Andhra Pradesh High Court · 2004
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO : 21224 of 1995 Between: 1 P. Raja Babu S/o Venkata Subbaiah R/o Vijayawada, Krishna Dist. 2 Ch. Venkaiah S/o Appaiah R/o Vijayawada, Krishna Dist. AND ..... PETITIONERS
1 The Govt. of A.P. rep. by Secretary Transport, Secretariat Buildings, Saifanad, Hyderabad 2 The Commissioner, Road Transport Authority, Govt. of A.P. 6th Floor, Burgula Ramakrishna Rao Bhavan, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or Direction more especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the respondents herein in imposing Motor Vehicles Tax on Road Rollers and Road Asphalt Paving Machine as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to the provisions of the A.P.Motor Vehicles Taxation Act 1963, Motor Vehicles Act 1988 and quash G.O.Ms.No.75 Transport, Roads and Buildings (TR.II) Dept., dt: 27-4-93 in so far as it enables the Respondents to impose tax on the Road Rollers and Road Asphalt Paving Machine. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.SURESH Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR TRANSPORT The Court made the following
O R D E R (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Bilal Nazki):
Operative part
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he does not press the writ petition in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. No order as to costs. _____________________ (BILAL NAZKI, J) 31st August, 2004. _____________________ (S.ANANDA REDDY, J) To 1 The Govt. of A.P. rep. by Secretary Transport, Secretariat Buildings, Saifanad, Hyderabad 2 The Commissioner, Road Transport Authority, Govt. of A.P. 6th Floor, Burgula Ramakrishna Rao Bhavan, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad 3 Two C.Cs to the Government Pleader for Transport, High Court Buildings,A.P., Hyderabad (OUT) 4 Two C.D copies
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; A.P.Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1963; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 31 Aug 2004. The bench was BILAL NAZKI, S ANANDA REDDY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.