th,: ur-il p,etition with any other conrrected pending matters. 6 We hare heard the partles.

7. We fincl substance in the argument of learrLect Additional Solicitor (ient:r'al of India that if the appel iants intended for 3 analogous hearing with other similar matters, they should have apprised the writ Court at appropriate stage and not after the linal decision of the matter. So far the appellants' contention regarding order dated 19.02.2025 aforesaid is concerned, as agreed, it is observed that the said order will be read as such and whatever is mentioned therein will hold the field 8 With the aforesaid observation, the Writ Appeal 1S disposed of. No costs Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall a-lso stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/.N. SRIHARI EPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, 1 ^ ild Welfare DePartment, Alwal, Medchal Malkajgiri The Princioal Secretary, Women Development an Seiretariai. The State bf Telangana, Hyderabad' The Chair Person, The child Welfare Committee, District. W"lfare Department, Medchal-Malkajgiri District Hi".ialrr. Venqal Rao Nasar, Ameerpet, Hyderabad Neiedmet, Secunderabad Medchal-Malkajgiri District 2 a. ine cniro welfare project Director, womg1, Qhjldren, Disabled Senior citizen - + i'n.j'i,iilgrii"d Cr,iro'protection Serviies (;CPS), Sishuvihar, State Home, s. iti;"C"o;;i..lind-i Fotice,"nacnaronia' Cohmissionerate' Vavupuri - 6. i;; si;ii,;" H;G;-orric;, Medipittv lq1i6.s.tatlon, Medipallv' Rachakonda - Commissionarate, (Medchal-Malkajgiri Pitlc.t) . z. ine Oistrict Collectbr, Medchal-Malkaigiri District' 8. iii; 6;";il1 A;;ptio" ne-s*ii" Autnriiitv' vinisrry of women and child - oevelooment Gdvernmentof lndia Wesf Block-8, wing-2' First Floor' Ramakiishnapuram, New Delhi-1 10 066 Telanqana, at HYderabad IOUTI s. C)i; cCio 5h v""ia Babu Gandu, Adygqqte [oPUCl 1 0. Two CCs to GP to, won1""1'b;ichiro w"tid|-", uigh Court for the State of 11 +;;'id i;'ili" 6p toi nore, High court for the state of Telangana' at 12.'i';; cc-6ine Aooitionat solicitor Generat of tndia, High court for the State HyderabadlOUTI of Telangana, at HYderabad[OUT]

13.Two CD CoPies TJ LS HIGH COURT' DATED:01 10512025 ORDER WA.No.S17 of 2025 .r<i -:==- I rE S rAr l \ 2 ; r,hi ;tjl5 1' c, \: ,' I (jiil 9 * DISPOSING ICF THE WRIT APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS ,f @ 7u CHA 'Id\ €