Muvva Srinivas v. The Station House Officer, Tenali Taluka Rural
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
4) With the above observations, Writ Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 427, 447
Judgment
PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 21418 of 2009 Between: Muvva Srinivas, And . .Petitioner The Station House Officer, Tenali Taluka Rural Police Stationa nd others. .. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO.21418 OF 2009 ORDER: The petitioner filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus to direct the 1st respondent to proceed with the investigation in Crime No.182 of 2009. 2) The grievance of the petitioner is that on the basis of a complaint made by the petitioner, the 1st respondent registered a case in Crime No.182 of 2009 on 09.09.2009 against respondent Nos.2 to 5 for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 427 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code. However, as the 1st respondent is not completing the investigation, the petitioner approached this Court and filed the present writ petition. 3) Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent, Station House Officer, Tenali Rural Police Station to complete the investigation in Crime No.182 of 2009, at the earliest, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and submit a final report. 4) With the above observations, Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. October 07, 2009 KSH ________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: 4) With the above observations, Writ Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 427, 447.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.