✦ High Court of India · 12 Feb 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 12 Feb 2025

25.B. Srihari, S/o. B. Rajesham, Copyist, Junior Civil Judges Court, Gajwel Ri'/o' Gaiwel

26.Smt. M. Sujatha, W/o. Railingam, Copyist, Mobile Court, Sangareedy, Rl/o. SangareddY

27.M. Jaipal Reddy, S/o.Madhava Reddy, Copyist, Junior Civil Judges Court, Zaheeiabad, Ff o. Zaheerabad

28.P.V. Narahari Rao, S/o. P.V. Rama Rao, Copyist, Junior Civil Judges Court, Zaheerabad, F/o. Zaheerabad

29.Anwar Khan, S/r:. Munwer Khan, Copyist, District Court, Sangareddy RL/o. SangareddY

30.Smt. A. Nagarani, D/o. Ramulu, Copyist, District Court, Rl/o Medak 31 . G. Buchaiah, S/o. Muthaiah, Record Assistant, Vl Addl. District Court' Siddipet, RYo SidJipet ...PETITIONERS AND

1. The Registrar (A<tministration), High Court of A.P. Hyderabad 2. The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Medak at Sangareddy ...RESPONDENTS J ' Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, lt is prayed that this llon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the proceedings of the lst respondent in order Roc No.196012009-C1, dt. 20-10-2009 and the consequential show cause notice in Dis.No. 621, dt. o1-z-2010 and further proceedings dt. 18.03.2010 in continuation of show cause notice issued by the 2nd respondent reverting the petitioners to the lower categories of posts which they were holding prior to their promotions as unjustified, illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioners in the various categories of posts which they were holding prior to their reversions and pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. (Amended prayer as per Court Order dt.12-02-2025 yide l.A.Nd.3 ol 2O10 (WPMP.No.9373 ot 2010 in W.P.No.6429 of 2010) l.A. NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP. NO: 8290 OF 2010) Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the proceedings in order Roc No. 1g6O/200g-C1 , dt.20-.10-2009 issued by the 1st respondent and the consequential show cause notice in Dis.No. 621i7, dt. 02-2-2010 issued by the 2nd respondent, pending disposal of the writ petition. !.A. NO: 2OF 201O(WP MP. NO: 8622OF 20101 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners herein to amend the prayers in the qnain writ petition WP.no.6429 of 2O1O and also in WPMP.No.829O|2O1O in the interest of justice. Gounsel for the Petitioner : SRI D.LINGA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: SRI Y.RAMA RAO (SC FOR APHC) ,) 4 .P.No.8729 OF 2010 Between: E. Hanmanth Reddy, Sio. Srinivas Reddy' COPYIST (U1d91 O.t9"t9l Reversion As Fioieli Se.reriAtdnOerl .tunior Civil Judge Court, Meijak, Medak District. ...PETITIONER AND

2. The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Medak at Sangareddy' The Registrar (Admn.) High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under l,rticle 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a \&'rit, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus declaring the impugned Proc.No. 157Ot1O dted 18-3-2010 issued the principal District and Sessions Judge, Medak at sangareddy as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and subversive of Articles . 4, '16 and 21 of the Constitution besides being opposed to all principles of natural justice equity and fair play and consequently hold that the petitioner is entitled to r:ontinue as Copyist on the basis of promotion orders issued in order dated 27 -3-2008 with all consequential benefits- . l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO:35378 oF 2015) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Juniors Assistant/Typist duly keeping in view the amended Rules issued in G.O.Ms.No. 100 Law (t-A&J Home Courts.D) Department dated 0-8-2013' l.A. NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP. NO: 11243 oF 2010) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in srupport of the petition, the High Court mav be pleased suspend the operation of the impugned Proc.No. 1570110 dated 18-:3-20'10 issued the Principal District & rsessions Judge, Medak al Sanga Reddy. 5 lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for promotion to the post of Senior Assistants and Superintendents before any other juniors reviewing all the promotions made in the original cadre of process Server/ Attenders and also in the cadre of Copyists and other higher categories of Junior Assistants/Typists, Senior Assistants and Superintendents as per the law laid down by the Honble High Court and Honble Supreme Court of lndia reported in AIR 1997 SC 800 without reference to the pendency of Writ Petition further direct the respondents to give monitory benefits and other service benefits from the yeat 2O11. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI D.LINGA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: SRI Y.RAMA RAO (SC FOR APHC) W.P.No.9806 OF 20'10 Between:

1. B. Krishna Reddy, S/o. B. Pentaiah, (Under order of Reversion of as Junior Assistant), Junioi Civil Judge Court, Narayankhed, Medak District.

