High Court · 2025

7. Srl Roddam Khaja Mynoddin, S/o Sri R Abdul Subhan, aged about 62 years Occ: Business, Rl/o Krishna Hospital, Malakpet Also at H.No.6-4-10/15, flat No. 502 R.S. Residency 3rd cross, Maruthi Nagar Anatapur, Andhra Pradesh, 5't5001. Respondent No.7 is impleaded as per Court Order dated 04.09.2025 in l.A. t'[o. 2 of 2025 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Coflstitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an Order, Direction or Writ and more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the aclion of the respondents No.2 to 6 in threatening to disionnect the electricity power supply contt of the petitioner bearing municipal No. 3-5-1099, Flat No.3r) Apartments, Narayanaguda, Hyderabad, vide S:C I No.114677776, Category-l Domestic, inspite of injunction cr in favour of the petitioner and during the pendency of the su on the file of X Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, I arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural iustice and t[l( and consequently direct the respondents No.2 to 5 not ttl the electricity power supply connection to property of t municipal No. 3-5-1099, Flat No.304, Grace Fatin. Narayanaguda, Hyderabad, vide S.C.No.G2008630' I Category-l Domestic and also not to take any coercive or t the petitioner at the behest of any third party without due interest of justice. ction to the propertY i, Grace Fatima KGN 1o.G2008630, USC ler dated i4-o7-2o22 t in O.S.No.329/2022 yderabad, as illegal, Constitution of lndia disconnecudismantle re petitioner bearing KGN Apartments, ISC No.114677776, nlaMul steps against ,rocess of law, in the lA NO: I OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the oi cumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court rr ry be pleased to pass order directing the respondent No. 2 to 6 not to dis c rnnecUdismantle the electricity power supply connection to property of the petitic rer bearing municipal No. 3-5-1099, Flat No.304, Grace Fatima KGN Apartrr 3nts, Narayanaguda, Hyderabad vide S.C.No.G2008630 and USC No.1 11677776, Category-l Domestic, pending disposal of writ petition, in the interest cf iustice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G. SURENDER Counsel for the Respondent No.l: GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 6: SRI N. SBEEDHI{ IREDDY' S.C. FORTGS PDCL The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No.13322 OF 2Q.25 ORDER: The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking to declare the action of the respondent authorities (respondents No.2 to 6) in threatening to disconnect the electricit5r power supply to the petitioner's property bearing Municipal No.3-5- 1099, FIat No.304, Grace Fatima KGN Apartments, Narayanaguda, Hyderabad, despite the subsistence of an injunction order dated L4.O7.2022 in O.S. No. 329 of 2022 on the hle of the X Additior,:rl Chief Judge, Ciry Civil Court, Hyderabad, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 2I ol the Constitution of India, and consequently to direct the respondents not to disconnect or dismanfle the electricity supply to the said premises.

2. Heard Sri G. Surender, leamed couns;l for the petitioner; learned Government Pleader for Energr, for respondent No.1 and Sri N. Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TGSPDCL, for respondent Nos.2 to ti.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the lawlul owner and possessor of the subject property, having I I ! , I :i l I I I l I I I I ! t I L I i I l I I I i I I 2 duly obtained an electricit5r connection and hzl' ing regularly paid all dues pertaining thereto. He submits that (he petitioner is protected by an injunction order in his pending s uit i.e. O.S.No.329 of 2022 for specific performance, yet responder t authorities have threatened disconnection at the behest of thi: d parties without proper notice or due process. He further subm.1 s that such action of the respondent authorities is arbitrary and r iolative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, as we [I as principles of natural justice.

4. l,earned Standing Counsel for TGSPI) lL filed counter allidavit stating that the power supply to the s ubject properer of the petitioner wag.initially disconnected based r n a request made by certain third parties claiming ownershi: However, upon verification, it was noticed that ithe petitioner ir rd his family were residing in the subject property. Accordingly, the power supply was restored immediately, and the respondent authorities have undertaken not to -isconnect the sarne so lor,1 as the petitioner continues to reside therein and there are no due s pending towards electricity cons umption.

5. In view of the categorical statement made ty the respondent authorities that power supply has already bee r restored to the 3 subject property of the petitioner and that no disconnection would be effected excgpt in accordance with law, nothing further sunrives for adjudication in this Writ Petition.

6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed, recording the statem€nt of the respondent authorities. It is, however, made clear that the respondent authorities shall not disconnect or dismantle the electricity supply to the subject property of the petitioner except in accordance with law and after following due process. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. To //TRUE COPY// SD/-T.SRIDEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER

1. One CC to SRI G. SURENDER, Advocate{OpUCl 2. Two CCs to GP for Energy, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUTI

3. One CC to SRI N. SREEDHAR REDDY, S.C. for TGSPDCL tOpUCl 4. Two CD Copies MP PMK wA l I I l HIGH COURT DAI ED:3011012025 i ( C) tHE S .J 5 r,tl\fl 2026 * )r ;PATC * DER WP.N,: .13322 of 2025 CLOSING THE '/IRIT PETITION WI"HOUT COSTS pr^c{ zq\z\ra i i l, II I I i I ! I I I I