✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court · 07 Dec 2011

Judgment · High Court · 2011

Judgment

Order

When this writ petition is taken up for further consideration today, learned Government Pleader for Revenue (G) (A & R) has produced a communication bearing No. Rc.B.97/2009, dated 16-08-2011 Tahsildar, D.V.Satram Mandal, SPS Nellore District, setting out that the notice issued by him earlier, which gave raise to this writ petition, has since been withdrawn. The learned Government Pleader has also produced a copy of the same, which is taken on record. In view of this, the learned counsel appearing on either side would submit that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication.

The writ petition is, therefore, disposed, but however, without costs. ------------------------------------ Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J 7th December 2011

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P No. 15359 of 2011). ← Search more judgments