Mekathoti Prakasa Rao & Ors. v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is ordered to be returned. ____________________________ Justice N.RAVI SHANKAR Dated 29.7.2011. Dvs HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1568 of 2011 Dated 29.7.2011
Judgment
Cause title
The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. …Respondents
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1568 of 2011
ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.
It is seen that the petitioner has not pursued the remedy of appeal provided against the impugned order under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
Petitioners’ counsel says that papers may be returned for pursuing the remedy.
Hence, the Registry shall return the papers under proper acknowledgment to the counsel for presentation of the matter before the proper Court.
Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is ordered to be returned. ____________________________ Justice N.RAVI SHANKAR Dated 29.7.2011. Dvs HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1568 of 2011 Dated 29.7.2011
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 — s. 29.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 29 Jul 2011. The bench was N RAVI SHANKAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.