High Court · 2025

petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therew the High court may be pteased to issue *r0..'.,*^. -:^":,:':rewith' Mand a m us dec a r ns,r" :,",i:1 ;n::ffi:::l ;:: ;iiT H:j",:I,:;HJ Sth respondent in not considering the representa tion dr.o2to4/2025 made in respect of Sy.No.196iAA, admeasuring Ac.0.35 r Viilase, Moinabad,r,or,,'*r"n" ;""d;il;",fll_l l'*',:, at yenkapary rrection of wrong entry from Nara to Agricurturar which is prohibited unoer e .o.vl and viorative of Articre 14, 21 and 300-4 of ,^i'::Jff:""ill'fl;, ili consequen,y direct the 1st to Sth respondents, more particularly the Sth respondent to consider the representation dt.02.04.2025 in respect of Sy.No.196/44, admeasuring Ac.O.35 gts., situat€ o at Yenkapally Vilrage, Moinabad Mandar, nrng" n"uoy District to ,"*" .o' ection of the wrong entry as I i Y NalatoagriculturaIattc'furtherdirectthe5threspondenttoissueDgitalPattadar Passbook and Rytlru l:iiendhu or Rythu Bharosa IA NO: 10F 202s Petitionunder:jectionl5lcPCprayingthatinthecircum;tancesstatedin the affidavit filed in sr- cport of the petition, the High couri may be pleased to direct the sth respondent .o consider the representation dt02 0420)5 in respect of Sy.No.196/AA,adm:rasuringAc'0.35gts',situatedatYerrkarpallyVillage' Moinabad Mandal. Ra.rga Reddy District by issuing Digital Patra Irassbook and RythuBandhuorRytl.trBharosapendingdisposaloftheaboveV\ritPetition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G.PRASANTH RAO Counsel for the Resl:'ondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.B HASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITI ON No.12 984 of2O25 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking following relief: "For the reasons stated in. the .accompanying affidavit, is hereby prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ o"r Order rnore particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos."1 to S, mole particularly 5tn respondent in not considering the representa tLon dt- o2.o4.2o2s made iT *"lr."J Sy.No.196/AA, admeasuring Ac.0.35 gts., situared at yenkapally Village, Moinabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District for coriection of wrong entry from Nala to Agricultural which is prohibited under G.O.Ms.No.1l1 as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 14, 2r and 3oo A of the constitution ot India ani co.""A.;,t direct the 1st to Strr respondents, more particularly the se respondent to consider the representation dt.O2.O4.2O2S in respect of Sy.No:196/AA, admeasuring ac.O.eS gts., situated at Yenkapally Viuage, Moinabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District to make correction of the wrong entry as Nala to agricuitural "and furiher direct the Se respondent to issue Digitar pattadar passbooklnd Rythu Bandhu or Rythu Bharosa and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'bre iourt deem nt .,-ra p.op.. i., ir-re circumstances of the case."

2. It is stated that petitioner is the pattadar and possessor of dry agricultural land admeasuring Acs. 0.35 guntas in Survey No.196/AA, situated at Yenkapally Village, Moinabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District (for short, 'the subject landJ and he was issued o1d pattadar passbook and title deed under the provisions of the Telalgana State Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, rgzr- It is further stated that the nature of subject lands were classified as non-agricultural lands in terms of G.o.Ms.No.1r 1 dated 08.03.1996. It is the case of the petitioner that before notifying the said lands, no notice of whatsoever has been issued to him and seeking deletion of the said rands as non-agriculturar lands and prohibited for transactions in terms of G.O.Ms.No. 111 clated Og.03.1996, he submitted representation dated 02.o4.2025 to the Sth respondent. The grievance of the petitioner is that even after receipt of representation dated O2.O4 .2025, tlll * \w 2 CVBR, J W.P.i{o.12984 of 2O25 date, no orders have lreen passed by the 5ft respondent. Hrlrtc€, the present writ petition.

3. Consirle e d the submissions made by the learnc'd c<'unse1 for the parties and with th r ir consent, this writ petition is dispos,:cl of at the admission stage.

4. Learned :ounsel for the petitioner contended t-L at petitioner never made any aOpli:ation seeking for conversion of the agrt:ultural land to non-agricultural pu-rose and as on the date, the natrrre of lands are agricultural 1ands,. 'l'L ere fore, making entries in the Dharani Portal as NAI-A lands is illegal ancl i I r,iew of the classification of the lands. tl-r: pel.itioner is not in a posittorL II rcceive various inCentives from thc Llt,vernment as investment subsir [ie:; lor cultivation of the land.

5. The 1c'L:'ned Assistant Government Pleade for Rcvenue appearing for respor clents has submilted that Telangana Right; in Land and Pattadar Passbook: Act, 2O2O (for short "the Act 9 of 2O2O") has been repealed and rr:pla::r:d rvith Telangana Bhu Bharati (Rer:r rd of Rights in Land) Act, 2025 'kt' short "the Act 1 of 2025"\ and if the ;re trt oner submits online applicatiorL ir the prescribed format in Bhu Bharati !/elr Portal and if the same fulfills a1i the requirements of the Act 7 of 2O2:t and the Rules made thereunder', r.lre respondent authorities will consid'rr the same, in accordance with lav'.

6. In vier,, cl the above submissions, this Court u'i ,h< ut expressing any opinion on thc right and entitiement of the petitioner, rir ce it is stated WP.No. 12984 of 2O2i that the petitioner has submitted representation dated O2.O4.2O25 to the respondent No.S, ends of justice would be met if the respondents are directed to consider the said representation, in accorda,ce with law. If the said application is not considered as on the date of this order, the petitioner is permitted to make appropriate online application in the prescribed format in Bhu Bharati web Portal, seeking correction of entries in the revenue records and for issuance of pattadar passbooks in.respect of subject lands. In the event of such apprication being made by the petitioner and if the same fulfills all the requirements under the provisions of the Act 7 0f 2025and the Rules made thereunder, the respondent_authorities shall examine and consider the case of the petitioner. In any event, if the application of the petitioner does not fulfilr the requirements of the Act 7 0f 2025and the Rures made thereunder, the respondent_authorities shall pass a reasoned order, in accordance with law and communicate the same to the petitioner. The entire exercise shall be compreted within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of the application. 7 With the above observations, the Writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. M_iscellaneous ap{11at1ons pending, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/- P. PADMANABHA REDDY DEPUTY REfISTRAR ,, SECTIOft/OFFICER 3:8.:i:?ijiif.%%tXf LandAdministrationGovernmentof reransana, Ili.3:,i:llX?:H[r'J.t"o Administration, Govemment or reransana, District' office at Konsarakaran, Ransa {!sr?'Ji'."Jrsf i?iiTr5,i,it?,T"iddv r ner<evenue Divisional Officer, Chevella, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana if*q":,,"'ffij##fl $iilnrJ3#i{i{fl{3,,,::ff i::::::l *e Two CD Copies To

2. .).

4. 5 6 7 8 PSK. GIP HIGH COURT DATED:2810412025 ORDER WP.No.12984 of 2025 I ,) : lt:.,t . :.-. ,t .l sa) a r) s* S) t\ ,'t J;19rs * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS u l6l,lu'