2. Shaik Akthar Ahmed, S/o. Shaik Aziz Ahmed, Senior Assistant, (Under order of Reversion of as Junior Assistant), Vl, Addl. District Court, Siddipet, Medak District. ...PETITIONERS AND 1 2 The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Medak at Sangareddy. The Registrar (Admn.) High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned Proc.No. 1563/10 dated 18-3-20'10 issued the principal District and Sessions Judge, Medak at Sangareddy as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and subversive of Articles 14, 16, 21 and 31 1 of the Constitution besides being opposed to all principles of natural jutice equity and fair play and consequently 6 hold that the petitioner s entitled to continue as Copyist on the basis of promotion orders issued in order dated 24-3-2008 with all consequential benefits' l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015 WPMP. NO: 35389 0F 201s Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for promotion to the post of Superintendents duly keeping in view the amended Rules issued in G'O Ms'No' 100 Law (LA&T Home Courts.D) Department dated 8-8-20'13' l.A. NO: 1 OF 201O(WPMP. NO: 12625 0F 20 10) PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspendtheoperationoftheimpugnedProc.No.l563/10dated1B-:}-2p10issued the principal District & llessions Judge, Medak at Sangareddy pending disposal of the main writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI D.LINGA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: SRI Y.RAMA RAO (SC FOR APHC) W. P.No.9807 OF 2010 Between:

1. T. Anuradha, wo. Venkatesh Junior Assistant (under order or reversion as Field Assistaht) Sienior Civil Judge Court, Zaheerabad' 2.Mohd'AimirAli'S/o.Mohd.AmzadAliJuniorAssistant(underorderor - ievetsiori as Copyist) Special Mobile Court, Sanga Reddy' 3. G. Anuradha, w/o. Eswara charan Junior Assistant (under order or reversion as Copyist) Principal District Court, Sanga Reddy' reversion as Copyist) Junior Civil Judge Court, Jogipet'

4. Mohd. Shabuddin, s/o. Mohd. Moinuddin Junior Assistant (under order or ' 5. K. Ravi Shankar Kumar, S/o. Mohan rao- Junior Assistant (under order or - r..uersion as Field Assistant) Family Court, Sanga Reddy' B. Manaiah, S/o. Ramappa Junior Assistant (under order or reversion as Field Assistant) Junior Civil Judge Court, Narsapur. Sved sadat Ali. Ii/o. syed Abdul Ali Junior Assistant (under order or reversion as Copyist) Junior Civil Judge Court' Medak. Mohd. Ghousuddin, S/o. Yousufuddin Junior Assistant (under order or reversion as Cop,yist) Addl. Junior Civil Judge Court, Siddipet. 6 7 8 7

9. J_ameel Ahmed, S/o. Fateh Mohammed Typist (under order or reversion as Copyist) Junior Civil Judge Court, Siddipet.

10. P. Ramanjaneyulu, Sio. Seshaiah Typist (under order or reversion as Copyist) Junior Civil Judge Court, Zaheerabad.

11.M. Sukumar, S/o. Raghuram Typist (under order or reversion as Copyist) Excise Court, Sanga Reddy. (All are belong to Medak District) AND

2. .The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Medak at Sangareddy. The Registrar (Admn.), High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONERS ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 o{ the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the impugned Proc.No. 15642010 and 15652010 dated 18-3- 2010 issued the Principal District amp Sessions Judge, Medak at Sarigareddy as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and subversive of Articles '14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution besides being opposed to all principles of natural jutice equity and fair play and consequently hold that the petitioner is entitled to continue as Copyist on the basis of promotion orders issued in order daled 27 -3-2008 with all consequential benefits. l.A. NO: 1 OF 201S(WPMP. NO: 35440 OF 2015 ) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for promotion to the post of Senior AssistanVJunior Assistant duly keeping in view the amended Rules issued in G.O.Ms.No. 100 Law (LA&J Home Courts.D) Department dated 8-8-2013. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2010(wPMP. NO: 12626 OF 20101 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned proceedings No.1564/2010 and 156512010 dated '18.3.2010 issued by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Medak at Sanga Reddy pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI D'LINGA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: SRI Y'RAMA RAO (SC FOR APHC) w.P.No.9808 OF 2010 8 Between: Court, Medak.

1. S-Ramesh, S/o.l,njaneyulu Attender (Promoted copyists) Junior civil Judge

2. .Mohd. Gouse Piasha, s/o.Hameed Attender (Promoted copyists) Principal Junior Civil Judge Court , Sangareddy'

3. waheed Khan, ti/o.Ahmed Khan Attender (Promoted copyists) Junior civil Judge Court , Zaheerabad, Medak District

4. B.Srihari, s/o.Rajesham Attender (Promoted copyists) Junior civil Judge Court , SiddiPet, Medak District.

5. smt.M.Suiatha, wo.Rjalingam Attender (Promoted copyists) Mobile court, Sanga ReddY. Medak District.

6. M.Jaipal Reddy, S/o.Madhava Reddy Attender (Promoted Copyists) Junior Civil judge Court , Zaheerabad, Medak District.

7. p.V.Narahari Rao, s/o.P.V. Rama Rao Attender (Promoted copyists) Prl. Junior Civil Judge Court , Siddipet, Medak District.

8. Anwar Khan, Sic,'Munwar Khan Attender (Promoted Copyists) Excise Court, Sanga ReddY, Medak District'

9.- Smt.A.Nagarani, D/o.Ramulu Attender (lrqmoteo copyists) .JUnior civil Judge Coirt, Meriak (all are under orders of Reversion as Attenders/ Process Seriers and belong to Medak District). ...PETTTIONER(S) AND The Principal District AND Sessions Judge', Medak at Sanga Reddy The Registrar (Admn.), High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 1 2 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned Proceedings No.1570/2010 dated 18.3.20'10 issued by the Principal District amp Sessions Judge, Medak at Sanga Reddy as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and subversive of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the constitution besides being opposed to all principles of natural justice, equity and fair play and consequently hold that the petitioner is entitled to continue as copyist on the basis of promotion orders issued in order dated2l .3.2OO8 with all consequential benefits. 9 l.A. NO: 1 0F 2010(WPMP. NO: 12627 O F 2010) Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased suspend the operation of the impugned proceedings No.1570/2010 dated 18.3.2010 issued by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Medak at Sanga Reddy pending disposal of the main Writ petition. lA NO: 1 OF 2o2o Petition under Section 1b1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for promotion to the post of Senior Assistants and Superintendents before any other juniors reviewing all the promotions made in the original cadre of process Server/ Attenders and also int eh cadre of copyists and other higher categories of Junior Assistantsffyfliits, senior Assistants and superintendents as per the law laid down by the Honble High court and Honble Supreme court of lndia mentioned without reference to the pendency of writ Petition and further direct the Respondents to grant monitory and other service benefits from the yeat 2011. l.A. NO: 1 OF 201S(WPMP. NO: 35382 0F 2015) Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respbndents to consider the case of the petitioners for promotion to the post of Junior Assistanurypists duly keeping in view the amended Rules issued in G.O.Ms.No. 100 Law (LA&J Home Courts.D) Department dated 8-8-2013, Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI D.LINGA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: SRI Y.RAMA RAO (SC FOR APHC) W.P.No.9809 OF 2010 Between:

1. M.Ramulu, Record assi S/o Parmaiah Field Assistant (Under order of Reversion stant) Vth Addl District Judge Court,Sanga Reddy District AS 10

2. t\/.Rana Pratap Raju, S/o. M.Ambaiah Fie-ld .Assistant (under order of ' ruj!*il ,l'F!o,ii'i b"rver/Attender Junior civil Judge court,Narasapur - ;;;;;;Gderver nttenoer) Senior Civil Judge Court'Siddipet 3.MohdAvubAli'sioMahaboobAliFieldAssistant(ulder.orderofReversion 4. G.Narsimlu, S/o lrlallaiah Field-Assistant.(9ESt order of Revision as process SJ*ernttehder) P.D.M Court,Sanga Reddy District

5.MohdWaizAli,I}/o.AppaiahExamine(underorderofRevisionasProcess server Attender) E:xcise Court,Sanga Reddy - 6.B.GopalReddy,fi/oVenkatReddyFieldAssistant(underorderofReve.rsion ,.-pio"u.s-b'<jrverlnttenOtr) eiiise Court, Sangi Reddy District (all are belong to Medak District ..,PETITIONERS ANO The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Medak at Sanga Reddy The Registrar (Admn) High Court, of A.P Hyderabad

2. ...RES?ONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned proceeding No '1 567/2010 dt 18-3-2010 issued by the principal District and Session Judge' Medak at Sanga Reddy as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and subversive of Articles 14,'16 and 21 of the constitution besides being opposed to all principles of natural justice equity and fair play and consequently hold of promotion orders issued in order dt 27 -3'2OO8 with all consequential benefits. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2010 (WPMP. NO:1 2628 0F 2010) Petition under Section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased suspend the operation of the impugned proceedings NO 156/2010 dt 18-3-2010 issued by the Principal District & session Judge Medak at sanga Reddy pending disposal of the main wP. 1l l.A. NO: 1 OF 201s(WPMP. NO: 3 5444 0F 20151 Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for promotion to the post of senior AssistanuJunior Assistant duly keeping in view the amended Rules issued in G.o.Ms.No. 100 Law (LA&J Home courts.D) Department dated 8-8-2013. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRt D.LINGA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: SRI Y.RAMA RAO (SC FOR APHC) The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE P'SAM KOSHY rHE H.N.TTRABLE tii i'91'9E NARSING RAo 9808& 9809 OF 2010 NANDTKONDA AND W.P.N os.642!) 8729 9 80 6 980 7 COM MON ORDI iR, @er Hon'ble Sri Jus ce P Sam Kosh't) lleard Mr. tr. Linga Rao' learned counsel for the pettttotlers and Mr' Y ltama Rao, leamed Standing Counsel for the I ligh Coufl lor the resPondents . Perused the record' I I 'loday, rvhen the matters are taken up for hearing' lerrned

2. cor.ursel tbr the petitioners produce d a bunch of Proceedings 16.01.2021 , 0807'2022 and also 17 '12'2020 passed on these orders those \\'erei passed between the intervening period Lc,arned submits that the grl(rvance of thc coutrse I lor the Petitioners petitioners stand llow redressed pursuant to the aforernentioned proceedings and as such nothing furlher remains to be adjuclicated upon in this bunt:h Petitions'

3. Given the saicl submission made by learned counsel tbr the petitioners ancl Laking the documcnts that he has filed' on record' 1 2 the instant batch of writ petitions stands closed and disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPYII SD/.P.GOWRI SHANKAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER 'l . One CC to SRI D.LINGA RAO. Advocate. tOpUCt 2. One CC to SRt Y.RAMA RAO, (SC FOR APHC). IOPUC] 3. Two CD Copies. \ \ To, ,_\ BSt</BSKw HIGH COURT PSK,J & NNR,J DATED:1 210212025 13t Y 4 l o o E S,TAT c 0 5 t4\n 20?5 + DES i: l ,; Cr .,:c, '7 p f,: COMMON ORDER WP.Nos. 6429, 8729, 9806, 9807, 9808 & 9809 0F 2010 CLOSING THE WRIT PETITIONS WITHOUT COSTS o ,{

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments